Debunking Kryptonite Physics
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 апр 2024
- To try everything Brilliant has to offer for free for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Martymer81 or click on the link in the description. You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
ChrisUK, aka Kryptonite Physics, is a flat-earther who has made a video explaining how to debunk his supposed knockdown blow against reality. Naturally, everything he says is wrong. It's so cute when flerfs think they understand physics well enough to prove that physics is inconsistent with physics. LOL!
This video is sponsored by Brilliant.
My Patreon: / martymer81
If you don't like Patreon, you can also make donations to martymer81(at)gmail.com via Paypal!
My Twitter: @MartymerM81
To try everything Brilliant has to offer for free for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Martymer81 or click on the link in the description. You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
Kryptonite failed to include variables in his calculations to account for Frequency and Space Jews.
Well, there's always "plant medicine" to fix this issue
I was really confused until I figured out that most of the "B" were not references to the fish B but to the "Bee".
It was a poor choice of insect, should have gone with a fly.
A bee weighing 30 grams?, that's one gifuckingnormous bee.
me as well
Yeah❗️ A FLYwheel has no ambiguity at all⁉️🤪🤷♂️
single letter variable names in physics, math: 🤩
single letter variable names in computer science: 🤮🤮💀
1 bee doesnt weigh 35 grams. Average bee is 1/10 of 1 gram. 🤣
Ffs they never get even the simplest details correct.
The details are not important to them. Repeating the narrative is the important part. And the narrative is that NASA and other secular authorities shouldn't be trusted. Facts about bees and the shape of the earth are just disposable tools for creating doubt.
This is why the bee need a wheel to get around.
Imagine we would have 35 gram bees. They would be top of the food chain.
Stay in school, kids, or you end up a topic of a Martymer debunking video.
Better to be graded by Martymer than be debunked by him.
Part of me wants to try creating satirical flat earth videos where I claim to prove the flat earth however all the math I use proves the opposite which will fly right over the heads of real flat earthers heads who will then parrot me and by extension disprove the flat earth in every argument.
*tries to debunk relative motion*
*proves relative motion*
Now that’s a true flerf move right there.
Fun fact- The empirical evidence/standard if evidence for the claim "earth is flat" is 100% perfectly identical to the evidence/standard for "trans women ARE women".
Both rely on precisely ZERO empirical evidence, and use standard of evidence, where the ONLY criteria is "but it FEEELS true, to me!!!"
[Except even flerfs don't demand that lesbians MUST be open to heterosexual relations with males, because they're intolerant authoritarians who conflate evidence-based sex with self-declared "gender", and think that "same-SEX attracted, homoSEXual females" is the same thing as "same-GENDER attracted homoGENDERual males, who IDENTIFY AS female, in some spooky, mystical sense, unrelated to real-world biology".
And even flerfs don't chemically mutilate children in perfect physical health, using no evidenc-based diagnostic criteria at all, SOLELY for the purpose of making the child conform to pointless stereotypes... Needlessly mutilated chidren, who turn out to be same-sex attracted over 80% of the time...
And even flerfs aren't SO unhinged, that they think "just a social construct" is (somehow?!?) a valid subsitute for having more than zero ACTUAL EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE, when justifying medical procedures, like the amputation of 100% healthy body-parts...
So I guess that even flat earthers are LESS irrational and unethical, than people who believe in sex-independent "gender"....]
Flerf Perfection! 😂
Hey Martymer!
I have also done a few videos on Chris' videos. He started arguing with me in the comments, accusing me of not understanding basic vector addition (I am finishing my MSc in Astronomy rn) and just dismissing my arguments and detailed explanations.
He later got featured on Taboo Conspiracy, where I posted comments as to what is wrong and why, which got dismissed and later one got even deleted.
A few days later, an 'engineer' on the FE side told him that he was wrong in a very complicated way, after which Taboo Conspiracy added a disclaimer that something is wrong.
--> They did not give a poo when I corrected them, as they did not look at the actual content of the criticism.
--> Chris is apparently even plainly wrong to other flerfs, somehow.
If reality were so easy to disprove it would have been done long before now.
Flerf "FiZzIx" has two "Z"s, like "Wizzard."
At least Rincewind has a reason to be a flat worlder.
The turtle moves!
He's been to the edge and over it and walked the counterweight continent, he's actually justified in his belief😂
@@l0rf He even visited round world several times.
Terry Pratchett fan here too!
@@44yvo 🤝
Now I understand the _kryptonite_ part in his name. His reasoning is like saying a Superman comic equals a physics book.
Superman comics and movies are the last place you want to go to learn physics.
@@chbu7081
Appropriate. Flat Earth is Likewise the last place you want to go to learn of reality. 😂
"If you print this page you'll have evidence..." - No. You'll have wasted a sheet of paper. 🤦♀
Not to mention the ink! And the machine cycles to render it. . .electricity isn't free, though there are RUclips shills who claim otherwise.
Loving the upload schedule. Glad you have time to put out these great flerf vids
ok you really cant have this video in the background, otherwise theres constant confusion between "to be", bee and B
Something like "Two bee or not two bee?"
So, this guy found out about high school-level physics and understood _just enough_ of it to come to a completely wrong conclusion.
30 grams? That some very big bees
Yes, even some birds don't weigh that much.
The bee is apparantly from the Carboniferous period.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH, he thinks we should be able to feel the Earth moving/ No, because we're moving at the same speed. The only reason we can feel our motion when we're, say, in an open boat is because of the wind in our faces, but in a car on a totally smooth road, or in a plane, you can't feel that you're moving, because everything is going at the same speed. If that weren't the case, the box of tissues you keep on the passenger seat would go flying backwards every time you start driving.
Relative motion seems like this completely unfathomable concept to them when it comes to the earth, but they are entirely fine with it in a car or on a train or a plane.
I was rather intrigued that Cryptonite Harry used miles/hour as rotational speed. When I studied physics our tutor would have slapped our fingers if had made that gross error.
Ouch.
Flerfers do that all the time to make Earth's rotations look more impossibly fast.
@@vaiyt Yes. They take delight in saying that -- according to Globies -- Earth rotates faster than the speed of sound. Which is impossible because we wouldn't even be able to breathe air moving at mach 1.35.
The 1000km/h tangential velocity of earth can be approximated as beeing constant linear motion since the radius is so big, but flerfs never understand that
An angular change of less than a degree per day on average
@@vaiyt oh i meant earths rotation, but sure earths orbit is even more linear in comparison
Isn't the main problem that flat-earther's, and conspiracy theorists tend to start with the conclusion and then look for evidence, which is the wrong round? Pip pip
this argument that we must be "flung off the spinning ball" is so silly
look at a clock.
would you be flung off something moving as half as fast as the hour hand?
2:58
Those must be the bees Robert Jordan keeps comparing Loial's voice to.
Do these idiots think all the rest of the planets in the solar system are flat😂
Nah, they probably think they're holograms being projected onto the firmament by NASA.
@@Martymer81Realy? It Isn't simply an error in the matrix?🤔
@@Martymer81 well, according to Susskind everything is a hologram, so maybe they're on to something!
@@SardonicSoul It can basically be a million things, depending on which flerf you ask, except a massive stellar object orbiting our star.
@@Martymer81 so ... they think they are flat?
The motion the fish can detect depends on which direction they are swimming.
Kryptonite physics is like bringing a wet noodle to a knife fight...
Oh this was a very pleasant surprise thank you!
That was a perfect Segway to the add! Love it
I hope he never tries to get real world results from his misunderstandings…
People figured out that the Earth is round during antiquity and even measured the the size of the Earth. Still we got flatearthers.
I've enjoyed watching you for years now. Thanks for the hours of fun. I'm curious, do you have any experience, resources, or knowledge regarding learning physics (and related stuff) for individuals with dyscalculia?
My immediate thoughts are that you may want to study it at a pop science level. You won't really learn to _do_ physics, but you'll learn _about_ physics. But then, I don't know how bad your dyscalculia is.
@@Martymer81 I was able to muddle through and get a degree in computer engineering... While it takes me significantly longer to get the work done, I understand conceptually. Language and concepts aren't a problem. I'm always on the lookout for any practical tips or suggestions to work with or around number crunching. It's not my career, so it isn't critical - I just really enjoy STEM. I appreciate your reply.
The thing that changed my life was to do as much calculation as possible in a horizontally linear fashion. Vertically, it's like looking at squiggles that you can see clearly but have no meaning, no defined value. For whatever reason, setting up horizontally made the numbers "stay in place," so to speak. Everything seemed more concrete. It's still frustrating and doesn't always work, but that approach made all the difference in being capable of (slowly) solving equations.
@@marshallahonen Then you seem to have found a way to at least make it less difficult. Use that, and I'm sure you get somewhere in physics.
@@marshallahonen I think one simple step you could take is installing a dyslexia friendly font, it'll probably make the numbers easier to read for you. Another piece of advice I can think of is just being extremely careful about writing down everything and doing so in an orderly and easy to read way. Develop a strict system for how you write things down where there isn't clutter and where you go into great detail never skipping a step. That way you won't have to juggle a lot of stuff in your head and can focus on just doing the calculations. Getting a tablet like an iPad to take notes with a pen might be a good idea because then you can also use different colors and diagrams to help make your notes clearer. Also at the same time trying to memorize as many calculation rules as possible might be a good idea, like just simple rote memorization, then you can remove a lot of the mental work as well. And of course use every assistive tool possible, Wolfram Alpha is great but also keep something like a formula collection handy.
I personally have dyslexia, autism and ADHD and I've used similar strategies to deal with my challenges. Specifically when it comes to languges and spelling I tried to make my notes as explicit as possible, like getting into the really dumb and simple details and I ended up scoring pretty high marks in language subjects. Also I basically just memorized how to spell every word.
Very nicely set-up segue into the promotion.
As someone who can actually follow the high school physics, you did a good job of showing where "Kryptonite Physics" omitted some rather important information. I find this a constant in flat earth "proofs." There's always something they omit and often, as it seems in this case, without realizing the significance of it.
I don't feel stupid but I'm fascinated by the physics in your video and want to thank you for breaking it down in the way that I can understand.
Physics is his Kryptonite.
Currently getting my degree in computer science. This has come with learning a lot of math. I enjoy math. However, the more I learn, the more I see that I know so very little. Each new piece learned, reveals a new ocean of things I’m completely ignorant about. For me, this builds curiosity. I want to learn more about the stuff I don’t understand as well.
Thanks for the reassurance, Marty, but I doubt I'm taking any physics courses.
... indeed, this topic isn't really a part of my day-to-day. :-)
@@irrelevant_noob You should learn chemistry because it almost certainly is relevant in your everyday life.
@@hedgehog3180 fwiw i did enjoy parts of chem (definitely way more than i did physics) but it's still not at all relevant to my day-to-day. 🤷♂
In addition to the B versus ‘bee’ debacle, he uses walking cartoons for what are supposed to be (bee?) stationary observers in their respective reference frames.
Confusing choices all around.
Another Flerf with an obliviously ironic channel name. Interpreting/Understanding/Applying physics correctly is certainly Gate Guy's Kryptonite!
I dont feel stupid when i see things i dont understand, but i am self-aware enough to know that me not understanding them doesn't mean they aren't true. I just never took high school physics or any physics, for that matter.
I can feel how the earth is moving, but only after a few drinks 🥳
I just realized that Martymer sounds a heck of a lot like Skallagrim
Yaaaaaaaaaaaay, you acknowledge that I'm an idiot.
Wait what?
🤣
But as you can tell, I understand this in practical terms rather than in mathematical ones.
Very good video 😊
Velocity is a vector with a length and a direction. The speed is just the length, or absolute value, of the velocity vector.
That guy refuse to understand that. Then, here on Earth, we are not in a closed box, we can see the stars. We van measure our velocity relative to those stars. We can also observe the rest of the universe, and that enable us to measure our velocity relative to the whole universe. He can't accept that as it shatters his narrative.
Not understanding frames of reference (aka the most basic physics)
- every flerf ever
Tbf frames of reference are quite tricky.
Watching Martymer videos makes me feel really stupid, which is great!
I cant beleive this channel doesn't have more subscribers, its insane.
12 flatturd butts have been *SERIOUSLY HURT* by this video, so far :) .
Oh, that guy. I already posted under a couple of his videos pointing out how he gets pretty much everything wrong. To no avail, of course.
Heh. Never come across a flerf myself, but debunks like this are always amusing
@giin97 Heh. Watch JUST ONE flerf video and youtube will recommend to an unending stream of them.
When you tire of flerf videos, take a look at a "jet fuel hoax" one. Those are even more dumb than flerfers.
Sometimes I wonder, if by some quirk of temporal mechanics, these sort of people somehow ended up in science lessons being taught by that paragon of science education and knowledge...Kenny "Doctor Dino-Rod" Hovind.
It would explain a lot in my book.
If something took 15 minutes to accelerate to 100 km/h, how far did it travel when it reached its top speed of 100 km/h?
IIRC, the accel/force from earth rotating is 0.02 m/s2, some 50 times less than gravity (9.81 m/s2). Kinda hard to "feel". I may confuse it with some other force, though
Good times.
He's just not trying hard enough... poor flatly
He must be preparing to become a part of the flerfs “A” team! 😂
His videos otherwise translate to: Tell me you don’t understand physics without telling me you don’t understand physics!
Conmen don't lack gall. I don't know how you go about using physics to debunk physics, but then I don't occupy the same place on Dunning-Krueger.
The dog ate my homework 🤷🏾
yesss
If we assume translation through a medium such as air, shouldn't the subject be able to feel the acceleration relative to the medium? Or is this meant to be a purely theoretical exercise assuming a vacuum and no other forces outside of the ones mentioned?
You'd feel acceleration even without air medium (well, what you feel is just uneven acceleration of your molecules). Translation can't be felt unless you'd run into something (in this case, air), so yeah.
Serious question: are we sure that Kryptonite is a native English speaker? If the script was machine translated, that would actually explain a lot--the text-to-speech, the conflation of speed and velocity, the B/bee confusion, the odd sentence structure in places, the fact that I can't even follow the written argument on the screen...
I really want to see this 30 gramme bee.
Looking at the bee diagram made me feel stupid for not understanding what argument he was even trying to make. Why do the bees think A and B are the same but not C, while the "observers" (the little cartoon men i assume) think B and C are the same but not A? It doesn't make sense.
can some group, overseen by flat earth representatives, launch a balloon with a camera, that they approve, into sky so they can see the globe earth once and for all? to shut them up for good...
There are tons of those vids on youtube. Some even with cameras that have no barrel distortion. The flattards are all over the comments. They just "nuh uh" everything and claim the video supports their claim. You can pause and place a straight edge against the horizon and see the curve. They ignore this.
@user-ug3ev7qo4s That has been done. Unfortunately, NASA had already hacked the camera.
2 B or not 2 B a flerf, that is the ?
I didn't understand any of that! So, I will be making a video about physics.... sorry, music! A video about music. I at least understand a tiny amount about music after 50 years of study. Physics??? It's all Greek to me!!! But I do enjoy the Martymer videos!!!!
Yeah, I watched that video before and noted some flaws. When he tries to calculate the acceleration the bee 'feels', he notes that the rate that bee A moves across the ground varies. At the bottom of the wheel, relative to the ground the bee is momentarily stationary. At the top of the wheel, it's twice v1. So he argues that 'clearly the bee is undergoing accelerations'. But he only looks at acceleration along the 'x' axis. If you add to it the accelerations happening along the y axis, Voila!! The total of x and y accelerations adds up to a constant value.
Flerfers have a hard time thinking in multiple dimensions.
High school physics, I didn’t take it. Hated math. Yet I don’t think the earth is flat. We all know it’s shaped like a doughnut.
The reason the computer generated voice is used as the "creator" thinks sounds authoritative and confident, thus will be more convincing.
The failure to get the math and physics anywhere near correct somewhat undermines the attempt.
It's good to know it's normal to feel dumb relative to other things lol. I really didn't understand a lot of this, but I'm not arrogant enough to claim I do. I did learn something. :) Most channels simply state that there's a difference between speed and acceleration or something and leave it at that.
Recognizing you don't know something is really the opposite of being stupid, you're only dumb if you don't understand something but fail to recognize it. I mean no one can know everything, a big part of science is recognizing that and not going beyond what you know so you're on the right track.
Chris uk! Gate guy?
The voice synthesizer is because he wants to be the next Steven Hawking
I would like it if Martymer would address the physics challenge of youtuber Draftscience, specifically his critique of the kinetic formula 1/2mv^2. Draftscience is not a weak target or a flat-earther - in fact he's a type of genius who seems to be obsessed with debunking kinetic energy (as a flawed formula with a dubious and almost "politicized" origin).
But this is extremely easy to measure and to prove.
@@hedgehog3180 consider the following. Fire a weight off of a spring and then receive that weight into another spring. Then put a smaller weight on that spring and fire again. According to the kinetic energy formula, you have just accrued energy, which of course is impossible.
@@captaingrub2228 "According to the kinetic energy formula, you have just accrued energy"
Nope
Output spring potential energy = weight kinetic energy = receiving spring potential energy = small weight potential energy
Where's "accruement"?
@@a2sbestos768 OK so maybe that was a bad example. Consider this one you have two charges gunpowder and a bullet one is a bigger heavier object. One is a smaller lighter object assuming the lighter smaller object will crew more Connecticut energy? You can’t make this shit up with how funny the AutoCorrect is. Will the smaller lighter object fired off the same charge gain kinetic energy?
@@captaingrub2228 yes, it will. Same energy, but different speeds.
Ok, scratch that - maybe it will be different. I'm not sure I see the problem yet, though.
Headache of trying understand stupidity. Why, leave them alone, they do not understand reality. But it is content, i see.
But if the acceleration at the equator is 0.03m/s², that would mean that if I lived on the equator for a month, I'd be accelerated to 77.7km/s and if I let go of whatever I'd been clinging on to for that month, I would escape not only the earth, but the solar system (or at least, the burned husk of my remains would, after I carbonised myself through the atmosphere for a brief instant).
So, proves the acceleration at the equator is either 0 or nobody lives there for more than a few hours at a time.
Checkmate, globular clusters
I think you forgot to take something into account. GRAVITY! 😂
Well...at least I KNOW I'm about as smart as a fish when it comes to most of this stuff. Marty, your gifted IQ is showing. And I don't even really believe in IQ, so there you go.
You shouldn't put yourself down for not getting it though, think of it as an opportunity.
Man I wish i took highschool physics. I took highschool chemistry instead 😅
I mean chemistry is also cool.
Are there enough of these people to be worth your time? DX Is there a way to ignore these people or expose how harmful they are? DDXX Thank you for your service!
They are a minority, but a very vocal one, enough idiots spouting the same thing will eventually infect more idiots with this mindrot and this will increase exponentially with every case.
2 Bs, and not 2 bs
🙃
Even the guy's NAME is incorrect. It should be "KRYPTONIAN Physics." FFS!
Hello Martmer 81, You do a great job here, but please keep the "Bullshit Asymmetry Principle" in mind. You are capable of producing fascinating content that actually teaches those who are already curious. Try focusing on that instead. - Cheers.
I am still waiting for the 1st successful prediction of the flat Earth model. Nothing special. Just a good old Sunrise, for example. The globe Earth model works every day, at every location.
Luckiest "scam" ever? sigh...
I'm waiting for a picture of the dome plus video footage of them being ejected from Antarctica by armed penguins.
What's a compuder?
TBH I find not only his explanations confusing, but also yours. Liked you other videos, which I watched before though. I think part of that because it was hard for me to follow who's talking now. Maybe add your talking head in the corner, when you're commenting.
stop saying "high school physics". very few of your viewers when to school in sweden.
Get a life.
Taking a swing on someone because they use TTS? You seem to recognize that there are legit reasons to use it, but just have to insult based on that. Low blow, Martymer, low blow.
In fairness most channels that use TTS are garbage, so it’s understandable why it would be a red flag.
well, he said do you have a speech disability or other problems OR do you use it for stupid reasons.
he asked the legit question, and made his own assumption, but didn't state that it is that.
unlike you who just stated as a fact he attacked him for using it, despite the actual question being in the video..