Blitzkrieg: The Origins of Germany's Lightning War | Tanks! | War Stories

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 сен 2023
  • In 1939, Nazi Germany unleashed the horrors of Blitzkrieg to an unsuspecting Europe. This new type of warfare would go on to propel Germany to enormous territorial gains during the next few years with the world still in shock from the surprise of mechanised warfare. But little did they know, Blitzkrieg had been taking shape in the shadows for years before.
    War Stories is your one stop shop for all things military history. From Waterloo to Verdun, we'll be bringing you only the best documentaries and stories from history's most engaging and dramatic conflicts.
    Discover the past on History Hit with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly presented by world renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code WARSTORIES bit.ly/3rc7nqm
    You can find more from us on:
    / warstoriesdocs
    This channel is part of the History Hit Network. For any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com.
    #warstories #documentary #military

Комментарии • 61

  • @HK_Productions47
    @HK_Productions47 7 месяцев назад +4

    OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG! I had this on VHS as a little kid like 20 years ago!!!

  • @Egalitare
    @Egalitare 7 месяцев назад +2

    It’s astounding how many 1940 German operations were on a logistical knife’s edge.

    • @PlasticSorcererTheOriginal
      @PlasticSorcererTheOriginal 3 месяца назад

      Sources also show that Germany had only about 50% of the oil it needed to collect before WW2.

  • @mohammedsaysrashid3587
    @mohammedsaysrashid3587 7 месяцев назад +5

    Super wonderful and informative documentary coverage about (Blitzkrieg) tactical attacking, which suicided through harsh circumstances of Barbarossa

  • @robertdelacruz2951
    @robertdelacruz2951 7 месяцев назад +5

    A good summation of WW2 in Europe, but no better than that.

    • @flashgordon6670
      @flashgordon6670 7 месяцев назад +1

      The Title is; “Blitzkrieg: The Origins of Germany’s lightening war.”
      What were you expecting?

    • @asullivan4047
      @asullivan4047 7 месяцев назад

      I enjoy viewing the still & motion pictures 📷 I haven't seen before. Those photographers did a professional service.

  • @ianforcer956
    @ianforcer956 7 месяцев назад +2

    why do you re-release the same documentaries 5 times under different names

  • @earlshaner4441
    @earlshaner4441 7 месяцев назад +3

    French light tanks( sub-titles got it wrong)

  • @ht8520
    @ht8520 7 месяцев назад +35

    Polish calvary did not just charge German panzers with lances... That is a myth and wrong. Getting history correct is important.

    • @anto64kennedy
      @anto64kennedy 7 месяцев назад +4

      if POL_cav + recoilless rifle/anti-tank rocket then maybe beat puny PzKpfw I, II and 38(t)

    • @flashgordon6670
      @flashgordon6670 7 месяцев назад +6

      He didn’t say that’s all the Polish did to fight against the Panzers, you imagined that.

    • @ht8520
      @ht8520 7 месяцев назад +4

      @@flashgordon6670 No I know that's not ALL that was said. But the narrator directly said "the polish calvary had the impossible task of charging the German panzers with lances" which is entirely wrong and is a common myth about WW2. That not wtf happened, so they shouldn't claim it.

    • @flashgordon6670
      @flashgordon6670 7 месяцев назад +5

      ​@@ht8520 No you failed to understand again. I never said the narrator said the Polish did more than that, that is what he said we both agree on that. But he didn’t say, that’s all the Polish did, you’re imagining things again that you thought the Narrator said and what I said.
      The narrator is portraying the history using something called Artistic license, it’s what they do in films to condense the story and make a bigger impression. Rightly or wrongly as it maybe.
      The truth is the Polish at that time we’re technologically outclassed by the Germans, however you want to cut it and the narrator is just condensing the story and creating an impression, for the sake of brevity and to make it easy to remember.
      They do that all the time in history, for example they say the British defeated the French at Waterloo, but most of the British army was made of other nationalities.
      They say Columbus discovered America, but the Vikings were there hundreds of years earlier and the “Native Americans” must’ve discovered it a long time before as well. They do it all the time so you shouldn’t get offended so easily by it. If anything it makes the Polish sound even braver, bc they were willing to fight against tanks with horses and lances.
      The thought also occurred to me that perhaps the Polish had bombs on the end of their lances, just as speculation. Then it wouldn’t sound like the Polish were stupid as I think you’re complaining about.
      The narrator also didn’t mention that the Polish were persecuting the German ethnic people in Poland, in the Polish corridor between Danzig and Germany and all the tensions between Poland and Germany and how Poland antagonised Germany in the lead up to WW2, but I bet you don’t want to talk about that do you?
      You shouldn’t be such a delicate little snowflake and get so worked up over little details and then perhaps people wouldn’t invade your country so much.

    • @ht8520
      @ht8520 7 месяцев назад +3

      @@flashgordon6670 time to teach you something, pay attention now lad: The charge at Krojanty (where this myth most likely comes from) was polish ulans charging a group of 800 german INFANTRY who were in the open (an actual calvary target), and they were successful in that task. German armoured cars showed up and they fell back immediately as they weren't dumb enough to engage them like that.

  • @terrymcmaster2787
    @terrymcmaster2787 7 месяцев назад +2

    Sir John Monash used blitzkrieg at the battle of Hamel in WWI
    It was an Australian innovation

    • @enalb5085
      @enalb5085 7 месяцев назад

      yea but they didnt call it blitzkrieg they called it Kangaroo-koala war, there is a difference

    • @asullivan4047
      @asullivan4047 7 месяцев назад

      Thanks I will research battle of Hamel.

  • @1noduncle
    @1noduncle 7 месяцев назад +2

    Go fast? I mean methamphetamine. A desire to be Orky?

  • @TheCosmicGuy0111
    @TheCosmicGuy0111 7 месяцев назад

    Woah

  • @sirbarringtonwomblembe4098
    @sirbarringtonwomblembe4098 4 месяца назад

    The Germans never used the anglicised term 'Blitzkrieg', they said 'Bewegungskrieg" - Movement war.

  • @VonMed
    @VonMed 3 месяца назад

    A British man came up with blitzkrieg,Hobart,Rommel and guderian had his works translated for themselves

  • @anthonywilfredwong4545
    @anthonywilfredwong4545 7 месяцев назад

    Even i find it incredible that Imperial Japanese Army tanks in the west were regarded as inferior.

    • @laughingowl7896
      @laughingowl7896 7 месяцев назад

      Because they were. Check out the Tank Museum's piece on the Ki-Ha. Like the Zero, by '42-'43 they both were obsolete.

    • @mentalasylumescapee6389
      @mentalasylumescapee6389 7 месяцев назад

      crocodiles > Japanese army tanks

  • @kenc3288
    @kenc3288 7 месяцев назад +2

    Infantile CGI nonsense opening.

  • @josedorsaith5261
    @josedorsaith5261 7 месяцев назад

    The treaty of Versailles all but guaranteed another war

  • @kenbellchambers4577
    @kenbellchambers4577 7 месяцев назад

    It hurts me to see soldiers made to goosestep. An infantryman relies on his feet and his boots. Goosestepping and foot slamming of any sort ruins both the feet and the boots! As soon as I see this abuse, I know the army will lose because the leaders are too dumb and careless to see the obvious.

  • @janskovjensen
    @janskovjensen 7 месяцев назад

    BAGRATION, the most costly battle fore the wehrmact.

  • @mentalasylumescapee6389
    @mentalasylumescapee6389 7 месяцев назад

    1:52 "i'm gonna give you the most boring story and with the most monotonous tone what i have been studying for years ok...."

  • @ThePrader
    @ThePrader 6 месяцев назад

    Karma is real. The USSR invaded Finland. Finland later fought the USSR on the side of the Nazi's. Germany was not allowed to have any tanks at all after 1919. So , the USSR helped Germany build tanks in the mid-late 1930's. So, of course the Nazi's invaded the USSR. Karma baby, karma.

  • @xBruceLee88x
    @xBruceLee88x 7 месяцев назад

    What? Russia a pariah? Nah... That'd never ha--- oh.
    Seems we've come full circle with German built tanks now going against Soviet era tanks again.

    • @josedorsaith5261
      @josedorsaith5261 7 месяцев назад

      How'd that go, by the way? I heard the Leopard 2 would "turn the tide"

    • @xBruceLee88x
      @xBruceLee88x 7 месяцев назад +2

      @@josedorsaith5261 never implied how it'd go, just that they're up against each other

    • @josedorsaith5261
      @josedorsaith5261 7 месяцев назад

      @@xBruceLee88x
      I was being serious. I have yet to see anybody talking about how the tanks fared

    • @xBruceLee88x
      @xBruceLee88x 7 месяцев назад +2

      @@josedorsaith5261 ah, well from what I've heard... Overall well. Some losses because no tank is invulnerable but they seem to be performing well.
      Edit: in 13 weeks they only lost 5 of the 71 that they received in Ukraine. 10 were in for repairs so still having 50+. This based on a report back in August

    • @JohnSmith-uc9cr
      @JohnSmith-uc9cr 7 месяцев назад

      @@xBruceLee88x keep that dirt off ya shoulder bro - that guys a piranha