Family Friendly Fun! Steve's 1968 442 Convertible

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 25

  • @janivarsrvaag5137
    @janivarsrvaag5137 3 года назад +1

    1968 oldsmobile tums upp cool car

  • @oleandreasjensen5263
    @oleandreasjensen5263 2 года назад

    I love these models....

  • @monarchmark1967
    @monarchmark1967 3 года назад +4

    Nice! thanks for sharing.

  • @chrisconklin4739
    @chrisconklin4739 2 года назад

    Sweet car

  • @guy6935
    @guy6935 3 года назад +3

    Great car. Love the 1968.

  • @JamesBrown-ld8um
    @JamesBrown-ld8um 3 года назад +3

    Beautiful car Steve!

    • @steveninnaimo2645
      @steveninnaimo2645 3 года назад +1

      Thanks Jim. Cant wait for the video of the Crown Jewel to come out!

  • @randyluca6339
    @randyluca6339 3 года назад +3

    Love the silver with the green cast to it, and the vertical stripes just set the car off so nicely. Another great Olds video. Sweet ride.

  • @fifteenbyfive
    @fifteenbyfive 3 года назад +2

    It looks immaculate. Congrats to the owner and kudos to who did the body work. If the Wife doesn't like to drive it, I'm sure she likes to ride in this because it's a treat for all the senses. It's a driver's car because everything must be done yourself, the car loyally does what it's told. I had one and miss it badly. It is a great car for a long drive because it's so comfortable (seats, ride, driving position).

  • @thomasharris703
    @thomasharris703 3 года назад +1

    I have a love/hate relationship with my '68! I love mine like no other but finding parts can be a P.I.A.! I feel I "stole" my power antenna for $700 and a floor shift tilt column for $100! Took 2 years to find 1968 correct power driver bucket and reclining passenger bucket seats. Also bought a '68 specific "sport hood". Very unique because 90% of anything for them is one year only! Love your car BTW!

  • @gordonborsboom7460
    @gordonborsboom7460 3 года назад +2

    Shes a beauty. Good workmanship on the resto. I'm partial to the W31 in the background however

    • @oldsmobobby410
      @oldsmobobby410  3 года назад

      It's actually a W30! That video is coming up soon. That car was the cover car on the OCA Facebook page for a while.

    • @steveninnaimo2645
      @steveninnaimo2645 3 года назад +1

      Thanks Gordon. Watch for the Rally Red W30 video to emerge in the next couple of months!

  • @olzkng
    @olzkng 3 года назад +4

    1965-1967 400 was the short stroke version (4.00" bore x 3.975" stroke). The 1965 400 would have "389298 B" cast above the water pump area. The 1966 and 1967 400 has "390925 E" cast above the water pump area. The 1968 and 1969 400 was the long stoke version (3.87" bore x 4.250" stroke) and have "396026 G" cast above the water pump area. Beautiful car!

    • @oldsmobobby410
      @oldsmobobby410  3 года назад +2

      Thanks for the info!

    • @olzkng
      @olzkng 3 года назад +3

      @@oldsmobobby410 Keep up the good work!

    • @steveninnaimo2645
      @steveninnaimo2645 3 года назад +2

      Thanks oldzkg! I had it completely backwards. So the more desirable 400's are the pre-68 B and E cast blocks.

  • @Wireman134
    @Wireman134 3 года назад +3

    400cid. 4bbl, Qjet 350hp 290hp with 2bbl. 68' start of the long stroke big blocks. W30 was 360hp

  • @bobmaher2657
    @bobmaher2657 3 года назад +2

    U worked at Crowley Ford. Your car was purchased at Hoffman Olds in East Hartford. 😊

    • @oldsmobobby410
      @oldsmobobby410  3 года назад

      Woops. Cool to know my Olds came from Hoffman though! I'll have to see if I can find a dealer plaque.

    • @w41duvernay
      @w41duvernay 3 года назад +1

      @@oldsmobobby410 How about trying to visit the location of the Original Olds dealer, and see if they have any of the original records of this 442?

  • @fredtbettner4924
    @fredtbettner4924 2 года назад +1

    I had the spoke wheels .yellow . And no pin stripe inside .

  • @w41duvernay
    @w41duvernay 3 года назад +2

    Oldsmobile wanted to used the 455 rods in their 400, so they changed the bore and stroke on their 400, AND improved the heads on the 68 to 69 400. IT didn't make their 68/69 400 any faster than the short stroke 400. The gentleman has the long stroke 400. I JUST wish we could have seen the improved heads on the short stroke 400 instead OR the factory install the 425 Tornado engine.

    • @w41duvernay
      @w41duvernay 3 года назад +1

      I talked with 69 owner of a 442 in GM Carlile show and because these 400s weren't any faster, he told me a popular modification was for 442 owners to go get a 425 out of an Tornado and do an engine swap.

    • @Richard-vu7kh
      @Richard-vu7kh 3 года назад +1

      @@w41duvernay I owned a ‘68 442, and spoke with Joe Mondello about transplanting a “better” engine. His advice was unless I wanted an all-out super-stock engine, the long-stroke 400 was an excellent motor. With minor mods, and for very little money I enjoyed week-ends at our local drag-strip....and surprised a number of guys racing high rpm musclecars. The long stroke 400 in ‘68 and ‘69 held the NHRA D-stock record @ 12.39 / 113mph (Berejik Olds).
      On the street, my 442 was a beautiful daily driver. At 180,000 miles I had the engine compression checked - still tight and on the numbers. I parted with the car in the early 1980’s....wish I’d hung on ! Anyway, a lot of shade’s been thrown at this motor in the days since, but back in the day they were competitive in the stock classes.
      Here’s a link to NHRA records in ‘68 and ‘69...
      classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=62510