Two planes have crashed before because of one broken lightbulb. An exploded fan blade from one engine left UA 232 with no hydraulic controls. Point is, plane crashes and disasters in general can be weird because one small object can cause massive damage.
Boeing just ended their racist DEI programs on November 1st, 2024 just a little bit too late, as the DEI issues are just showing their true dangers, causing death and malfunctions. Had Boeing HR employed top talent, instead of what color or gender the applicant was, Boeing could have engineered far better safety systems. It will take years of more crashes to overcome the long-term effects of Boeing's dangerous DEI programs in their engineering departments. Boeing may need to bring in real top engineers to identify and weed out the dangerous DEI wannabes.
I cant comment any cause im not a pilot or an engr or an expert. All i can do is pray for people died in that crash. 🙏🙏 Rest in peace brothers and sisters.
yes the plane landed smoothly and the pilot has control over the plane and all, but what questions me the most is that why did the pilot approach the runway with normal speed touch down, instead of a slower approach if they KNEW that they're gears are malfunctioning Edit: Saw some more Info's about the crash and before the crash, before the landing and the crash, the plane had a bird stike to its right engine causing it to loose power, the pilot also did turned around instead of landing the plane that time, and yes the plane had its flaps and gears down that time, but this second attempt of them landing, the gears now had its malfunction, but they did tried to land it at a staggering speed, out of all the passenger the plane had, just 2 survived.
@@il313li he is not slowing down. those engines can be heard at full thrust. he is trying to get to the concrete runway. its the badly designed barrier at the end that did them in.
The concrete wall antenna killed the plane. If it veered to the left more it would not hit the wall and momentum would have stopped it from ground friction.
@williamm6446 Yes they can't but the landing direction approach should have been taken into account by the tower since the plane would be just sliding the soil would have been a better braking material than tarmac.
@@Loohhvb the 737 has a switch that releases the gears by gravity. The pilots must have not been able to reach it in time because it's so far back. And according to Swiss, the plane did a teardrop maneuver and went even faster
This was a bird strike near final approach, according to witnesses on the ground. Sadly, the pilots likely turned off the wrong engine after a likely single power-plant bird strike, which left them with no power at all. But if it were a double bird strike, they didn't have much time to plan the complex emergency landing on a known short runway. Notwithstanding, after the bird strike, the pilots failed to pull the 3 manual levers to drop the landing gear without hydraulics (its behind their seats), they failed to fire up the APU to power the flaps into a "down" landing position without engine power, they approached way above stall speed because they had no flaps. The pilots landed level at an abnormally high speed, with only two thirds of the short runway remaining. Without any power, they couldn't even reverse thrust. Then a huge concrete blast-proof barrier was dead in their way. Honestly, they should have just aimed for a water landing... and followed the exact same procedures as Captain Sully did on the Hudson river in America. A water landing would have given them much more room to play with, and likely most, if not all the passengers and crew would have survived.
I think pilot not activate spoiler and reverse thrust to help make it reduce the speed of plane before reach the end of the runway and minimize the impact to the wall?
as for the brick wall at the end of the runway.....all these runways in south korea are military runways. korea is still at civil war with the north. there is a truce in place, not a peace agreement. the wall is there for military aircraft carrying bombs and missiles from delivering those weapons into the neighborhoods stupid governments allow to be built at the ends of runways full well knowing this will happen sooner rather than later.... those massive apartment eating craters left by russian aviation bombs in ukraine....yeah now picture 12 of those going off in a neighborhood and school at the end of a runway when there was no need to drop them or the military aircraft was damaged and tried to return for an emergency landing from battle damage. look up the old footage of the B-17 bombers from ww2 returning to base. my dads boss was an B-17 captain in ww2. he lost 3 B-17 due to battle damage all 3 were on fire, one they had to dtich over the english channel, another one started on fire during final approach, barely got the plane stopped before the entire B-17 was engulfed in flames, most of the crew did not make it especially the ball turret gunner. his third started on fire upon landing as they were trying to evacuate most of his crew who were wounded from german AA flak. he lost 58 crew members of his four B-17's from the start of the war to his boots on the ground pictures of the bomb damage he personally did to the reichstag in berlin.
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control its looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒
My guess is that they turned off the wrong engine. Now with dual engine failure, there will be no power to hydraulics and flap extension would be impossible. Probably, no hydraulic power to landing gear as well. But why they didn't use gravity deployment of landing gear is beyond me.
But the APU at the back can be switched on no in that scenario? I assume it's not enough to control the flaps function i guess. Also I hear there is a manual override for the landing gear to come down on it's own weight on that model of aircraft. I guess we will wait for the flight recorder analysis.
They would still be able to extend the landing gear unless they slowed too much before hand, I suppose it's possible they shut off the wrong engine and spent too long trying to get it to start again to extend the gear with gravity.
The pilots failed to pull the 3 manual levers to drop the landing gear, they failed to fire up the APU to power the flaps without engine power, they also likely turned off the wrong engine after the bird strike, which left them with no power at all.
@@RandyHoff Ya it's a very confusing sequence of events, not nearly enough time to complete any checklist between the go around and the landing. If they shut off the wrong engine was that even enough time to understand what they did? Surely you'd expect after completing the go around they'd level off, declare an emergency and troubleshoot any warnings. Either an extremely catastrophic failure happened from maybe shrapnel damage from the engine after the bird strike or this has to be pilot error.
The ILS at the end of the runway shouldn't have been built with hard concrete. If that concrete barrier wasn't there, the plane would still have had a chance to stop and more could have survived. It is beyond justification, and is on the verge of criminal that they've built that concrete barrier.
The Answer: Why would a pilot land with no flaps and no gear down? If he had no power he would keep the flaps up and gear up to glide further. But he mis-judged the glide rate by about 2 seconds which made him land long. He had no reverse thrusters to slow the plane and no brakes. He needs about 5500 feet for a normal landing. The runway is 9200 feet. He landed at about the 4000 foot mark. Impossible to slow down without reverse thrusters and no brakes. The plane was very controlled so he had hydraulics but he had no power.. This is my best guess as it makes sense.
The plane was so fast from what I saw in the photo, had the approach done in a slow pace maybe it had been different, just my thinking. Rest in peace brothers and sisters, Amen.
The run way is long but i think they landed in half of run way and its very fast..no flaps apply ..one think is if they do not build a solid concrete wall my be have a chance to survive.its better cyclone fence..because of the fast travel and the impact they create a explosion..
From the visuals I guess the flaps were not down and the aircraft was coming in too fast.A few years back a polish airlines (LOT)Boeing 767 was in the similar situation but the aircraft made a safe landing.
well, no one can prevent ramming into that concrete wall, even if you have a smooth belly landing and control of the aircraft. Who puts that at the end of the landing strip if you know an emergency landing can happen and you need a run-off to slow the plane down. a concrete wall does that too, but with deadly consequences.
It honestly feels like the pilot was inexperienced. Why attempt a landing without landing gear and flaps? Isnt a water landing more recommended in this case? Also why couldnt they communicate with the ground to know that there was a concrete wall there?
still short runway I think ,if the runway longer enough without wall just straight and flat ground or grassy soil ,the damage and explosion would not so much and cathastropic...even there was a sudden technical problem happened in its landing gear and why there so much speed approaching landing path?
No. That’s not how the aviation industry works. Aviation safety is built on blood. That’s why it’s the safest mode of transport-every catastrophe leads to systemic change. Praying does not lead to change. I’m not stopping you from praying, but I’m telling you that it’s 100% wrong to say that we cannot do something about this.
@@rhetorical1488it’s safer than landing on a runway with a wall on the end of it. Remember when captain sully succesfully landed an airbus a320 on the hudson river back in 2009
@@Absolutely420 sully got lucky. very lucky. a casual search will show you a water landing will look exactly like this minus the fire than everyone drowns.
people specially those who claim they are “eXpErTs” should refrain from giving opinion until after investigation. it is so easy to pronounce phrases if you are not the pilot. too many “whys”
there should be a manual lever to release the landing gear. im thinking the pilot forgot he lacks landing gear to properly slow the plane. and why his flaps are not down?
Someone landed a plane successfully like this. . . from what I remember, he circled around and around the airport to use up ALL THE FUEL so it won't ignite from the belly landing. Did they do that too?? 🤔🤔🤔
The pilot should just fly back up after he knew that the landing gears are malfunctioning, and wait for further instructions from the ground while circling in the air..
Korea has had similar issues before. the pilot system is rooted in societal hierarchy. the copilot defers to the senior pilot in all cases and can try and hint but never expressly challenge a decision.
Trucks have a runaway barrier it would have been good sense to have some sort of sand bank instead of a bile of discarded junk at the end of that runway. Also, if you take note there was a body of water near that crash site ... Trust me with almost 100, 000 moving parts its a wonder of the ages there is not more of these incidences ?
They said. Landing in reverse. Auto pilot to manual needs 2 minutes. Mayday from pilot, 2 minutes before impact. I am a normal person with zero knowledge in aviation etc.
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control it's looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒 need the Cvr confirmation.
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? and they attempted to land mid runway! unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control it's looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒 need the Cvr confirmation.
1. no coordination with ATC. Pilot should have requested emergency services with ATC such as ambulance, fire trucks, and applying foam in the run way ASAP while they they're doing a holding pattern. 2. Pilots didn't utilize the flaps properly to further slow the plane. 3. Pilots should have coordinated with ATC for alternative airports that have a very long runway. RIP🥺
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control it's looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒 need the Cvr confirmation.
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control its looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒
It seems to me, that if not for the brick wall at the end of the runway, this air plane may not have crashed landed, in the way that it did. Hopefully the South Korean Airport, and those that are in charge, will put a collapsible antenna at the end of their runways and not use brick walls. So sad for all the people who lost loved ones.😒
This raises doubts about the 911 WTC narrative. How could a plane get absorbed by a building made of thick steel and concrete designed to stop a jet, creating a cartoon cut out shape through the whole building, coming out of the other side, when a thin brick wall will stop and disintegrate a Boeing 737?
The hydraulic system of a 737 has not 1, not 2, but 3 backup systems, apart from the fact that this never have happened before, a bird strike simply would never ever have any affect on the hydraulic system! In my guess 100% pilot error, they rushed or ignored the checklist and simply forgot half of it!
The concrete wall the plane it and then exploded could have stopped a tank.What is a cement wall doing at the end of a runway? Every airport I`ve seen holding up radar equipment is stuck into the ground with metal poles or they have a small shack holding some of the electronics.I don`t think a hunk of tons of concrete is smart.
This raises doubts about the 911 WTC narrative. How could a plane get absorbed by a building made of thick steel and concrete, creating a cartoon cut out shape through the whole building, coming out of the other side, when a thin wall will stop and disintegrate a Boeing 737?
nag panic ang piloto, nakalimutan ilabas ang gulong ng eroplano. kawawa mahinang nilalang na damay ang 171 passengers sa kahinaang nilalang para maging piloto.
We condole to those who loses theirs love one😢and to those who are fast to give their own opinon and blame somebody and the wall or the landing gear,ride a bus😮
Insensitive, sorry. Pakisabi, 6/7 sa aming magkakapatid graduate. Kung buhay tatay ko, nakapaggolf na yon ngayon. Nung dinala nila ako sa construction while in kuwait, isa na lang nagaaral.
The real true questions is just how much well experienced was the Pilots especially the captain and how many flight experiences was between the 2 Pilots because big corporates airlines are literally laying off well experienced older Pilots and replacing them with young unexperienced Pilots you will not see much Pilots over 50 years old these days now majority of Pilots are very young in their 20's with very little experience flight hrs under their wings I know a captain who is 48 years old and was laid off due to his age the big corporates airliners has found that keeping on well experienced older Pilots will result in higher costs in pay and pensions so once your contract expires they just won't renew it because new contracts mean having to pay more than what they want to pay because of the experience the older Pilots has, lesser experienced Pilots means airliners can dictated the pay and amount of hrs per shift per month, lesser experience lesser hrs more younger Pilots = lesser amount of money being paid out to the Pilots and more bigger profits for the big corporates due to lesser expenses paying for well experienced older Pilots is very costly these days now according to the corporates airliners in their latest research, having more younger unexperienced Pilots on the rosters results in lesser money being paid out a new Pilot only does 3 to 4 days of flight per week and 8 hours per shift and the airliners are actually literally looking at to make it Pilots do 3 days a week 8 hours per shift, the more young unexperienced Pilots the lesser flight hrs the lesser amount of money being paid out on pay and pensions for new employees more control dictatorship the corporates airliners has the bigger profits it's very much all about the billions and billions of profit they can make corporates greediness
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
hard to believe that everything in the plane stopped functioning from a single bird strike
Could be some form of elaborate distraction, while some criminal act of genocide of theft takes place.
Two planes have crashed before because of one broken lightbulb.
An exploded fan blade from one engine left UA 232 with no hydraulic controls.
Point is, plane crashes and disasters in general can be weird because one small object can cause massive damage.
Boeing just ended their racist DEI programs on November 1st, 2024 just a little bit too late, as the DEI issues are just showing their true dangers, causing death and malfunctions.
Had Boeing HR employed top talent, instead of what color or gender the applicant was, Boeing could have engineered far better safety systems. It will take years of more crashes to overcome the long-term effects of Boeing's dangerous DEI programs in their engineering departments. Boeing may need to bring in real top engineers to identify and weed out the dangerous DEI wannabes.
Happened in the Hudson River. Both planes had no power but both had perfectly working flight controls.
@@handlenumber707 someone was overdosed of Netflix
I cant comment any cause im not a pilot or an engr or an expert. All i can do is pray for people died in that crash. 🙏🙏 Rest in peace brothers and sisters.
yes the plane landed smoothly and the pilot has control over the plane and all, but what questions me the most is that why did the pilot approach the runway with normal speed touch down, instead of a slower approach if they KNEW that they're gears are malfunctioning
Edit: Saw some more Info's about the crash and before the crash,
before the landing and the crash, the plane had a bird stike to its right engine causing it to loose power, the pilot also did turned around instead of landing the plane that time, and yes the plane had its flaps and gears down that time, but this second attempt of them landing, the gears now had its malfunction, but they did tried to land it at a staggering speed, out of all the passenger the plane had, just 2 survived.
common sense…he’s trying to take off again and regain elevation
You need flaps to slow down. The flaps weren't extended allowing for a higher speed upon landing.
Pilot must havd tried to slow down but technical failure resulted in crash.
@@STUNNAG-bj8hf while kissing the ground?
@@il313li he is not slowing down. those engines can be heard at full thrust. he is trying to get to the concrete runway. its the badly designed barrier at the end that did them in.
These abrupt cuts between speaker and other images are highly annoying and amateurish.
The concrete wall antenna killed the plane. If it veered to the left more it would not hit the wall and momentum would have stopped it from ground friction.
They couldn't steer it.
@williamm6446 Yes they can't but the landing direction approach should have been taken into account by the tower since the plane would be just sliding the soil would have been a better braking material than tarmac.
@@krytopi Going for the grass would still be bad and the pilots must have thought it would stop before the embankment
The Plane was quite fast. It's most likely to prevent a stall which would be as deadly. But the touchdown was incredibly late.
한번의 착륙이 실패하고 다시 날아올라 바로 한바퀴만 돌아 역행해서 착륙했기에 터치다운이 늦었고 그로인해 활주 길이가 짧아졌다고 합니다
@@Loohhvb the 737 has a switch that releases the gears by gravity. The pilots must have not been able to reach it in time because it's so far back. And according to Swiss, the plane did a teardrop maneuver and went even faster
that is gear landing
This was a bird strike near final approach, according to witnesses on the ground.
Sadly, the pilots likely turned off the wrong engine after a likely single power-plant bird strike, which left them with no power at all. But if it were a double bird strike, they didn't have much time to plan the complex emergency landing on a known short runway.
Notwithstanding, after the bird strike, the pilots failed to pull the 3 manual levers to drop the landing gear without hydraulics (its behind their seats), they failed to fire up the APU to power the flaps into a "down" landing position without engine power, they approached way above stall speed because they had no flaps. The pilots landed level at an abnormally high speed, with only two thirds of the short runway remaining. Without any power, they couldn't even reverse thrust. Then a huge concrete blast-proof barrier was dead in their way.
Honestly, they should have just aimed for a water landing... and followed the exact same procedures as Captain Sully did on the Hudson river in America. A water landing would have given them much more room to play with, and likely most, if not all the passengers and crew would have survived.
Why the speed seems not in normal landing approach???
It's not, they hit the wall at basically the speed that planes normally touchdown on the runway at.
I think pilot not activate spoiler and reverse thrust to help make it reduce the speed of plane before reach the end of the runway and minimize the impact to the wall?
@@Eskabetse_pan-os thé revérse thrust is activated but the lañding geàr and flaps did not go down
Why a wall at end of runway??????????
as for the brick wall at the end of the runway.....all these runways in south korea are military runways. korea is still at civil war with the north. there is a truce in place, not a peace agreement.
the wall is there for military aircraft carrying bombs and missiles from delivering those weapons into the neighborhoods stupid governments allow to be built at the ends of runways full well knowing this will happen sooner rather than later.... those massive apartment eating craters left by russian aviation bombs in ukraine....yeah now picture 12 of those going off in a neighborhood and school at the end of a runway when there was no need to drop them or the military aircraft was damaged and tried to return for an emergency landing from battle damage.
look up the old footage of the B-17 bombers from ww2 returning to base. my dads boss was an B-17 captain in ww2. he lost 3 B-17 due to battle damage all 3 were on fire, one they had to dtich over the english channel, another one started on fire during final approach, barely got the plane stopped before the entire B-17 was engulfed in flames, most of the crew did not make it especially the ball turret gunner. his third started on fire upon landing as they were trying to evacuate most of his crew who were wounded from german AA flak. he lost 58 crew members of his four B-17's from the start of the war to his boots on the ground pictures of the bomb damage he personally did to the reichstag in berlin.
Human shields
@@aprilgeneric8027 Thanks for clarification.
9200 foot super long runway... pilot only used 1/2 of the runway
This is so terribly awful! My thoughts and prayers are with all the families impacted by this tragedy.
Who in the right mind allowed a huge concrete wall to be built and the end of a runway!?!? That should be illegal!
If there were emergency the airport should be prepared and just around the area of accident. This could be a mistake by the pilot
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control its looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒
My guess is that they turned off the wrong engine. Now with dual engine failure, there will be no power to hydraulics and flap extension would be impossible. Probably, no hydraulic power to landing gear as well. But why they didn't use gravity deployment of landing gear is beyond me.
But the APU at the back can be switched on no in that scenario? I assume it's not enough to control the flaps function i guess. Also I hear there is a manual override for the landing gear to come down on it's own weight on that model of aircraft. I guess we will wait for the flight recorder analysis.
They would still be able to extend the landing gear unless they slowed too much before hand, I suppose it's possible they shut off the wrong engine and spent too long trying to get it to start again to extend the gear with gravity.
The pilots failed to pull the 3 manual levers to drop the landing gear, they failed to fire up the APU to power the flaps without engine power, they also likely turned off the wrong engine after the bird strike, which left them with no power at all.
@@RandyHoff Ya it's a very confusing sequence of events, not nearly enough time to complete any checklist between the go around and the landing. If they shut off the wrong engine was that even enough time to understand what they did? Surely you'd expect after completing the go around they'd level off, declare an emergency and troubleshoot any warnings. Either an extremely catastrophic failure happened from maybe shrapnel damage from the engine after the bird strike or this has to be pilot error.
The ILS at the end of the runway shouldn't have been built with hard concrete. If that concrete barrier wasn't there, the plane would still have had a chance to stop and more could have survived. It is beyond justification, and is on the verge of criminal that they've built that concrete barrier.
Why is there a brick wall???
Where is the foam?
Why didn’t they dump the fuel?
Why didn’t they land at the start of the runway?
That's the question for most people here.
What if those antennas were just stuck on the ground? Why have a thick wall of concrete at the end of the runway? Quite crazy
The Answer: Why would a pilot land with no flaps and no gear down? If he had no power he would keep the flaps up and gear up to glide further. But he mis-judged the glide rate by about 2 seconds which made him land long. He had no reverse thrusters to slow the plane and no brakes. He needs about 5500 feet for a normal landing. The runway is 9200 feet. He landed at about the 4000 foot mark. Impossible to slow down without reverse thrusters and no brakes. The plane was very controlled so he had hydraulics but he had no power.. This is my best guess as it makes sense.
A mountain of sand must build instead of a concrete wall on the runway it is an accident please pray for them…
Physics, the sand will act like concrete at high speed and still shred the plane. This is why even water landings are still very very tricky.
The plane was so fast from what I saw in the photo, had the approach done in a slow pace maybe it had been different, just my thinking.
Rest in peace brothers and sisters, Amen.
The run way is long but i think they landed in half of run way and its very fast..no flaps apply ..one think is if they do not build a solid concrete wall my be have a chance to survive.its better cyclone fence..because of the fast travel and the impact they create a explosion..
From the visuals I guess the flaps were not down and the aircraft was coming in too fast.A few years back a polish airlines (LOT)Boeing 767 was in the similar situation but the aircraft made a safe landing.
Boeing has some safety issues according to former engineers of that plane
@@ellamae6360 they don't call the 800 flying coffin for nothing
well, no one can prevent ramming into that concrete wall, even if you have a smooth belly landing and control of the aircraft. Who puts that at the end of the landing strip if you know an emergency landing can happen and you need a run-off to slow the plane down. a concrete wall does that too, but with deadly consequences.
Is there any possibility that the plane would survive if they tried it on the grassy part of the runway?
Anything except hitting thick concrete
Unlikely since after grass is concrete wall around the air field
The real question is. Is it actually bird strike or landing gear malfunction
It honestly feels like the pilot was inexperienced. Why attempt a landing without landing gear and flaps? Isnt a water landing more recommended in this case? Also why couldnt they communicate with the ground to know that there was a concrete wall there?
You can't land at water coz with that speed water itself act as concrete wall. leading severe damage
still short runway I think ,if the runway longer enough without wall just straight and flat ground or grassy soil ,the damage and explosion would not so much and cathastropic...even there was a sudden technical problem happened in its landing gear and why there so much speed approaching landing path?
It was mere an accident. We cannot do something but to pray for those dead and their families.
No. That’s not how the aviation industry works.
Aviation safety is built on blood. That’s why it’s the safest mode of transport-every catastrophe leads to systemic change.
Praying does not lead to change.
I’m not stopping you from praying, but I’m telling you that it’s 100% wrong to say that we cannot do something about this.
Yeah there was no landing gear. That’s a real issue.
It was two "Diversity Hire" pilots. Usually cheap airlines will put at least one decent pilot with the mixed-race DEI wannabe "pilot" for safety.
After the itaewon stampede incident now the deadly plane crash. This is so sad.
Pilot can reduce petrol by continuous flying..n touch down near by waterbody to avoid any collison.
landing in water is not as safe as you think it is.
@@rhetorical1488it’s safer than landing on a runway with a wall on the end of it. Remember when captain sully succesfully landed an airbus a320 on the hudson river back in 2009
@@Absolutely420 sully got lucky. very lucky.
a casual search will show you a water landing will look exactly like this minus the fire than everyone drowns.
for now dont blame each other,lets pray for the victim may there soul be at peace..😢
Does the pilot when he land he will definitely hit the wall and explode?...
people specially those who claim they are “eXpErTs” should refrain from giving opinion until after
investigation. it is so easy to pronounce phrases if you are not the pilot. too many “whys”
there should be a manual lever to release the landing gear. im thinking the pilot forgot he lacks landing gear to properly slow the plane. and why his flaps are not down?
No pilot panic,dont know what to do
That's what I thought also
lets hear it in the blackbox something went wrong
Someone landed a plane successfully like this. . . from what I remember, he circled around and around the airport to use up ALL THE FUEL so it won't ignite from the belly landing. Did they do that too?? 🤔🤔🤔
The pilot should just fly back up after he knew that the landing gears are malfunctioning, and wait for further instructions from the ground while circling in the air..
" landing gears are malfunctioning" ... well you know, it's a BOING and you have to expect that.
@@catholiccowboy8545 it's Boeing mate
According to Wikipedia, this was his second attempt at landing.
Korea has had similar issues before. the pilot system is rooted in societal hierarchy. the copilot defers to the senior pilot in all cases and can try and hint but never expressly challenge a decision.
From what I read the plane was on its 2nd or 3rd attempt to land. I believe this plane was falling apart. A true BOEING !
Trucks have a runaway barrier it would have been good sense to have some sort of sand bank instead of a bile of discarded junk at the end of that runway. Also, if you take note there was a body of water near that crash site ... Trust me with almost 100, 000 moving parts its a wonder of the ages there is not more of these incidences ?
Waiting for armchair, self-proclaimed, and overnight aeronautics, flight physics and aviation experts in the comments
I've just searched "Airplane" in Google 2 minutes ago, you can ask me anything and I'll provide you with my expert opinion.
They said. Landing in reverse. Auto pilot to manual needs 2 minutes. Mayday from pilot, 2 minutes before impact. I am a normal person with zero knowledge in aviation etc.
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control it's looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒 need the Cvr confirmation.
there are no landing gear doors on the 73. only on the nose wheel.
😔😔😔… 🙏🙏🙏….. My Prayers are with the Families , During this time , So sad
The concrete wall causes the plane explosion. If not because of it I think many survived😢 rip😢
Did anyone survive?
2 people. Cabin crew.
The plne was too fast
Experts suddenly sprout like mushrooms after the rain
🍄
Whatever happened to momentum????
Not enough runway to decide between powering up and taking back off or land despite the defective landing gear.
pilot error..........
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? and they attempted to land mid runway! unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control it's looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒 need the Cvr confirmation.
1. no coordination with ATC. Pilot should have requested emergency services with ATC such as ambulance, fire trucks, and applying foam in the run way ASAP while they they're doing a holding pattern.
2. Pilots didn't utilize the flaps properly to further slow the plane.
3. Pilots should have coordinated with ATC for alternative airports that have a very long runway.
RIP🥺
3 landing gears up/failed?
May those perished souls rest in peace.
What was the atc doing
Seems some sabotage
It would be another bird strike without that video
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control it's looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒 need the Cvr confirmation.
I don’t think a bird strike prevents landing gear.
🤦♂️✈️ it looks like the plane lost all hydraulics, including Rutters what really destroyed the plane is the wall it ran into at the end of the runway
Let's not disregard a terrorist attack. Rip to the souls of the dead 🙏🏾
It has been confirmed it was indeed a bird strike there is footage showing the strike but the tragedy was a classic unstable approach less than 3 minutes elapse between declaring emergency and the failed landing not nearly enough time to go over checklist? unless there was some catastrophic loss of total control its looking more and more like PIlot error!!! 😒
It seems to me, that if not for the brick wall at the end of the runway, this air plane may not have crashed landed, in the way that it did. Hopefully the South Korean Airport, and those that are in charge, will put a collapsible antenna at the end of their runways and not use brick walls. So sad for all the people who lost loved ones.😒
This raises doubts about the 911 WTC narrative. How could a plane get absorbed by a building made of thick steel and concrete designed to stop a jet, creating a cartoon cut out shape through the whole building, coming out of the other side, when a thin brick wall will stop and disintegrate a Boeing 737?
Maybe more chance if pilot landed on water (on the right side of the terminal)
The frictional force may cause fire
Short runway with tall concrete wall at the end. Very smart of the profit oriented south Koreans.
The hydraulic system of a 737 has not 1, not 2, but 3 backup systems, apart from the fact that this never have happened before, a bird strike simply would never ever have any affect on the hydraulic system!
In my guess 100% pilot error, they rushed or ignored the checklist and simply forgot half of it!
Airplane touchdown landed reverse side of runway cause hit the walls and explosion occurred
Its must have a landing foam on the wall much better
THANK YOU SANTA CLAUS FOR THE EXPLANATION
Any how or any wrong decision by the pilots...but in this case shortness of this runway is the only factor of this catastrophic accident. 💐🙏
Rest in peace
The concrete wall should have never been there so sad 😞
It is an act of terror
Agreed! The birds demanded free food!
The concrete wall the plane it and then exploded could have stopped a tank.What is a cement wall doing at the end of a runway? Every airport I`ve seen holding up radar equipment is stuck into the ground with metal poles or they have a small shack holding some of the electronics.I don`t think a hunk of tons of concrete is smart.
This raises doubts about the 911 WTC narrative. How could a plane get absorbed by a building made of thick steel and concrete, creating a cartoon cut out shape through the whole building, coming out of the other side, when a thin wall will stop and disintegrate a Boeing 737?
He came in way to fast for a belly landing
I hope my flight doesn't end up like that 0_0
Did someone survive??
2
nag panic ang piloto, nakalimutan ilabas ang gulong ng eroplano. kawawa mahinang nilalang na damay ang 171 passengers sa kahinaang nilalang para maging piloto.
Dapat mahina na dapat yun kasi palanding na piro parang bilis parin hindi naka sad sad yung ulo ng plain naka high parin
Jay Costura and Baldwin prediction are true
Is it necessary for him to say the investigation will be transparent because SK is a western country ?
Because non western countries often are outrageously corrupt
South Korea a western country? 2:30. West of Japan yes, but western country?
OmG..😢😢😢😢😢
Maybe controls in german💀
SI SARA NAKASAKAY?!??? 😮😮
NAKA SHABU SIGURO PILOT
Kaya takot aq ng sumakay sa eroplano
We condole to those who loses theirs love one😢and to those who are fast to give their own opinon and blame somebody and the wall or the landing gear,ride a bus😮
😢😢😢😢😢😢
Baby drawing but dramatic good job 👍
Yung concrete wall ang pumatay.
Kasalana nian airport bkit my pader haharang harang
"western country"... "transparent"... LOL
somethings fishy
😞🥺😢
Boeing again!
Your point, do you know the cause of the crash?
@alexrebmann1253 It's Boeing again!
@@Jay-hr3rh That doesn't prove that Boeing was responsible which I think is what you are trying to insinuate.
@alexrebmann1253 When was the last time you heard of a deadly incident involving an airbus?
It's boeing again @@alexrebmann1253
😭😭😭😭😭
After explosion the Gear is now not malfunction. 😂
🙏 🙏 🙏
Insensitive, sorry. Pakisabi, 6/7 sa aming magkakapatid graduate. Kung buhay tatay ko, nakapaggolf na yon ngayon. Nung dinala nila ako sa construction while in kuwait, isa na lang nagaaral.
Daming A.i na tnga sa comment section may masabi lang
The real true questions is just how much well experienced was the Pilots especially the captain and how many flight experiences was between the 2 Pilots because big corporates airlines are literally laying off well experienced older Pilots and replacing them with young unexperienced Pilots you will not see much Pilots over 50 years old these days now majority of Pilots are very young in their 20's with very little experience flight hrs under their wings I know a captain who is 48 years old and was laid off due to his age the big corporates airliners has found that keeping on well experienced older Pilots will result in higher costs in pay and pensions so once your contract expires they just won't renew it because new contracts mean having to pay more than what they want to pay because of the experience the older Pilots has, lesser experienced Pilots means airliners can dictated the pay and amount of hrs per shift per month, lesser experience lesser hrs more younger Pilots = lesser amount of money being paid out to the Pilots and more bigger profits for the big corporates due to lesser expenses paying for well experienced older Pilots is very costly these days now according to the corporates airliners in their latest research, having more younger unexperienced Pilots on the rosters results in lesser money being paid out a new Pilot only does 3 to 4 days of flight per week and 8 hours per shift and the airliners are actually literally looking at to make it Pilots do 3 days a week 8 hours per shift, the more young unexperienced Pilots the lesser flight hrs the lesser amount of money being paid out on pay and pensions for new employees more control dictatorship the corporates airliners has the bigger profits it's very much all about the billions and billions of profit they can make corporates greediness
........omg !
Sherlock , what's your conclusion ?, or , are you still waiting for Watson ?
🥺🥺🥺
ANIA MEA DOMINE!!!
🤦♂️