I have loved SK's movies since I was 14 year old. It's not just about morals and his viewpoint about human society and essence. I loved his images. My father was a journalism photographer and I used to read a lot of photo magazines since I was a kid. Bresson was one of my favorites. I just knew how amazing his movies were when I saw the famous violent ballet scene clips from "Clockwork Orange(!)" on a art movie TV program. One day, I saw a notice of some underground college film students' study group cinematheque would show all of SK movies in Seoul, Korea in the 90's on a movie magazine. I went there for days wearing my high school uniform and I watched all of them with joy and wonder. What a genius he was!
I know the feeling. I was one of the kids you barely see in FMJ, the saigon scenes. Actually the guy that drives the bicycle is my uncle. I'm totally lying. It's pretty easy for losers to make shit up to get attention.
"kubrick was such a genius !" did you actually watch any of his films ? Because people like you find he's pretty boring and shining is too scary to watch. Do you think the end of 2001 meant the next step of human evolution that STAN meant to wake up in every human beings, and human beings just went "meh" ?
Finished the your Kubrick series today. Specifically the making of 2001: A Space Odyssey and I found it tremendous. I have always wanted an in depth series of the film, and it delivered. Fantastic. So, when I saw in my subscription feed another Kubrick file, I clicked instantly.
oh look, an actual fan. I thought "the killing" was way ahead of it's time and I never saw Barry Lyndon. I think strangelove is sk's best film because he's obviously having such a fun time with it.
Watch it anyway. It’s a period masterpiece, probably the best cinematography in history arguably, and O’Neal plays a total douchebag so you’ll have an excellent time hating him more than usual.
@@SteveSmith-ze5mw Total douchebag is his wheelhouse. He excels in that talent in Paper Moon... I love that movie. Madeline Khan kills me in that scene when she's climbing the hill.
I love how you cover the history of how things were done and how it created a style. I have a greater appreciation of Kubrick. I knew he was great , I just didn't know why.
You know you're a Cinema Tyler groupie when you click the thumbs-up button as soon as the video starts. Thank you, Maestro! This latest essay of yours is impeccably written and presented. I'll look into Skillshare - having to hand over my credit card information before a two month trial is one thing; not even knowing what Skillshare is, is another! :)
Kubrick is one of my all-time favorite directors. Discovering this channel has been like uncovering new infos on an old friend. Your work is great! Comments that say your channel is a hidden gem are right. Keep it up, I'll be back for much more.
This is great! I live in Boulder Colorado and live one block away from the location shot at the beginning of the shining where danny and wendy lived. I only had my Iphone but did a pretty good job replicating the same perspective and view from where kubrick stood.. Even the cars were in the same parking spots, unfortunately the trees had grown at least 50 feet, obstructing some of the view of the flat irons. But it was fascinating just to stand there, especially after re-watching the shining one night and suddenly recognizing thats exactly where I live lol
That's awesome! only problem is Kubrick never took that shot in Colorado...he had a crew fly over to the U.S and get all the shots. He was deathly afraid of airplanes. That's still awesome though that you live so close to that location
Man, I just want to say this is a great series. I watched this one again a second time and have learnt something about Stanley's work method a second time. What also strikes me is the amount of care you put into your production, the cutting's well timed and it's presented in a clear and tidy manner. And while I've got your attention, what do you think of "Eyes Wide Shut"? Is it a symbolic work that is mostly misunderstood? Or is it more of a disasterpiece? Thank you.
Yeah i can see the photography gave so much influence in kubrick's films, feels like his movies are moving photographies from his skill in selecting the best shot of an ordinary moment. thank you for this analysis.
I've been finding a lot of video essays tiresome and samey recently, but yours are packed with factual and visual details as well as good editing. Have subscribed!
One stylistic approach that I have noticed in all Kubrick movies that I have seen, from Paths of Glory on up, is that he continually relies on long, uninterrupted takes, and uses minimal cuts. I imagine this stems largely from his still photography background, in which a single image had to tell the story. A well timed and conceived photograph contains a plethora of information, and so it is with all of the shots in his movies. He always allowed the actors tell the story as much as possible, while his camera filled in the details and the mood. I think it is part of the reason why his films feel so immersive, because the long takes allow the audience to fully absorb the scene and internalize it. Most average directors rely far too heavily on editing, and use it more as a crutch. They rely on editing to create mood or energy for lack of a compelling image.
Where does the behind the scenes clip come from at 0:13? The Kubrick files is one of my favorite series on youtube. I love that you go in depth on smal subjects because those are the ones that interest me the most.
Slightly underrated and slipping into obscurity is Andre Kertesz, a contemporary of Cartier-Bresson whose photos always struck me as being more candid and humane while also highly formal. Some of his most famous shots are of Washington Square in winter.
I have been getting in film cameras a lot lately, and I have to say this has been a very interesting video to me. And Kubrick is probably my favourite director of all time. Great video, looking forward to the next one.
Dude your videos are so well made and insanely insightful. I love how you went out to recreate or experience the train and street photography situations. Great stuff.
Your explanation on ambiguity is perfect, and that's why most people those trying to impose a theory on his films are wrong, his movies simply didn't have one big meaning! When I saw the shining I thought that was ambiguity itself, the twin remind you of Diane Arbus, but also of the twins tortured by the Nazis. The viewer can see different things in his movies
The photo at 8:01 is not by Cartier-Bresson, it's actually by Rui Palha, a portuguese photographer. The photo is often attributed to Bresson due to its similarities in style and composition but, in fact, it's not by the french photographer.
Hello, CinemaTyler! Fantastic work! These are the best film documentaries I've seen on RUclips, and I am an avid watcher of these types of videos. I was wondering if you would ever do a video on Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. I am very curious to see what you can uncover from the making of the film -- especially in regards to R. Lee Ermey's performance, and how Kubrick worked with him and allegedly allowed him to improvise most of his lines. Thanks again for the amazing content!
If you pause it at 18:37 you will see a diagonal line going across the whole screen , from the upper right corner down across the top of his head , down the awning to the lower left , down the building. As a photographer these are things I have been trained to see. I would have shot this for the angle as well as the off centered subject and contrast . Though many photos and paintings use the rule of thirds as well. To me Kubrick was the pinnacle of those who can see great compositions in the real world and capture them.
I’m going to a Boston comic expo this summer. And Keir Dullea is going to be Signing there. You guys can bet your bottom dollar I’m going to ask him as many Kubrick questions as possible.
dude i just found you channel and have been nonstop binging while doing tasks on "escapefromtarkov" you make amazing videos dude. had me entertained and constantly tabbing out to watch scenes throughout all these boring ass missions lmao
I discovered Kubrick with "Dr. Strangelove," which at the tender age of 13 left me overwhelmed and unsure if I had a future! Then came "the proverbial 'good' science-fiction movie," as Arthur C. Clarke called it, which has influenced popular culture more frequently than any other movie icon I've seen since. After that, I was just a total Kubrick konvert. The precision of his vision was simultaneously macroscopic and panoramic, and his films evoke humans at our worst and our best, and all the shades in between. Kubrick was not romantic, compassionate or nurturing; do not go to his films if you want to come out whistling the theme song! (FMJ is the WORST DATE MOVIE EVER, BTW) Go and watch them for the beautiful compositions and acid-etched stories of humans caught in conflict with reality.
I'd like to request a little help to understand some aspects related to the aspect ratios on Kubrick's films, mostly their color movies as well as Dr. Strangelove and Paths of Glory. For me is relevant since the aspect ratio is completely attached to the composition of the frame. I've done some research but anything conclusive. As an example, I can't understand why apparently Kubrick decided to shot the epic "Full Metal Jacket" in a 4:3 instead of any of the widescreen formats available on those days what I suppose would be the logical choice. Another movie that is intriguing for me is 2001 A Space Odyssey. So far I've researched that there are two equally accepted formats for this film, one The Cinerama 2.21:1 and the other the Anamorphic 2.35:1 but all this information is kind of overwhelming and confusing to me. Thanks in advance for any help provided. Greetings!
I have loved SK's movies since I was 14 year old. It's not just about morals and his viewpoint about human society and essence. I loved his images. My father was a journalism photographer and I used to read a lot of photo magazines since I was a kid. Bresson was one of my favorites. I just knew how amazing his movies were when I saw the famous violent ballet scene clips from "Clockwork Orange(!)" on a art movie TV program. One day, I saw a notice of some underground college film students' study group cinematheque would show all of SK movies in Seoul, Korea in the 90's on a movie magazine. I went there for days wearing my high school uniform and I watched all of them with joy and wonder. What a genius he was!
What a cool way to be introduced to his films! Thanks for sharing!
I know the feeling. I was one of the kids you barely see in FMJ, the saigon scenes. Actually the guy that drives the bicycle is my uncle. I'm totally lying. It's pretty easy for losers to make shit up to get attention.
"kubrick was such a genius !" did you actually watch any of his films ? Because people like you find he's pretty boring and shining is too scary to watch. Do you think the end of 2001 meant the next step of human evolution that STAN meant to wake up in every human beings, and human beings just went "meh" ?
@@SpyanLordok
@@SpyanLordwtf is this comment??
This channel is a hidden gem
This is like, free film school. Thank you so much.
You mean useless?
@Jeff Miller
I am a filmmaker. I'm not watching this video again to figure out what was useless about it however.
I am about to finish film school and everything they teach you there can be learned for free on RUclips and by making your own projects
@@Geronimo_Jehoshaphat lol one year later and still only you liked that comment
@@drown_n
Jokes on you then, I'll like my own comment right now to bring the number of knowledgeable people to a whopping TWO.
I just saw Paths Of Glory for the first time last week...it is SO impressive 'for it's time' and feels incredibly modern.
Really Great movie.
Finished the your Kubrick series today. Specifically the making of 2001: A Space Odyssey and I found it tremendous. I have always wanted an in depth series of the film, and it delivered. Fantastic. So, when I saw in my subscription feed another Kubrick file, I clicked instantly.
Watch Lolita again and realize Peter Sellers' Clare Quilty is a pitch perfect impression of Stanley Kubrick's voice. It's elusively obvious!
hidden in plain sight! so is much of eyes wide shut (kubricks father was a doctor for instance)
oh look, an actual fan. I thought "the killing" was way ahead of it's time and I never saw Barry Lyndon. I think strangelove is sk's best film because he's obviously having such a fun time with it.
@@SpyanLord I really want to see Barry Lyndon, but I strongly dislike Ryan O'Neal.
Watch it anyway. It’s a period masterpiece, probably the best cinematography in history arguably, and O’Neal plays a total douchebag so you’ll have an excellent time hating him more than usual.
@@SteveSmith-ze5mw Total douchebag is his wheelhouse. He excels in that talent in Paper Moon... I love that movie. Madeline Khan kills me in that scene when she's climbing the hill.
SO MUCH PRODUCTION QUALITY, good stuff Tyler
I love how you cover the history of how things were done and how it created a style. I have a greater appreciation of Kubrick. I knew he was great , I just didn't know why.
"The ideas have to be discovered by the audience, and the thrill of discovery makes it all the more powerful."
Nothing better than losing internet over the holidays and coming back to a new episode of Kubrick Files n_n
Imagine getting to eat lunch with Kubrick
Imagine play chess with him
If he enjoys the conversation, then lunch will be going till dinner
UrielCinema I wonder wha I would eat....
and tea and and cake with Stanley at 4 too. stew fmj crew.
You know you're a Cinema Tyler groupie when you click the thumbs-up button as soon as the video starts. Thank you, Maestro! This latest essay of yours is impeccably written and presented. I'll look into Skillshare - having to hand over my credit card information before a two month trial is one thing; not even knowing what Skillshare is, is another! :)
I might just have to congratulate you on every new video. Amazing insight. Thank you for the care and research.
So great to finally learn more about his influences. Love this series!
Tyler, please make a new Kubrick files soon. I love your work and just can’t get enough of them.
Thanks! Writing a video on A Clockwork Orange now, but I'll definitely consider making another Kubrick Files soon!
Kubrick is one of my all-time favorite directors.
Discovering this channel has been like uncovering new infos on an old friend.
Your work is great! Comments that say your channel is a hidden gem are right. Keep it up, I'll be back for much more.
This is great! I live in Boulder Colorado and live one block away from the location shot at the beginning of the shining where danny and wendy lived. I only had my Iphone but did a pretty good job replicating the same perspective and view from where kubrick stood.. Even the cars were in the same parking spots, unfortunately the trees had grown at least 50 feet, obstructing some of the view of the flat irons. But it was fascinating just to stand there, especially after re-watching the shining one night and suddenly recognizing thats exactly where I live lol
That's awesome! only problem is Kubrick never took that shot in Colorado...he had a crew fly over to the U.S and get all the shots. He was deathly afraid of airplanes. That's still awesome though that you live so close to that location
Man, I just want to say this is a great series. I watched this one again a second time and have learnt something about Stanley's work method a second time. What also strikes me is the amount of care you put into your production, the cutting's well timed and it's presented in a clear and tidy manner.
And while I've got your attention, what do you think of "Eyes Wide Shut"? Is it a symbolic work that is mostly misunderstood? Or is it more of a disasterpiece?
Thank you.
I loved Eyes Wide Shut! That said, I feel like I'll probably appreciate it much more in a later era of my life (if that makes sense).
Beautiful video, you deserve way more recognition for such a great work!
I really enjoyed this series on Kubrick. Thank you immensely for taking the time to make it for us.
Yeah i can see the photography gave so much influence in kubrick's films, feels like his movies are moving photographies from his skill in selecting the best shot of an ordinary moment. thank you for this analysis.
I've been finding a lot of video essays tiresome and samey recently, but yours are packed with factual and visual details as well as good editing. Have subscribed!
I've been watching Kubrick content on RUclips for years now and this channel is the the best out there. This is some great work.
Loving the Kubrick files so much. Keep up the good work!
One stylistic approach that I have noticed in all Kubrick movies that I have seen, from Paths of Glory on up, is that he continually relies on long, uninterrupted takes, and uses minimal cuts. I imagine this stems largely from his still photography background, in which a single image had to tell the story. A well timed and conceived photograph contains a plethora of information, and so it is with all of the shots in his movies. He always allowed the actors tell the story as much as possible, while his camera filled in the details and the mood. I think it is part of the reason why his films feel so immersive, because the long takes allow the audience to fully absorb the scene and internalize it. Most average directors rely far too heavily on editing, and use it more as a crutch. They rely on editing to create mood or energy for lack of a compelling image.
Where does the behind the scenes clip come from at 0:13?
The Kubrick files is one of my favorite series on youtube. I love that you go in depth on smal subjects because those are the ones that interest me the most.
Thanks! That is from the "Kubrick Remembered" doc.
Slightly underrated and slipping into obscurity is Andre Kertesz, a contemporary of Cartier-Bresson whose photos always struck me as being more candid and humane while also highly formal. Some of his most famous shots are of Washington Square in winter.
I really love all these Kubrick videos. I appreciate how in depth they are. Lots of really great information I didn't know before.
I love your videos on Kubrick, much respect for your overall expenduture. I can only imagine how long you work on a video like this.
I have been getting in film cameras a lot lately, and I have to say this has been a very interesting video to me. And Kubrick is probably my favourite director of all time. Great video, looking forward to the next one.
I've been waiting for this for so long
Fascinating, I had no idea that so much of his photographic work had been preserved. Really enjoy the way you've presented all this - kudos to you.
Great episode. Seen many of these Kubrick photos before and it was cool seeing what the locations look like today!
Loved it! So well produced! Professional quality!!
I enjoyed how you recreated his pictures... Must have been quit an experience.
Nice that you showed up in your video!
Greetings from Munich.
Dude your videos are so well made and insanely insightful. I love how you went out to recreate or experience the train and street photography situations. Great stuff.
Your videos get better and better Tyler!
& thanks for the info about the museum :) planning a trip to NY now
That was fun! Good idea recreating some of Kubrick's shots.
Thanks for the tip on where to find his archives.
Your explanation on ambiguity is perfect, and that's why most people those trying to impose a theory on his films are wrong, his movies simply didn't have one big meaning! When I saw the shining I thought that was ambiguity itself, the twin remind you of Diane Arbus, but also of the twins tortured by the Nazis. The viewer can see different things in his movies
Great series! I just started a deep dive into Kubrick and love the level of detail you present.
To top off his brilliance he was also the godfather of the up-skirt. Wow!
The photo at 8:01 is not by Cartier-Bresson, it's actually by Rui Palha, a portuguese photographer. The photo is often attributed to Bresson due to its similarities in style and composition but, in fact, it's not by the french photographer.
Great work as always! thanks for taking so much care into making these videos. I'm looking forward for the next episode ;)
This video really digs into the past of an important artist in an illuminating and evocative way. Thanks!
Great video ---thanks for your hard work
This series is awesome brother! Super inspiring, thank you so much!!!!
I think Stanley Kubrick would be flattered that you hunted down all the locations depicted in this video. Thanks for this.
Man your videos are so good !!! we need more videos about the shining though !
Hello, CinemaTyler! Fantastic work! These are the best film documentaries I've seen on RUclips, and I am an avid watcher of these types of videos. I was wondering if you would ever do a video on Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. I am very curious to see what you can uncover from the making of the film -- especially in regards to R. Lee Ermey's performance, and how Kubrick worked with him and allegedly allowed him to improvise most of his lines. Thanks again for the amazing content!
Thanks! I have a folder on my computer for FMJ that I've been throwing resources into for a while. I definitely want to do something on FMJ someday!
You have a great future. I can't wait to see your movies on the big screen.
Amazing, you can really tell the effort you have put into this video. Thanks for your hard work!
Awesome work Tyler! Great research, editing,music and of course excellent subject! Thanks so much
I can see you put alot into this, and it was worth it. This was great.
Well done, Tyler. I'm a massive Kubrick aficionado and this is superb
This is probably my favourite video of yours, very, very nice.
This is amazing. Thank you for making this.
Great video, a huge Kubrick fan and this showed me aspects of his career I knew little about
Your videos rock man! You really have an eye for film. Love your content. Hopefully in the future you create an amazing film.
If you pause it at 18:37 you will see a diagonal line going across the whole screen , from the upper right corner down across the top of his head , down the awning to the lower left , down the building. As a photographer these are things I have been trained to see. I would have shot this for the angle as well as the off centered subject and contrast . Though many photos and paintings use the rule of thirds as well.
To me Kubrick was the pinnacle of those who can see great compositions in the real world and capture them.
I’m going to a Boston comic expo this summer. And Keir Dullea is going to be Signing there. You guys can bet your bottom dollar I’m going to ask him as many Kubrick questions as possible.
This series is a fine, classy journey. Thank you.
Very insightful and well-made presentation! Thanks a lot.
Awesome !!! Amazing! Can't have a better start to my new year!
Excellent job on this...I'll need to get to that show in May!
Owen Harris Shining code nice to see you used some of his stuff.
Great, great work you’ve done.
This is amazing! Such dedication!
keep going! your kubrick work is awe inspiring. great recreations!
I love this tribute to SK ! Really well done efforts sir!
Great video! Thank you for all your work, especially Kubrick related ❤
dude i just found you channel and have been nonstop binging while doing tasks on "escapefromtarkov" you make amazing videos dude. had me entertained and constantly tabbing out to watch scenes throughout all these boring ass missions lmao
Tyler, please make a video about Kubrick and Jazz
Great stuff, thank you for this!
Seriously, when that pic of the young Kubrick flashed onto the screen, he looked like a younger you.
This is just wonderful, great work.
Phenomenal effort and content and production.
The fact he was born on 14/14 Shakespeare Avenue is kinda apt. A mix up of the symmetrical, the bizarre and genius
Fantastic Documentary. Here's to you.
Excellent docu man. Really great to see into this art. Nice use of old cameras. I did something similar with a 70's Olympus ECR camera. Fun isn't it.
Another great insight into Kubrick's work. Thanks.
Good job , as usual . Keep up the good work !
Love the vintage look of the footage you shot in New York! How did you do that?
Firs.....I mean, Second! Stanley Kubrick was a master story teller, whether in moving pictures or in his photography.
Excellent video (as always)
I love this series. Mahalo Tyler!
I discovered Kubrick with "Dr. Strangelove," which at the tender age of 13 left me overwhelmed and unsure if I had a future! Then came "the proverbial 'good' science-fiction movie," as Arthur C. Clarke called it, which has influenced popular culture more frequently than any other movie icon I've seen since. After that, I was just a total Kubrick konvert. The precision of his vision was simultaneously macroscopic and panoramic, and his films evoke humans at our worst and our best, and all the shades in between. Kubrick was not romantic, compassionate or nurturing; do not go to his films if you want to come out whistling the theme song! (FMJ is the WORST DATE MOVIE EVER, BTW) Go and watch them for the beautiful compositions and acid-etched stories of humans caught in conflict with reality.
I was exposed to Washington Square Park for the first time when it was prominently presented in the 1998 film "Half Baked"
"Simply Add Boiling Water"...Hahaha...love it.
I remember seeing those little glass circles on the streets of nyc.
That was brilliant, well done mate
I'd like to request a little help to understand some aspects related to the aspect ratios on Kubrick's films, mostly their color movies as well as Dr. Strangelove and Paths of Glory. For me is relevant since the aspect ratio is completely attached to the composition of the frame. I've done some research but anything conclusive. As an example, I can't understand why apparently Kubrick decided to shot the epic "Full Metal Jacket" in a 4:3 instead of any of the widescreen formats available on those days what I suppose would be the logical choice. Another movie that is intriguing for me is 2001 A Space Odyssey. So far I've researched that there are two equally accepted formats for this film, one The Cinerama 2.21:1 and the other the Anamorphic 2.35:1 but all this information is kind of overwhelming and confusing to me. Thanks in advance for any help provided. Greetings!
Great content Tyler. You helped me a lot. Just one small mistake you made. At 8:02, that photo isn't from Bresson but Rui Palha
Thanks for the correction!
Max Ophuls was a big influence on Kubrick, especially reverse tracking.
Awesome work
Most enjoyable. Very well done. Only one problemo: too short. Another hour or two would have been just about right. Thanks for sharing.
Great Job Ty! You've done it again, much luv & thanks my man.
You have become my favorite RUclips channel.
Thanks!
Excellent video work...thanks!
hey tyler hope you geek out on lola montes someday, keep up the awesome work..thanks.
Thank you cinetylr