Comparing scRNA-Seq | Suerat Integration Analysis (Brief)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @pingliu1310
    @pingliu1310 2 года назад +2

    Thanks a lot for your video, quite a nice introduction!!!!

  • @kitdordkhar4964
    @kitdordkhar4964 2 года назад +1

    Useful for my analysis. Thanks LB 🙂

  • @mahamoussa5712
    @mahamoussa5712 Год назад

    You are a fabulous teacher, of cures! Could you post your other video?

  • @paroletatel
    @paroletatel 2 года назад +1

    Thank you

  • @RituVerma27
    @RituVerma27 2 года назад +1

    Hello Brandon, I am having the following error - Error in which(x = object.classes, useNames = TRUE) :
    argument to 'which' is not logical
    in the step where we are trying to find anchors (chapter 1)

  • @mamiburgac2032
    @mamiburgac2032 Год назад

    Hello, first of all thank you for explaining the Satijilab code! Its is really great what you are doing!
    However, I have a very short question. On my analysis there are more than 2 samples, therefore
    sample_detect

  • @MohammadSaleem-vl8sn
    @MohammadSaleem-vl8sn 2 года назад +1

    Please make tutorial on how we can use machine learning like random forest, bortula , k means , in GWAS, disease prediction,

  • @dannieqing535
    @dannieqing535 Год назад

    Hi Brandon, do you know how to get gene with logFC with different treatment. It is easy to make dot plot, but how to get those sample level dataset and read in csv file?Thanks!

  • @paapangromearound446
    @paapangromearound446 2 года назад

    Hi, Thank you very much for many of your vdo. That's brilliant helpful for me.
    I have a question is that, I did a single cell sequencing. However, I found out that there is the batch effect in my dataset.
    My question is that When I look at the data I feel like the batch 1 usually can read with the lower count number while batch 2 shown much more different in the scale. and this will cause the problem because I cannot compare this control and treatment by pooling the data together because both of them are in different scale.
    In this case which method would be the best fit to try and does quantile normalization is necessary.

    • @LiquidBrain
      @LiquidBrain  2 года назад

      Hi you may regress out the batch effect at the step “scaleData”, with the function vars.to.regress = “your_sample_batch_ID”
      Hope this helps - Lind

    • @paapangromearound446
      @paapangromearound446 2 года назад

      @@LiquidBrain thank you so much, I would like to ask if you are open for some collaboration in research?

    • @LiquidBrain
      @LiquidBrain  2 года назад +1

      @@paapangromearound446 Oh ya sure, you can drop us an email here liquidbrain.r@gmail.com

    • @paapangromearound446
      @paapangromearound446 2 года назад

      @@LiquidBrain Thank you very much, I have sent you my email. :)

    • @paapangromearound446
      @paapangromearound446 2 года назад

      @@LiquidBrain Hi, I am sorry for my delay response of my email due to my health circumstance. However, I have sent you the information. I am very sorry for my late reply again. I am looking forward for our discussion. Thank you very much

  • @chih-hanh.9514
    @chih-hanh.9514 8 месяцев назад

    Hi, thank you for your video. I have an error message when I was in this line "merged.WIHN

    • @chih-hanh.9514
      @chih-hanh.9514 8 месяцев назад

      For those who have the same problem, I solved this issue by downgrading Seurat from v5 to v4.3.0.