At first I was kind of skeptic because of the video quality but it was very well explained and easy to follow. I'm glad I found this because so far it seems like the best resource for learning Discrete Structures! Thank You!
@randerson112358, my bad after 3 more hours of studying I figured out you can set (q^p) to represent a variable itself then you can use the implication you used.
Domination Law states: p V T = T and p ^ F = F Here is a video showing the laws of equivalence. ruclips.net/video/PtfHvnHJTXg/видео.html As for p->q, that is a conditional statement p->q = -p V q Thanks for watching; randerson112358
How would you use a tautology to show a logical expression is a contradiction? So (P -> Q) ~(~P \/ Q). Prove that is a contradiction using (P \/ ~P) is a tautology.
Domination Law states: p V T = T and p ^ F = F Here is a video showing the laws of equivalence. ruclips.net/video/PtfHvnHJTXg/видео.html I also see your question about p->q, that is a conditional statement p->q = -p V q Thanks for watching; randerson112358
my brain hurts...I don't get it...more specifically the laws and what happens with those laws. Because all my teacher gave me was the laws and that's it...
Hey! can you HELP me with this tautology problem. I cant figure it out. I watched you video on Tautology but Im still stumped on this problem ((p→q)∧¬q)→ ¬p I have to prove that it's a tautology. The same thing you did in the video
Thank you. You helped me more than my boring discrete math teacher.
At first I was kind of skeptic because of the video quality but it was very well explained and easy to follow. I'm glad I found this because so far it seems like the best resource for learning Discrete Structures! Thank You!
Good stuff. I completely understand the laws the only problem is that I never know when to use what laws
Hey- thanks for the vid! What do you think is the best way to learn this material fluently? I wanna glide through this like you!
You make it look so easy :(
Thanks man you widen my understand....
Glad I could help Asong !
Thank you very much,this helps me a lot in my assignment
Glad the video helped!
Yes it is, thank you ❤
thx man that was really helpful!
Thank u for u help, you clarified it a lot
This is so helpful thank u
Glad it was helpful to you!
Thank you so much!
Thanks for the comment and for watching the video !
After the identity law at (q ^ p) --> q why do you use the implication law and how do you get ~(q ^ p) v q?
isn't implication law p -> q = ~p v q ? I must be missing something because I don't see how its related
You're right, he got it wrong. So frustrated I broke my pencil cause it wasn't making any sense
What exactly is wrong ?
@randerson112358, my bad after 3 more hours of studying I figured out you can set (q^p) to represent a variable itself then you can use the implication you used.
I think what you call the domination law is also called the annulment law.
Thank you very much.
thanks.....it help to know tautology step by step
at 3:56 you place the negation sign outside the parenthesis. Why is it not inside like in the first step?
Thanks so much bro
Glad you enjoyed the video!
I am glad I am doing this one right! but my assignments one are more challenging! ... contingency ...
Negation? Looks like complement property to me for the negation after distributive
thank you so much that was so super..but i didnt get why at 1:20 we changed the → to ∨ ??? I mean what is the main point of implication?
Domination Law states: p V T = T and p ^ F = F
Here is a video showing the laws of equivalence.
ruclips.net/video/PtfHvnHJTXg/видео.html
As for p->q, that is a conditional statement p->q = -p V q
Thanks for watching;
randerson112358
randerson112358 THANK you very much now its all clear
Thank you so much for helping with us
Thanks watching !
thanks dude
Great job
Thank you Knight!
yo, can yu explain to me the first identity law that you used? how can it get rid of the whole F V ?
Which law are you talking about ?
@@randerson112358 from 2:21 on, why does it become F and what is the law that takes rid of the F?
Thanks. It was very helpful for me.
Thanks for watching Javed, I am glad this video was helpful !
How would you use a tautology to show a logical expression is a contradiction? So (P -> Q) ~(~P \/ Q). Prove that is a contradiction using (P \/ ~P) is a tautology.
Thanks a lot
Thanks for watching Ankit, I am glad my video was useful.
What is Domination Law? Could you explain please
Domination Law states: p V T = T and p ^ F = F
Here is a video showing the laws of equivalence.
ruclips.net/video/PtfHvnHJTXg/видео.html
I also see your question about p->q, that is a conditional statement p->q = -p V q
Thanks for watching;
randerson112358
randerson112358 thank you alot
its other name is Universal bound law
Thank you professor. Really good video I needed this.
+Jesse Rosenthal thanks , but I am not a professor
+Jesse Rosenthal thanks , but I am not a professor
Oh okay I really appreciate the video it's helping a lot of people. We lots more videos as much as you can deliver. Thank you again.
Thank you again for the kind comment.
can you show for 3 proposition?
Great help for assignment
Thanks for watching !
Thank u it was really helpfull
thanks alot very helpful
Thanks Jose, I am glad the video was helpful for you.
tq u .....my teacher
Thank u. It is helpful
+peace brown thanks for watching
Awesome
Thanks sir.I m understand.
Thank u sir..
Thanks for watching!
my brain hurts...I don't get it...more specifically the laws and what happens with those laws. Because all my teacher gave me was the laws and that's it...
Thank you sir
Thank You :)
Thank you Aubrey ! I hope the video was helpful.
Thanks bro ❤️❤️
Thanks for watching!
Sir please explain PDNF please sir
Luvhhh uhhh so much Sir...
From India❤
U are a great teacher❤
Thank you Chanchal for the very kind comment.
HY SOME ONE TELL ME HINDI OR URDU LANGUAGE WEBSITE FOR DISCREATE MATH TO SOLVE THIS EQUATIONN
Good Sir,
Thank you !
Thanks
Thanks for watching Bala !
Thank you babe
Identity law kaya ha
help me. I cant do my assignment.
nice
My name is aven l am kurdish thank you help me about matmatical
omg this is the exact problem I am doing. praise jesus! lol
+Im The Real Tammy gonna that is fortunate.
Hey! can you HELP me with this tautology problem. I cant figure it out. I watched you video on Tautology but Im still stumped on this problem ((p→q)∧¬q)→ ¬p I have to prove that it's a tautology. The same thing you did in the video
P->(Q->P).show that its a tautology
I can’t understand this stuff 😭
Confucius said: 'He who says he can and he who says he can't are both usually right,'
S
Thank you soo much!