His books Traitor King and another on the Mountbattens can be found covered on the Cheere Denise channel. Mr Lownie gets a real kick out of following her doing his books. He & I have a young SM friendship after I told him he’d built up quite a fan base via Cheere’s channel. I contacted him because Lady Colin Campbell was extremely rude, in fact in my opinion she was threatening & bullying to a young mum & teacher in the US - a totally different time zone- when Lady C wanted certain assurances by a certain time when she was covering one of her books. A most unpleasant exchange & sadly now taken down understandabley. More recent interviews go into the difficulty this historian had getting information from the Royal Archives so a lot came via the USA.
I cannot convey how much I have enjoyed these 'talks', which I discovered recently. Thank you so much for uploading them on to RUclips, they are all riveting… I look forward to future treats! Thank you, again. Kind regards, Stevie Corbett
Yes, the absence of common courtesy to their guest speaker, even after being asked to mute their microphones did not reflect well on those making the noise and, like you, drove me crazy too.
So the duke and duchess of windsor were both bisexual and the mountbattens were bisexual too....that seems like a lot from a small group of people. is there something in the water ?
Everybody else is bringing up these royal children, and rich people's children, except their own parents: the parents are too busy having sexual affairs: no time for their children. So other people: staff have access 24/7 to these innocent and unprotected royal children: These children are targets for paedophiles: who are in the service of their employers. You see how ridiculous this life style is detrimental to their children, it destroys them.
This is so interesting. I have just finished the book, it's a great read. I really liked the opportunity to hear the author speaking about it firsthand. These people were really appalling self entitled money grabbers. They have sad parallels with a self-exiled royal couple today who seem to be grabbing onto any thing they can to remain relevant.
I would like to know exactly which pieces of jewelry sold in Geneva had been reported as stolen, and did the insurance company which paid the claims recover the money? Stolen property is stolen property; if the insurance paid it off, the insurer owns it.
Can i ask you a question sir? You mentioned that churchill threatened Edward with a court Marshall was it ever discussed bringing treason charges against the duke? Im not British im an American lawyer and he could easily be charged with conspiracy to commit treason which just in my country carries the possibility from 25 year to death depending upon the degree. The fact that he was given 21,000 pounds a year and 2 post government jobs is just maddening im well as king or queen you can not be prosecuted but as a duke i believe treason laws can still apply
I went to Amazon to buy The Traitor King and it is Banned to Americans! It says You are not allowed to buy this book in the U.S. of America. I need the Audiobook because I am 73 Amd almost blind. Quite funny Americans Are Banned from reading Andrew's Book!!!
So the picture of Wallis in the white dress with Ernest was not their wedding. They got married I. A registry office. That was a picture from her presentation to the king and queen.
having affairs with married women was what men always did and still do and in the days before the pill there was more reason to sleep with married women. first, if there is a pregnancy, there is no scandal, she is married and the child is supposed to be her husband's. secondly, since she is married, there is no chance of her expecting the guy to marry her since she already is married and up to the 1970's divorce was difficult to get and socially frowned on.
A very interesting item. Thank you. It would be very interesting to learn more about those on both sides of the Atlantic who shared his views and objectives? Perhaps there were some senior politicians and industrialists in the USA and some members of the British aristocracy who were with him?
I do not know why people are so surprised about his German affiliation and sympathies, After all his mother was German, His father was half German half Danish. Both Queen Elizabeth’s sisters in law were married to high ranking SS officers. If we insist on having a German royal family, what do we expect! This thesis of this talk is one sided, what about the Nazi saluting royal family at home.
Another thing. People who are emotionally deprived growing up in an authoritarian households who have learned to be dismissive of their own emotions and needs make the perfect followers for wolves in sheeps clothing to take advantage of. Wolves in sheeps clothing who are much better at doing duplicity than they are. After the isolation of a soul from birth who is then forced to become suddenly isolated from all meaninful friendships and contact with their birth mother too while that soul is then being encoraged to wear wolves clothing who from birth who could say no the whole time to that unless they have near supernatural protection?
I am in no way defending Edward but had a very cold upbringing with no emotional nurturing from his parents. I do think that after his resignation from the monarchy his behavior became a quest to remain important and relevant on the national stage. This attention seeking behavior left him wide open for Nazi manipulation. Edward’s visit and collaborations with Germany were fueled from this behavior. Having been made irrelevant through his British family, he now placed his new German acceptance over his position as a British citizen and military officer. And sadly he lacked the common sense and intelligence to realize why this behavior, especially during war time, was so wrong.
I don't understand why people say the Duke of Windsor would have been a puppet king to the Nazis. People always comment on how England might have been "a very different country" if he had remained on the throne. How could this have happened if the Monarchy has no power to do anything but be a figurehead? The Prime Minister wouldn't have had a say in it? The British Parliament wouldn't have had a say? The British subjects wouldn't have had a say? The British military wouldn't have had a say? MI5 wouldn't have had a say?
@@laurastortoni-hager1510 Yes he was BUT that is the sort of marriage he wanted. Some men do not want "to drive the car" in the marriage. Some men are perfectly happy with the wife in charge. That arrangement worked for their marriage. Who are we to say it is wrong or right!?!
@@andyroo9381 : Just and merely as an aside [ ipso facto for what it is worth ], there is no shortage of women who think and not short of fierceness either [ ! ] that they should be in the driver’s seat anyway! But humour apart, your point as to ´who are we to say who or what is right? ´ which is not an impertinent point, except that the greater part of our existence is affected by what others do to further their belief of what must, should, even ought, to be done in reaction to - either in support of or in opposition to - mandatory decisions being taken in law by others with power to do so, which are bound to change our individual and collective lives for better or worse according to our perhaps limited thoughts and knowledge on the issues. In democracies, in principle the mass of population is encouraged to show and voice their interest through elected representatives to achieve a consensus of national or collective will,it being accepted that there will be winners and losers, and hopefully that majority opinion will err on the side of reason and with decent respect and consideration of those in disagreement. But then along comes the Trojan horse called ´efficiency’ one half of which derides ´democracy’ as rank bullshit and tantamount to decisions being taken by the weak and indecisive and self-interested under the guise of multi-meaning words mouthed by people looking over the shoulders most of the time and the other Trojan half by others deeming that only the bottom half of the intelligent mass should be given the right to vote and that they must all vote in favour of whatever their leader proposes. The Trojan Horse is Totalitarian Uniformity whose credo is Might is Right and that in ´Realpolitik’ terms only fools believe the opposing ideal of Right being Might ie if not today then ´eventually’ and hopefully…all being well, ha ha, and too bad if it ain’t ´cos I’m all right I have more money and a good job, and for you mate ´hard cheese’ … The moral of which is that if we take no interest others will, and they may be right or they may be wrong and that given an honest chance we have only ourselves to blame if we get it wrong and have to pay the price for our lack of will and interest and fair-minded but not foolish determination to hear and debate matters out face to face over the table of decent discussion. We stand at least to improve our knowledge and learn something! My full praise and compliments to the Organisors of this most excellent documentary and grateful thanks for making it available for viewing! Very Best Wishes to All for a Happy New Year!
@@dennisroyhall121 I started to read your response. I read about the first 3 or 5 lines and then stopped. It sounded like too much of a "Lillith from Cheers" response. I was getting a headache. Thank you for responding and I hope other people are able to decipher your code. A Happy New Year to you!!
@@TrishVidal.......and she disrepected and abused him and never forgave him for abdicating. She was nit young. She was not beautiful: in photos her teeth struck me for being dirty, diseased and disgusting. Her chin was disproportionately jutting out. Her nose was huge and misshapen. It is true that love is blind. But did he love her? Maybe he was just dominated. And yes the King WAS a Nazi sympathizer.
This author speaks clearly and concisely - no sensationalising just the facts - so interesting
His books Traitor King and another on the Mountbattens can be found covered on the Cheere Denise channel.
Mr Lownie gets a real kick out of following her doing his books.
He & I have a young SM friendship after I told him he’d built up quite a fan base via Cheere’s channel.
I contacted him because Lady Colin Campbell was extremely rude, in fact in my opinion she was threatening & bullying to a young mum & teacher in the US - a totally different time zone- when Lady C wanted certain assurances by a certain time when she was covering one of her books. A most unpleasant exchange & sadly now taken down understandabley.
More recent interviews go into the difficulty this historian had getting information from the Royal Archives so a lot came via the USA.
Thank you for this. Seems like the ‘little man’ was a real stinker after all.
I cannot convey how much I have enjoyed these 'talks', which I discovered recently. Thank you so much for uploading them on to RUclips, they are all riveting… I look forward to future treats! Thank you, again. Kind regards, Stevie Corbett
Mr Lownie is always a great interview & through the Q & A some blanks of mine from the book have been filled.
Thank you very much.
That background pops and noises drove me crazy.
Yes, the absence of common courtesy to their guest speaker, even after being asked to mute their microphones did not reflect well on those making the noise and, like you, drove me crazy too.
It was very distracting indeed….
That was so interesting. Thank you.
This was very good Andrew. Hope that you do more.
The one on the Mountbattens is very good.
very interesting thank you
This is fantastic. No flap👍
This consolidates information I’d read in several books.
So the duke and duchess of windsor were both bisexual and the mountbattens were bisexual too....that seems like a lot from a small group of people. is there something in the water ?
Everybody else is bringing up these royal children, and rich people's children, except their own parents: the parents are too busy having sexual affairs: no time for their children.
So other people: staff have access 24/7 to these innocent and unprotected royal children:
These children are targets for paedophiles: who are in the service of their employers.
You see how ridiculous this life style is detrimental to their children, it destroys them.
Yeah doesn't make much sense to tar all of them, now does it?...I once read that Wallis was a hermaphrodite...Lawd knows!
He was a traitor! Selfish and spoiled!
Well said
Thank you for getting the truth out there
This is so interesting. I have just finished the book, it's a great read. I really liked the opportunity to hear the author speaking about it firsthand. These people were really appalling self entitled money grabbers. They have sad parallels with a self-exiled royal couple today who seem to be grabbing onto any thing they can to remain relevant.
Who could you be thinking of..? ? !
It’s a brilliant book and very readable.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Andrew is just so interesting!
I really enjoyed this video. It was real interesting
I would like to know exactly which pieces of jewelry sold in Geneva had been reported as stolen, and did the insurance company which paid the claims recover the money? Stolen property is stolen property; if the insurance paid it off, the insurer owns it.
Interesting comment!!
Eye opening for sure ! They really did reap what they sowed in the end, if the facts are accurate, which they seem to be.
Too bad the audio has so much interference.
What is the racket in the background
Edward washing the dishes noisely, trying to shut Andrew up for giving away his secrets!
@8.46
Anyone remember the Charles Atlas ' Before and After '
magazine pics ? I think I know where he got the ' Before '
idea from ?
Thanks for muting. Excellent book and author 👏🏻🇺🇸
I would love to read this book but we can’t buy it in U.S. til May 2022. ☹️
Why not order it from the UK? I do it all the time.
Amazon UK website tells me it can’t complete the transaction. How do you get past that?
Can i ask you a question sir? You mentioned that churchill threatened Edward with a court Marshall was it ever discussed bringing treason charges against the duke? Im not British im an American lawyer and he could easily be charged with conspiracy to commit treason which just in my country carries the possibility from 25 year to death depending upon the degree. The fact that he was given 21,000 pounds a year and 2 post government jobs is just maddening im well as king or queen you can not be prosecuted but as a duke i believe treason laws can still apply
I went to Amazon to buy The Traitor King and it is Banned to Americans! It says You are not allowed to buy this book in the U.S. of America.
I need the Audiobook because I am 73 Amd almost blind. Quite funny Americans Are Banned from reading Andrew's Book!!!
So the picture of Wallis in the white dress with Ernest was not their wedding. They got married I. A registry office. That was a picture from her presentation to the king and queen.
having affairs with married women was what men always did and still do and in the days before the pill there was more reason to sleep with married women. first, if there is a pregnancy, there is no scandal, she is married and the child is supposed to be her husband's. secondly, since she is married, there is no chance of her expecting the guy to marry her since she already is married and up to the 1970's divorce was difficult to get and socially frowned on.
I heard that King Edward was infertile because he had mumps at 14. That see.s to make sense because ther would be no pregnancies, well caused by him.
Yes, l second yr comment.
Thankfully Edward abdicated
From what I read Edward and Wallace would have greatly given the UK to Hitler 👀🥺👺😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠👺👺😠
A very interesting item. Thank you.
It would be very interesting to learn more about those on both sides of the Atlantic who shared his views and objectives? Perhaps there were some senior politicians and industrialists in the USA and some members of the British aristocracy who were with him?
The New York Times was sympathetic towards the Nazi’s until public opinion forced them to appear less so.
Self indulgence.
What happened to the other brother?
I do not know why people are so surprised about his German affiliation and sympathies, After all his mother was German, His father was half German half Danish. Both Queen Elizabeth’s sisters in law were married to high ranking SS officers. If we insist on having a German royal family, what do we expect! This thesis of this talk is one sided, what about the Nazi saluting royal family at home.
Another thing. People who are emotionally deprived growing up in an authoritarian households who have learned to be dismissive of their own emotions and needs make the perfect followers for wolves in sheeps clothing to take advantage of. Wolves in sheeps clothing who are much better at doing duplicity than they are. After the isolation of a soul from birth who is then forced to become suddenly isolated from all meaninful friendships and contact with their birth mother too while that soul is then being encoraged to wear wolves clothing who from birth who could say no the whole time to that unless they have near supernatural protection?
Maybe something to do with the death of his father King George V?
I don't hear anything thing new here.
Great!
I am in no way defending Edward but had a very cold upbringing with no emotional nurturing from his parents. I do think that after his resignation from the monarchy his behavior became a quest to remain important and relevant on the national stage. This attention seeking behavior left him wide open for Nazi manipulation. Edward’s visit and collaborations with Germany were fueled from this behavior. Having been made irrelevant through his British family, he now placed his new German acceptance over his position as a British citizen and military officer. And sadly he lacked the common sense and intelligence to realize why this behavior, especially during war time, was so wrong.
I don't understand why people say the Duke of Windsor would have been a puppet king to the Nazis. People always comment on how England might have been "a very different country" if he had remained on the throne. How could this have happened if the Monarchy has no power to do anything but be a figurehead? The Prime Minister wouldn't have had a say in it? The British Parliament wouldn't have had a say? The British subjects wouldn't have had a say? The British military wouldn't have had a say? MI5 wouldn't have had a say?
He was a puppet to Wallis.
@@laurastortoni-hager1510 Yes he was BUT that is the sort of marriage he wanted. Some men do not want "to drive the car" in the marriage. Some men are perfectly happy with the wife in charge. That arrangement worked for their marriage. Who are we to say it is wrong or right!?!
@@andyroo9381 : Just and merely as an aside [ ipso facto for what it is worth ], there is no shortage of women who think and not short of fierceness either [ ! ] that they should be in the driver’s seat anyway!
But humour apart, your point as to ´who are we to say who or what is right? ´ which is not an impertinent point, except that the greater part of our existence is affected by what others do to further their belief of what must, should, even ought, to be done in reaction to - either in support of or in opposition to - mandatory decisions being taken in law by others with power to do so, which are bound to change our individual and collective lives for better or worse according to our perhaps limited thoughts and knowledge on the issues.
In democracies, in principle the mass of population is encouraged to show and voice their interest through elected representatives to achieve a consensus of national or collective will,it being accepted that there will be winners and losers, and hopefully that majority opinion will err on the side of reason and with decent respect and consideration of those in disagreement.
But then along comes the Trojan horse called ´efficiency’ one half of which derides ´democracy’ as rank bullshit and tantamount to decisions being taken by the weak and indecisive and self-interested under the guise of multi-meaning words mouthed by people looking over the shoulders most of the time and the other Trojan half by others deeming that only the bottom half of the intelligent mass should be given the right to vote and that they must all vote in favour of whatever their leader proposes.
The Trojan Horse is Totalitarian Uniformity whose credo is Might is Right and that in ´Realpolitik’ terms only fools believe the opposing ideal of Right being Might ie if not today then ´eventually’ and hopefully…all being well, ha ha, and too bad if it ain’t ´cos I’m all right I have more money and a good job, and for you mate ´hard cheese’ …
The moral of which is that if we take no interest others will, and they may be right or they may be wrong and that given an honest chance we have only ourselves to blame if we get it wrong and have to pay the price for our lack of will and interest and fair-minded but not foolish determination to hear and debate matters out face to face over the table of decent discussion. We stand at least to improve our knowledge and learn something!
My full praise and compliments to the Organisors of this most excellent documentary and grateful thanks for making it available for viewing!
Very Best Wishes to All for a Happy New Year!
@@dennisroyhall121 I started to read your response. I read about the first 3 or 5 lines and then stopped. It sounded like too much of a "Lillith from Cheers" response. I was getting a headache. Thank you for responding and I hope other people are able to decipher your code. A Happy New Year to you!!
I’d like to hear a good explanation of this also.
too soft
Windsor sounds rather like an English trump . . .
Edward I suspect would have made a better king rather than his hapless brother and their off spring.
edward was a racist, an anti-semite and a nazi sympathizer. he had no respect for other peoples marriages as he had many affairs with married women
Edward was too weak to be king. It's common knowledge that Wallis bossed him around.
@RM Garland the historical record
@@TrishVidal.......and she disrepected and abused him and never forgave him for abdicating. She was nit young. She was not beautiful: in photos her teeth struck me for being dirty, diseased and disgusting. Her chin was disproportionately jutting out. Her nose was huge and misshapen. It is true that love is blind. But did he love her? Maybe he was just dominated. And yes the King WAS a Nazi sympathizer.
@@TrishVidal Agree.