Комментарии •

  • @lawwithsufyanalich.5675
    @lawwithsufyanalich.5675 6 лет назад +15

    Gennifer Housen you are awesome. Everytime I hear you, I feel you teach by your heart.
    Thanks for being here.

  • @guyanderson9549
    @guyanderson9549 3 года назад +8

    This is great. Saved my ass, I almost failed my assessment

  • @gengjoseph7304
    @gengjoseph7304 10 лет назад +8

    Very informative video on remedies to breach of contract. She is very eloquent with excellent accent. It helped me in my studies, thank you!

  • @bonoloratshivhadela2720
    @bonoloratshivhadela2720 3 года назад +1

    I was watching this video 8 years later and I find really helpful. Thanks a lot Jennifer.

  • @tianogriffin3468
    @tianogriffin3468 6 лет назад +2

    Thank you so much for this video, originally I was confused on how to seek damages on the breaching party, but now I understand in order to seek the full expected amount negotiated, I have to sue for liquidated damages, but if for some odd reason, I'm unable to calculate the estimated value of my contact with the defendant, the damages awarded would fall under the nominal or non liquidated damages category, and I have also learned if I plane on suing for any torts caused from the breach, I must file a different lawsuit for punitive damages, once again thank you

  • @ibrahimbashir1126
    @ibrahimbashir1126 4 года назад

    Really, educative and I wish you all the best Gennifer.

  • @gissellem
    @gissellem 4 года назад +1

    This lady is fantastic!! Thank you for uploading!!!

  • @wizasimuchimba839
    @wizasimuchimba839 7 лет назад +3

    This is so helpful and among those who enjoy your tutorials is me but i have been searching for your tutorials on Law of Tort and Law of Agency

  • @arbabarbab6525
    @arbabarbab6525 7 лет назад

    Thanks Ms. Jennifer for your valuable and useful lecture

  • @superstu84
    @superstu84 6 лет назад +3

    Amazingly helpful - My assignment is on remedies. Is there a part two? :)

  • @emmanuelsocris9145
    @emmanuelsocris9145 4 года назад

    I dnt know ur name but u teach extremely well abt the breach of contract tnx for giving us ur knowledge

  • @sarangunasekaran76
    @sarangunasekaran76 11 лет назад +1

    Good video,it makes easy for the students to understand particular topic

  • @phelomatomanematomane1952
    @phelomatomanematomane1952 5 лет назад

    Thank you so much for this video
    Sendipasile 💃💃💃

  • @ritu9058
    @ritu9058 6 лет назад +1

    Thank u for your vedio it's really helpfull for me
    I love it ........

  • @muhammadiqbalchughtai8144
    @muhammadiqbalchughtai8144 7 лет назад

    lecture is very helpfull to understand the misrepresentation and fraud

  • @janelouw402
    @janelouw402 3 года назад +1

    Keep uploading. Many thanks

  • @MKR.91
    @MKR.91 10 лет назад +4

    Awesome!

  • @stacichilds4721
    @stacichilds4721 8 лет назад +18

    i really like your videos and your
    accent lol

  • @lightfurythedragon9662
    @lightfurythedragon9662 5 лет назад +3

    Where is the 2nd part of this video please?

  • @LawSessions
    @LawSessions 11 лет назад +6

    WATCH THE FULL VIDEO...The Law Sessions website is now operational and you can view the full lecture at the site.

  • @mongiwazulu1991
    @mongiwazulu1991 5 лет назад

    very articulate I really enjoyed it

  • @imrantachmuradov5870
    @imrantachmuradov5870 11 лет назад

    Very nice video Thank You so much!

  • @tanhow2237
    @tanhow2237 5 лет назад +4

    Thanks for the guide on the remedies in damages.

  • @nickbagnall
    @nickbagnall 11 лет назад +1

    Very well presented, difficult concepts made easily understood even for a lay person:
    My assumption from this and the other previews are; I will be joining the courses if? Lay persons allowed. Excellent!!

    • @fefont6887
      @fefont6887 2 года назад

      totally agree and thought the same; from someone who is not even a Lawyer

  • @efesamson6204
    @efesamson6204 5 лет назад

    thanks this is very explanatory

  • @TheJefooo
    @TheJefooo 2 года назад +1

    Thanks so very much. Great revision sessions. Exams soon.

  • @edwingutierrez2641
    @edwingutierrez2641 4 года назад

    Thank you. Great!

  • @lawwithbarristerhamna
    @lawwithbarristerhamna 3 года назад +1

    Very well explained

  • @gipi23
    @gipi23 3 года назад

    I still cannot workout, in the layman's terms, what is the difference between liquidated damages and contractual damages

  • @186marie
    @186marie 3 года назад

    Very clear thank you

  • @alhassanmohammed3573
    @alhassanmohammed3573 8 лет назад

    in company law what does this expressing mean How mighty and great are members when they are of one mind and speak with one voice! They can do anything that is lawful and intra vires, regardless of the process or time line.

  • @186marie
    @186marie 3 года назад

    Is part 2 on RUclips ? Can not find it !

  • @michaelgagliano6316
    @michaelgagliano6316 7 лет назад +2

    omg i love you my teacher sucks but you made it so clear

    • @darmillionaire
      @darmillionaire 7 лет назад

      So you say I suck huh! I will show you how much I suck in your final grade.

  • @hellow4130
    @hellow4130 5 лет назад

    The website is no longer available. :(

  • @MrROVINSTANLEY
    @MrROVINSTANLEY 8 лет назад

    Very helpful

  • @mymechanicfriend6017
    @mymechanicfriend6017 Год назад

    Hi... nice, but how to rescind signature???

  • @educationtv6408
    @educationtv6408 4 года назад

    great job

  • @trevwaksdal2221
    @trevwaksdal2221 4 года назад

    Hello. Question... must there be two signatures on a contract/agreement,to make it a legally binding contract?

    • @jacobthomas1356
      @jacobthomas1356 4 года назад

      as far as I understand, any agreement can be deemed legally binding, whether verbally agreed, accepted in an email or writen in contract form, as long as the agreed exchange has been activated by the conduct of both parties. This means you do not need both parties to sign. You simply need one party to make a proposal and the other party to accept and give their concent to the terms proposed. When taken to court however you must be able to provide proof of said offer and acceptance in some form. The most commonly used form of proof is signature however, signature is not the only form of proof you can use. In her previous video, Acceptance part 1, Jennifer mentions the case of Brogden vs. Metropolitan Rly Co 1877, where Metropolitan recieved a contractual agreement from Brogden and then proceeded to place an order with Brogden in accordance with the term of that agreement. When Brogden later took Metropolitan to court claiming no contract had been signed, the conduct of both parties prevailed as valid proof of agreement to the terms.
      TL;DR: You don't have to sign, but it's good practice to do so

  • @atimjovia6479
    @atimjovia6479 3 года назад +2

    Very good work, very informative. Your videos help a lot

  • @alhassanmohammed6964
    @alhassanmohammed6964 2 года назад +1

    Very informative. Can we have a part 2 ?

    • @LawSessions
      @LawSessions 2 года назад +1

      It is now uploaded. Including parts 2, 3 and 4

  • @nelofarazam9053
    @nelofarazam9053 3 года назад

    Awesome

  • @kathynsam123
    @kathynsam123 8 лет назад +1

    is this valid in us

  • @teacherella2842
    @teacherella2842 5 лет назад

    Hi Mam what will happen if you sign two contracts with two different employee?

    • @ToneB
      @ToneB 5 лет назад

      Take them to small claims court.

  • @ahsanmohammed1
    @ahsanmohammed1 3 года назад

    Please make playlists.

  • @amandastephens6300
    @amandastephens6300 8 лет назад

    your videos are very helpful but i cant seem to find the other parts of the lectures for e.g. part 2 of misrepresentation

    • @fitnetworkershub1775
      @fitnetworkershub1775 8 лет назад

      +Amanda Stephens somebody has been absent for 14 days... without notice,,, he pops up at day 15 saying he was sick...checked medical records for verifications, the clinical officers cant verified... can i fire this one without benefitttsss????

    • @fitnetworkershub1775
      @fitnetworkershub1775 8 лет назад

      +Kalwisha Mulambia or suspension...

    • @amandastephens6300
      @amandastephens6300 8 лет назад

      +Kalwisha Mulambia I must admit I'm not quite sure but I will assume that after verification of medial records that nothing was provided from the employee I will say that it may be view as job abandonment

    • @fitnetworkershub1775
      @fitnetworkershub1775 8 лет назад

      Thanks.

  • @hopefaithlove2022
    @hopefaithlove2022 3 года назад

    Yesssss 🙏🙌💜😁

  • @azizaakhmedova1326
    @azizaakhmedova1326 2 года назад

    Hi guys. I need your help i have a case where can I get advise from students like me?

    • @LawSessions
      @LawSessions 2 года назад

      Not sure what you mean. Can you please clarify?

  • @seanberge1
    @seanberge1 10 лет назад

    My best friend got into an argument with his wife. She prepares my taxes, she used my tax information to send the police to my house. I got arrested because I refused to let them search my house I heard her say this via a voice mail. She said "I can't remember Sean's address, I'll just look at his tax return"
    . What can I do, and expect as far as this breach of confidentiality?
    She still has my financial records.
    What legal recourse do I have? If anyone has a similar story, please tell me how I should handle this. I am not going to let her get away with this.

    • @MrWizardpant
      @MrWizardpant 10 лет назад +1

      Breech of confidence is an option under tort law not contract. The real problem here is proving that you reasonably expected that your privacy was to be protected and there is no public interest in said information being published (publish just means to say something), look at the Mckennit V Ash 2008 case for more information. I would advise speaking to a qualified solicitor though.

    • @seanberge1
      @seanberge1 10 лет назад +1

      Luke Luya Thanks Luke, I will.

  • @miss.phyllisreneefoster9547
    @miss.phyllisreneefoster9547 8 лет назад +3

    I am entitle too damages

  • @AsheghePersianz
    @AsheghePersianz 10 лет назад +8

    You have to pay for other parts... Thats so sad, im a student :/

    • @londiweshozi1593
      @londiweshozi1593 10 лет назад

      mxm

    • @panamavisitors
      @panamavisitors 7 лет назад

      Really? I was looking for part 2

    • @Highnz57
      @Highnz57 6 лет назад

      If you don't mind, I have a legal question. Can you get a dui dismissed by challenging jurisdiction or exposing the straw man or taking the role of executor and beneficiary of the all caps "MY NAME" trust? I know courts rule under maritime admirility law by manipulating our consent through legalese jargon, also exposing the straw man; where the court puts THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA" as give plaintiff but the ppl of the state don't have first hand knowledge of the situation at hand. And the trust law angle, where a person's name is not spelled in all caps, that's a corporation, but it is in court papers. Am I supposed to take executor and beneficiary role of the "ALL CAPS NAME" on the court contract and would that work in the defendants favor?

  • @shantellevenson2232
    @shantellevenson2232 3 года назад

    This woman 💃 🎓🥺

  • @Jtmanda
    @Jtmanda 2 года назад

    JENNY! I crush on you honestly 😅. Kindly asking ma'am Why is the comment section turned off the new video 📹 I have a question based on the new Video posted 10 minutes ago

    • @LawSessions
      @LawSessions 2 года назад +1

      I have just returned to uploading videos and so I was not intending to answer any questions right now as I am 'cleaning up' all the old videos as I am going to focus on my channel now.

    • @Jtmanda
      @Jtmanda 2 года назад

      @@LawSessions 😇Well noted ✅ 👌 l wish you a happy amazing days to come 🙂 Passing love all the way from Zambia🇿🇲. You have no idea how l submerge myself to each and every word you utter paying attention to the small detail. Last semester when l was doing Criminal law , law of Contract 1 , Legal Process and Constitution Law. I completely fell in love with your lectures!

  • @se7ensnakes
    @se7ensnakes 8 лет назад

    A promissory note is not a contract. The two have vastly different elements. One is governed by UCC article 3 and the other by common law. So why do lawyers filed complaints claiming BREACH OF CONTRACT to a promissory note? That should be dismissed under subject matter jurisdiction.
    The proper filing should be BREACH OF PROMISSORY NOTE

    • @sahirahboss4221
      @sahirahboss4221 8 лет назад

      a promissory note is a contract.

    • @se7ensnakes
      @se7ensnakes 8 лет назад

      Sahirah Boss They have different elements

    • @sahirahboss4221
      @sahirahboss4221 8 лет назад +1

      i believe you are confused, there is no one type of contract. there are multiple types of contracts.

    • @se7ensnakes
      @se7ensnakes 8 лет назад

      contract have elements. When you are indicted there has to be certain information which one can refer to. If you are claiming a breach of contract then you will looking for the contracts and see if that contract fulfills the elements. If it is a promissory note you will claim it is not a valid contract because those contractual elements are not in what you are presenting.

    • @sahirahboss4221
      @sahirahboss4221 8 лет назад +1

      A contract is a promise or a set of promises by a party to a transaction, enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law. A promissory note is an unconditional written promise, signed by the maker, to pay absolutely and in any event a certain sum of money to the bearer or a designated person. (Do you see the sameness in these two?)

  • @bonoloratshivhadela2720
    @bonoloratshivhadela2720 3 года назад

    Wow she is incredible. What's her name?

  • @samforshaw7964
    @samforshaw7964 5 лет назад

    intro a bit far out for a law lecture xD