I like the stuff that has only one person doing the close protection. I was trained using 2 for departure and arrival. Four in the vehicle with the client. Driver, lead, and two rear sandwiching the client. Lead gets out, opens door, rear security exits, client then exits essentially sandwiched between us. The extra rear security is there in vehicle to provide suppression if needed. I was trained almost 20 years ago so this may not be the SOP anymore. The reason I like this is because I am a father, husband, and friend. It’s easy to do this stuff with a team, but most times, the everyday life we protect, we are the only ones.
That's how it should be done, client is always in a box. Maybe with current times and smaller budgets security gets cut and being forced to do same jobs with less personnel/equipment.
@@localbrew73 the practicality of doing it like this definitely has applications in everyday life. Keeping your head on a swivel with more tools is good. I do agree full box is better. Training drills, we would train man down like in hot in/exfils. But that was we’re fucked. This is operating under this as the norm. It’s not that different on how you move and cover than with the support a full box. Just alone.
Probably super over looked but what I really enjoyed in this video is at 8:10. When he deployed his flashlight he didn’t just shine it straight ahead he had towards the ceiling. Most people don’t know doing that with a good hand held light actually is a way to light up majority if not all of the room. Also hitting a white wal or mirror with a good solid light while dismantle your own POV once you move the light to a different spot on the wall the ceiling eliminates that possibility as well.
Thank you very much, excellent tactical instructor. In theory complete and in concept 👍 👌 Because I learn from you something easy that seems difficult. Above all, preserving life is easier than inventing irresponsible movements, just because someone like you does not exist in every story. Teach the correct and detailed.
I'm with Jp421. We were always taught to have the principal on the side closest to the entrance, not to expose them any longer than necessary. Also we never turned our back to an identified threat. Just my two cents worth.
They're not going to. UF Pro is meant for professionals only, sadly. By professionals I meant police and military, that's exclusively who they're focussed on and sell to, not to civilians.
Did some training on lets say, more offensive actions using vehicles. This fall I will be learning the more defensive aspects / VIP protection, this video has been a great introduction. As always, thanks a bunch for your uploads
When you open the door, should you go inside the building before your protectee??? Just to make sure there is no threat inside waiting. Should you use the car door closest to the entry door in the building??? Avoid walking around the vehicle.
Agreed, especially if you know the venue and route you're taking have the client on the side of the entry and exit point. I also think leaving the door open of the AIC when exiting to retrieve the client is safer; if there is an event you're able to get the client secured and hop back in the passenger side faster if you don't have to open the door. The driver acts as observation in the event someone tries to enter the vehicle while ushering the client to the egress point of the venue. Great video though and great practices shown here.
wouldn't you get that done exiting the passenger side, clearing, scanning, then exiting the client? I guess either side works, but I guess personally I'd rather limit my clients exposure as much as possible@@3nertia
In the Imminent Threat scenarios I noticed that the client covered up in a boxer’s cover. Do you teach that to clients? How deeply do you brief clients in what to do if things go sideways? What do you do if a client freezes, tries to run or otherwise compromises their own safety due to instinct overriding training?
Loving this series. Is there no one checking for threats behind the door, before letting the client enter first? Or is this deemed a "safe" place in this scenario?
Remember, a two man one vehicle team sucks…and is usually only done stateside. Also, as the driver you never pull a James Yeager and put your vehicle in park while picking up or dropping off your client. You will inherently forget to put it in drive and you will sit there flirting it and going no where…just like the ditch queen James Yeager did.
But what if the threat is inside ? why would the guard not walk in first then the client? there could be a guy waiting inside with a gun for the client !
On the clean departure, why did you not put the principal back into the car on the side that was closest to the exit door of the building or have the driver turn the car around (pre-staging the car) so that the vehicle was facing the opposite direction and the appropriate car door was closest to the building? I feel that walking the principal all the way around the car exposes him to more possible threats (pedestrian, vehicle, sniper).
In the depicted scenario, the danger is within the venue or building - no snipers or other external threats were mentioned - and I could see how walking the client around the car might provide a degree of protection from anything coming out of the building (bullets, explosive debris)
@@scdrescher1 One-man bodyguard = probably low-risk mission, so It's better to open the door for him and let him go Through. High risk = probably 3 to 5 PES, one would have to open the door and check the inside of the venue before the VIP even put a foot on the ground. Hope that makes sense...
Why does the client enter first through the door?. I understand this is a clean arrival, but it seems counterintuitive. Nothing to be gained by it, but a lot to lose. Even if the risks assessment tells you there is no risk, it's a bad habit surely....
4:00 - 4:10 client is protecting your back 😂 and you have narrow visual cover only to the wall. How would you change this? Or you would not change anything.
Cant behind services like this. Unless its a family member or close friend, no grown man should agree their life is less important than a random client and amount of money. Beta activity
people doing this (should) believe themselves to have enough skill to protect both themselves and the client. Like mentioned several times, security is multi layered and this is only a small part of the whole. Lots of footage of security services failing to do their job in recent times so these kinds of instructionals are very important.
The only beta activity here is your grammar and spelling. Now for the real measure of alpha beta incel bullshit you’re espousing, you and one of them in a room. Who walks out? Put your “alpha” where your mouth is or fuck off with that shit.
It is called a capitalist society. one person's skill is protection, another person's skill is they have a huge bank account. They are not protecting Mother Theresa. Skill sellers and Skill buyers connect. I can think of 91 indictment reasons why Judges and lawyers currently need this service.
Firefighters, police officers, soldiers and security guards put others ahead of themselves every day. For many it is the answer to a simple question, if not me, then who? For others it is knowing that we might make the difference between success and failure.
Great video, thanks for sharing.
😎🤙
I like the stuff that has only one person doing the close protection. I was trained using 2 for departure and arrival. Four in the vehicle with the client. Driver, lead, and two rear sandwiching the client. Lead gets out, opens door, rear security exits, client then exits essentially sandwiched between us. The extra rear security is there in vehicle to provide suppression if needed. I was trained almost 20 years ago so this may not be the SOP anymore.
The reason I like this is because I am a father, husband, and friend. It’s easy to do this stuff with a team, but most times, the everyday life we protect, we are the only ones.
That's how it should be done, client is always in a box. Maybe with current times and smaller budgets security gets cut and being forced to do same jobs with less personnel/equipment.
@@localbrew73 I definitely can see that happening. Less bodies, less money, more profit for the shareholders.
@@localbrew73 the practicality of doing it like this definitely has applications in everyday life. Keeping your head on a swivel with more tools is good. I do agree full box is better.
Training drills, we would train man down like in hot in/exfils. But that was we’re fucked. This is operating under this as the norm. It’s not that different on how you move and cover than with the support a full box. Just alone.
@@ThinMantheGhost that's the key, train in every different scenario only makes you more versatile in my opinion.
@@localbrew73 That's the problem... Budgets !! Now you better train with only 2 or 3 and 1 vehicle sadly ...
Probably super over looked but what I really enjoyed in this video is at 8:10. When he deployed his flashlight he didn’t just shine it straight ahead he had towards the ceiling. Most people don’t know doing that with a good hand held light actually is a way to light up majority if not all of the room. Also hitting a white wal or mirror with a good solid light while dismantle your own POV once you move the light to a different spot on the wall the ceiling eliminates that possibility as well.
Thank you very much, excellent tactical instructor. In theory complete and in concept 👍 👌 Because I learn from you something easy that seems difficult. Above all, preserving life is easier than inventing irresponsible movements, just because someone like you does not exist in every story. Teach the correct and detailed.
Perfect practice makes perfect
I'm with Jp421. We were always taught to have the principal on the side closest to the entrance, not to expose them any longer than necessary. Also we never turned our back to an identified threat. Just my two cents worth.
Can you run a scenario of a father protecting his family and or a couple protecting their kids in a similar scenario?
They're not going to. UF Pro is meant for professionals only, sadly. By professionals I meant police and military, that's exclusively who they're focussed on and sell to, not to civilians.
Did some training on lets say, more offensive actions using vehicles. This fall I will be learning the more defensive aspects / VIP protection, this video has been a great introduction. As always, thanks a bunch for your uploads
It wasn't very good. I would not use that as a training video.
@@brianr6457 hi Brian
I'm a novice in this topic, got any input or recommendations? Cheers
@@vorwaerts_nie_zurueck Look into an accredited school. For example, executive security International in Colorado.
Much needed lesson
indeed much needed lesbian
Shout out to you guys!
1st🥇 World Class
Grand Master for the
Armoring Industry
I’M D ARMOR MASTER
🇺🇸🇨🇦🇦🇪🇲🇽🇧🇷🇻🇪🇦🇷
When you open the door, should you go inside the building before your protectee???
Just to make sure there is no threat inside waiting.
Should you use the car door closest to the entry door in the building???
Avoid walking around the vehicle.
richtig coole folge.. finde dieses Konzept von der Erklärung solcher tweets echt cool
Is there a reason to exit the vehicle on the far side of the entry door, rather than adjacent to it?
Agreed, especially if you know the venue and route you're taking have the client on the side of the entry and exit point. I also think leaving the door open of the AIC when exiting to retrieve the client is safer; if there is an event you're able to get the client secured and hop back in the passenger side faster if you don't have to open the door. The driver acts as observation in the event someone tries to enter the vehicle while ushering the client to the egress point of the venue. Great video though and great practices shown here.
They may have just done this for ease of recording
To clear the opposing side of the vehicle so you don't get blindsided by an ambush from behind?
I’d say because you’d have more freedom of movement and concealment in case of a threat.
wouldn't you get that done exiting the passenger side, clearing, scanning, then exiting the client? I guess either side works, but I guess personally I'd rather limit my clients exposure as much as possible@@3nertia
Great video. Good training and techniques.
😎🤙
In the Imminent Threat scenarios I noticed that the client covered up in a boxer’s cover.
Do you teach that to clients? How deeply do you brief clients in what to do if things go sideways? What do you do if a client freezes, tries to run or otherwise compromises their own safety due to instinct overriding training?
bring back triple feed..outstanding
Very good , I am Close Protection VIP/Authority in Brazil
Sitting giggling at mount.
Great video!!!
Loving this series.
Is there no one checking for threats behind the door, before letting the client enter first? Or is this deemed a "safe" place in this scenario?
Windows down in vehicle first mistake, principal opening the door and entering first second mistake; that area wasn’t cleared
Take positive control of the client's door.
Per second recoil in mma but fast forwarded for three.
A support for seconds assertive.
Poderia ter traduções em português 😢😢😢
💯
Why do you never look high/low when approaching a door for IED's/tripwires.
Are f crazy? protection team IED? wiretraps?
Goood stuff!
😎🤙
Remember, a two man one vehicle team sucks…and is usually only done stateside. Also, as the driver you never pull a James Yeager and put your vehicle in park while picking up or dropping off your client. You will inherently forget to put it in drive and you will sit there flirting it and going no where…just like the ditch queen James Yeager did.
But what if the threat is inside ? why would the guard not walk in first then the client? there could be a guy waiting inside with a gun for the client !
Why didn't Client exit and enter from the Driver's side of the vehicle ? Shorter distance and cover for the client.
The client always sits behind the Bodyguard no matter what.
On the clean departure, why did you not put the principal back into the car on the side that was closest to the exit door of the building or have the driver turn the car around (pre-staging the car) so that the vehicle was facing the opposite direction and the appropriate car door was closest to the building? I feel that walking the principal all the way around the car exposes him to more possible threats (pedestrian, vehicle, sniper).
@@foxtrotoscar4284 What you said is true. I was just wondering why they wouldn't show the ideal way to do it, on this training video.
In the depicted scenario, the danger is within the venue or building - no snipers or other external threats were mentioned - and I could see how walking the client around the car might provide a degree of protection from anything coming out of the building (bullets, explosive debris)
@@Chagsis That is not true. Watch the video again. They covered interior and exterior threat scenarios.
Would you ever let the primary enter first into an uncleared structure? Don’t know if I missed that in the explanation.
@@scdrescher1 One-man bodyguard = probably low-risk mission, so It's better to open the door for him and let him go Through. High risk = probably 3 to 5 PES, one would have to open the door and check the inside of the venue before the VIP even put a foot on the ground. Hope that makes sense...
Mais vamos estudar o ingles agora kkkk
Why does the client enter first through the door?. I understand this is a clean arrival, but it seems counterintuitive. Nothing to be gained by it, but a lot to lose. Even if the risks assessment tells you there is no risk, it's a bad habit surely....
first time he leaved door open, and then he close it.
Left ear right ear
D USA
In real scenario things wont go so clean. They would be dead.
I think he needs more training , here ex french legion in activity
hi
Of course all car windows stay closed. You don't want someone to throw something inside the car, like a smoke gren, flashbang or worse.
hey man, and who close the back vip door in real case :-D???::::Driver?...:etc....-)sorry I understand. promo is promo and real is real...
At 05:14 you flagged your charged gun towards your driver, why?
Again at 05:39, same flagging !
I saw it too
The problem with all this is it doesn't work because cars arnt bullet proof.
D AGENCYE
he open door put client before himself, and client got shoot. fin
D AGENSI
D COP
D
D AMERICAN
4:00 - 4:10 client is protecting your back 😂 and you have narrow visual cover only to the wall.
How would you change this? Or you would not change anything.
These days! Once He/She They/them 😅
😂😂😂
D FBI
Is it not dangerous if these videos could fall in the wrong hands ?
В жизни не думал, что в 21 веке будет так много татуированных дурачков и дурочек.
No and more NO with a hell NO
Windows down wrong, allowing the Principal to close the door is also wrong.
D AGENSY
At stop?
who is Marc Thiery... his company owns 51% of uf pro but theres hardly any info on him
Cant behind services like this. Unless its a family member or close friend, no grown man should agree their life is less important than a random client and amount of money. Beta activity
people doing this (should) believe themselves to have enough skill to protect both themselves and the client. Like mentioned several times, security is multi layered and this is only a small part of the whole. Lots of footage of security services failing to do their job in recent times so these kinds of instructionals are very important.
The only beta activity here is your grammar and spelling. Now for the real measure of alpha beta incel bullshit you’re espousing, you and one of them in a room. Who walks out? Put your “alpha” where your mouth is or fuck off with that shit.
It is called a capitalist society. one person's skill is protection, another person's skill is they have a huge bank account. They are not protecting Mother Theresa. Skill sellers and Skill buyers connect. I can think of 91 indictment reasons why Judges and lawyers currently need this service.
Firefighters, police officers, soldiers and security guards put others ahead of themselves every day. For many it is the answer to a simple question, if not me, then who? For others it is knowing that we might make the difference between success and failure.
@@markkouri2877 id say EMS is necessary. Rich people who refuse to arm themselves isnt lol