Tesla's big gamble: Full Self-Driving in the wild
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 май 2024
- Full Self-Driving, or FSD, is one of the most controversial parts of Elon Musk’s Tesla strategy, with regulators calling the branding misleading and dangerous. But love it or hate it, Tesla has unleashed FSD, with a free trial for millions of U.S. drivers. That means more data -- an essential component to any company trying to develop autonomous driving. Tesla’s approach to gathering all that data could prove all of Musk’s naysayers wrong, or leave it continuing to play catch up with more advanced self-driving tech. This week on TechCheck, Tesla’s big FSD gamble.
0:00 - Tesla’s Big Gamble
5:00 - The Data Factor
8:14 - Search for Subscription Revenue
Written and produced by: Jasmine Wu, Laura Batchelor & Deirdre Bosa
Catch all the TechCheck deep dives at cnbc.com/tcweekly
For access to live and exclusive video from CNBC subscribe to CNBC PRO: cnb.cx/42d859g
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
Turn to CNBC TV for the latest stock market news and analysis. From market futures to live price updates CNBC is the leader in business news worldwide.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC on Threads: cnb.cx/threads
Follow CNBC News on X: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC on WhatsApp: cnb.cx/WhatsAppCNBC
www.cnbc.com/select/best-cred...
#CNBC
#CNBCTV
This is what you call poor journalism. The producers are either ignorant or deliberately giving false information.
This biased, unfair and sometimes maddening commentary is just plain sad. There is NOBODY doing even close to what Tesla does on ALL U.S. roads without being Geofenced and CN-(BS) knows it.
That MKBHD clip that you cherrypicked is from December 2022 🙄
Ancient on a software scale.
Esp when v12 has happened since
FUD - old news! The shift to AI is the news! Yet you don’t mention this advancement at all! Bet you haven’t tried it! Stop reporting old news and do your job!
Suggesting that Mercedes is ahead of Tesla in autonomy is a freaking joke.
This is so biased against Tesla that I couldn't finish watching.
You missed the crucial difference between Tesla and other car companies hardware based solutions. While most companies rely on predetermined instructions, Tesla's AI learns and adapts.
There's a reason some experts have concerns about AI surpassing human intelligence, it's the first technology that can learn and make decisions on its own.
By employing an AI strategy with cameras, Tesla FSD has the potential to drive more effectively than humans, and can anticipate varied real-world scenarios.
Unlike radar or lidar systems, AI-equipped with cameras can theoretically handle any driving situation without prior programming. This is the core differentiator Tesla commands.
While the time frame is unclear, the outcome is not, sooner or later, Tesla's AI based full self-driving WILL exceed human capabilities.
Amazing how all the comments realize how the MSM is so bias against TSLA. At the end of the day, shareholders know and vote with their dollars. The violent upward price actions will be undeniable
Notice on this channel CN-(BS) how Tesla so consistently sucks and all other manufacturers rarely do wrong. You would think the public would eventually catch-on to this but I am probably giving the average person WAY TOO MUCH credit.
So how much did the big automakers pay you to say this?
A lot of the clips played to make their point is SEVERELY out of date.
How about we look at Tesla's FSD software today? It's literally amazing and will only get better.
fr
Yeah. The MKBHD clip is super old
And Musk can go to prison because of his lies. (and those old "out of date" clips). Musk 2019: A million robo-taxis by 2020 with nobody in them "FOR SURE!" ???? Mssk 2015: Tesla Model S and X today can drive by itself safer than a human being! Wow Makes Elizabeth Holmes sound tame. LOL
MUSK FSD still is nowhere near autonomous even today. Will you trust your life to Musk FSD and sit in the back seat and sleep while it drives in Bankok rush hour or Mumbai India or in middle of severe blizzard storm? Do you understand what full autonomous driving demands??? Do you understand the state of AI? And why AI hallucinates and it cannot be fixed in current state of art? LAMO
@@springer-qb4dv Those dates were estimates for the completion of a technology that did not exist at the time. Not like other whose technology can not be aplied to a normal car, the Tesla software can run in about 6M cars on the road today provided it is purchased or rented as soon as it is aproved by regulating agencies. Only the original Tesla Roads er can not run that software. It tkae courage to admit a wrong line of research (FSD Beta with 300,000 lines of code) and restart just 9 moths ago with an artificial inteligence aproach. Version 12.1 was demostrated by Elon Muck on Dec 2023 with just 4 month of training. Newest version released a couple of days ago is almost perfect. During the first moth of the new aproach the training was computer limited. That limit does not exist today. Itis expected to be anounced (FSD withou last name) on Auhust 8, 2024
Tesla cars with the FSD Supervised are 5X less prone to have an acciden than a human driver. Numbers do not lie.
more tesla hit pieces. People need to try FSD, its pretty amazing.
Blind Musk fanboys are amazing. A decade of being lied to in the face by Musk and they still can't wake up. Some former Musk fanboys have already bailed. But rock headed Musk fanboys are aging like milk. LOL
@@springer-qb4dv have you tried FSD or are you in an echo chamber? Im using it daily, its amazing, especially for traffic.
@@springer-qb4dv Tesla was wise enought to comprehend that no programed code can cover all instances of driving found on roads. Tesla discarted all the code it had developed in years 6 months ago for an AI approach.. Now there is FSD Supervised based solely on artificial inteligence and it was released on February 2024. Now on ver 12.3.6 with releases every 2 weeks. Before August 8, 2024 it will be ready for government agencies to aprove it.
Since the government has aproved dummy aproaches, based on geo fencing, even knowing that cars stop when in trafic, there is no reson to take excess time on aproval since it is a life saving software.
How stupid they are!! Even human drivers make accident everyday and FSD never means perfect driving without accident. This is very high level ADAS system and it is very useful if you use it under proper supervision . I drive a long distance everyday and I would have had many accidents from long distance driving if there were no Tesla autopilot. FSD is great advance in car history and gives great benefit to a lot of drivers around the world.
i use fsd everyday and it really helps the monotonous parts of driving, especially during rush hour. been using it for a couple of years and it constantly improves in a two stops forward one step back fashion
This reporter isn’t familiar with tech industry. This reports is pretty bias even towards blackmailing
My GOD the media is so horrible and unfair. Has it ALWAYS (probably so) been like this and I am only now noticing after retiring a few years ago and having life slow-down a bit.
And rock headed Musk fanboys are aging like milk. LOOOOLLLLLLLLL
fyi the free trial is over for most drivers. mine ended yesterday. so this is a little late. where are all the april headlines about huge numbers of fsd failures? this is honestly not worth anybodys time as the "news" involved is all old AF. cheers.
FREE Trial , does NOT end for NEW purchases.
you can use TESLA referral points , for FREE 3 mos FSD.
FSD is now only $99/mo , well worth it.
After 10 years of being wrong, Musk fanboys still haven't learned anything. Musk fanboys will age like milk. LOL
@@springer-qb4dv FSD Suoervised was released on Feb this year after FSD Beta based on code was completedly scraped. No human written code can include all the posibilities found on real world driving. FSD Supervised (AI implementation) was far superior to code versions. It is superior to Waymo, Cruize, and others since it works on all the US, while the ones that use geo fencing work on limited geographical areas, and they stop in the midle of trafic, when they encounter a big change. Both systems have human oprerators behing, Both are a money pit. MB system is a sad joke, A FSD solution that requires a car driven by a human in front. That only works under 45mph on any highway? It also need perfectly cler weather conditions.Highway speeds in the US are from 65 pmh to 70 mph, anyone driving at 45mph in a highway is a danger to all other drivers. How MB got is aproval is beyond my reasoning (woring in Germany for at least a couple of years). In California there were only 61 cars for sale with the system. Mecedez charges $2,500 for it (loosing money), but in California only 1 of the 61 for sale was sold. Germany sould be the same as the Autobans have no speed limit, and a car at 45mph will be banned for highway use.
8:13 “once other companies catch up” But they won’t. They can’t.
It is like the ten years "Tesla killers".
Hit piece. Slow minds. Exactly what we've come to expect from traditional media outlets.
I believe Tesla is still closer than anyone else to solving autonomy at scale, esp. with V12. While this criticism of where they stand today vs. what they promised isn't unfounded, it's utterly absurd to assert that Mercedes has "beaten Tesla to the punch" or to list them among the "leaders" in self driving. All they've done is obtain regulatory approval and assumed liability for users to operate the same adaptive cruise and lane keeping systems that have been available for years (if not decades) without paying attention under extremely specific road scenarios - scenarios that hardly ever occur for any useful amount of time and where incidents aren't likely to occur anyway! Any modern auto manufacturer can do the same whenever they want. A marketing gimmick is all it is - either these CNBC journalists aren't smart enough to see past it, or they have an agenda. C'mon folks, do better
I cannot believe someone like Deirdre Bosa can be so bias. I lost lot of respect for her today.
Diedre is an NPC.
Important tip.....just because a reporter says something you disagree with, it does not necessarily follow that the info is wrong and the reporter is non-credible.
What did you object to, specifically?
@@delxinogaming6046 May I speculate? My guess is that ANY reports that reflect poorly on Musk are perceived as a personal threat by his followers. There's likely nothing in the report that this commenter can factually dispute.
Except when it is and they are
As far as I know I do not shoot lasers from my eyes to drive but only use vision with my neural network. Has anybody heard of first principles thinking?
This is blatant anti Tesla propaganda and deliberate disingenuos misinformation to create clickbait. Losing respect for CNBC
Wow what a bunch of bs reporting
1. Is there a judicial order on tesla fsd to ban it ? If some one sue or make an allegation that means nada
2. You forget the fact that Mercedes tech does not work in whole US and it only works with roads
After 10 years of being wrong, Musk fanboys still haven't learned anything. LOL
Have you driven FSD ? Or are you also one of them ice fanboy ?
@@springer-qb4dv Do not bet against Tesla.
It is worth mentioning that CNBC is sponsored by traditional Auto companies. I leave the rest to all of you to extrapolate why they have not a single positive thing to say about MUSK that has turned the auto industry up side down :)))
so much incorrect info on here
FSD is not Self-Driving, as Elon promised 8 years ago.
FSD is Supervised driving. Customers were deceived, that is NOT what they paid for.
FSD still makes mistakes every day. Full Autonomy is far in the future.
Blame government regulations
@@kassarc16 No, the blame is on Tesla for NOT having the engineering skills to make a Level 5 Self Driving computer.
@@DerekDavis213they paid for a beta product
Tesla is TRYING. That's the product. It's not ADAS
@@DerekDavis213no one does but Tesla is the only one really trying
It's about time news organisations were held to account for inaccurate, biased reporting. This is not journalism, it's a hit piece, pure and simple. Disappointing.
Another CN-(BS) hit-piece. Even with FSD-we get the competition is coming.
They always have a negative spin on everything whatsoever TSLA (Elon) said or did. On the other hand, they always have a positive spin on AAPL. For example, AAPL wasted 10 years (who knows how much money and resources) on EV, At the beginning, they touted Apple cars as a big threat to TSLA, when Apple cancelled the program, they praised Cook for making a great decision, never mentioned how big the blunder this was. You could get fired in most companies for wasting so much money, resources, and time. I own both AAPL and TSLA, but I strongly believe TLSA will be bigger than AAPL within 5 to 7 years. TSLA is a higher technology company than AAPL, computer on wheels deserves higher is higher technology than computer on your palms, period!
Maybe if everyone lived in their cars, then tesla can be bigger than apple
@@tru5919Tesla could release a phone lol
Tesla FSD will be mandatory in all new cars by 2030.
@@tru5919 No, Tesla just needs to start selling the Optimus bot.
@@tru5919 The car market is 10x the size of smartphone market.
I was a skeptic and agree prior versions had trouble on some roads. The new software is vastly improved and agree with the other posters that it will only get better. I have taken multiple trips now in heavy traffic and it performs well
WE ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ TESLA!!!!!!!!!!!
Adaptive cruise, autosteer, lane assist and all safety features is included in base price on all tesla cars sold since about 2018
👍👍 Thanks for the update! Despite the economic recession, I no longer depend on Government Grants since I acquire $86,400 weekly profits.
Great news! how did you get that?
It's all thanks to Robert Marion
trading under proper guidance remains the best way to succeed in today's crypto market.
I know Robert Marion. He platform maintains a unique perspective and is very transparent with their investors. Regardless of whether or not he outperforms. I will forever stay invested!
Yeah, $50k from Robert Marion, looking up to acquire a new house, blessings 🙌
Some people ARE stupid. Some people LOOK stupid. Dierdre Bosa manages to pull of both with flying colors.
What a hit peace! Now when Tesla is getting really closer, they attack it? Had like a decade to do so.
They have been attacking for 10 years.
@@davidbeppler3032 True.
This will age like milk. You guys are clueless.
TSLA just laid off 10% of its global workforce and cancelled all superchargers. Good luck bud 😉
@@2AoDqqLTU5v Cancelled all superchargers? You mean they're downsizing their supercharger team and focusing on putting more chargers in at existing sites rather than buying more sites to put chargers in..
Why are they doing this? Because Tesla now control the US charging standard. Meaning everyone else has to put Tesla chargers in if they want to grow their charging network. Why do the job yourself when others will do it for you?
As for streamlining the workforce, this happens all the time. Tesla has only gone back to a staff on par with 2023 levels. It's really not a big deal. Once demand kicks back up (with new models etc), headcount will increase again in the areas that need to be increased. It's called trimming the fat. Ironically, usually when other companies 'trim the fat', the market reacts positively. Not with Tesla though. I wonder why...
@@2AoDqqLTU5v like he's never done this before? It's called becoming more efficient.
@@2AoDqqLTU5vno he didn't. He cancelled the global growth team
The team that manufacturers them still exist in California
@@mikespence8895 TSLA down 30% since the beginning of the year alone. That’s also called efficiency? 😂 Keep coping bro
Yes, it's true FSD (Full-Self-Driving) is a big bet by Elon Musk - anyone who knows and understands Elon Musk knows how the bets have turned out so far. The SpaceX rockets that flew back and were reusable were also a technical "impossible" masterpiece and today there is no one who can do the same
Just like FSD, the reusable rockets will be copied as soon as it is solved. "Reusable rockets offer SpaceX no real advantage over the competition." -12 years ago
Still no reusable rockets that are not from SpaceX. If FSD follows the same timeline.... Tesla will own the consumer car market by 2030. 80% of all new cars sold will be running Tesla software.
Tesla cars monitor driving and by default send data to the company, no matter whether the owner has received FSD software. However, an owner may opt out of such transmission., but I doubt many do.
I used to consider CNBC a credible financial news channel, but no longer. CNBC needs to do accurate and current research before reporting on a topic which they are clearly unfamiliar and uneducated. I wonder if advertising dollars from OEM automakers played any role in their airing of this dated, inaccurate and shoddy piece? Take the time to schedule a Tesla FSD V12.3 test drive, something CNBC appears did not think was worth their time.
Old news click bait . No thanks.
Instead of giving credit and appreciating what Elon has done (turned the mountain from ICE->EV's mindset/ paradigm shift) main media just find one or the other reason to bash on Elon/ Tesla... we love TESLA!
After 10 years of being wrong, Musk fanboys still haven't learned anything. Musk fanboys will age like milk. LOL
@@springer-qb4dv Your brain can only create one sentence per day or less.
CNBS HAHA. it’s great they’re giving more attention to Tesla tho
Recall = over the air update. = bigger “buttons”.
Clearly FSD is a 'works in progress'. It gets better almost daily and will be better than a majority of Human drivers very soon. Legacy media has propped up the Petrol Dollar through Propaganda for 50 years and change is happening.
This scepticism in this report is so short sighted
After 10 years of being wrong, Musk fanboys still haven't learned anything. LOL
Waymo and Mercedes are leaders??? Of what? Jesus Christ...
NVDA is making Mercedes leader of FSD.
@dinosaurdude5668 lol. Tsla is one of the biggest customers of nvda chips... go dig up some dinosaur bones if u have zero idea what u r talking about...
Waymo already operates robotaxis in a few cities. Teslas fsd requires a driver, and requires that driver to keep their hands on the wheel. You don't think that makes waymo the leader in robotaxis?
@PeterSedesse limited areas in a couple of cities? while costing more than uber/lyft and not making any profit? I mean if people r gonna make arguments for or against Tsla, just use some common sense instead of making some nonsense hit piece against tsla.
@@jayan5221 false, Waymo is cheaper than Uber when you factor in the tip for an Uber driver, which you don't have to give to Waymo. And how can you compare profitability when Tesla is years away from having robotaxis. And you failed to mention regulations. Waymo is currently operating under the good graces of city regulators, Tesla fsd has a good chance of being banned or limited in CA, and that is fsd, not even robotaxis. Tesla fsd has thousands of accidents and dozens of deaths, and that is supervised fsd, you really think cities are going to allow robotaxis? Hell, even the insurance of Tesla's with fsd are skyrocketing...imagine the rates Tesla robotaxis are going to have to pay.
My take on CNBC was not high to begin with, it has lost the rest of any respect I had for them. This is so misleading in so many ways it would take pages of text to provide a fact checking response. I wonder who paid them to do this? Maybe Dan O? GM? Ford? or maybe Waymo or Mercedes.
You guys are so obvious with this hit piece it's embarrassing.
Using out of date articles, and information.
Mercedes has better driving software 😂
Cruse and Waymo have to have maps to operate. If there is a road construction change they will just sit there because they don't know what to do.
What a joke.
I suspect the testimonial clips were all based on previous non-neural tech. The hundreds of thousands of temporary C++ code is gone, now that the data warehouse has collected scale data needed for version 12 release.
Doesn't matter if you understand anything about current state of AI. Musk can't stop FSD from hallucinating. Care to trust your life to halluciating FSD? LOL
Anyone else get a negative tone throughout this whole video about tesla? Cant wait for CNBC to eat their words in a year or 2 when elons net worth doubles
Title: CNBS Tesla hit-piece.
I wonder why they call you “fake news”…
This is a hit job!
I’m done with watching any CNN from here!
It is depend on FSD hardware that is process speed without latency. Also how program was coded.
What the hell is this, a hit piece? You are using footage from like 2 years ago and having people with a financial interest in opposing Tesla comment? So obviously terrible...
They could have tried harder to make a hit piece. Oh well.
How much are we going to lie on this segment? Yes
Waymo has proprietary technology that allows vehicles to be driven remotely by human operators in the rare instances when the computers need help.
WAYMO vehicles cost $250k each.
Tesla , below $35k.
let that sink in.
That was TRULY PATHETIC reporting, especially all the OLD-clips that are extremely outdated considering the current V-12. No mention of the insane progress being made with V-12. Just the coming competition with great tech.
Seems pretty factual to me. V12 isn't level 3 but it's at best still level 2.5. Elon has repeated the FSD claim soon and not delivered, that's not even debatable.
@@GK-qc5ryso what? That's not the latest software. It should state it self improves
@@TheMagicJIZZ the video discussed that calling it FSD is factually incorrect and false. Yes it's self learning but it's far from full self driving but it's Tesla branding it like it is.
After 10 years of being wrong, Musk fanboys still haven't learned anything. LOL
@@springer-qb4dv You are sad. Model Y is the best selling car in the world. FSD is the best autonomous software in the world. SpaceX launches the best rockets in the world. Nuralink is the best brain implant in the world. Tesla bot is the best generalized bot in the world. Tesla cars are the safest in the world. So many things for Tesla fanboys to learn.
She spelled huge wrong.
I read your comment before I watched the video and ended up getting a big [huge?] laugh out of it! Yeah... she's THAT dumb, apparently!
Another Hit piece from cnBS
How much does FSD add to the cars cost??
8000
The FSD Hardware is built in all cars and it costs nothing. You need to pay for the service/software either 99/month or 1000/year...or just buy it for 8K
About $2500 in computer and sensors. Tesla gets a huge discount due to bulk purchasing.
These negative news about Tesla reminds me of when the FUD was at an all time high surrounding Model 3 production ramp. But the stock exploded to unprecedented heights shortly after. This must be the storm that happens before something monumental.
Y'all musta forgot... what happens when the Internet catches you holding up a whiteboard. Rookie mistake 😂💀💀💀
It even has their logo on screen... Can't wait for the memes 😭😭
He is a boy who cried wolf, but the wolf came one day....
i don't have a tesla, i agree FSD shouldn't be called FSD it's misleading, i agree autopilot is junk. i STRONGLY disagree with this news, many video especially MKBHD is outdated of almost 2 years now. what is on the road today is totally different. review your copy
Tesla FULL self driving Supervised , whats misleading ?
@@markplott4820 hahaha
@@sullfolife Have you used the latest software? Autopilot is great. It does exactly what it's meant to. As for FSD, it's not even in full release version and it's already amazing.
@@HopeIsFleeting I don’t have a Tesla, I’m about to get one within the next couple months
@@sullfolifeyou're a moron
Who cares what it is called? What matters does it work? Tell me what GM supercruise or ultra cruise means? Or blue cruise
Please tell me?
Stop comparing/confusing stories on Autopilot with FSD. They are two separate systems. Autopilot is old code more similar to Ford's Bluecruise or GM's Super Cruise.
Waymo's self-driving Jaguars are ugly but brilliant. I and my friends have taken multiple trips without a single issue. I generally love Teslas, and have seriously considered the Model Y, but don't trust a self-driving system based solely on cameras, and would certainly not pay extra for it.
What is the net value added by this video? Who benefits from producing and airing this garbage? Who is the target audience for this inaccurate and biased coverage? This is exactly the reason why I stopped watching CNBC. This coverage is just an insult of our intelligence.
I don't think Apple subscriptions are very sticky recurring revenue at all. There's better music streaming platforms out there. There's better TV streaming platforms. There's better cloud solutions. I don't think it would take much for Tesla to find better subscription revenues. A supercharging subscription could be really sticky if they keep it reliable for consumers. Same for FSD.
I think separating the differences in Autopilot vs. FSD is something that the media tends to confuse. But Elon has over-promised and under delivered. That's a fact for sure. Still love my Tesla though for so many other reasons than just limited FSD, but I must admit FSD (Supervised) is much better and probably going to get better with each update! ❤🎉
This is surface level insight on the state of FSD. The rate of progression has been massive and rather than give real analysis to the investor community, this seems like a hit piece.
This report is technically deficient with info & details significantly out of date. It lacks an overall understanding of the AI tech. Either poor reporting or biases reporting.
This is a hit piece.
LOL 13 deaths mean while 35.000 a year are killed in all other vehicles 35.000/year
So far Tesla has not been found responsible in a single death while a vehicle was on FSD.
When you dont know, you dont know..I wonder if she or her team has even experienced it🤔
Hey Deirdre, have you checked in on Rahul Ligma and Daniel Johnson?
Aren't you supposed to say "Paid Sponsorship" on pieces like this?
I think the human "stress" response one of the drivers in your video mentioned resulting from giving up control of the vehicle (FSD) to a software progam will be the biggest obstacle to FSD adoption at a mass scale. People value their lives over anything else and that pyschological hard-wired chemical connection in our brains took millinenia to develop and will be hard to overcome no matter how smart we think the technology is IMHO. I dought with even the most "assured" guarantees that a driver will be safe--even safer than human drivers Musk likes to say--will make full FSD adoption more for a niche (risk-takers) part of society with large bank rolls to spare. Only time will tell of course and I'm optimistic about it. Who knows, maybe China's adoption of FSD will achieve mass scale sooner than the USA and we can learn from them how successful or not the technology is. Trying to program for every uncertainty when it comes to driving I would think is a near impossibility. I mean, how to you program for thos split-second decisions human drivers need to make to avoid loss of life--theirs or others--or the least harm from a set of outcomes the human brain can muster in a fraction of second? I'd hate to be the unlucky soul faced with such a "programmatic" error and I hope the Department of Safety and their gobs of accident data are both consulted and infused in the programming code rule sets to inform such decisions the driverless car will take. And more importantly, that the general public can vote somehow to accept the liability of driverless cars. The last thing we need is more vehicular litigation in this country. I do realize the theory is that AI programs are self-learning and will learn from coded feedback loops, but how good is good enough before it is decided that FSD is ready for prime time. I mean, all drivers theoretically are at risk here are they not? I suppose it will come down to on FSD, will society--people--accept the risk of riding in a driverless robo taxi or EV and thereby willingly relinguishing vehicle control/first response to a self-taught computer program?
People get on air planes every day. That alone refutes your argument.
Imagine trying to sue Tesla for a fender bender, when all you have is your clients testimony. Tesla has thousands of lawyers, billions of dollars, and camera footage from 12 different angles showing your client is lying. Good luck winning.
Tasla?
Never head of it!
Wow. What a terrible report. So inaccurate- real hit piece. Old info, inaccurate descriptions and comparisons.
CNBC 😅😆🤣😂
Why would anyone trust Elon to have FSD?? 😂
He built Tesla and spacex not someone else?
If the car is safer then a human being it will get approved simple otherwise the legislators will probably be sued for negligence. So it is in my opinion over and no one is close to Tesla.
Tesla FSD supervised is 5X better than Human driver. 2024.
let that sink in.
@@markplott4820 FSD saves lives. Full stop.
I can see this becoming an insurance bias in favor of the automated vehicles. Money moves in funny ways and there could be b2b incentives involved at some point. Obviously the technology needs a vast amount of refinement to operate unsupervised and everyone using it has become an unpaid employee. Sorry you still have to fork over thousands of dollars for it.
By 2030 Tesla FSD software will be mandatory in all new cars.
wow Dan O Dowd! HA
The most pathetic piece of "journalism" ever, imo. How gullible would one have to be, not to see through this advertising revenue funded hit piece, shame on you CNBC!
Very biased review. Refused to see progress made.
so one pays for lease, insurance, subscription, parking and it becomes insane/ Phuck subscription rip off
I am enjoying the fanboi meltdown below. HOW DARE THEY CRITICISE ELON!😂
Pump is coming 😂
Do you write your own segments, Deirdre? Or are you just a teleprompter reader?
If you do your own research for segments, then shame on you. If others prepare what you read, then shame on you for letting CNBS talk you into reading such nonsense. Please do some research, and please take a Tesla with FSD version 12.3.6 for a spin.
How you can tout Cruise after their failures is mind-staggering.
And, within the coming year, Tesla's FSD will be a full order of magnitude safer than humans driving a Tesla, and twenty times safer than drivers in lesser vehicles.
They’re not totally wrong tho. Musk has been missing this timeline for many years but I think they’re in the cusp!
Autopilot is free. This is one of the most well balanced pieces from CNBC. They still don’t define basic autopilot well and conflate the recall as having something to do with FSD but it does not.
Thank you! Let me buy some more $TSLA shares!!!
Just don't drive at night
Fake news. Showing 2 year old clips, old versions. This hit piece is complete FUD
Anyone who has bothered to read their Tesla owner's manual knows that FSD isn't "Full Self Driving". Also, Musk's countless unfulfilled promises regarding FSD being "only months away" during the last decade should make everyone highly skeptical of witnessing a fully functional Robo Taxi on US roads anytime soon, much less August 2024.
So it’s called full self driving but isn’t “Full Self Driving”? 😂
@@tatata1543 Yes, Tesla sells a feature called "Full Self Driving". This CNBC video indicates that Tesla is now facing charges of false marketing claims when it comes to FSD. Frankly, it is amazing that Tesla has gotten away with these lies for so long.
@@NanuqoftheNorth Sounds like a scam, it’s true.
Yes, your information is valuable.
TESLA BOT IS THE BOLDEST PRODUCT AND STATEMENT EVER!!! NOT FSD. Also you guys at CNBC buy a Tesla so you KNOW what it is and can report FACTUALLY, BETTER.
lol, who needs an FSD in the first place?
People that don't want to drive. People that don't have a car and want to ride in Robotaxis. People that want to free time up that would otherwise be taken up by driving. People that want to take human error out of driving. People who like technology. People who aren't physically able to drive. I could go on but you get the point.
People who want to arrive alive.
So how much did Waymo and benz pay you guys for this video? Either you have no clue or you are lying through your teeth, and my guess is the later.