It they can bring first-class support of JSX into OCaml itself, maybe like a function that can take props and the JSX template string... man! I think that could possibly make OCaml much more enticing for web development. And then you can even build reactivity on top of that however you want, you only have to call the function again each time a prop changes.
See I'm one of the weird folks that tend to like writing C++ (fuck setting up a project but the language itself) and this is so insanely readable to me despite your entire chat thinking brainfuck is easier to read haha Not sure what that says about me but damn its making ocaml tempting to pick up haha
i like hiccup better (clojure) [:div ;;html element {:class "my class" :id "my_id"} ;;attributes ;; then whatever "text content"] hiccup is just vectors and you manipulate vectors representing html
Honestly I'm going through the 99 ocaml problems and it's so hard. The type inference is REALLY good, but the recursive aspect it relies on is absolutely horrible. It looks good, but man does it complicate things
dude if I dont know anything about nvim and don't want spend days of studying the config then I just go with predefined one like astrovim so I can get a feel how it works with the basic stuff like motions, what's so hard to understand about it, when you are learning a new language you go as well with some basic setup and learn from there, simple as that
You know some people DO like watching others develop stuff to see how they think. GRUG like watch good content.
Very educational, the caller was helpful and friendly.
It they can bring first-class support of JSX into OCaml itself, maybe like a function that can take props and the JSX template string... man! I think that could possibly make OCaml much more enticing for web development. And then you can even build reactivity on top of that however you want, you only have to call the function again each time a prop changes.
See I'm one of the weird folks that tend to like writing C++ (fuck setting up a project but the language itself) and this is so insanely readable to me despite your entire chat thinking brainfuck is easier to read haha
Not sure what that says about me but damn its making ocaml tempting to pick up haha
This was super helpful! I ran into let%lwt and didn't know what it was. This explained it.
pay Teej in exposure... the totally not fraud currency...
Love live coding session especially discovering new programming language (for me)
“Bu boy what did you say to me??”😂
chat thinks that bad syntax is when its not just typescript
ReasonML is nice, same type system, familiar syntax
i like hiccup better (clojure)
[:div ;;html element
{:class "my class" :id "my_id"} ;;attributes
;; then whatever
"text content"]
hiccup is just vectors and you manipulate vectors representing html
It looks so hard to read, like putting bleach in my eyes 😭
@@oubracodelol you’re not wrong
@@oubracodei think ;; are comments so without them is not really hard
this language broke my brain
Honestly I'm going through the 99 ocaml problems and it's so hard. The type inference is REALLY good, but the recursive aspect it relies on is absolutely horrible. It looks good, but man does it complicate things
nah
dude if I dont know anything about nvim and don't want spend days of studying the config then I just go with predefined one like astrovim so I can get a feel how it works with the basic stuff like motions, what's so hard to understand about it, when you are learning a new language you go as well with some basic setup and learn from there, simple as that
I’m stealing your web stack bro
Elm!!!