Strategic litigation and the rule of law | David Ansara & Mark Oppenheimer

Join FMF CEO David Ansara and Advocate Mark Oppenheimer in this engaging discussion on strategic litigation and the rule of law in South Africa.
David Ansara highlights FMF's mission, policy advocacy, and public interest litigation, emphasising private property rights and economic freedom. Mark Oppenheimer shares insights from high-profile constitutional cases, discussing the importance of non-racialism and legal precedent.
Learn about the challenges and successes of strategic litigation in South Africa and its impact on promoting a free and just society.
Date: 12 April 2024
The FMF would like to thank the Stellenbosch University Law Clinic for hosting this event.
Watch the full discussion: • Strategic litigation a...
========================
🌐 FMF website: www.freemarket...
🙏 Donate to us: www.freemarket...
💼 LinkedIn: / free-market-foundation
👤 Facebook: / fmfsa
🐦Twitter: / fmfsouthafrica
ABOUT THE FMF:
The Free Market Foundation (FMF) is a thinktank and independent public benefit organisation based in Johannesburg, South Africa.
The FMF stands for the right of all individuals to freely pursue their own aspirations without unwanted interference.
Our mission is to promote and defend the principles of individual liberty, private property, free enterprise, and limited government in southern Africa.

[@moonchild7033]

I didn't even get a notification that you were live!

[@halinaleonowicz8038]

Most relevant discussion by legal qualified persons in today reality locallyand internationally. Will try contact you by email, regarding generally to government laws/🤔 rules with unintended consequences but with case attached

[@samanthacaplan5168]

I would like to get in touch with the Opernheimets if you have availability as i dog work with them before. Thank you.

[@philosophy_by_psyche]

@47mins in... I think here David Ansara would do better to focus on the Constitutional language: "access to" is what the state is saddled with ensuring... this is better guaranteed by developing self-sufficiency in the population, obviously- and only really gets engaged directly when you are dealing with disabled and indigent people: which a government could also argue can be more equitably helped by focusing its expenditure of enlarging the tax base, in order to eventually be able to progressively realize the so-called socio-economic rights and guarantees: ironically perhaps, the more indirect the policy interventions are, the better they are at providing people "access to" the various provisions in the Bill of rights.