Legatum 6: Canada Sponsored Email Internet & Phone Interception : TekSavvy Computer Crimes

Attention: The Legatum Prosperity Index: US News & world Report to Human Rights Crimes in Canada Safety and Security ... There is No Safety, Security and Rules of Law in Canada as Police and countless agents of Corrupt Queen Elizabeth II and Bastard William are threatening Life of Citizens in Canada : Down with British Government of Canada
TekSavvy Sucks by Cheating in Services including Refusing to Answer to the Customers! PROOF!
OUR Proofs that Canada Sucks for 150 Years!
Federal Court Corrupt Judges received Bribes from TekSavvy to dismiss a potential lawsuit ...thus these bastard are continuing frauds against all citizens
Corrupt CEO Marc Gaudrault is a real Shame for Canadian
TekSavvy Solutions Inc. is a Canadian residential, business, and wholesale telecommunications company based in Chatham, Ontario. TekSavvy has committed all kinds of fraud and cheating in Internet Services and refusing to answer to Customer .
Ample Complaints and Lawsuits against these Bastard Canadian Such as:
Voltage Pictures v. Does
In November 2012, Voltage Pictures, an American film production company with a history of filing lawsuits against people alleged to have illegally shared movies online, sought disclosure of personal information belonging to approximately 2000 TekSavvy subscribers based on data collected by the Canadian anti-piracy company Canipre between September 1, 2012 to October 31, 2012.[13][14]
On November 14, 2012 Voltage filed a Statement of Claim in Federal Court, initiating action against TekSavvy (court file T-2058-12, Voltage Pictures LLC v. John Doe and Jane Doe)[15] seeking a court order for the release of subscribers' personal information, including telephone numbers and email addresses,[16] associated with about 2000 IP addresses allegedly involved in copyright infringement.
On February 21, 2014 the Federal Court released its decision compelling TekSavvy to identify the consumers identified by Voltage as alleged downloaders while also implementing several constraints on Voltage. The court ruled that the demand letters sent by Voltage to the specified consumers be approved by a judge to ensure "there is no inappropriate language" and that "any correspondence... shall clearly state in bold type that no court has yet made a determination that such subscriber has infringed or is liable in any way for payment of damages", and that Voltage must pay TekSavvy's legal costs and any costs associated with identifying the consumers.[17] The Federal Court ruling further limited the information Voltage could request from TekSavvy, only permitting them to access the names and mailing addresses of the subscribers in question.
TekSavvy stated in a February 21, 2014 press release that they were satisfied with the framework implemented by the Federal Court for the case, claiming that it will protect consumers by discouraging future copyright trolling, but will only provide the information when Voltage meets all conditions of the courts orders and the affected customers have been notified.[16] Yet, some scholars have contended that the framework implemented by the Federal Court in this case fails to adequately protect the affected customers' online privacy rights in accordance with the principles articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v. Spencer.
Source Wikipedia
Marc Gaudrault