Odysseus: America’s First Moon Landing in Half a Century
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- Witness history in the making as America returns to the Moon after 52 years! Join us as we delve into the triumphs, challenges, and future of the groundbreaking Odysseus mission!
![FendiDa Rappa - Clock Dat ft. Shamar Marco [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3NBU8KHdxYY/mqdefault.jpg)
About fucking time you upload on here again!! I'm a long long time viewer of your many glorious channels! Early Megaprojects viewer and then I found Sideprojects. And an OGBB! Brain Blaze has changed and grown so much. I'm so glad you didn't stay with the Business Blaze theme. I do miss the ba dum tsss and the script slapping. Anyways, I love this direction. The space and alien stuff, I'm into that shit. Science Unbound, I forget what it used to be atm, I love it too. We need more, preferably a little longer content. Like maybe 20-25 min videos. The topics are just so interesting. Anyway, your attitude helps distract me from my life at work. Keep up the great work Simon "The boy with the blaze" Whister and all the writers and editers andeverone else that make these videos possible! Much love from TN, u.s.
Astrographics videos always make my day.
Nice to see we're finally going back to the moon again.
Nope, it will be the first time man has set foot on the moons surface.
Ask yourself, if NASA cannot successfully land an unmanned Lander in 2024 how did they safely land men on the moon nearly 60 years ago?!?!?
@@SirNecroleave the grownups to talk.
@@iniquity123 bwahahaha.. 2 failed attempts in 2024 when they supposedly put multiple missions on the surface of the moon between 50 an 55 years ago.
Time to stop drinking the cool aid my man
@SirNecro you're an idiot bud, but too stupid to comprehend it.
@@SirNecro With a far bigger budget, far more safety measures (higher cost) and local ability to adjust course rather than watching from the ground.
Counter-question(s): If NASA couldn't actually land people on the moon 55 years ago and instead simply pretended to, why did they pretend to do it five times rather than one? And why did they pretend one of them ended in failure? And why did the USSR not call them out on it when they were no doubt watching NASA's every move in space?
Yay new space Astrographics ! Glad to see Simon hasnt given up with this channel
Probably could have done without the junk onboard...
one thing i personal would love to see is the apollo landing site if its there so we can show those who belive the moonlanding was fake and it have to be live
That would be a complete waste of time and money.
First, we've already got photos of it from orbit. But secondly and more importantly, what would the point be? It couldn't accomplish any scientific goals. It would take time and resources from the mission, making that mission less effective. It would add other potential failure points to said mission. So why bother?
No one with more then two functioning brain cells doubts the moon landings. Trying to photo them provides no benefits, adds risk, and costs tons of extra money, all while reducing the missions scientific value. For what? To prove something we all already know? To try and shut up the deniers, who besides being sub human scum not worth any consideration for anything, would all just deny it anyway, and claim it was faked? It has no value or point.
The same people would probably just claim that the new footage was fake.
You cannot reason someone out of a decision they didn't reason themselves into. In other words stupid is as stupid does.
Heck yes, another Astrographics!
Love this channel.
You need to advertise on the others.
Had to search for it.
RUclips didn't suggest it to me
As always thank you guys for the content, very happy you guys made the plunge to make this channel finally.
How many millions was spent on this thing just to fall over on its side ?
Nothing was spent compared to the Apollo program. That's the point of this program genius. A lot of probes. They won't all work but they are cheap enough that if a few works they will return multiple times their cost worth of data.
@@kkloikok lol ok Smart One. If we landed men on the moon with 1960’s technology and with our smart phones having more ability then the computers of the day. Why can’t they land a simple probe on the moon without the thing falling over ??? Or have we lost all the technology from the 60’s like the lost technology from the pyramids?? 🤔🤔🤔
Nobody lost the technology to build pyramids lol.
I'm sure the US could do apollo again, if it wanted to blow nearly 2% of its GDP on it. Also, it helped to have a pilot landing it in real time.
They didn't lose the technology*. They lost the budget.
*yes, there's that quote people bang on about; admittedly, it's true they no longer have the expertise to code those hand-wired computers. Fortunately, we have better ones now.
Can't wait for the conspiracy theories for this.
Every time I open YT and see an Astrographics video I know I'm gonna learn something cool 😎
Definitely one of my favorite Fact Boi channels. Made my day to see a new video.
Embry Riddle would make a good topic for its own video on this channel. It is a unique institution.
Didnt this thing like shit a brick?
All that money and effort, just for it to fall over? Lol
Love this channel. Simon you've done it again!
I thought a super villain stole the moon in 2010.
Yes, and I'm now renting it out to idiots like Elon Musk
@@leighpowell1062Gru put it back
Better get your foil hat!!
Don't. I don't want to acknowledge that it's been that long since it came out. I'm already getting too old too fast xD
Why the sudden boom in moon missions lately?🤔 Has It become cheaper or something?
Yes. For about 10 years now launch costs have been tumbling down.
@@Mike-ls1he also for about the same amount of time NASA's been having new space suits designed, ones that they hope will be more resistant to tearing from lunar dust and easier to move in. Soon we'll be mining cheese!
To low earth orbit, space shuttle was $54k/kg, falcon 9 is closer to $1.5k/kg.
Not sure on cost to moon, but I'm sure it has gone the same way.
SpaceX has been a game changer
‘Unexplained Magentism’?
Like TMA-1 from ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’??😮
Seriously, I was born right at Apollo 17, and I hope to live long enough to see people got not just to the Moon, but Mars too.
Fact Boy time! 💪🍻
Copyright Perry Dowd
This will come to be known as The Voyager Effect, The Voyager Syndrome, The Princess Dian... No! Wait! (that one's illegal).
But seriously, these little sentinels really have a habit of serving above and beyond.
How the hell did I not know about this channel!!??
Love this channel
America hasn’t gone back to the Moon until a human has. Robots do not count.
Eventually we’ll be robots, so y not now? lol
Gold standard?
The team did some tremendous things (so did Astrobotic) and deserve lots of credit, but let’s not go overboard. The spacecraft still had horizontal speed at touchdown and flipped over.
The 1966 vintage Surveyor spacecraft stuck the landing on 5 out of 7 tries and it didn’t even have a computer on board.
We seem to be patting ourselves on the back for being almost as proficient as we were 58 years ago.
It's funny how Americans dramatize even their failure. Imagine if they successfully stick the landing
I was in high school the last time a man set foot on the moon. I am a senior citizen. Now, the first US based landing since then (unmanned) fell on its side. Where is the rotating commercial space station and moon base envisioned in 2001 A Space Oddesy?
We could of gone back to the moon at anytime. Honestly, I think it's a waste of time and money doing so. Funny how after China announced they were going to the moon, America had to be like; us too!🙄
Great vid. The 2024 landing has been delayed due to safety concerns.
Цікаве та пізнавальне відео
Дякую ❤️
I bet the next generation of billion dollar moon landers will have wider legs so they don't fall over the instant they land.
Now we can spend billions to send jeff up there to stand it back up.
Great work getting this out so quickly. Thank you 🙏
I like to know if say NASA, space x and all the others share data or if each have to learn on their own how to do things
I still question how they pick where south or north pole is, I know someone picked where earth 7 poles are
Why do all these space things keep falling over?
So we are going to be throwing all of our junk at the moon now and just leaving it there. For science
It fell over. Is it related to Biden by any chance??
First
Wasn’t a really good design though
So, how did they get the video of it? Unreal.
Im not holding my breath. Ive been told were going back to the Moon every 5 years for the past 20 years.
Yeah but now China are doing it, so it's a bit of a hurry
that thumbnail needs to be rotated 90°
Make a video on the VIPER rover
Please make a video on Eta Carinae!
"We're Whalers on the Moon"
Its not actually the 1 st moon lander in this century as chandrayan of india made the landing
As did SLIM and a bunch of Chinese landers. This is the first commercially produced lander and the first American landing of the century. It's amazing how quickly we've gone from two nations making soft landings to five.
By the way, IM2 will contain a Finnish rover. Israel will probably try again next year.
And it does tricks
Well done Evan.
11kms took me a while to really get how fast that actually is as, I'm not used to seeing speeds as that so initially didn't seem that fast until the seconds part registered properly. It's 30.000kmh which for some reason seems so much more impressive.
Unlike gymnastics, the ship must "stick the landing". If the mission had a living crew, they would be marooned. At least, the Odysseus mission is part of the learning curve. Perhaps the lesson learned was "landing a craft on an unprepared surface should have a lower center of mass." But, the mission gets gold stars for the items that did work.
another channel!
7:30 If ONLY the landing legs had been able to absorb the shock and then rebound, would surely have worked better than breakable legs.
"That's one small step for Simon........ one giant leap for Simon-kind..............." ;)
Simon Bro , how many channels do you have, GOD DAMN
I’m glad we went back to the moon.
Oh shit. I thought it was the Japanese lunar probe that had flopped on its side, id misunderstood the details when the story originally broke.
9:05 it was. Or rather also was. They both landed on their side 😅
@@MakeOrBreakSocietyAlthough the Japanese craft was supposed to tip over on its side, just not the side it tipped over on. Despite that, it's done what it's supposed to do and more. If the next lander also tips over, it becomes a tradition.
Why all the art junk? That space and weight can be used on something more important, such as a scientific instrument. I think the moon aliens can wait to see the artsy stuff for another day.
Another channel Simon…..ok fine. I’ll sub. I don’t have 5 hours a day to watch you on my phone dude.
Why do you speak soooo fast. Relax bro😄. I can't catch you
Yhea I agree I think it's because that's what he does virtually all day all week. If you watch his old stuff I'm pretty sure he wasn't as fast as he is now. Not just be easier to listen along and process but would help him make his videos a bit longer which would improve his watch time as people aren't any more or less likely to finish the video early due to him talking a little slower. You're either interested and will finish or your not an extra minute or so won't change anything.
You mean the failed mission that crashed
NASA, not NASER.
With all this drama,how am I to believe this wasn't also hand crafted by Stanley Kubrik ?