👩⚖️📜 Lawyer Reacts: Alan Beck Oral Arguments 23-16164 Wolford v Lopez US Court of Appeals 9th Circ.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 май 2024
- In this captivating episode of Lawyer Reacts, we delve into the legal arena with Alan Beck, a renowned 2nd Amendment rights lawyer, as he dissects recent arguments before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Get ready for an insider's perspective and expert analysis on pivotal civil rights issues!
Go here to watch Alan argue his case • 23-16164 Jason Wolford...
🔫 2A Rights: Join us as we explore the intricacies of the Second Amendment with Alan Beck, a stalwart defender of gun rights. From firearm regulations to landmark court cases, we unravel the legal landscape surrounding one of America's most hotly debated constitutional provisions.
🏛️ 9th Circuit Arguments: Step inside the courtroom as we break down recent arguments heard before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. What legal precedents were invoked? What implications do these cases hold for civil liberties and individual freedoms? Find out as Alan Beck provides unparalleled insights!
💬 Top Civil Rights Lawyer: Gain valuable perspectives from a seasoned legal advocate as Alan Beck shares his experiences, strategies, and observations from the front lines of civil rights litigation. From high-profile cases to grassroots activism, get ready to be inspired!
🤔 Legal Analysis: Our panel of legal experts offers in-depth analysis and commentary on the key issues raised during the 9th Circuit arguments. From constitutional interpretations to judicial reasoning, we provide a comprehensive overview of the legal intricacies at play.
🔍 Insider's Perspective: Go behind the scenes with Alan Beck as he provides a candid glimpse into the world of civil rights advocacy. Hear firsthand accounts, anecdotes, and legal strategies from one of the nation's leading voices in the fight for individual liberties.
🌐 Join the Discussion: Have questions or insights to share? We invite you to engage with us in the comments section below. Your perspectives enrich our understanding and foster meaningful dialogue within the legal community!
📺 Subscribe & Stay Tuned: Don't miss out on future episodes featuring in-depth discussions, legal analyses, and expert insights. Hit the subscribe button and turn on notifications to stay updated on our latest content!
#LawyerReact #AlanBeck #2ndAmendmentRights #CivilRights #9thCircuitCourt #LegalAnalysis #LegalPerspectives #LegalInsights #ConstitutionalLaw #CivilLiberties #LegalDiscussion #RUclipsLegalCommunity #GunRights #LegalAdvocacy #LegalExpertise #LegalDebate #LegalStrategy #CivilRightsActivism #LegalCommentary #JudicialProcess #LegalPerspective #WolfordvLopez #USCourtAppeals #NinthCircuit #LegalAnalysis #CaseLaw #AppellateCourt #LegalDebate #JudicialReview #ConstitutionalLaw #LegalPrecedent #LegalOpinion #CourtJudgment #LegalArgument #LegalProcedure #AppellateJurisdiction #LegalDispute #CaseAnalysis #LegalPrinciple #JudicialDecision #LegalAppeal #LegalChallenge #LegalRights #SecondAmendment #GunRights #RightToBearArms #GunControlDebate #ConstitutionalRights #FirearmsLaw #GunPolicy #SecondAmendmentRights #GunOwnership #GunSafety #GunLaws #SecondAmendmentDebate #hellervdc #hellercase #dickheller #armedscholar @ArmedScholar @armedscholarclips @BZWATCHDOG @StephenGardner1 @taylorcavanaugh4174 @professornez @thecivilrightslawyer @DemonsRow @DeleteLawz1984 @HerestheDeal
We the people pay big money (in taxes) to defeat ourselves in court. Then we pay more money to defend ourselves against the attorneys those taxes paid for.
CONGRATULATIONS GUNNER!!! 🎉
Hello Mr. Beck. Very nice to meet you. Michael E... ROCK$TAR statistic.
How about a 1st Am argument that the gov is essentially requiring business owners to publish their political opinion on a sensitive topic?
Love that
Hoping Alan takes my case in Hawaii…
So when the SCOTUS reinterpreted Nunn v State in their Bruen decision, when they concluded a state has to allow carry, one way, ie, open carry or the other, ie, concealed carry. Did they do that to bring concealed carry within the meaning of the right or was it to bring licensing as being acceptable under the right. I say that because first and foremost, a right can not be licensed. Numerous cases support that, Murdock v Penn being one them as an issued license is evidence of a direct tax paid, rights can't be taxed in such a way. Licenses are also adhesion contracts, and I hardly believe the govt can compel one under a license contract to exercise a fundamental right. Also, because in DC v Heller, they ruled that states can prohibit concealed carry under the 2A and used the reasoning of Nunn v State mainly and other cases. Nunn v State, NEVER used the one way or the other position that the Bruen court said they did. A state can easily issue a Certificate of Competence, not a contract, to easily satisfy their interests in lieu of a license.
❤
You don’t have my permission to get my permission. Figure that one out.
Yuk!