These were good for what they were. They actually cleaned really well and were built pretty alright. The biggest draw backs are the fact that it has no tools and that it never filtered very well. But giving the original $35 price point they were solid, they were better in almost every way when compared to the competition like the Bissell EasyVac and Eureka Optima, and are certainly better than what is thrown out today.
Curious, is this one made out of parts? because on the 2006 models the metal part of the handle should be silver and the brushroll should be a little different
![[2024] New Shark PowerDetect Pet vacuum cleaner- Performance Testing](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-voL9XDBtuk/mqdefault.jpg)
![[2024] New Shark PowerDetect Pet vacuum cleaner- Performance Testing](/img/tr.png)
When I was young (around 7) we had one as a spare vacuum (we also used it as a basement vac) it was pink and it worked really well for what it was
These were good for what they were. They actually cleaned really well and were built pretty alright. The biggest draw backs are the fact that it has no tools and that it never filtered very well. But giving the original $35 price point they were solid, they were better in almost every way when compared to the competition like the Bissell EasyVac and Eureka Optima, and are certainly better than what is thrown out today.
Really nice vacuum cleaner
Como cuanto cuesta una igual
Why were the cyclonic 2010 models discontinued and when
Curious, is this one made out of parts? because on the 2006 models the metal part of the handle should be silver and the brushroll should be a little different
Yes. I swapped parts from the 2010 model and put them on this one. So I bascially made a Frankenstein project.