because toyota has been well known for reliabilty while nissan since merging with renault means they have cars with problematic parts thats why renault shouldve sell off nissan to toyota but of course theyre japanese anyway
@@awakawiateazrutyialocinadn5207 I disagree. There is nothing wrong with Renault cars. The only people who complain about reliability are people who don't maintain their cars... they just want to keep driving a car for years until the wheels fall off. I own both the Hiace and Nissan and both are reliable and parts are similar in price. But with Hiace, you can get parts for cheaper if you are willing to buy parts that were not made by Toyota. With Nissan its best to buy original Nissan parts.
@@angrysocialjusticewarrior So in addition, AFAIK, Mexico is one of the few markets in the Americas to sell the Urvan (aka NV350) while the Hiace in the said markets are neither sold nor available there, even stateside and Canada, neither the Urvan nor Hiace are sold there as I said earlier and since Nissan last sold the unrelated Quest minivan (aka MPV to ze Europeans) five years ago meant Nissan is brand not in the interest to sell vans not only in the Americas - even the similar Sienna (Toyota) could try to survive now with the minivan (MPV) market being dwarfened by always-FWD crossover SUVs. (Sadly this video appears to be uploaded for viewers from countries where the Hiace and Urvan are sold.) Also, apart from the guys who always binge on Coronas (the beer), nachos, tacos, burritos and other (Mexican) dishes, I think given that Nissan has the most sales for a Japanese maker in Mexico then if I believe Renault were already sold Nissan ALONE - plus Mitsubishi - to Toyota, just as the latter already does with Subaru, Mazda and etc, then I believe that all of Toyota's cars should trade their own technologies in exchange for being re-animated as Nissans - similar to Dacia's cars since they're rebadged Renaults/Nissans. (Fortunately Renault hasn't been stateside since the Soviet Union ended in 1991 but if I wonder that if Renault were already transferred Nissan and Mitsubishi to Toyota then people who buy Japanese cars would just trade them for the Chinese and even Koreans since none of these last two countries appreciate Japan.)
Nissan ko davao to cubao walang patayan makina.di kaya habulin ng toyota d4d hi ace commuter,grandia at super grandia.nahina lang ang both van pag madumi na ang egr at masira ang turbk actuator.
If consider the Comfort , pulling power , handling and for long journey friendly , the NV350 is far better than Hiace even in diesel versions. Generally in a crash Hiace is safer than NV350. Therefore vote for NV350.
@@bernardotumba8097 yess sir kahit mga luma nila malalakas talaga basta nissan pangbardagulan makina niyan kaya kahit hindi mo masyado eh upgrade pwede mo ilaban pangkarera ang makina ng nissan
@@phoebesuzuki8959 diba madam dito sa iloilo sikat parin ang nissan mula noon hanggang ngayon paborito ng mga ilonggo na brand kasi matatag at magaan sa byahe tapos performance talaga ang makina at eto rin kalimitan ginagamit sa transportasyon kasi matulin ang nissan at malakas ang makina nakakalusot siya sa mga alanganin na sitwasyon sa kalsada lalo na pag oovertake..😁
sa tagal ko nang uv express driver ang masasabi ko lang kung 2.5 ang hiace pantay lang ng lakas ang nv at hiace na try ko na yan ilang beses na pa palit palit ako ng 45. pero kung aircon ang usapan di hamak nv ang da best dyan. talo nga lang sa maintance 😢
Nissan in fact, is more like brother to Toyota as Kia does to Hyundai but since Nissan is Japanese perhaps Renault should have sell off Nissan to Toyota and of course Nissan could become a luxury marque if they merge with Toyota.
@@phoebesuzuki8959 totoo yan malakas talaga ang nissan kahit kelan hindi kaya ni toyota tapatan ang lakas ng makina ng nissan kahit mapahanggang ngayon
I'm a foreigner here, but while the vans―that the uploader of this video discusses about―have their exterior designs look similar as their strengths does, then I could just say that Nissan alone―which manufactured the noseless NV350 van that is neither sold in the whole of Europe (plus Britain and Ireland) too―should dissolve its partnership with Renault in exchange for the former [Nissan] alone to propose a merger with the Hyundai Motor Group (HMG) instead. And when Nissan alone already merged with the Hyundai Motor Group (HMG), in which it also contains Kia, Genesis and―recently―Ioniq, therefore the latter [Hyundai] could might as well propose a takeover of the Ford Motor Company (FMC/FoMoCo) instead. As that means, both HMG (Hyundai) and Nissan could gain benefit from Ford's expertise in commercial vehicles, which contains the Transit (van) and Ranger (pick-up/ute/bakkie), while Hyundai―along with Kia and Genesis for examples―could benefit from Nissan's powertrains and body platforms, and as well as the latter [Nissan] could also benefit from the automatic transmissions that the Hyundai Motor Group developed and used into its cars ― although HMG's lineup in the Japanese market is deeply smaller in numbers than Nissan alone...
I still do not see a solid reason as to why Nissan shall dissolve the long standing partnership with Renault. Afterall, Hyundai is definitely not interested in having a shareholder that is of a Japanese origin as many Korean companies usually avoid from having a merger/business corporation with the Japanese. I have never been in a Ford Transit before but the Nissan NV350 does just anything your typical van does, it hauls passenger, goods and anything you wish to effortlessly. Plus more, if Renault (which is a French automaker) holds such a significant amount of stake in Nissan, why not just tell them to do a market survey and sell the NV350 in Europe just like what they did with the Nissan Cabstar?
As for your statement regarding Ford Motor Company, they already have a great standing in the automotive industry, bigger than Hyundai Motor Company themselves, and obviously they wouldn't be bought out by Hyundai as easily as words could go.
@@sequentialtt0415 Whatever, drug. Since you commented like that, so messy-looking, I think the only car manufacturer that Renault would sell Nissan to would be Toyota, since it is Japanese and unlike Hyundai - which is Korean (South) - then having Renault selling off Nissan to Toyota would be useful as while Renault already missed from the US and Canadian markets since the late 1980s then as Toyota is still a small player in next-door Mexico (Spanish-speaking) than Nissan means for the former to purchase the latter from Renault would benefit Toyota from Nissan's Mexican presence. Also, one recognisable tidbit of Renault's moments in the American and Canadian markets were supplying cars to Chrysler while the latter established Eagle during that period, as to consider that Eagle was so notorious because its products were rebadged from Renault and later Mitsubishi, one of those cars were the Eagle Talon (a rebadged Mitsubishi Eclipse) and Eagle Vision (renamed as Chrysler Vision for Europe) and none of them succeed until the Eagle marque discontinued in 1988. And speaking of that, you're from Indonesia right? I also realise that country deeply loathes Israel for a long time just like how neighbouring Malaysia does...
@@sequentialtt0415 Well, Hyundai in fact does not have any great history compared to Ford and other manufacturers that are in similarity with the latter but as I believe that you are from a country that strongly yet fiercely hates Israel, then Indonesia is a market that no longer accepts Ford there as Japan and India does, but interestingly Ford still exists in the Israeli market just as the same thing does with Russia (Israel is one of the biggest Russophone and Russophile countries outside Russia since a number of Israelis are of Russian origins). Especially as I mentioned earlier that Ford no longer exists in Indonesia, which has the largest critics of Israel overseas, then the Transit has never been sold there just as in the Japanese and Indian markets, since these destinations didn't have Ford to gain a foothold and of course to be honest many Indonesians prefer Japanese cars than Hyundais but Israelis however also prefer Hyundai cars just as Russia's friends. e.g. Serbia and Hungary, does (Hyundai and Kia vehicles are interestingly successful and popular in Eastern Europe since the end of the Cold War).
The subtle differences don't really matter. For me it comes down to service and finding spare parts in which case the HIACE wins (for me).
у ниссан есть запчасти все и он лучше чем HIACE
The engine in the toyota hiace is better and cheaper to maintain from parts and other components that needs to be replaced on a regular basis.
because toyota has been well known for reliabilty while nissan since merging with renault means they have cars with problematic parts thats why renault shouldve sell off nissan to toyota but of course theyre japanese anyway
@@awakawiateazrutyialocinadn5207 I disagree. There is nothing wrong with Renault cars. The only people who complain about reliability are people who don't maintain their cars... they just want to keep driving a car for years until the wheels fall off.
I own both the Hiace and Nissan and both are reliable and parts are similar in price. But with Hiace, you can get parts for cheaper if you are willing to buy parts that were not made by Toyota. With Nissan its best to buy original Nissan parts.
@@angrysocialjusticewarrior So in addition, AFAIK, Mexico is one of the few markets in the Americas to sell the Urvan (aka NV350) while the Hiace in the said markets are neither sold nor available there, even stateside and Canada, neither the Urvan nor Hiace are sold there as I said earlier and since Nissan last sold the unrelated Quest minivan (aka MPV to ze Europeans) five years ago meant Nissan is brand not in the interest to sell vans not only in the Americas - even the similar Sienna (Toyota) could try to survive now with the minivan (MPV) market being dwarfened by always-FWD crossover SUVs. (Sadly this video appears to be uploaded for viewers from countries where the Hiace and Urvan are sold.)
Also, apart from the guys who always binge on Coronas (the beer), nachos, tacos, burritos and other (Mexican) dishes, I think given that Nissan has the most sales for a Japanese maker in Mexico then if I believe Renault were already sold Nissan ALONE - plus Mitsubishi - to Toyota, just as the latter already does with Subaru, Mazda and etc, then I believe that all of Toyota's cars should trade their own technologies in exchange for being re-animated as Nissans - similar to Dacia's cars since they're rebadged Renaults/Nissans. (Fortunately Renault hasn't been stateside since the Soviet Union ended in 1991 but if I wonder that if Renault were already transferred Nissan and Mitsubishi to Toyota then people who buy Japanese cars would just trade them for the Chinese and even Koreans since none of these last two countries appreciate Japan.)
у ниссан караван двигатель не хуже а может даже лучше чем у HIACE
I love Nissan for price and quality!!!
Nissan ko davao to cubao walang patayan makina.di kaya habulin ng toyota d4d hi ace commuter,grandia at super grandia.nahina lang ang both van pag madumi na ang egr at masira ang turbk actuator.
Lalo na kung 2kd lang ung hiace sir.
i'like both of the quality!!!!!!!!!
If consider the Comfort , pulling power , handling and for long journey friendly , the NV350 is far better than Hiace even in diesel versions.
Generally in a crash Hiace is safer than NV350.
Therefore vote for NV350.
Very good but those'nt the hiace with that model # (TRH200) comes with a 2TRFE engine, which is actually a 2700cc engine, not a 2000cc.
NV 350 is more comfortable than hiace.
Thanks I'm gonna buy a Nissan nv350 caravan with 9 seats for me n my family
It's the Nissan for me
The nissan has an advantage of carrying more, the dash display is better in the nissan
However,I like Nissan Caravan
Very very very Good work 💯💯
Good day sir. Can you do a video on which the better vehicle in terms of gas consumption and durability ? thanks
I second dis
Thank you loved your review
I like NISSAN NV350 is better . It is lots very good
My love is Toyota haice because verry nice engine
I luv nissan best engine very strong
Used this before sir?
@@bernardotumba8097 yess sir kahit mga luma nila malalakas talaga basta nissan pangbardagulan makina niyan kaya kahit hindi mo masyado eh upgrade pwede mo ilaban pangkarera ang makina ng nissan
@@nestorsembrano3955. Totoo yan ang sinasabi mo dto s Japan pagdating s Business ang Nissan tlga Bardugulan 😍👌
@@phoebesuzuki8959 diba madam dito sa iloilo sikat parin ang nissan mula noon hanggang ngayon paborito ng mga ilonggo na brand kasi matatag at magaan sa byahe tapos performance talaga ang makina at eto rin kalimitan ginagamit sa transportasyon kasi matulin ang nissan at malakas ang makina nakakalusot siya sa mga alanganin na sitwasyon sa kalsada lalo na pag oovertake..😁
Can you put a zero turn inside
sa tagal ko nang uv express driver ang masasabi ko lang kung 2.5 ang hiace pantay lang ng lakas ang nv at hiace na try ko na yan ilang beses na pa palit palit ako ng 45. pero kung aircon ang usapan di hamak nv ang da best dyan. talo nga lang sa maintance 😢
Timing belt vs timing gear or chain,,
Nissan parts are pricey
E qual é a sua durabilidade?
Both has only the driver steering wheel airbag?
Hi. Do you export to Mozambique?
Yes we do.
Go to sbt or beforward japan they are available with good prices
Sorry hi ace is the best I have hi ace 4yrs still strong.
and low maintenance cost Love it also,💓
How much calavan
Toyota is not comfortable when seating three at the from coz that extention below the knee tend to course uncomfortable at the knee
I think the toyota hiace your showing is the old version.
Hi sir , tell me the price and the year please 🙏
One word
NISSAN
по дизайну экстерьера и интерьера Nissan NV350. лучше смотрится чем HIACE
I thought the Caravan was a rebadged Hiace, because at first glance they look exactly the same
Hiace is the best. Toyota is one step ahead always.
Nissan in fact, is more like brother to Toyota as Kia does to Hyundai but since Nissan is Japanese perhaps Renault should have sell off Nissan to Toyota and of course Nissan could become a luxury marque if they merge with Toyota.
@@awakawiateazrutyialocinadn5207truth
i like toyota hiace van
30000 Nissan nv350 caravan and Toyota hiace let's supply me farm veng today
How much would it cost to purchase , ship and clear in jamaica color white or dark blue . Diesel preffered .
Why do you sound like your saying hius? It High -ace (hiace)
Thr nissan gearbox feels night and better than the toyota but the hiace will probably outlast time
Wee neeed a drag race
Mahina yong nissan turbo yong nasira actuator tapos aircon
Anong pinag ssabi mo kasinungalingan nissan ssakyan ko .. baliktad mas mahina ang toyota .Waahhhh
@@phoebesuzuki8959 totoo yan malakas talaga ang nissan kahit kelan hindi kaya ni toyota tapatan ang lakas ng makina ng nissan kahit mapahanggang ngayon
@@nestorsembrano3955, Upo, tama po kayo👌
sorry but in the philippines the toyota hiace has both mirrrors at the sides not at the quarter pannel
The Toyota hiace van is maunul and the Nissan carvan /urvan is automatic so thay are still different
I'm a foreigner here, but while the vans―that the uploader of this video discusses about―have their exterior designs look similar as their strengths does, then I could just say that Nissan alone―which manufactured the noseless NV350 van that is neither sold in the whole of Europe (plus Britain and Ireland) too―should dissolve its partnership with Renault in exchange for the former [Nissan] alone to propose a merger with the Hyundai Motor Group (HMG) instead.
And when Nissan alone already merged with the Hyundai Motor Group (HMG), in which it also contains Kia, Genesis and―recently―Ioniq, therefore the latter [Hyundai] could might as well propose a takeover of the Ford Motor Company (FMC/FoMoCo) instead.
As that means, both HMG (Hyundai) and Nissan could gain benefit from Ford's expertise in commercial vehicles, which contains the Transit (van) and Ranger (pick-up/ute/bakkie), while Hyundai―along with Kia and Genesis for examples―could benefit from Nissan's powertrains and body platforms, and as well as the latter [Nissan] could also benefit from the automatic transmissions that the Hyundai Motor Group developed and used into its cars ― although HMG's lineup in the Japanese market is deeply smaller in numbers than Nissan alone...
I still do not see a solid reason as to why Nissan shall dissolve the long standing partnership with Renault. Afterall, Hyundai is definitely not interested in having a shareholder that is of a Japanese origin as many Korean companies usually avoid from having a merger/business corporation with the Japanese. I have never been in a Ford Transit before but the Nissan NV350 does just anything your typical van does, it hauls passenger, goods and anything you wish to effortlessly. Plus more, if Renault (which is a French automaker) holds such a significant amount of stake in Nissan, why not just tell them to do a market survey and sell the NV350 in Europe just like what they did with the Nissan Cabstar?
As for your statement regarding Ford Motor Company, they already have a great standing in the automotive industry, bigger than Hyundai Motor Company themselves, and obviously they wouldn't be bought out by Hyundai as easily as words could go.
@@sequentialtt0415
Whatever, drug.
Since you commented like that, so messy-looking, I think the only car manufacturer that Renault would sell Nissan to would be Toyota, since it is Japanese and unlike Hyundai - which is Korean (South) - then having Renault selling off Nissan to Toyota would be useful as while Renault already missed from the US and Canadian markets since the late 1980s then as Toyota is still a small player in next-door Mexico (Spanish-speaking) than Nissan means for the former to purchase the latter from Renault would benefit Toyota from Nissan's Mexican presence.
Also, one recognisable tidbit of Renault's moments in the American and Canadian markets were supplying cars to Chrysler while the latter established Eagle during that period, as to consider that Eagle was so notorious because its products were rebadged from Renault and later Mitsubishi, one of those cars were the Eagle Talon (a rebadged Mitsubishi Eclipse) and Eagle Vision (renamed as Chrysler Vision for Europe) and none of them succeed until the Eagle marque discontinued in 1988.
And speaking of that, you're from Indonesia right? I also realise that country deeply loathes Israel for a long time just like how neighbouring Malaysia does...
@@sequentialtt0415 Well, Hyundai in fact does not have any great history compared to Ford and other manufacturers that are in similarity with the latter but as I believe that you are from a country that strongly yet fiercely hates Israel, then Indonesia is a market that no longer accepts Ford there as Japan and India does, but interestingly Ford still exists in the Israeli market just as the same thing does with Russia (Israel is one of the biggest Russophone and Russophile countries outside Russia since a number of Israelis are of Russian origins).
Especially as I mentioned earlier that Ford no longer exists in Indonesia, which has the largest critics of Israel overseas, then the Transit has never been sold there just as in the Japanese and Indian markets, since these destinations didn't have Ford to gain a foothold and of course to be honest many Indonesians prefer Japanese cars than Hyundais but Israelis however also prefer Hyundai cars just as Russia's friends. e.g. Serbia and Hungary, does (Hyundai and Kia vehicles are interestingly successful and popular in Eastern Europe since the end of the Cold War).
How much? In Tanzania shilling?
Toyota ❤
Hiaace is overrated.i prefer nissan nv350.price value is critical .
How come i havent seen this vehicule in thw usa?
Do you guys sport to 🇺🇸 please let me know thanks
Nissan cheap but the Toyota is better all the way
Nissan is mine
Toyota is the best lead the way!🥰
Nissan e25 was more moe better looking which beaten the hiace
the hiace looks way better
NISSAN / ISUZU COMO ALL THE WAY
That's a Japanese Second hand Hiace
Nissan duribility
Hiace wins
Nissan is trash. Night and day difference with the toyota
How can u say that nissan is trash ? My car is nissan meanwhile , toyota is weak when it comes to engine sales .
En pru
Yea but what are the subtle differences? Lol