Thats not surprising, since the russians have 1980’s technology with vehicles, so the bradley is that american rival to that technology. The russians havent upgraded majority of thier armored elements, so the bradley is fighting enemy vehicles that it was designed to go up against.
Against largely USSR era Russian analog scrap metals --- with no modern, electronic technologies ---- loaded with powerful shells, sure. But the future requires light armored vehicles, like the German and British BAE platforms that are modular and driverless, if some dangerous missions needed them to be so. BAE and the Germans are finishing their next gen 40mm cannon ---- likely to be adopted by most NATO nations, if proven successful in the next 2-3 years ---- that is said to be up to 4 times as powerful as today's average 30mm cannons.
@@Headloser usa army only uses 3700 of the 6000 they have so your richt bud they also need to keep alot for conscripts and replacments for destroyed ones for when a war starts bud as they are already making a replacment for the bradley i think they should fix up all there oldest and most broken bradleys about 300-500 to send to ukrain it would be a win-win
The analysis of the Brad's short-comings was also BS. It's a 1970 design and electronics weren't a thing. The size issue is about the number of fighters it holds, not cramped crew quarters. The armor was never designed for artillery or anti-tank, and it was praised as the first tracked vehicle to exceed 45 kph. Where do you get your facts?
So there are no electronics at and in a car's engine block how did the Sherman's tank work how do you think car batteries work how do you think the Sherman actually operates do you think it was just purely combustion engine and mechanical where did the spark in the engine come from without electricity you can't just spontaneously make fuel combust into flame you need a spark plug. Somehow the new engines today don't generate more power. And no what he's showing is the m10 Booker not the next train best uses the Griffin chassis with 105 mm turret
And no the new Ifv chassis have better speed than the Bradley chassis. The Bradley replacement is more likely to use the Griffin 2 with the far better drive train and power pack look up the advanced combat engine and hybrid power pack tell me the Bradley is still going to be just fine in the future with a current engine no improvements to the drivetrain or transmission at all. The m10 Booker in other words the light tank will probably use the Griffin 3 chassis
Nothing was mentioned about the amount of the dismounted team about these vehicles. As a former Bradley dismounted crew member, I think this would be important. If no Infantry is to be transported then they don't have a replacement for the Bradley but a light tank. I know the M-10 Booker is not a tank but is an assault gun ? 🤔
Look at some of the Brad’s in Ukraine, they have eaten tank and anti armor rounds and spit out the crew in one piece! Cramped? The Ukrainians put 17 in one last summer! Plus another 15+ riding on top holding on. It’s old, that’s it. I can tell you that my Ukrainian friends, including a Mech Inf Bn Cdr can tell you how many hundred(s) of his soldiers are still in the fight because they were in Bradley’s vice the old BMPs.
@@gerdmeyer1601 I actually just talked with Artem, one of the reasons that they love the Bradley is because early in the war, they were hosed because they were trying to mount local counterattacks using UNARMED & UNARMORED HMMV’s! Artillery ate their lunch, then they got 113’s and then the Bradley to team up with the Abrams. They got a ton more Brad’s so they formed Hunter/Killer teams of 3-4 Brad’s doing what is essentially a drive by meets Thunder Run and they will do what I coined as counter armor Whack-a-Mole. They will have 2-3 teams per track and tons of smoke, they will run around a village and keep stopping at different t points. The drones can’t always catch exactly where teams exited because they will stop 10-15 times and let the crunchies have at the Orks. Then they just reverse the maneuver to extract them. And between the TOW’s, and man packed kit, they put a hurting. Quick war story. For whatever reason the military of the Clinton Era was enamoured with Corporate Think. So they had this wonderful idea for streamlining the logistics tail, instead of the old way when you r direct and general support maintenance units had all of the spare parts they needed, the brain test came up with “ just in time logistics” where there is nothing on the shelf and you order it and it magically appears just in time. Oh that shit didn’t work, because once again American soldiers don’t look at the freaking clock and they attacked until the bad guys are dead, however that leaves great distances between the gunfighter and, the sharpest. If you go back and look closely at the Iraq armoured units in and around back, you will see most of the T 55/54’s, some of the T62’s and all of the A PCs and IFV’s or not catastrophic kills. When you see them there are holes and scorch marks; and that is because a significant amount of the 3ID’s we’re having to fight their way up the roads. That meant that the Abrams were running low on main gun rounds and therefore they did not engage anything that was not a T72 or modified T62’s, all of the other armour, mech and wheeled vehicle kills were all done by Bradleys using their gun or from an anti-armour teams organic. Many of those soldiers were having to squeak by with only 1-2 liters of potable water! There were officers that went into Iraqi stores, threw down $40-60 and buying bottled water for their troops! They used “other” water to get chilled and used to pour down the back. Anyway back to the point. Target identification, designation, location and destruction was very carefully managed by the Sergeants and lieutenants who knew the deal, they let the tanks kill tanks and let the IFV’s kill everything else. If this wandered I’ve been up for three days.
I wouldn't ax the bradley yet. I'd upgrade it. That's exactly what the Army did, and it appears to be working. The good ol M2 has a lot of fight left in it. Don't retire it yet.
So you want our troops to wait years if not decades before an American made option is developed tested and deployed? Or we can buy the best of the market, modified to suit our needs.
What really needs to change are the outdated tactics employed by the US Army. The US Army employs the Bradley like semi mobile pillboxes. Moving from static position to static position, only firing when stationary. The Ukrainians revolutionized their employ and true mobile assault vehicle. Using its speed and mobility to outmaneuver their opponents. The maximized the stability and power of the main auto cannon. Get mobility kills on MBT. Ukraine Bradley’s move too fast to wait for infantry support, to walk along side them.
I'd like to see a wheeled version of the bradley or cv90 that doesn't have a troop compartment. That'd probably be an interesting light tank/ MPF vehicle.
So let's spend 10s of billions to develop and build another vehicle. The abradley was never designed to fight tank to tank, but to give adequate protection while chauffering troops to the front line or to be a Cavalry scout fighting vehicle to support dismounted soldiers.
Not how it works and it'd take over a decade maybe longer. Bids get put in and the military decides which is best, y start from scratch when you have IFV's pretty much rdy to go?
Well, Bradley is old but it's working wonders in Ukraine!
Thats not surprising, since the russians have 1980’s technology with vehicles, so the bradley is that american rival to that technology. The russians havent upgraded majority of thier armored elements, so the bradley is fighting enemy vehicles that it was designed to go up against.
So. Who else will we be facing? Chinese crap?
@@jaypenha5352 Yeah, and with Russian and Chinese crap being all they are likely to face, I don't see that changing.
Against largely USSR era Russian analog scrap metals --- with no modern, electronic technologies ---- loaded with powerful shells, sure. But the future requires light armored vehicles, like the German and British BAE platforms that are modular and driverless, if some dangerous missions needed them to be so.
BAE and the Germans are finishing their next gen 40mm cannon ---- likely to be adopted by most NATO nations, if proven successful in the next 2-3 years ---- that is said to be up to 4 times as powerful as today's average 30mm cannons.
you haven't heard of Bradley square in ukraine 😂
BS. The Ukrainian Army loves them. They use Bradley's against russian MBTs all the time.
give them over 500 since USA got over 6500 of them.
They’re reliable as hell, M10 better be worth it….
more against infantry, apc and ifv. against mbt obly happend twice
@@Headloser usa army only uses 3700 of the 6000 they have so your richt bud they also need to keep alot for conscripts and replacments for destroyed ones for when a war starts bud as they are already making a replacment for the bradley i think they should fix up all there oldest and most broken bradleys about 300-500 to send to ukrain it would be a win-win
@@MilitaryPlayer141 the m10 wont replace the bradley
For the Bradley to be "obsolete" it's doing a hell of a job of taking out Russian armor for the Ukranian military......
Yeah, the Griffin 3 footage is a m-10 booker
The Bradley is still able to take out Russian tanks :)
The analysis of the Brad's short-comings was also BS. It's a 1970 design and electronics weren't a thing. The size issue is about the number of fighters it holds, not cramped crew quarters. The armor was never designed for artillery or anti-tank, and it was praised as the first tracked vehicle to exceed 45 kph. Where do you get your facts?
So there are no electronics at and in a car's engine block how did the Sherman's tank work how do you think car batteries work how do you think the Sherman actually operates do you think it was just purely combustion engine and mechanical where did the spark in the engine come from without electricity you can't just spontaneously make fuel combust into flame you need a spark plug. Somehow the new engines today don't generate more power. And no what he's showing is the m10 Booker not the next train best uses the Griffin chassis with 105 mm turret
And no the new Ifv chassis have better speed than the Bradley chassis. The Bradley replacement is more likely to use the Griffin 2 with the far better drive train and power pack look up the advanced combat engine and hybrid power pack tell me the Bradley is still going to be just fine in the future with a current engine no improvements to the drivetrain or transmission at all. The m10 Booker in other words the light tank will probably use the Griffin 3 chassis
@@danielsnook7362-- It's a Diesel engine, Casey Jones.
Facts from pentagon wars movie😂😂
@speterj -- sounded like it.
Video Footage not the correct IFV, the actual choice was not revealed, no new info.
Nothing was mentioned about the amount of the dismounted team about these vehicles. As a former Bradley dismounted crew member, I think this would be important. If no Infantry is to be transported then they don't have a replacement for the Bradley but a light tank. I know the M-10 Booker is not a tank but is an assault gun ? 🤔
Bradley are working pretty good in Ukraine
This vid is BS. Since when is a Booker a IFV????
When you strap lawn chairs to the top.
Look at some of the Brad’s in Ukraine, they have eaten tank and anti armor rounds and spit out the crew in one piece! Cramped? The Ukrainians put 17 in one last summer! Plus another 15+ riding on top holding on. It’s old, that’s it. I can tell you that my Ukrainian friends, including a Mech Inf Bn Cdr can tell you how many hundred(s) of his soldiers are still in the fight because they were in Bradley’s vice the old BMPs.
The Bradley is old, but the BMP´s are even older and in case of armor are BMP´s worst than the Bradley. The Bradley is an upgrade to an BMP.
@@gerdmeyer1601 I actually just talked with Artem, one of the reasons that they love the Bradley is because early in the war, they were hosed because they were trying to mount local counterattacks using UNARMED & UNARMORED HMMV’s! Artillery ate their lunch, then they got 113’s and then the Bradley to team up with the Abrams. They got a ton more Brad’s so they formed Hunter/Killer teams of 3-4 Brad’s doing what is essentially a drive by meets Thunder Run and they will do what I coined as counter armor Whack-a-Mole. They will have 2-3 teams per track and tons of smoke, they will run around a village and keep stopping at different t points. The drones can’t always catch exactly where teams exited because they will stop 10-15 times and let the crunchies have at the Orks. Then they just reverse the maneuver to extract them. And between the TOW’s, and man packed kit, they put a hurting. Quick war story. For whatever reason the military of the Clinton Era was enamoured with Corporate Think. So they had this wonderful idea for streamlining the logistics tail, instead of the old way when you r direct and general support maintenance units had all of the spare parts they needed, the brain test came up with “ just in time logistics” where there is nothing on the shelf and you order it and it magically appears just in time. Oh that shit didn’t work, because once again American soldiers don’t look at the freaking clock and they attacked until the bad guys are dead, however that leaves great distances between the gunfighter and, the sharpest. If you go back and look closely at the Iraq armoured units in and around back, you will see most of the T 55/54’s, some of the T62’s and all of the A PCs and IFV’s or not catastrophic kills. When you see them there are holes and scorch marks; and that is because a significant amount of the 3ID’s we’re having to fight their way up the roads. That meant that the Abrams were running low on main gun rounds and therefore they did not engage anything that was not a T72 or modified T62’s, all of the other armour, mech and wheeled vehicle kills were all done by Bradleys using their gun or from an anti-armour teams organic. Many of those soldiers were having to squeak by with only 1-2 liters of potable water! There were officers that went into Iraqi stores, threw down $40-60 and buying bottled water for their troops! They used “other” water to get chilled and used to pour down the back. Anyway back to the point. Target identification, designation, location and destruction was very carefully managed by the Sergeants and lieutenants who knew the deal, they let the tanks kill tanks and let the IFV’s kill everything else. If this wandered I’ve been up for three days.
I wouldn't ax the bradley yet. I'd upgrade it. That's exactly what the Army did, and it appears to be working. The good ol M2 has a lot of fight left in it. Don't retire it yet.
The old Bradley’s were disabling T-90’s in Ukraine. That 40mm chain gun upgrade will be a nice test.
The US should not order foreign made vehicles all US Equipment should be American made period!!
So you want our troops to wait years if not decades before an American made option is developed tested and deployed? Or we can buy the best of the market, modified to suit our needs.
They would be built in the U.S.
As a veteran, I believe our troops deserve the best, most effective and survivable vehicles available, no matter WHERE they are made.
What really needs to change are the outdated tactics employed by the US Army. The US Army employs the Bradley like semi mobile pillboxes. Moving from static position to static position, only firing when stationary. The Ukrainians revolutionized their employ and true mobile assault vehicle. Using its speed and mobility to outmaneuver their opponents. The maximized the stability and power of the main auto cannon. Get mobility kills on MBT. Ukraine
Bradley’s move too fast to wait for infantry support, to walk along side them.
I would sure love to own for my commute to work every day.
then where do you park it? :))
Who would argue? lol
@@WeaponTheory-j5hanywhere you want to. 😈
put port holes on it and make it amphibious! And a bigger gun. With some anti tank missles. And make it haul troops
I'd like to see a wheeled version of the bradley or cv90 that doesn't have a troop compartment. That'd probably be an interesting light tank/ MPF vehicle.
Fun fact… since it’s original conception in 1968 it cost 14 billion dollars to develop this weapon.
I think Ukraine would disagree....
So let's spend 10s of billions to develop and build another vehicle. The abradley was never designed to fight tank to tank, but to give adequate protection while chauffering troops to the front line or to be a Cavalry scout fighting vehicle to support dismounted soldiers.
Rome was a great powerful country dude.
Great unmanned tanks, aircraft, robot troops. Did anyone watch the terminator?
Girffin 3 looks good not gonna lie
Thumbnail of the video is lame.
That’s a booker
3 Minutes in. Talks about the Griffin 3 but shows the M-10 Booker.
The bigger threat comes from above such as drones and guided munitions instead of infantry and armoured vehicles.
HDMI’s they do against drones?
Is it just me or did the cannon on that first vehicle look much larger than 50 mm? More like 105.
How come you didn't mention that the CV90 is operating in Ukraine?
And the M10 Booker will be used alomg side with one of these?
Is the Bradley good for what it is? Yes! But we can do better.
Go with the NATO version for standardization
Look what happened to bradley in war in russia it's too garbage
From what I hear they been kick Russian infantry ass
Us military should design their own.
Not how it works and it'd take over a decade maybe longer. Bids get put in and the military decides which is best, y start from scratch when you have IFV's pretty much rdy to go?
Wow easy target for invisible drones😅
Showing the booker as an IFV come on
Bradley looks like Luchs also Sherman
PR claptrap.........
Is it drone proof ? How much does a drone cost ? How much does a Bradley cost ? Next war will be fought by nerds !
I like the CV90
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
The Bradley does need to be replaced. But it is kiking ass in Ukraine.
It's not a bad design.... and the storyline is BS.... defence industry just trying for a profit
Dahil sa gyrera sa Ukraine bibinta ang bradley ng US.
Etu the best for phil. Military wish lng naman
The Br A.I. dley , ?
See that Mr Putin lol...
AI bs.
Fake news!😮
👍👍👍
Bot