Professor Brian Cox about wormholes
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
- A wormhole is a hypothetical structure connecting disparate points in spacetime, and is based on a special solution of the Einstein field equations.
A wormhole can be visualized as a tunnel with two ends at separate points in spacetime (i.e., different locations, different points in time, or both). 
Наука
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Cue every movie that explains it with a pencil poking through a piece of paper except the pencil explodes
Speaking of. I just watched Event Horizon. Great Flick.
✔️
@@edicius52best hunted house in space movie ever!!
@@edicius52hell yeah that’s a classic
Actually the paper explodes... and the pencil with it I assume 😅
Brian cox is so much more informational and entertaining than most astrophysicists on youtube
As a time traveler, it behoves me how primitive the 21st century is.
Every depiction of the future smells and has the form of old methodology human labour .
Relax, they will figure it out in 137 years. 😊
You say that, but your dildos are basically the same as ours, and humans still shove them into themselves for fun.
Let's not get too superior now.
You’re delusional 😂
They spell BEHOOVE different in the future?
This is when I love science when they admit they don't fully know. Then I believe it is exciting. It adds mystery. Knowing everything is boring.
I love Brian Cox
THIS GUY IS SO INTELLIGENT. THE CUTEST MAN IN THE UNIVERSE. I CAN LISTEN TO HIM TILL ETERNITY. LOL
hes lke an intelligent Ellen degeneres except without being a piece of garbage.
Tf
@@gio3061why hate bro?
Sounds like someone has a crush. 🤔😍😃🥹
@@Johnnynix52understandable, i have a huge man-crush on him too, i think it's pretty reasonable 😂
It’s like a whirlpool in a river. When a log goes into it, it collapses and causes the whirlpool to become unstable…
unless its a huge one
Nice comparison
very nice image
@@Skittle02
Thank you… ✌️😎
@@lysmrtzunless that log is a bigger one…
So it would be more like the wormhole in Star Trek The Motion Picture rather than the stable Bajoran Wormhole in Star Trek Deep Space 9.
Sorry for getting super duper nerdy, but this is outrageously "fascinating," like Mister Spock's catch phrase.
Hearing Professor Brian Cox talk is often totally mind blowing.
This is why both outward curvature of spacetime and, more importantly, time as a fourth dimension are problematic. The mathematical treatment of time as a fourth dimension enables relativity's equations but also creates interpretative pitfalls. Time is abstracted into the geometric structure of spacetime, which can mislead us into thinking it has physical spatial properties. I think a better model is the Frame Rate Theory of Time found in The Ultimate Gravity Breakthrough. The Frame Rate Theory of Time redefines time as a measure of the rate of change in matter, influenced by mass and velocity, rather than as a physical dimension. It suggests that time flows at different "frame rates" across spacetime, with higher mass or velocity reducing the rate of change. The speed of light remains constant, synchronizing all frame rates within a universal present, avoiding paradoxes like the block universe and treating time as dynamic rather than spatial.
Sure, that's easy for you to say. ;-)
I have a feeling that this man is a genius! Great job, you are "the special one '
Very special scientist
Thank you for your lessons on the universe; I can get enough of your knowledge and the way you explain the mysteries of the universe.🙂🙂
I can't get enough*
Even though space is really empty, there should be some atoms or light there to travel into a worm hole. Wouldn’t that mean that since there is stuff there there shouldn’t be any wormholes. They should collapse instantly. Or is it a case of you don’t see the tree because of the forest?
The information transferring is a reality. Which I can experience. Time travel is also a reality based on the principles.
I suspect reverse time travel isn’t possible because A) the past and future don’t exist as physical things or places, there’s only the present that can be accessed at any time, and B) you would therefore need to rewind the entire universe itself, which would necessitate the reversal of entropy and get you on Newton’s thermodynamic watchlist
Happy to see Hawking had a thought I had when I was 9 being time travel probably don't exist and never will as we never had visitors from other times (except if there's a convention to not travel.. and then in this case why and how we even reach the technology, or if it exists but in another space). Anyway it's weird we put this citations instead of thousands of genius things he said
All he talks about really fascinates me if had a I would love to see the universe and where we come from I believe in god bless
We come from right here on this planet.
The best Chef, the delicious recipe, expensive cutlery , candle lights.... But due to lack of the ingredients there will be no food on the table.
That's what Quantum is all about.
The key is counter balance, an equal amount of antimatter constantly emitted by the vessel to keep the net mass at zero. The small amount of gravity from the mass of any object interferes to much with that of the wormhole. So you need to remove the gravity from your ship by counterbalancing the mass of your ship with an equal amount of antimatter like a protective bubble.
Explain to me like im 5, why antimatter?
@@Thenonsocial so antimatter is this stuff that when it comes in contact with normal stuff of an equal quantity they cancel each other out resulting in nothing. So if you had an equal amount of anti matter to matter than you would have zero net matter, since a wormhole can’t transport meaningful amounts of stuff without collapsing than by using the anti-stuff to cancel out the stuff that is your ship you could theoretically make it through.
@@JamesSemaj-h1h Sounds like bloody witchcraft
@@Thenonsocial most of theoretical physics is/sounds like witchcraft.
What if the key sits in the ocean
When you get into them, they would suck you in with a gravitational pullsimilar to water spiraling down a drain. Then when the spiral breaks just like water down a drain, it would shoot you to the other side- with a force, similar to the objects sitting in the spiral above the drain.- when you get the to other side, gravity would even out again and you would get caught in space justbas you were on the other side. If you happened to be getting pushed by a beam of light- you could go from point a to point b the light beam would only be visible while it was on one side or the other of the wormhole. It would flip the directional pull of the light from a pushing to a pulling effect but at the same force- with a "revese Murphys law" kind of effect. Gravity it probability the polar opposite on the opposite side of a wormhole but would act the same and you couldn't tell the difference. What is the ceiling in a house on some side would be the floor on the other. - kind of like an "upside down world", if you will. But you couldn't tell the difference. The time lapse and the effect of you being taken out of the world would probably cause some sort of " mandella effects" and "back to the future effect" in the old reality- where your existence would disappear. If you happened to slip back into that reality- there would be changes and no one would remember you, but the world would change slightly. You could probably not go back to the same reality exactly because it would no longer exist. And would probably go to a parallel one the is similar. For example we could be on reality Channel 4.000000001 and you would travel to 5.000000002, then back to 4.000000002 and would experience these effects. The reality changes would be greater, the attitude would be more vastly different, depending on how far you jumped. I think it is also possible that a whole world could be stuck between dimensions if we ripped a hole in space time somehow and "mandella effects" and "back to the future effect" could occur and possibly reverse even. This would not be apparent to the masses, those awake enough to notice and believe it is possible.
A theory(axiom) is adapting perception to a limited number of words to get the mathematics right for wich we have words to describe.
Holy Smokes!!! So the universe keeps us right here!! We can't zip round the universe by worm holes!
What others also usually don’t think about is the requirement for a higher spacial dimension. After all, even with the infamous ‘pencil through paper’ explanation, there are 3 spatial dimensions at play even with 2D space.
The paper is space represented only with 2 dimensions, but when you poke that pencil through, if you were to connect those holes together, that’s a cylinder. A 3 dimensional shape.
So the wormhole passage in our 3 dimensional space would have to be a 4 dimensional cylinder analogue.
It collapses the matter , and simultaneously reconstructs the matter on the other side -at a given point in time.
At the point of inflection , the time is both heading to zero on the dark hole entrenched side , while time is heading to infinity, or with infinite time possibilities on the other side, Hence, you have entered the 4th dimension where it is possible for a 3d object to exist in all times at once.
We can create a wormhole using roughly the power of the sun, so we must harness the power first. Here we are a type 2 civilization.
Next we will need Exotic Matter , which is a negative matter, to help hold the wormholes open -honestly i believe between the inflection of space becoming time and time becoming space , and the near stopping of time upon entry, will mean that no exotic matter will be needed to build the wormholes.
You heard it here first....😮
Damn it, Bryan. Stop social media, get your pen and start working on that theory of gravity. I need to see my future self.
I mean we can technically travel into the future just not the past. You just have to travel close to the speed of light or go near a super massive black hole. 🙃
Or just live life. Nerds
You need a Einstein type of physicist to solve that type of problem.
@@ajxbl6754, These “nerds” are working towards the betterment and future of humanity while you’re sitting on your ass doing nothing.
@@edgaraguileraaguilera6782well you can time travel without leaving Earth.
If you and a friend go to a mountain in Arizona, one stays at the bottom and the other at the top, whoever is at the top will be 1/20th of a billion second ahead of you. So effectively not at all.
The Russian astronaut who got left on the ISS during the fall of the Soviet Union due to the prolonged time in space he IS in fact in the future not by a lot not even reaching an hour.
To effectively time travel to the “future”;
The farther away from a planets Mass (the mountain experiment) or;
Travelling at fast speeds even 1% of the Speed of Light.
However the likely hood of us EVER being able to travel at any speed of light % is quite low.
Sad thing is the nearest blackhole even at 80% of the speed of light would take us 30 odd million years at 20% it would take 9 digits worth or years 158,000,000 (this is a rounded number but close to the time to get to Gaia the nearest blackhole at 20% the speed of light)
I think Brian should show us by example and go through it
Ironically, few people believe that a rotating black hole’s ring singularity is the closest we’ll ever get to a wormhole.
Finally good shorts videos 😂
This guy knows all about wormholes
He literally knows nothing
@@Dr-puppenstein Nothing? Thats a bold statement. A toddler knows nothing about it, he has studies his whole life😂
@@T_DUFF studies his whole life and literally knows nothing still💀
@@Dr-puppenstein You are a special one.
@@T_DUFF get off your knees snowflake
The time machine is the mechanism through which the time travel is taking place, so it has to exist, in an operable state, at both points in time to work. This is why you can't travel to a time before its creation.
More importantly though, if someone travels back in time and changes the course of history, it could theoretically happen an infinite number of times leading to a constantly changing reality where in an instant, anything/anyone could morph and pop in/out of existence leading to an increasingly unstable reality and possibly the end of time itself.
I believe the moment an operable time machine is powered up and connected to a point in the future, everything goes black. It's all over.
All you need is negative mater to keep them open that’s how black holes in general stay stable.
The face that you can think of a time machine means that you can build one, we are just not fhere yet
Take me back to the 90s. I swear I’ll rule the world with the knowledge I have now.
HOW DOES HE KNOW WHAT WE NEED IF WE DONT HAVE SUCH A THING ! MY GAWD this man is so friggin intelligent
You need to act like a partical/ keep the quntom engagement open, so have a drown in front of your ship a one behind keeping everything in between under a field or gravitational force of pull / push. 😁 you need a wave counterclockwise in front and clockwise behind to sorta corkscrew yourself through.
The spatiotemporal 'whirlpool' of a black hole will collapse in the same way as a 'whirlpool of water' in a bathtub.
Any object that is too large to pass through it will eventually stop its rotation and collapse.
This is how I hypothesise it works for black holes.
The bigger they are, the bigger the objects that can pass through them.
I'm pretty sure that once gravitational collapse of a star occurs, the event horizon warps spacetime so much that even an object that has more mass or volume couldn't just "plug the hole" as it were. A comet the size of mount everest would get torn apart...stretched out..."spaghettified"...before it fell all the way in to a black hole the size of Earth. However, a black hole the size of Mt. Everest would eat a comet the size of Earth in the same way.
So the volume of a black hole can be smaller than the volume of what it eats.
That's not what Brian is saying. He is refuting that and saying it's impossible to travel through any and he believes they will all collapse no matter the relative sizes
@@mcmanus260 if you're responding to me (I'm unsure), then you should know my comment wasn't to Brian. Can you clarify?
@@Anthony-t8l
Brian in the video states the exact opposite of what you claim.
Not only matter but even information makes unstable and is thought to make black holes collapse.
@@gabrielepierattelli3948 over vast amounts of time, though, right? Regarding volume versus mass, think of those classical images you see of what appears to be a large star next to a black hole, with the side of the star closest to the event horizon being sucked (stretched, spaghettified) into it. I think that is a very accurate way to depict it. I just don't think you could shoot an object directly into a black hole and have it suddenly "plug the hole " as it were. The fabric of spacetime near a black hole is way too warped. Imagine spacetime as a grid that's lightly curved. Stuff travels on that grid fairly smoothly, so long as the lines are relatively smooth. If you are matter or energy and you are traveling along that grid and that grid starts to bend and break and collapse inward onto itself , you will not be able to fall unchallenged into the black hole. You will probably be decimated and ripped apart before you ever got close. An object couldn't plug the "hole" because its not just a hole in the grid, not even a hole at all. Imagine the path an object takes into the event horizon as a single lane road. Imagine your vehicle is the object that is falling (driving) into the event horizon. You have two sides of the road: left and right. Those sides or borders are part of the spacetime grid. They are straight or slightly curved until the ridiculously strong gravity near the event horizon begins completely warping them in every way. Sometimes the left side of the road gets distorted and bent and folded in onto the right side. The right side veers off and twists around the left. How do you travel smoothly along a road that twists and folds and has loop de loops and portions where the left becomes the right and simultaneously is the bottom and top, while also being none of those at all? You could never hope to get to the center before being destroyed, unless you were somehow traveling in such a way that could fix the warped spacetime around you as you traveled. With that said...am I confused about your point? I'm trying to understand. Cheers.
Also what Brian doesn't mention is it takes a huge amount of energy to make and maintain it!
More specifically, it requires exotic matter/energy, which we don’t have any evidence of existing thus far.
If time machines were possible, the first thing that would happen when you turned it on would be a message coming through to turn it off
Just like crossing ocean currents can create a vortex, perhaps overlapping atomic swirls in special places within the universe can create stable "invisible" wormholes.
Sadly I'm not a physisist, so my knowledge are my own. ❤
But then again, how stable would it be? It would probebly be stable enought to boost matter between dimensions.
Somehow it makes sense what you are telling...
If you’re not a physicist, you don’t have any knowledge on the subject. Your ideas and opinions may be your own - but they are not “knowledge”.
@@Tenly2009 like a none scientists, never searching for evolution but rather stay in history, the uncanny valley, consciousness stronger than yourself litle atom.
Point is, timeline not singular but rather in evolution, but you could devolve, depends...
My knowledge goes from the pree Universe when darkness and time roamed as buddies untill the present time with future insight, what about you?
@@timhising3716 Me? No. I’m not delusional.
@@Tenly2009 The flow of time being infinite, much like darkness, suggesting a deep connection between consciousness and the universe. If consciousness evolved within time, it might have developed the ability to perceive and interact with the darkness, perhaps as a means of understanding the unknown or the void.
Consciousness is not static; rather, it undergoes transformations, much like energy in the universe. Each cycle represent a learning experience, contributing to the greater evolution of consciousness over time.
When atoms are destroyed, their energy returns to a natural state, ready to begin the cycle of evolution anew.
The consciousness that an atom could have would be way larger than mine. If we think about spectrums-not just the visible spectrum-it’s a totally different experience altogether, but perhaps with the same consciousness. It’s just stretched in a totally different way.
The idea of consciousness stretching in relation to the speed of light suggests a profound connection between our perception of reality and the fundamental laws of the universe.
This perspective implies that every action and interaction at the atomic level resonates through spacetime, potentially influencing the evolution of consciousness itself.
Perhaps abit scary for some, experiencing reality as it is.
Well im no genius but when i look at the poles of the earth and the electromagnetic fields around earth... it really reminds me of the 3d diagram of wormholes so i think what we are talking about is can you pass the atomic code along electrical currents and keep them identicle upon the other side. Visual thought only.
It would be good and bad to be that smart . Good because everyone looks up to you but bad because you know everything is impossible , if sort of kills dreams
Well, caves as holes in mountains can be unstable. Holes in the ground are often unstable. So, you have to stablize that which is unstable in order to safely travel through it.
Okay, time travel is science fiction.
But, likely an electromagnetic field or energy may stablize a wormhole. A constant collisions of particles against a platform, which would collode with quantum particles of apace itself could staize an event horizon.
Traversable wormholes would allow faster than light speed travel, not time travel.
You can't go through a blackhole maybe because its a solid object that grinds down objects to elemental level.
🎉... wormholes don't need as large as always pictured. We want an entire human being to pass thru at once. Maybe that's not the case at all. Star Trek wormholes disassemble the being and reassemble at the other end. So the wormholes never collapse or disappear but hold the fabric of space together...🎉
A stable hole in the quantum foam would open up some crazy possibilities. Time to build that self-adjusting dimmer switch that scans the atomic energies of what's passing through the wormhole to calibrate as needed. lol.
Though we dont know much about wormholes what if in future we can create them momentarily enough for things and information to pass because even now humans create things to do things which cant be done naturally like vacuum chambers , pressure chambers etc.
Though we may not live long enough to know everything about wormholes
Information is light in this explanation? If light behaves as both wave and particle simultaneously, are we transmitting just waves, so we are not actually transmitting, thus becoming unstable? Supposed the wave(s) were transmitted at the point of collapse, the reaction or effect will be bounced back via another wormhole no?
According to current knowledge, there is no way to create such a tunnel, because the only way is to fall into a black hole and... be thrown out of a white hole. However, Prof. Hawking proved that only single photons fall out of a black hole. Therefore, no material teleportation is possible.
If a wormhole is opposite of black hole , then it repels any gravity, which means nothing with any mass can enter into it.
ÀqQAAàtn.
😅
Wormholes aren't opposites of black holes as far as I know
White holes are the opposite of black holes - wormholes are not the opposite of anything.
Except it’s not the opposite 😂 This is basic shit.
The opposite of a wormhole is a anti-parasitichole.
If wormholes become unstable when something goes through it then they can't exist because the instant they open automatically something will go through just given the noise in space.
basically for a wormhole you need to stabilize it first
They're actually now starting to theorize that the universe is made up of wormholes, like a quilt. Brian Greene talks about it with Neil de grasse tyson
When I was a kid I saw a real life portal in a room someone opened it. It was like hurricane Katrina trapped in a room
What if... going through, disrupts particles and dark matter. Resulting in like a water pooling affect drawing the hole closed. If only we had a way to not disrupt to current....
If time travel was ever possible, why has no one came back here from the future
How do you know they don't?
As someone who lives in 2024, I don't want to live in 2024, so I would not come back to this time if I could.
That's why
Maybe that Metallica concert in Russia was 100,000 Russians and 900,000 time travellers.
The dancing was certainly a bit weird.
And maybe the ludicrously huge amount of hot-dogs sold at Jesus's crucifixion is evidence of such?
You can travel in the future but not backwards .
Hey may not exist in nature, but one day we’ll build one
Hmm. Shining light through a wormhole that ends up going in a feedback loop. That's light going "faster" than light faster and faster. Physics is crazy 🤯
Sounds like when you put your finger in the whirlpool around the plug when you’re draining a bath and the whirlpool disappears
Worm holes and faster than light travel are wonderful superstitions promoted by TV shows
Ironically, a deadass literal interpetation of einstein’s theory of relativity allows for all kinds of crazy stuff which has never been observed
My boys Cooper and TARS now have that information for you.
Isn't Brian Cox' explanation only for wormholes that are from non- spinning black holes with a point singularity? The point singularity in essence has no dimensions. So the resulting wormhole will be correspondingly a line 1D and unstable. Most physicists agree that for spinning black holes, there is a ring singularity and a stable wormhole connecting to a stable white hole. There is no need for quantum theory of gravity.
No, you would need to enter at the same strength of fields as the hole, thus you become invisible to it. Any type of weighted mass or (gravity) would collapse the hole 🕳. VEM =0Msquared. Peace ✌️ 😎.
Instant moving……!!!! A “ think” can be in 2 places….???😊 in every place this “ think” is independent…???😊
WE CAN INDEED TRAVEL THROUGH NOT ONLY SPACE BUT TIME AS WELL AND EVEN JUMP DIMENSIONS
I have 0 knowledge about any of this stuff and I’m high but wouldn’t it be the same as shining a flashlight into the pitch black. The light only goes so far. So in order to make it through a wormhole wouldn’t the “object” for lack of better word have to be really dense or have a lot of energy in order to make it through the worm hole
Isn't gravity an inate property of atoms sum of charges? Wouldn't a wormhole be an extension of this displaying symmetry.
I just watched him on another video state time travel is possible & teleporting so who needs a wormhole
Why do they collapse?
If you can see what’s inside but not yet go through.& of course you want to know where you going . I’m sure you getting feedback not just dark or blank.
Let's work with the postulates of Einstein's theory of relativity.
And if we apply new technologies for this, using the experience of Michelson Morley on the airplane fixing speed 200, 300, 400 m/s., we will see how quantum gravity works. Such measurements are impossible on the satellite due to weightlessness.
Everybody is finding life everywhere in space. But, they are not finding happiness in life
No one has yet found any life anywhere in space.
@@donleavellconsidering there are 2 trillion galaxies in observable universe. For all 2 trillion galaxies, each one has 100 billion stars. Next, one in five stars has an Earth-like planet. That means there are as many as 40 billion Earth-sized planets.
Considering this one and thinking that we are alone is quite ignorant and I could say selfish as well .
@@Gabbbb410 they never said there isn't other life in the universe but that we haven't found any. chill your beans
@@Gabbbb410no … you are right … but we HAVENT FOUND SHIT !! Imagine just IMAGINE if we’re the only ones out of BILLIONS AND BILLIONS . That would make us gods
It’s the universe telling us “Hey, you can’t cheat!”
It can be done, we just can’t do it yet.
Wormholes are everywhere... It's your conscious...
Can you elaborate
i hate to be that guy who just copies a comment he saw, actually no i don't
bro is onto nothing
I more I understand Interstellar movie the more the mind blowing
Oh, this gonna be fixed. Our grandchildren will be coming to visit usl
They have already . They are amongst us
How do you know we need one without knowing what one is
How can one be absolutely sure with theoretical tools?
If time travel is possible surely you’d only be able to travel into the past not the future right?
No only time travel into the future is possible by accelerating to beat the speed of light. The faster you move the slower time goes for you from an observers perspective
Multiverse?
If you can think it, it's possible.
Okay, do it then
If we can create the old warp bubble from Star Trek and avoid linear travel - would we still destabelize the wormhole?
Dann bräuchten wir kein Wormhole. Sinn vom Wormhole ist nicht in die Vergangenheit oder Zukunft zu reisen, das wäre nur rein theoretisch möglich, es geht darum hohe Distanzen zu überwinden.
Beim Warpantrieb, fliegt das Schiff nicht schneller als das Licht. Die Raumzeit wird gekrümmt und damit die Distanz verringert, solange das Schiff in dieser Blase sitzt.
Lt Star Trek gibt es den Subraum, über diesen nicht nur blitzschnell kommuniziert werden kann, sondern der auch wichtig ist bei Warp.
Dieser wird durch die Warpbubble beschädigt, weshalb innerhalb von Klasse M Sonnensystemen eigentlich NUR Impulse (Unterlichtgeschw.) geflogen werden darf.
Ich brauche eigentlich keine Zeitmaschine.
Vielleicht gibts irgendwo den Guardian of forever mot seinem Zeittor.
Ich möchte lieber per Generationenschiff das Universum erkunden, als sein eigenes Schicksal zu verändern.
Mit Warp kann man eh nicht durch ein Wormhole fliegen. Das würde sofort zerstört werden. Das Schiff in der Warpbubble nicht unbedingt. Kommt ganz drauf an, wie sich die Explosion ausbreiten würde.
Auch was am anderen Ende ist. Könnte ja auch ein Black Hole sein, was zuviel Materie aufgenommen hat und die Dark Mater diese wieder abstößt.
Müssten erst ein stabiles Wormhole finden, was auch in beide Richtungen begehbar wäre.
Einen Transphasentorpedo könnte man durch schicken. Der würde sich an sämtliche molokulare Veränderungen anpassen und nicht wie Licht unendlich hin-/und her wandern -> Perpetual Infinity nennt man das glaube ich.
Can you have two wormholes working simultaneously but “spin” in opposite axis
Those forces might hold it open
I travel into the future in my dreams and so I suspect everything happens all at once, time is an illusion.
I have a lot of wormholes in my backyard. Feel free to dive in... Bring your other scientific friends as well.
To use a wormhole and reach the other side you would have to figure out how to fall through a maelstrom and not interrupt the vortex. (You may not touch the sides of the vortex and you cannot disrupt the air pressure) also understand that when you figure this out you still won't know how to limit the momentum incurred through, and exiting the wormhole. This would be congruent with turning lightning into directed energy.
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever read from someone trying to sound smart. Actually just gibberish
Guess we're not going to be able to shoot through the galaxy to Andromeda anytime soon
Even if you try and send a little bit of light through that makes no sense because in theory that would mean that all the stars that are giving off light that head in that direction would cause it to collapse unless there's something I'm missing actually there's probably a lot I'm missing I'm pretty stupid
Not only do we not have a theory of Quantum Gravity we don’t have a correct theory of ordinary gravity. It has been shown by careful experiments that gravity is a repulsive force blocked by mass. This was done by carrying out the classical Cavendish at increasing depths. The deeper you go the lesser value of Big “G”, the “Universal “Gravitational “Constant “.
Might be a different story with neutrinos, they might not be affected by it
So, stray starlight that is everywhere doesn’t collapse it but ‘trying to send light through”, does?
Eh?
Mean while some youtubers are doing lectures on time travel
Which interview is this?
Joe Rogan Experience
Since its not really like the movies , you don't travel through an actual wormhole , the event horizon on your end is the event horizon on the other end , the moment you enter one side you simply exit the other , two seperate points in space occupying the same point , there would be no time for it to collapse ! Instant transfer, one horizon not two at each end !
You say the instant you enter the event horizon you exit (no time for it to collapse). Ok but what if, the instant you enter the event horizon it collapses? No wormhole, no two points in the same place, no time for you to exit the other side.
Both outcomes are equally as plausible to occur right? Thats the thing about events occurring instantly, we don't understand priority (what happens first?).
@@RabidxDog yes , but , zero time is zero , no time at all , the event horizon has no thickness at all , a collapse is a process of distance over time . But I see your point . Sort of ,
The tourist may be interdimensional being and we can't see them unless they allow us to.
It’s because of the warp
We need to make education free an available to allow a genius to come up with an answer
You need more than a genius. I’m a genius and I don’t have a clue. Geniuses are a dime a dozen. Two out of every 100 people are genius by definition. You need a once in a generation SUPER GENIUS to have a chance at figuring this stuff out.
Send voyager 3. That be interesting😂
Maybe. But what if you entered the other side. You’re showing a simulation that enters one side. What about the other side.
I need to speak to Brian Cox, I got a theory or more a hypothesis about Gravity. I Belive I know what gravity really is, which means you can at least travel speed of light, outside the laws of nature and mass effect.
Gravity moves at same speed of light, because lights limited in speed. because of gavitys effect.
You can write and submit papers to professors at universities. Cox isn’t the only person thinking about this stuff. You could also just write to him.