Understanding y+ in CFD Part 1/2 - Aidan Wimshurst | The Science Circle

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
  • 👉 Part 2: • Sizing inflation layer...
    👉 My main channel: ‪@JousefM‬
    ONLINE PRESENCE
    ================
    📈 APEX Consulting: theapexconsult...
    🌍 My website - jousefmurad.com/
    💌 My weekly science newsletter - jousef.substac...
    📸 Instagram - / jousefmrd
    🐦 Twitter - / jousefm2
    #yplus
    #engineering
    #computationalfluiddynamics

Комментарии • 24

  • @JousefLITE
    @JousefLITE  Год назад

    🧠Part 2 of Aidan's talk: community.sci-circle.com/checkout/community-member
    🌎 Science Courses: courses.jousefmurad.com/

    • @elizajayne2888
      @elizajayne2888 Год назад

      That formula is wrong when I attached the wimshurst to inside rim of a tire and the brake shoes .
      I got the wheels to generate energy with a wimshurst engine ..
      Now all four wheels generate energy to recharge the system...
      I’m rebuilding a wimshurst car from the wheels up ..

    • @elizajayne2888
      @elizajayne2888 Год назад

      I also reverse engineering uss enterprise back to original wimshurst design...

    • @pritampriyadarshi4530
      @pritampriyadarshi4530 Год назад +1

      I am not able to find the part 2 of the series

    • @siddharthamukharjee8202
      @siddharthamukharjee8202 4 месяца назад +1

      The second part is inaccessible...the link is not working

  • @willmorris5356
    @willmorris5356 2 месяца назад +1

    Perfect description of Y plus.

  • @sasquatchhimself
    @sasquatchhimself 9 месяцев назад +6

    I am a CFD noob and trying to figure out how to set up my meshes in a way that will give me good results. A lot of information online is over my head. This was good to give me a good base understanding. Thank you

  • @agusbuffa
    @agusbuffa Месяц назад

    Aidan explains really well and makes the learning process very straight forward. I got caught in the video, very interesting, every professor should take note on this video.

  • @ahmedalnemr3282
    @ahmedalnemr3282 Год назад +3

    Thank you for this episode, and also thank you Aidan for your endless tutorial series.

  • @siddharthamukharjee8202
    @siddharthamukharjee8202 4 месяца назад

    Amazing explanation of y+...

  • @GauravGupta-by1ml
    @GauravGupta-by1ml 8 месяцев назад

    Very informational. Got a lot of insight on this !

  • @hardiksharda9673
    @hardiksharda9673 Год назад

    Amazing talk!
    Thank You Jousef!

  • @elizajayne2888
    @elizajayne2888 Год назад +1

    I added the wimshurst design to four wheels and rims to build a wimshurst car ..
    The wheels recharge the cars electric system..

  • @haidarhahaha1727
    @haidarhahaha1727 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you very much fot the y+ explanation.

  • @黃冠傑-v3t
    @黃冠傑-v3t 5 месяцев назад

    y+ is really a fancy Reynolds number in turbulent.

  • @botonb4eg1
    @botonb4eg1 Год назад

    Great talk! Thank you!

  • @sandipgewali641
    @sandipgewali641 Год назад +4

    Is the part 2 still not available here ??

  • @mlo8943
    @mlo8943 9 месяцев назад

    Thanks Aidan @fluidmechanics101, Very useful as always!! Thanks very much

  • @nch5537
    @nch5537 10 месяцев назад

    Thank you for the video. It was very informational. Can you give the references of the authors and books you found this information from?

  • @sasquatchhimself
    @sasquatchhimself 9 месяцев назад +1

    And also where can I find part 2?

  • @diptasarkar3890
    @diptasarkar3890 Год назад +3

    is Second part available?

  • @FranciscoMondragón-j5x
    @FranciscoMondragón-j5x 8 дней назад

    What's the name of the paper?

  • @parthsavyasachi9348
    @parthsavyasachi9348 Год назад

    I found it funny when he said even the cfd engineers don't understand it. Yes its true they also don't understand it.
    Funny part is that he also doesn't really understand it but good effort for laymen's understanding.
    Ps: i do understand much more than him but even i lack lots of things. Wall area is surprisingly wide.
    Ps2: just small note to reduce the yplus to value of half one cannot simply reduce the mesh size in half. Thats because friction velocity doesn't stay the same that you assumed to be constant while reducing the mesh size. (If it was constant there is no point in changing mesh as friction velocity is what decides shear rate.

  • @elizajayne2888
    @elizajayne2888 Год назад +1

    Hilarious... I reverse engineering the uss enterprise back to original wimshurst design.
    Damn I’m that good ...