WHO predicts global cancer rates will rise more than 75% by 2050
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 янв 2024
- The World Health Organization (WHO) has come forward with some grim new statistics about the prevalence of cancer across society.
An estimated 20 million new cancer cases and close to 10 million deaths were reported globally in 2022, according to the WHO.
Lung cancer was the deadliest type of cancer, resulting in 1.8 million deaths worldwide.
The health agency is also predicting that more than 35 million new cancer cases will be detected by 2050 - an increase of 77 per cent from 2022.
Global’s Joe Scarpelli breaks down the reasons behind these staggering statistics.
For more info, please go to globalnews.ca/news/10262633/c...
Subscribe to Global News Channel HERE: bit.ly/20fcXDc
Like Global News on Facebook HERE: bit.ly/255GMJQ
Follow Global News on Twitter HERE: bit.ly/1Toz8mt
Follow Global News on Instagram HERE: bit.ly/2QZaZIB
#GlobalNews #who #cancer
Not difficult to foresee the results of mRNA vaccines against COVID.
Wow! I'm suprised your comment isn't hidden. Truth!!!!
One could just as easily say:"Not difficult to forsee the results of catching covid."
@@rosssmith8481catching a vax is all u need worry about I think
They're not predicting it , they're facilitating it .
From mRNA damage.
Gee, I wonder why... 🤔 💉
The big reset. The sheep trusted their government and now they’ll pay the ultimate price.
I bet you support Trump though eh? 😂🤣
@@bobwoods1302and you undoubtedly support Trudeau. Which is worse by far. Eh
Big scary drama teacher eh? 🤣😂@@jamescross6109
I see this argument a lot, and it confuses me. Why would they kill their sheep?
Wouldn’t it make more sense if the jab were meant to protect the sheep from something to come at a later date?
Get rid of all the people that listen to you? Great Idea 😂@@firstandforemost87
Due to MRNA VACS
The NIH ( National institute of health ) posted this regarding cancer and mrna vaccines, however it is hard to know who or what to trust today however this is what the science says : Recent research suggests that therapeutic mRNA vaccines represent a novel and intriguing immune-based approach as a potential treatment for existing cancer. Lessons learned during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have provided practical insights as we seek to study and introduce these agents in clinical trials of our patients with cancer.
While cancer vaccines have been under investigation for decades, unique features of mRNA position mRNA vaccines as promising therapies. Following injection into the patient, lipophilic particles containing specified mRNA sequences of interest are taken up by antigen presenting cells, upon which mRNA transcripts are translated into the desired epitopes for immune recognition3. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, such constructs have been designed to target the spike protein of the virus particles, and early studies in oncology have successfully generated vaccines informed by tumour whole-exome sequencing to identify the most (bioinformatically predicted) immunogenic neoantigens - unique for each patient - as a personalized therapeutic vaccine4. Recognition of these engineered neoepitopes upon antigen presenting cell-helper (CD4+) T cell interactions triggers activation of cellular and humoral immunity alike. In contrast to immune checkpoint blockade therapies that target PD1, PDL1 or CTLA4 and that have revolutionized oncology over the past decade via modulation of T cell-mediated antitumour immunity5, mRNA vaccines are capable of attacking ‘non-self’ cancer cells via induction of T cells and B cells alike.
Understanding the fundamentals of mRNA biology may help us to dispel misconceptions regarding the safety of these vaccines as we evaluate their use as possible cancer treatments. There have been no substantiated occurrences of disruption and/or integration of mRNA into the host genome by vaccine nucleotides. Real-world experience from now hundreds of millions of people globally treated with approved mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have substantiated the favourable safety and tolerability of this class of agents. These reassuring safety data for SARS-CoV-2 increase our confidence in the safety of therapeutic strategies for cancer as well.
TRUTH
Ridiculous!!!
So WHO is concerned about modeled predictions, but ignores the excess deaths that are happening right now?
An average death rate of 18,250 dead per day since the V 💉💉💉 Rollout.
77% ....same as who took the juice
Why would the government kill off all the people who listen to them? They will just be left with the people who dont listen to them.
Any chance they mentioned it was due to a certain vaccination?
You can't predict this type of thing, unless you are involved in the cause of it. Come on, people, think.
"They say cancer doesn't discriminate.....which is nice of it I guess" -Norm MacDonald
Dead?!
I didn't even know he was sick!
Rest in peace Norm MacDonald.
Turbo rising, eh?
Very effective.
You might even say that it's... ...safe and effective. 💉
Wonder what could have caused this? 💉
Probably Putin or Iran
Because of the safe and effective vaccine.
100% bro!
Omg!!!😂
Im not surprised after so many were coerced into taking the spike protein juice. Now big pharma will celebrating all over again
They were celebrating the cull before they released the spike juice.
Protein folding failure results in cancer
What causes protein folding failure ?
Prions....the spike protein is made of prions😌
17000 people died from cancer in On waiting for life saving surgery. Let’s not talk about how good cancer treatment in On.
True!
💉💉💉💉
I just clicked on the video to read the ‘it was the vaccine’ comments. 😂😏
tabaco and alcohol have been consumed for centuries. what changed? what happened? you know it
Both are on the decline, btw.
Fukushima 2011
Now they have a generational money maker.....
The WHO should probably tell people to stop eating processed food and sugar and get back to eating whole food. There, I've solved the problem.
I completely agree. Eat cancer promoting processed food and you will have higher risk of cancer
Eating “Whole Foods” and refusing to eat the tasty but ultra processed garbage is the biggest part of the solution. People are only just starting to wake up to the truth.
@@Another-Address $10 here buys you a decent steak. Pan-fry it for 10 minutes, one good meal.
@@Another-Address
Why do you have that privilege?
The thing is, its not just food. There are a lot of other factors that can trigger cancer mutations like sound, UV to mention a few. Why do you think rich ppl live so far from civilization? I would not be surprised if the higher rates come from city folk and ppl who live close to TV/radio/phone towers or centers with high frequency noices.
The WHO has proposed a Phase-2 Covid study in China 🇨🇳, including into the Wuhan labs.
- What happened to that?
Thanks to the clot shots Turbo cancers are increasing in huge numbers
More great news from your trusted organization.
Matthew 24 is playing out
All planned
Hmmm I wonder why... How many of you know someone personally who was cancer-free in rwmision. took the shots and boom back like a bat from hell and died?
My moms story exactly. Only one in the family who took the juice. Only one in the family with turbo cancer.
Get revenge. It was the shot and it was intentional.@@davidlopan9614
I feel sorry for people who buy frozen shrimp and prawns in the supermarket.
Most of it comes from 2 countries Vietnam and India, and sometimes from other foriegn countries never from here. And they are loaded with anti-biotics. Which means, and it was already proven in labs on marketplace, that if you get a serious or even minor infection in the future, no anti-biotics will help.
Thats nasty
Like they planed it.
🥴🤦🏼♀️
Gee i wonder why
Then bring out the F in cure we all know exists!!
Do you mean the cure that even the most rich and powerful people don't get? 😂
Nah. Now they have a permanent money supply.
@@bobwoods1302 Yes. That F in one! And have and still do believe they have the cure.
If they ever released it the pharmaceutical, research, and many other industries would go under!
If they did you'll accuse the cure of causing cancer
@@Acts-1915 There isn’t a sole on this earth that’ll change my mind! They’ve been fundraising since the 60’s for sure! They’ve got it!
Jabs? Anyone?
It’s safe, and effective.
I'm sure there is a cure but they ain't gonna let the Pharmaceutical companies go out of business...
All I'll say is this he who seeks shall find
But whata causing this? Only smoking, alcohol, obesity, or something else...
They already have .
Jabby jab jab .
WHO warns global cancer burden growing, with 77% spike in cases expected by 2050
There were estimated 20M new cancer cases, 9.7M deaths in 2022, says UN agency's latest report
Not safe, not effective... and it passes on to your future children. *slow clap*
The fasting cure. Thanks Mr Sinclair.
Tobacco
Alcoholism
Obesity
Insulin resistance
Vitamin Deficiencies
But of course most comments will ignore those risk factors and instead will focus on vaccinations. No wonder the rates continue to rise.
"A nice little ancillary benefit"
Of course they do. Because they mean to see to it.
That’s because of the shots…duh
Just in time to sell the newfound cure at exorbitant prices.
Wow 😯 this is not Good this should Stop 🛑 anytime soon 🔜
How strange can it be....
Unbelievable!
Don't believe everything...
It's stress and medications
I don't know, who?
Gee, I wonder why? Let's unpack this,.🤔🤔
Aren’t they looking into a cure for 30 years now?
Hello..... Connect the dots. You have an unvaccinated control group. There is a genius award out there for the taking.
Am unvaccinated here.
@@irenegea7644wtf would listen to WHO. Pushing the biggest poison in history then ignoring the elephant in the room. Laughable…I’m with u unvaxed.
Thanks to mRNA jabs.
Hmm. I wonder why....🥴
Which part of the globe? We care for Canadian lives, then everyone else.
Hmm bathing in 5g millimeter waves... What could go wrong?
I LIKE DANIELLE RODIN
That'll make for some nice partying at Davos over the coming years, eh ladies (whoops wrong chat)
5g
what..they doing have a booster for that.
🙏🌍☮💛🦁🐾
💉🧐
Let’s give more money for research