전 여기에 종착합니다 베어풋 MM35

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 8

  • @adu95kr
    @adu95kr 11 месяцев назад

    하이파이하기에는 kii가 베어풋보다 낳을까요?

    • @detroy_1975
      @detroy_1975  11 месяцев назад

      그렇지 않을까 싶습니다

  • @bartsimpson2131
    @bartsimpson2131 Год назад

    Hey buddy, hope you are doing well!
    What do you think about the barefoot footprint 01?
    I have a chance to get them for a good deal. I have the Genelec 8040b now.
    Footprint 01 compared to 8040, is there a big difference?
    And is the Footprint 01 similar to MM35, since the frequency response is similar (but the price is not :D )
    Thank you for your time!

    • @detroy_1975
      @detroy_1975  Год назад

      I've never heard footprint01 in my studio. anyway, i think footprint01 and 8040 are very different.

    • @bartsimpson2131
      @bartsimpson2131 Год назад +1

      Thanks for the reply!
      I have had the footprint 01 in the studio for one day, testing it with the genelec 8040b. They do sound different. I compared the 8040 vs footprint only in mono (but listened to the barefoot in stereo later on).
      The Genelec 8040b goes very deep for its size, but of course the barefoot about 10hz goes lower. But around up to about 45hz sounds excellent on the 8040b. The Genelec has more information in the upper midrange, making the vocals poke out more from the mix. The Barefoot seems to have more midrange information, or so it seems since the genelec sounds "harsher" in the upper midrange. The tweeter is very direct/narrow from the barefoot, while the tweeter from Genelec sounds bigger. Barefoot seems to have a more overall even/flat sound, since there is no "harshness" in the upper midrange, and has lower bass extension, while Genelec always seems like the vocals are the always the loudest and most important part of the song. Genelec measures better in my studio with sonarworks, more even.
      Since you've heard them both, which one is better in your opinion? @@detroy_1975