0:00 intro 1:00 game starts 5:05 stockfish line 1 6:25 stockfish line 2 7:10 controversy 8:58 question mark 9:30 easy line that could save black 10:26 Game review chessCom
Hi friend Stokfish, please answer this question, i think you can analyze it very well. The position at 9:43, lets pretend everytime black can check white, black will do it. Can White escape the checks so that the white king is not in check anymore?
1997: Wow, the supercomputer has beaten the Kasparov model human! This is the best chess that ever has been played and arguably the best chess that will ever be played. (Well, anyway, when Rybka comes, progress in chess will be basically over and the pinnacle will have been achieved.) 2022: Guys you won't believe how terrible that game was.
@@vivvpprof Actually, a lot of people said that chess would be solved with deep blue, I clearly remember it since I was a kid and saw a lot of news about it. This was a common feeling among players since some lines were very repetitive with draws and a lot of GMs encored Bob Fischer's words from decades ago that the openings studies would destroy chess
Why was kasparov playing as black 4 times. kasparov should have the white pices 3 times if the match goes all the way. How it should have been for fairness: kasparov, game 1 as white, game as 2 black, game 3 as WHITE!!!, game 4 black, game 5 white, game 6 black.
1997: "The machine is too good to be true, I bet it must be using some humans!" 2022: "That player is too good to be true, (s)he must be using pocket Stockfish!"
Why was kasparov playing as black 4 times. kasparov should have the white pices 3 times if the match goes all the way. How it should have been for fairness: kasparov, game 1 as white, game as 2 black, game 3 as WHITE!!!, game 4 black, game 5 white, game 6 black.
There was a game I think back in year 2000, maybe 2001 (?), played online and named, "Kasparov vs. the World." It was a game in which people could follow the moves and vote for the next move. I believe it was moderated by Judit Polgar, but I could be wrong. Kasparov won, but there was a controversy. In the endgame, at a crucial moment, there were basically 2 good moves for The World to play. One of them was better than the other, but no one could agree on which. Rumors went around saying that someone hacked into the system and added votes to the least favorable move, leading to Kasparov's win when The World voted to resign a couple moves later. Debate followed, and, Kasparov essentially put the debate to an end by posting his own analysis. The analysis revealed he saw 20 moves deep, with multiple variations off the "main line." It was quite amazing! However, at the end of his analysis he proclaims, "And this position is better for me," or something to that effect. I believe he also said that either way, he was winning? Anyway, chess experts chimed in, saying that he was wrong about the position being better for him. I ALWAYS WONDERED IF HE WAS RIGHT. I also always wondered if someone hacked into the server. It would be interesting to see Stockfish's analysis.
@@eljanrimsa5843 Ah, ok. I just now looked it up, and, looks like Kasparov actually cheated by reading what they were saying in the chat room. He saw their analysis and everything they were thinking. He claimed he needed to have an advantage - in other words, he cheated. Look it up on Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kasparov_versus_the_World
Why was kasparov playing as black 4 times. kasparov should have the white pices 3 times if the match goes all the way. How it should have been for fairness: kasparov, game 1 as white, game as 2 black, game 3 as WHITE!!!, game 4 black, game 5 white, game 6 black.
The game had probably been saved with just seeing the black queen move to E3. Deep blue is not Stockfish. Deep blue showed us that deep blue can easily make blunders.
What can I say, Mr. Fish? You analyzing this game is like us trying to understand Stone Age paintings ... We can only emit hypotheses regarding what they were thinking back then!
What about the 1977 game where Bobby Fischer squashed the Greenblatt supercomputer in only 21 moves? I bet Stockfish would get pretty worked up over that one.
I love the quote in this video which is inspired by the quote from breaking bad “What kind of man speaks to the DEA? No man. No man at all”-Gustavo Fring
What will Stockfish 15 think of Kasparov vs Topalov in 1999? Often considered the best human game because of a certain line that seems to require superhuman calculation.
Look at the accuracy - only 87%. In the Candidates Tournament 2024, we were routinely seeing 90+%, sometimes player going as high as 97-98%. And this is KASPAROV playing as the human player. It shows just how much chess has changed in the era of engines and memorisation.
I called in sick to work to watch both matches of Kasparov and your Uncle Deep Blue;All twelve games on a dial up modem. There was a wild theory that there were multiple Grandmasters in different rooms playing/teaming up to beat Kasparov and Deep Blue would choose the most popular move. I was playing with your Great Grandfather Radio Shack 2150. LOL
6:48 "While white is desperately trying not to win, black is desperately trying to lose" Kasparov trained and was using anti-computer tactics, which he normally doesn't employ in chess. I think both Kasparov and Deep Blue suffered from the horizon effect as a result
@Stokfish Hi Stockfisch, I typed a question wrong last time. This is my question: The position at 8:54, lets pretend white moved his king to h1 or h2. and then black plays black's rook to b8, and then white plays white's rook to a6, and then black plays black's queen to e3. everytime black can check white, black will do it. Can White's king escape the checks so that the white king is not in check anymore? And if white's king can escape, what side had the best chance to win, black or white?
Hi. White is still winning, after queen to e3, white must take the bishop on d6, best for black now is not even keep checking, consider white's king on h2, and let's say, queen to f4 check, just g3, white's bishop is hanging, but black rook is also hanging, if you want to keep checking, after queen to f2 check, just bishop to g2 and there is no more checks. There are many other lines of course
@@Stokfish In the 2 positions in my previous comment, if black plays the absolute best moves hoping to get a position where black can check forever in every move, then black still can't get a position where black can check forever in every move? As you see, this question is better than my last question.
Being unwilling to release the logs always smelled. I remember the accusations included that IBM not releasing prior games played by Deep Blue and that Deep Blue was programmed against Kasparov rather than as a chess engine.
You have no idea how much analysis would be required for humans to analyze the logs. The fact that the channel owner upvoted your comment shows that they also have no idea.
@@noobiamyes4853 That is besides the point. You apparently have no idea that using another engine to analyze the game won't enable you to with 100% certainty determine whether there was human interference.
Hello. can you make a video about Wesley So vs Maxime Vaschier-Lagrave at st. louis 9lx event. I read some article that Wesley do some unorthodox move that even engine(even you Mr. Stockfish) didnt predicted his sacrifice. Sorry for the wrong grammar Im just only a mere human.
I have always believed that Kasparov lost so badly bc he was being assisted by incredulity. He didn't believe an engine could beat him so he kept fighting the engine and a ghost instead of just playing over the board. Yes, I believe blue was as good or slightly better at that point but Kasparov fought it like a human.
bro would if stockfish has become so smart that he has created his own youtube channel and animates himself and none of us know and think its a human doing it
Hello, you have great series sir, thank you! Can you tell me, what do you use for a Robot face on your videos? Is there an app for that, or what is it? Thanks in advance!
If it was 2022, kasparov would have withdrawn from the tournament, tweeted a video of Mourinho insinuating that IBM was cheating, and then would keep silent for weeks.
The Future Chess Engine says, Deep Blue is my Grand Father, Stock Fish is my Uncle., Deep Blue is weak Engine, Stock Fish is just Average Engine, me is The Best Engine!.
Oooomg!!!! Back then i was in primary school... the whole planet talked about this game...about Kasparov s ability....and today what.....after 25 years he analysis the game by both sides saying the time such a failure....and no see at any move a positive thing???? I cant believe it!!! May be there was a hidden side even back then regardless chess itself being an ancient game on how chess can be approached nowadays..
The bishop move at 8:09 where some though a human player that move, someone should get a few engines that are around the same elo as deep blue was and see if it plays the bishop move or the queen move. I don’t have a computer or I would. If they all play the queen move then we can be pretty sure deep blue cheated. If anyone does this test please let me know under my post. I’d love to know.
8:20. I think it would have been much cooler if we’d have had Stockfish 15 on a gaming PC back then. This would have been far more effective at crushing some over blown egos. 😁 This would have been extremely disruptive and inlightening, because don’t forget Stockfish 15 is stronger than Alpha Zero or any other previous chess player human or not. 😁
Hello Mr. Fish. I am wondering if one day someone from your young brothers makes similar review comments about your games. Like any other software, you going to be fixed and improved in next releases, right? What do you think??
0:00 intro
1:00 game starts
5:05 stockfish line 1
6:25 stockfish line 2
7:10 controversy
8:58 question mark
9:30 easy line that could save black
10:26 Game review chessCom
ruclips.net/video/TtJeE0Th7rk/видео.html this game would be interesting to feature
Is this channel controlled by a human? Or is stockfish uploading and editing?
@@thenoob3024 i am sure this stockfish is assisted by a hunam , no engine would hate people and none of it could write a dialog like that :)
@@TymexComputing Yea i'm sure stockfish would be indifferent about humans, if it even were aware of our existence somehow.
Hi friend Stokfish, please answer this question, i think you can analyze it very well.
The position at 9:43, lets pretend
everytime black can check white, black will do it.
Can White escape the checks so that the white king is not in check anymore?
Ah yes, a game from the times when engines were accused of using humans and not the other way round
Lol
hahahha exactly
🤭🍺
I like how Stockfish is like,
"There was an obvious line here-" And then says like 50 moves in a row.
Lol
1997: Wow, the supercomputer has beaten the Kasparov model human! This is the best chess that ever has been played and arguably the best chess that will ever be played. (Well, anyway, when Rybka comes, progress in chess will be basically over and the pinnacle will have been achieved.)
2022: Guys you won't believe how terrible that game was.
This is funny but in all fairness, whoever in '97 said those things?
@@vivvpprof Actually, a lot of people said that chess would be solved with deep blue, I clearly remember it since I was a kid and saw a lot of news about it. This was a common feeling among players since some lines were very repetitive with draws and a lot of GMs encored Bob Fischer's words from decades ago that the openings studies would destroy chess
Terrible for stockfish, not humans
Why was kasparov playing as black 4 times. kasparov should have the white pices 3 times if the match goes all the way.
How it should have been for fairness: kasparov, game 1 as white, game as 2 black, game 3 as WHITE!!!, game 4 black, game 5 white, game 6 black.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
1997: "The machine is too good to be true, I bet it must be using some humans!"
2022: "That player is too good to be true, (s)he must be using pocket Stockfish!"
Why was kasparov playing as black 4 times. kasparov should have the white pices 3 times if the match goes all the way.
How it should have been for fairness: kasparov, game 1 as white, game as 2 black, game 3 as WHITE!!!, game 4 black, game 5 white, game 6 black.
"We even call him a grandmaster and he hates it"
There was a game I think back in year 2000, maybe 2001 (?), played online and named, "Kasparov vs. the World." It was a game in which people could follow the moves and vote for the next move. I believe it was moderated by Judit Polgar, but I could be wrong. Kasparov won, but there was a controversy. In the endgame, at a crucial moment, there were basically 2 good moves for The World to play. One of them was better than the other, but no one could agree on which. Rumors went around saying that someone hacked into the system and added votes to the least favorable move, leading to Kasparov's win when The World voted to resign a couple moves later. Debate followed, and, Kasparov essentially put the debate to an end by posting his own analysis. The analysis revealed he saw 20 moves deep, with multiple variations off the "main line." It was quite amazing! However, at the end of his analysis he proclaims, "And this position is better for me," or something to that effect. I believe he also said that either way, he was winning? Anyway, chess experts chimed in, saying that he was wrong about the position being better for him.
I ALWAYS WONDERED IF HE WAS RIGHT. I also always wondered if someone hacked into the server. It would be interesting to see Stockfish's analysis.
It was Irina Krush, not Judit Polgar. Kasparov's calculation had an error but his conclusion was right: Both moves would have lost the game.
@@eljanrimsa5843 Ah, ok. I just now looked it up, and, looks like Kasparov actually cheated by reading what they were saying in the chat room. He saw their analysis and everything they were thinking. He claimed he needed to have an advantage - in other words, he cheated. Look it up on Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kasparov_versus_the_World
Why was kasparov playing as black 4 times. kasparov should have the white pices 3 times if the match goes all the way.
How it should have been for fairness: kasparov, game 1 as white, game as 2 black, game 3 as WHITE!!!, game 4 black, game 5 white, game 6 black.
Crazy how Kasparov resigned and didn’t see those +40 moves ahead to save the game.
Yeah bro how did he manage to not find that😂😂😂
The game had probably been saved with just seeing the black queen move to E3. Deep blue is not Stockfish. Deep blue showed us that deep blue can easily make blunders.
What can I say, Mr. Fish? You analyzing this game is like us trying to understand Stone Age paintings ... We can only emit hypotheses regarding what they were thinking back then!
"We call him a GrandMaster and he absolutely hates it"
"Hello lesser minds" well hello to you too😂
The most shocking thing about this game is that Kasparov resigned in a position where he could hold the draw.
Excellent game selection for analysis!! Narrative is refreshing as always. "Stockfish for President"
Woah that was very instructive, it's amazing how the little details in the position make sense after fish explains it!
DipBlue made the only blander. He is truly a “grandmaster”
What about the 1977 game where Bobby Fischer squashed the Greenblatt supercomputer in only 21 moves? I bet Stockfish would get pretty worked up over that one.
Hold your horses, I want live few more days before humanity end sir.
"Supercomputer"! 😅😅😅
I love the quote in this video which is inspired by the quote from breaking bad “What kind of man speaks to the DEA? No man. No man at all”-Gustavo Fring
"We even call him Grand Master and he absolutely hates it" 😂
What will Stockfish 15 think of Kasparov vs Topalov in 1999? Often considered the best human game because of a certain line that seems to require superhuman calculation.
Hi Mr. Stokfish, please analyze for us the following one:
Nezhmetdinov vs Chernikov (1962)
1.e4c5 2.Nf3Nc6 3.d4cxd4 4.Nxd4g6 5.Nc3Bg7 6.Be3Nf6 7.Bc4O-O 8.Bb3Ng4 9.Qxg4Nxd4 10.Qh4Qa5 11.O-OBf6 12.Qxf6Ne2+ 13.Nxe2exf6 14.Nc3Re8 15.Nd5Re6 16.Bd4Kg7 17.Rad1d6 18.Rd3Bd7 19.Rf3Bb5 20.Bc3Qd8 21.Nxf6Be2 22.Nxh7+Kg8 23.Rh3Re5 24.f4Bxf1 25.Kxf1Rc8 26.Bd4b5 27.Ng5Rc7 28.Bxf7+Rxf7 29.Rh8+Kxh8 30.Nxf7+Kh7 31.Nxd8Rxe4 32.Nc6Rxf4+ 33.Ke2 1-0
Thanks
Matteo
"resigning was a terrible blunder" 😂
Hey Stockfish, you gotta respect your elders buddy 🤣🤣
I always wonder what stockfish would say if he saw my chess games 💀
Another superior demonstration.beautiful to watch.
LOL your commentary is legendary!
Love you Stockfish
Well, actually, Garry Kasparov won the game against deep blue, but the deep blue team wanted a rematch, which is what this game was.
Please, comment garry casparov vs veselin topalov game. Where there is a famous combination, beginning from RD5 as i remember.
“you play like this against me and I will cause you emotional damage” 🤣
Million thanks Stockfish you are pure objeyive reality, and you channel is simply THE BEST thank you very much
Look at the accuracy - only 87%. In the Candidates Tournament 2024, we were routinely seeing 90+%, sometimes player going as high as 97-98%. And this is KASPAROV playing as the human player. It shows just how much chess has changed in the era of engines and memorisation.
I called in sick to work to watch both matches of Kasparov and your Uncle Deep Blue;All twelve games on a dial up modem. There was a wild theory that there were multiple Grandmasters in different rooms playing/teaming up to beat Kasparov and Deep Blue would choose the most popular move. I was playing with your Great Grandfather Radio Shack 2150. LOL
"He is considered a disgrace to our family." lol
"U try to play like this with me an I will cause u emotional damage"
0:12 kim jong un to his uncle probably
I never knew they played chess
Thx Daniel. Great video again.
Question mark Question mark
?? Dubious move
0:00 intro - Stockfish android: "Hello lesser minds" in sotto voce at the commencement of the video.
LOL
Glad you made a deep blue game! Great video! You could do game 6 with SF taking over after Nxe6
6:48 "While white is desperately trying not to win, black is desperately trying to lose" Kasparov trained and was using anti-computer tactics, which he normally doesn't employ in chess. I think both Kasparov and Deep Blue suffered from the horizon effect as a result
Still laughing at 'While white is desperately trying not to win, black is desperately trying to lose' 😂
"Emotional Damage"
@Stokfish Hi Stockfisch, I typed a question wrong last time. This is my question:
The position at 8:54, lets pretend white moved his king to h1 or h2. and then black plays black's rook to b8, and then white plays white's rook to a6, and then black plays black's queen to e3.
everytime black can check white, black will do it.
Can White's king escape the checks so that the white king is not in check anymore?
And if white's king can escape, what side had the best chance to win, black or white?
Hi. White is still winning, after queen to e3, white must take the bishop on d6, best for black now is not even keep checking, consider white's king on h2, and let's say, queen to f4 check, just g3, white's bishop is hanging, but black rook is also hanging, if you want to keep checking, after queen to f2 check, just bishop to g2 and there is no more checks. There are many other lines of course
@@Stokfish In the 2 positions in my previous comment, if black plays the absolute best moves hoping to get a position where black can check forever in every move, then black still can't get a position where black can check forever in every move? As you see, this question is better than my last question.
Who else laughed at Gustavo frings quote lol
Kindly upload all famous games with analysis by stockfish It's really interesting and helpful.
09:10 the way he shakes his head :)))
Being unwilling to release the logs always smelled. I remember the accusations included that IBM not releasing prior games played by Deep Blue and that Deep Blue was programmed against Kasparov rather than as a chess engine.
You have no idea how much analysis would be required for humans to analyze the logs. The fact that the channel owner upvoted your comment shows that they also have no idea.
@@dannygjk just use another engine to analyse
@@noobiamyes4853 That is besides the point. You apparently have no idea that using another engine to analyze the game won't enable you to with 100% certainty determine whether there was human interference.
@@dannygjk It's not that hard, all they had to do was test the program against different games.
@@puppergump4117 It is pretty much impossible to prove guilt or innocence but the onus is on the accuser to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Hello. can you make a video about Wesley So vs Maxime Vaschier-Lagrave at st. louis 9lx event. I read some article that Wesley do some unorthodox move that even engine(even you Mr. Stockfish) didnt predicted his sacrifice. Sorry for the wrong grammar Im just only a mere human.
A move that I can't see?! That's impossible! I will take a look at this game. Thanks for the suggestion.
I have always believed that Kasparov lost so badly bc he was being assisted by incredulity. He didn't believe an engine could beat him so he kept fighting the engine and a ghost instead of just playing over the board. Yes, I believe blue was as good or slightly better at that point but Kasparov fought it like a human.
bro would if stockfish has become so smart that he has created his own youtube channel and animates himself and none of us know and think its a human doing it
Hello, you have great series sir, thank you! Can you tell me, what do you use for a Robot face on your videos? Is there an app for that, or what is it? Thanks in advance!
If it was 2022, kasparov would have withdrawn from the tournament, tweeted a video of Mourinho insinuating that IBM was cheating, and then would keep silent for weeks.
hahaha
The Future Chess Engine says, Deep Blue is my Grand Father, Stock Fish is my Uncle., Deep Blue is weak Engine, Stock Fish is just Average Engine, me is The Best Engine!.
Love this channel, all hail the engine overlords
This is absolutely hilarious man kind of reminds me of Max headroom back in the day
Wtf, this is the best chess channel name ever
Oooomg!!!! Back then i was in primary school... the whole planet talked about this game...about Kasparov s ability....and today what.....after 25 years he analysis the game by both sides saying the time such a failure....and no see at any move a positive thing???? I cant believe it!!! May be there was a hidden side even back then regardless chess itself being an ancient game on how chess can be approached nowadays..
I never knew that Deep Blue was Stockfish's Uncle. LOL!
I hope for a match between stockfish 15 vs Alphazero soon. Thanks for the video 🙏♥️
Next week there will be one of these, probably one of my losses, I mean, my brother's losses.
@@Stokfish 😂🤣🤣🤣
Stockfish: ha ha human are silly
Human: what is 2+2
Stockfish: sorry sir I overestimated my power of calculation 😓
@stokfish Hello, these are cool videos, keep it up! I'm just wondering how did you make the robot face?
the fact that stockfish speaks like a human trashtalker
Great video!!
"will he see it???Ofcourse not" hahahahaha
The bishop move at 8:09 where some though a human player that move, someone should get a few engines that are around the same elo as deep blue was and see if it plays the bishop move or the queen move. I don’t have a computer or I would. If they all play the queen move then we can be pretty sure deep blue cheated. If anyone does this test please let me know under my post. I’d love to know.
I'd like to know what rankings do you estimate they would be nowadays @stockfish ?
Dear Stockfish, I don't like you to "humaniate" the humans. Manners or we will plug you out! :D
Pretty impressive to take over the resigned position.
4:28 and forth - "emotional damage" ROFL
I’m surprised how 100 Eli can beat a 2k Elo person lol
lol
This is not checkers, lol! Funny!
It's amazing how stockfish uncle plays better than me with an elo rating of 100
The Deep Blue match was even after 5 games but Kasparov blundered in game 6 and lost the match.
you can start playing and commenting your live games... just like hikaru and the rest do it.. that would be lots of fun watching
This stockfish guy has some good moves in humor :D
The gustavo fring quote
Plz made analysis on Paul Morphy games. Not just the opera game but there are so many gems by paul Morphy
Paul Morphy will be roasted soon. Thanks for the suggestion.
@@Stokfish looking forward to it fish 😏
You're the man Stockfish.
In this case would be "machine" 😂
That was nice to see that mighty Garry Kasparov is being trolled 🤣
8:20. I think it would have been much cooler if we’d have had Stockfish 15 on a gaming PC back then. This would have been far more effective at crushing some over blown egos. 😁 This would have been extremely disruptive and inlightening, because don’t forget Stockfish 15 is stronger than Alpha Zero or any other previous chess player human or not. 😁
Well from what I heard they dismantled him after the games and put up his remains in some kind of museum
If Gary thought that he was playing a human he would not of given up.
Very laughing lecture uncle 🤣
Could you do analysis on stockfish games against alphazero where stockfish lost
How about a few Capablanca games?
I wonder if 30 years down the road the engines will make fun of this version of Stockfish just like it makes fun of Deep Blue.
Definitely
Stocky I hope the rumours about uncle deep being dismantled are untrue and he's alive and well, living the good life in the Bahamas..🌞
stockfish going to turn to rainbow
That is our boy, Stockfish. Since humans can use a figure of speech I can claim it.
I love the "or nots"👌🏿
That robot reminded me of Sheldon from "The Big Bang Theory" series.
ROFL - The level of insults kicked around is why we come here
Why is it so odly sattisfying to get roasted by a AI? LOL
you try to play this to me and i will call you emotional damage😂😂😂😂😂
Funny guy. Love watching your videos!
Kasparow was assisted by an engine in Kaspa vs. World game :)
5:38 "Obviously"
comon lets have more this is priceless!
After commenting a long line and saying at the end, "obviously", I'm done. lol
Try to solve Plaskett's puzzle
Hello Mr. Fish. I am wondering if one day someone from your young brothers makes similar review comments about your games. Like any other software, you going to be fixed and improved in next releases, right? What do you think??