Prove the Logical Expression Tautology

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024

Комментарии • 95

  • @martinvadakara7759
    @martinvadakara7759 8 лет назад +52

    Thank you. You helped me more than my boring discrete math teacher.

  • @boo89100
    @boo89100 8 лет назад +5

    At first I was kind of skeptic because of the video quality but it was very well explained and easy to follow. I'm glad I found this because so far it seems like the best resource for learning Discrete Structures! Thank You!

  • @PbaTv7
    @PbaTv7 5 лет назад +1

    Good stuff. I completely understand the laws the only problem is that I never know when to use what laws

  • @sben125
    @sben125 4 года назад +1

    Hey- thanks for the vid! What do you think is the best way to learn this material fluently? I wanna glide through this like you!

  • @ashwinraj5826
    @ashwinraj5826 6 лет назад +10

    You make it look so easy :(

  • @tintinu1
    @tintinu1 3 года назад +1

    Thanks man you widen my understand....

  • @exoluxx9853
    @exoluxx9853 4 года назад +1

    Thank you very much,this helps me a lot in my assignment

  • @orabylaikhan
    @orabylaikhan 3 года назад +1

    thx man that was really helpful!

  • @noacajila3906
    @noacajila3906 2 года назад

    Thank u for u help, you clarified it a lot

  • @so-2751
    @so-2751 2 года назад +1

    This is so helpful thank u

  • @JjOng-ef9kf
    @JjOng-ef9kf 3 года назад +2

    Thank you so much!

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  3 года назад

      Thanks for the comment and for watching the video !

  • @S1ikk3
    @S1ikk3 6 лет назад +2

    After the identity law at (q ^ p) --> q why do you use the implication law and how do you get ~(q ^ p) v q?

    • @S1ikk3
      @S1ikk3 6 лет назад +1

      isn't implication law p -> q = ~p v q ? I must be missing something because I don't see how its related

    • @cloudboysmusic5223
      @cloudboysmusic5223 6 лет назад

      You're right, he got it wrong. So frustrated I broke my pencil cause it wasn't making any sense

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  6 лет назад

      What exactly is wrong ?

    • @cloudboysmusic5223
      @cloudboysmusic5223 6 лет назад +2

      @randerson112358, my bad after 3 more hours of studying I figured out you can set (q^p) to represent a variable itself then you can use the implication you used.

  • @RedRebel8
    @RedRebel8 6 лет назад

    I think what you call the domination law is also called the annulment law.

  • @phumlanimbabela-thesocialc3285
    @phumlanimbabela-thesocialc3285 3 года назад

    Thank you very much.

  • @mdshrabon9817
    @mdshrabon9817 7 лет назад +1

    thanks.....it help to know tautology step by step

  • @thelilteacup
    @thelilteacup 5 лет назад

    at 3:56 you place the negation sign outside the parenthesis. Why is it not inside like in the first step?

  • @dekafmusic
    @dekafmusic 3 года назад +1

    Thanks so much bro

  • @instaminox
    @instaminox 7 лет назад

    I am glad I am doing this one right! but my assignments one are more challenging! ... contingency ...

  • @mrveejayofficial
    @mrveejayofficial 5 лет назад

    Negation? Looks like complement property to me for the negation after distributive

  • @bravek9881
    @bravek9881 7 лет назад

    thank you so much that was so super..but i didnt get why at 1:20 we changed the → to ∨ ??? I mean what is the main point of implication?

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  7 лет назад

      Domination Law states: p V T = T and p ^ F = F
      Here is a video showing the laws of equivalence.
      ruclips.net/video/PtfHvnHJTXg/видео.html
      As for p->q, that is a conditional statement p->q = -p V q
      Thanks for watching;
      randerson112358

    • @bravek9881
      @bravek9881 7 лет назад

      randerson112358 THANK you very much now its all clear

  • @NasriDevLab
    @NasriDevLab 6 лет назад +1

    Thank you so much for helping with us

  • @paolyncabantac3401
    @paolyncabantac3401 3 года назад +1

    thanks dude

  • @Monk3y1993
    @Monk3y1993 5 лет назад +1

    Great job

  • @Sakyawirananda
    @Sakyawirananda 6 лет назад

    yo, can yu explain to me the first identity law that you used? how can it get rid of the whole F V ?

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  6 лет назад

      Which law are you talking about ?

    • @sien2983
      @sien2983 5 лет назад

      @@randerson112358 from 2:21 on, why does it become F and what is the law that takes rid of the F?

  • @javedmatrah
    @javedmatrah 7 лет назад +1

    Thanks. It was very helpful for me.

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  7 лет назад

      Thanks for watching Javed, I am glad this video was helpful !

  • @irSpongstar
    @irSpongstar 6 лет назад

    How would you use a tautology to show a logical expression is a contradiction? So (P -> Q) ~(~P \/ Q). Prove that is a contradiction using (P \/ ~P) is a tautology.

  • @ankitarora495
    @ankitarora495 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks a lot

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  5 лет назад

      Thanks for watching Ankit, I am glad my video was useful.

  • @bravek9881
    @bravek9881 7 лет назад

    What is Domination Law? Could you explain please

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  7 лет назад

      Domination Law states: p V T = T and p ^ F = F
      Here is a video showing the laws of equivalence.
      ruclips.net/video/PtfHvnHJTXg/видео.html
      I also see your question about p->q, that is a conditional statement p->q = -p V q
      Thanks for watching;
      randerson112358

    • @bravek9881
      @bravek9881 7 лет назад

      randerson112358 thank you alot

    • @samiahabiburrehman8975
      @samiahabiburrehman8975 6 лет назад

      its other name is Universal bound law

  • @jesserosenthal9606
    @jesserosenthal9606 8 лет назад

    Thank you professor. Really good video I needed this.

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  8 лет назад

      +Jesse Rosenthal thanks , but I am not a professor

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  8 лет назад

      +Jesse Rosenthal thanks , but I am not a professor

    • @jesserosenthal9606
      @jesserosenthal9606 8 лет назад

      Oh okay I really appreciate the video it's helping a lot of people. We lots more videos as much as you can deliver. Thank you again.

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  8 лет назад

      Thank you again for the kind comment.

  • @iskandarzul6730
    @iskandarzul6730 5 лет назад

    can you show for 3 proposition?

  • @harisahmed4734
    @harisahmed4734 6 лет назад +1

    Great help for assignment

  • @keshara97
    @keshara97 5 лет назад

    Thank u it was really helpfull

  • @josecoverlessons
    @josecoverlessons 5 лет назад +1

    thanks alot very helpful

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  5 лет назад

      Thanks Jose, I am glad the video was helpful for you.

  • @subscribedulu5249
    @subscribedulu5249 6 лет назад

    tq u .....my teacher

  • @husnazainal3228
    @husnazainal3228 7 лет назад +1

    Thank u. It is helpful

  • @reniersteytler1859
    @reniersteytler1859 2 года назад

    Awesome

  • @shahzeb4962
    @shahzeb4962 6 лет назад

    Thanks sir.I m understand.

  • @puttakarthik3239
    @puttakarthik3239 5 лет назад +2

    Thank u sir..

  • @bobtom1495
    @bobtom1495 5 лет назад

    my brain hurts...I don't get it...more specifically the laws and what happens with those laws. Because all my teacher gave me was the laws and that's it...

  • @yolozenemy515
    @yolozenemy515 6 лет назад

    Thank you sir

  • @asu_chae
    @asu_chae 6 лет назад +1

    Thank You :)

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  6 лет назад +1

      Thank you Aubrey ! I hope the video was helpful.

  • @juhaiedhossain1620
    @juhaiedhossain1620 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks bro ❤️❤️

  • @jayashree9346
    @jayashree9346 6 лет назад

    Sir please explain PDNF please sir

  • @supernovaletscreateachange7772
    @supernovaletscreateachange7772 5 лет назад +1

    Luvhhh uhhh so much Sir...
    From India❤
    U are a great teacher❤

  • @sabamustafa-nq3lg
    @sabamustafa-nq3lg 6 лет назад

    HY SOME ONE TELL ME HINDI OR URDU LANGUAGE WEBSITE FOR DISCREATE MATH TO SOLVE THIS EQUATIONN

  • @e-studysphere7256
    @e-studysphere7256 7 лет назад +1

    Good Sir,

  • @balajamal
    @balajamal 6 лет назад +1

    Thanks

  • @mikel27180
    @mikel27180 7 лет назад

    Thank you babe

  • @rsinfotech6792
    @rsinfotech6792 4 года назад

    Identity law kaya ha

  • @jillpole2686
    @jillpole2686 7 лет назад

    help me. I cant do my assignment.

  • @chandrikav9197
    @chandrikav9197 6 лет назад +1

    nice

  • @avinjamal5051
    @avinjamal5051 5 лет назад

    My name is aven l am kurdish thank you help me about matmatical

  • @imtherealtammygonna6216
    @imtherealtammygonna6216 7 лет назад +1

    omg this is the exact problem I am doing. praise jesus! lol

    • @randerson112358
      @randerson112358  7 лет назад

      +Im The Real Tammy gonna that is fortunate.

    • @imtherealtammygonna6216
      @imtherealtammygonna6216 7 лет назад

      Hey! can you HELP me with this tautology problem. I cant figure it out. I watched you video on Tautology but Im still stumped on this problem ((p→q)∧¬q)→ ¬p I have to prove that it's a tautology. The same thing you did in the video

  • @tshephokoolekanye6824
    @tshephokoolekanye6824 6 лет назад

    P->(Q->P).show that its a tautology

  • @KyotePeterson
    @KyotePeterson 4 года назад +1

    I can’t understand this stuff 😭

  • @dbuc4671
    @dbuc4671 2 года назад

    S

  • @SreekantShenoy
    @SreekantShenoy 7 лет назад +1

    Thank you soo much!