Dear Robert, By assuming the radius of the circle = 1, then you can demonstrate - using trigonometry (Pythagorean rules, sin rule, ...) that: The top angle of the triangle is 45 degrees, thus : 1. The base side of the triangle (=side of the square) = 2sin(22.5°)/sin(67.5°) which corresponds also to 2(√2 - 1) 2. The perimeter of the square is thus (4xside)= 16(√2 - 1), approx. 6.627417 3. The area of the square is thus (side)^2 = 16 (3 - 2√2), approx. 2.745166 Consequently: a) Perimeter: P[square] is 12.61865% larger than P[circle]=2π (6.28319 ...) b) Area: A[square] is 5.47862 % smaller than A[circle]=π (3.14159...) Your approach is a perfect match for the DaVinci Vitruvian man. Spot on! There is an easier way to draw the circle/square by using a square edge and a compass (Masonic approach); identical result though. I can share my calculations if you wish (including some fascinating mathematical connections with the Vesica Pisces, the mother of geometries and the Fibonacci sequence (golden ratio Phi)). Kind regards, Philippe
I am so incredibly grateful for this robert. Its a gift to get to draw this... Thank you for sharing all the knowledge freely like you do. Not only the content but your atitude also deeply o inspires me.
Thank you! X marks the spot! :) Noticed an enhancement you might make: for this exercise, as you used a compass, a square, *and* the paper manufacturer's precision. In other words, you used the edge of the paper to line up the first (and a later) line. Instead, you could draw an initial horizontal line[1], and then use that as the "starting edge," so that the solution is completely 'self-contained" as it were, angle-wise. Thanks again! [1] -- Like, rotate the paper 45 degrees, or rip the edges off so they're not uniform, etc.
Even with the naked eye, you can see that neither the area nor the circumference of the circle matches the square. Without trigonometry math proof, the drawing is misleading.
this reminds me of the visual pathway of the brain images we see. How the view is inverted. i also noticed this is the esoteric sigil of lucifer inverted. I wonder what the triangle in the middle has to do with how we view perception. The X in the middle is almost that of a focal point. This looks like a map the the brain to me. Thank you for uploading.
Wait…so you need a perfectly square piece of paper and the ruler has to have a perfectly square edge too??? That doesn’t seem right…they said just straight edge and compass, not perfectly right angle square and compass… 🧐
as you drew this i kept thinking of the image done by DiVinci...showing the golden ratio...could that also be the squaring of a circle in that image as well?
Thank you My Divine Friend Robert Edward Grant and Everyone a part of it 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽 Value your Time 😇👆🏽🦀🤸🌝🌚🌅🌄 One Love 💛💚💜🤍🖤💙❤️🧡🕺🫁✌🏽 Peace 🧠 LOVE HOPE BELIEVE FAITH HEALTH PRAYERS STRENGTH HEALING ✨✨✨💫☯️💟🌌🌳🐉
The only figure that is accurate is your circle, everything else is not even a close approximation of anything. There is a simple way to show that you actually have a real square. Sorry but this is no better than guessing.
@@Truthseeker88888 i mean part of the “elite”, just they seem to be on “your side” telling you all these ancient knowledge about egypt and all that, but they just misleading you
@@Dieaboutitt__ there are lots of theories about ancient Egypt. Some more likely than others but math is a pretty good way to understand the creation and placement of what we still see today. What do you think is the truth about it and how are you certain?
Something incredibly stimulating watching you draw that out with that music in the background and your soft tone of voice. Thank you! 😍
Visual line, arpeggio tones, rhythmic breathing, clear mind, sharp pencil, quiet voice, resonating phenomena, Ah….Luminosity.
Thanks ❤
Actually brought tears to my eyes!! For real.
because upper energy is attractive to lower energy
Dear Robert,
By assuming the radius of the circle = 1, then you can demonstrate - using trigonometry (Pythagorean rules, sin rule, ...) that:
The top angle of the triangle is 45 degrees, thus :
1. The base side of the triangle (=side of the square) = 2sin(22.5°)/sin(67.5°) which corresponds also to 2(√2 - 1)
2. The perimeter of the square is thus (4xside)= 16(√2 - 1), approx. 6.627417
3. The area of the square is thus (side)^2 = 16 (3 - 2√2), approx. 2.745166
Consequently:
a) Perimeter: P[square] is 12.61865% larger than P[circle]=2π (6.28319 ...)
b) Area: A[square] is 5.47862 % smaller than A[circle]=π (3.14159...)
Your approach is a perfect match for the DaVinci Vitruvian man. Spot on!
There is an easier way to draw the circle/square by using a square edge and a compass (Masonic approach); identical result though.
I can share my calculations if you wish (including some fascinating mathematical connections with the Vesica Pisces, the mother of geometries and the Fibonacci sequence (golden ratio Phi)).
Kind regards, Philippe
I am so incredibly grateful for this robert. Its a gift to get to draw this... Thank you for sharing all the knowledge freely like you do. Not only the content but your atitude also deeply o inspires me.
Thank you! X marks the spot! :) Noticed an enhancement you might make: for this exercise, as you used a compass, a square, *and* the paper manufacturer's precision. In other words, you used the edge of the paper to line up the first (and a later) line.
Instead, you could draw an initial horizontal line[1], and then use that as the "starting edge," so that the solution is completely 'self-contained" as it were, angle-wise. Thanks again!
[1] -- Like, rotate the paper 45 degrees, or rip the edges off so they're not uniform, etc.
Even with the naked eye, you can see that neither the area nor the circumference of the circle matches the square. Without trigonometry math proof, the drawing is misleading.
i think about your work all the time and thank you for your time
Genius work Robert 😎
A single edged razor blade also works geat for sharpening the lead on your compass.
The true test was only to use a straight edge and a compass. Using the end of a ruler as a square is a cheat.
Yes. The compas can do it faster and more accurately. I wish I could show it. Nothing special, just a technique. Thanks for the fun video, though.
this reminds me of the visual pathway of the brain images we see. How the view is inverted. i also noticed this is the esoteric sigil of lucifer inverted. I wonder what the triangle in the middle has to do with how we view perception. The X in the middle is almost that of a focal point. This looks like a map the the brain to me. Thank you for uploading.
Would you kindly show the results of your final measurements with this technique?
Thank you Sir
Wait…so you need a perfectly square piece of paper and the ruler has to have a perfectly square edge too??? That doesn’t seem right…they said just straight edge and compass, not perfectly right angle square and compass… 🧐
what does it take to center the circle?
What lesson is it today professor
Why am I watching this? I should be asleep.
Can you point me to the lovely symphony being played
the square to the circle degree off set
as you drew this i kept thinking of the image done by DiVinci...showing the golden ratio...could that also be the squaring of a circle in that image as well?
The angle seen from the upper triangle is 47 degrees.
47 degrees from the compass + 90 degrees from the square equals 137
❤ 137=YHWH ❤
you used the bottom of the paper as a reference why don't you use your own square lines you draw.
it is not centered and probably for a reason
Amazing!
Nice compass!
Your hands, your voice.. and the squaring of the circle by you with you is heaven.. 🔵♥️🟥
Guess you Never learned to Use two set Squares to draw parallel Lines…
Thank you My Divine Friend Robert Edward Grant and Everyone a part of it 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽 Value your Time 😇👆🏽🦀🤸🌝🌚🌅🌄 One Love 💛💚💜🤍🖤💙❤️🧡🕺🫁✌🏽 Peace 🧠 LOVE HOPE BELIEVE FAITH HEALTH PRAYERS STRENGTH HEALING ✨✨✨💫☯️💟🌌🌳🐉
Looks a bit like the Masonic Compass and Square
what angle does that produce? is it 33 degrees
I literally sit here with tears from the articulation of your work, Robert! You've GOT to know DeVinci watches IN AWE from above your shoulder!!!
Hell ya
👍👍👍👍
The only figure that is accurate is your circle, everything else is not even a close approximation of anything. There is a simple way to show that you actually have a real square. Sorry but this is no better than guessing.
You are a controlled opp. You not diff from them.
Who is "them" to you? Controlled opp for what?
@@Truthseeker88888 controlled opposition, same as elon, andrew tate, etc…
@@Dieaboutitt__ what are they opposing though?
@@Truthseeker88888 i mean part of the “elite”, just they seem to be on “your side” telling you all these ancient knowledge about egypt and all that, but they just misleading you
@@Dieaboutitt__ there are lots of theories about ancient Egypt. Some more likely than others but math is a pretty good way to understand the creation and placement of what we still see today. What do you think is the truth about it and how are you certain?