Equivalence & Tolerance Relations | Fuzzy Logic

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 июл 2024
  • Topics covered:
    00:00 Introduction
    00:43 Reflexivity
    01:34 Symmetry
    02:32 Transitivity
    03:31 Crisp Equivalence Relation
    03:46 Crisp Tolerance Relation
    04:05 Reforming tolerance to equivalence relation
    04:38 Solved Example - Crisp equivalence & tolerance relations
    11:29 Reflexivity, Symmetry and transitivity for fuzzy relations
    12:17 Fuzzy Equivalence Relation & Tolerance Relation
    12:39 Solved Example -Fuzzy equivalence & tolerance relations
    Out music:
    ------------------------------
    Campfire by Scandinavianz / scandinavianz
    Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0
    Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/_campfire
    Music promoted by Audio Library • Campfire - Scandinavia...
    ------------------------------

Комментарии • 16

  • @bhavanimurugesan9026
    @bhavanimurugesan9026 Год назад +1

    Good Explanation.
    Pls check
    1. The condition given for symmetry property of fuzzy relation , instead of mentioning they should be equal, it is given as they should be equal to 1
    2. In the example, for transforming tolerance relation into equivalence relation
    R2 = fuzzy max min composition of R1 and R is correct ( but it is shown as R1 o R1

    • @Topperly
      @Topperly  Год назад

      Thank you Bhavani for pointing out the unforeseen mistakes.
      To all viewers,
      1. Please make note of point 1 she mentioned above. The definition given for symmetry of fuzzy relation at 11:30 is wrong. I made a mistake while preparing slides. The condition of symmetry is that diagonally opposite elements should be equal. This is correctly shown at 13:07 in the solved example.
      2. The second mistake she pointed out is already corrected with a pop-up pointing out the mistake.
      Apologies to everyone for these mistakes.

    • @SamiHajjaj287
      @SamiHajjaj287 Год назад

      @@Topperly with regards to the first issue ... I think you meant "diagonally opposite elements should be EQUAL" .. and not equal to zero ... as mentioned in the original comment and in your video at 13:07 ...
      still .. great work guys :))

  • @alihaneren9
    @alihaneren9 Год назад

    I just discovered this channel. These videos are amazing. I realized that you have multiple playlists on different topics. I hope this channel gets more subscribers. Thank you for the effort sir

    • @Topperly
      @Topperly  Год назад

      Thank you for your kind words :)

  • @dawoodkhattak2087
    @dawoodkhattak2087 Год назад +1

    Amazing

  • @ashutoshyadav7537
    @ashutoshyadav7537 Месяц назад

    Nice explanation sir ❤

    • @Topperly
      @Topperly  Месяц назад

      Glad you liked it :)

  • @sunainatiwariST
    @sunainatiwariST 6 месяцев назад

    Sir , which composition method u used to get R . R in Fuzzy Relation ? max-min composition or max product composition ?

    • @Topperly
      @Topperly  6 месяцев назад +2

      Hi,
      I have used max-min method :)

    • @sunainatiwari8297
      @sunainatiwari8297 6 месяцев назад

      Ok sir. Thank you so much 🙏 🙏

  • @vaibhavgagneja822
    @vaibhavgagneja822 7 месяцев назад

    you have performed composition on crisp set on what basis ?

    • @Topperly
      @Topperly  6 месяцев назад

      Hi Vaibhav,
      Sorry, I didn't get the question. Could you please elaborate?

    • @vaibhavgagneja822
      @vaibhavgagneja822 6 месяцев назад

      Hi @@Topperly
      I meant is it min max or max product

    • @Topperly
      @Topperly  6 месяцев назад

      It doesn't matter. As I have explained in previous video on compositions, for crisp sets, you'll get same results using max-min as well as max-product methods :)