The Law Minister dodged a question regarding the aspersion and PAP’s stance on gays standing for elections. Then he claimed that the opposition party member shifted goal posts. That’s how I see this clip.
I put myself in a position for "everyone", everyone to feel for oneself in a hypothesis of/for truth in search for an understanding for acceptance. This is it : You are a woman having everything of a woman within you BUT everyone insisted that you must be a man OR you are a man having everything of a man within you BUT everyone insisted that you must be a woman. Feel it. These are incidents where wisdom elaborates acceptance, a gift from God for allowing space to refine the complexity of existence, the Cosmo as a whole.
Pritam Singh should just ask Shanmugam in the latter's own style which is "just answer in a simple Yes or No, please" and stick to that. Shanmugam claims he can't make decisions as he is not the PM but he is amongst the first ones to have an opinion about anything and everything...even standing up to protect his party members. The hypocrisy is so overpowering!
Pritam Singh has more balls then the entire PAP put together. This is like the late Karpal Singh of Msia...who stood by his principles till his death. Without Karpal, the DAP has completely lost its principles.
Unexpectedly question become unrelavant question. A question become a question. A question is answered with a question. Finally no answer. Conclusion is no answer is a answer. Its been answered.
Well done Workers Party and especially to Mr Pritam Singh! The FACT that Mr Shanmugam does not even DARE to state category that ALL Singaporeans, REGARDLESS of race, language, religion and SEXUAL ORIENTATION has already itself shown what the PAP’s position was on this issue! That not all Singaporeans are seen and treated EQUALLY with what should be their ENTITLED Civil liberties as a citizen of this country! Not to mention the fact that PAP loves to Character Assassinate their political opponents using the state media as a tool for their agenda.
The opposite party trying to be the woke party can recruit all your gay candidates for all you like, who is to stop you? But why has this any relevance to how PAP recruits its own candidates?
@@hagisno I heard but I don’t see the prata. That’s why I asked you for your interpretation. In fact if you have good observation, Pritam didn’t pursue this line of argument. In other words, by bringing up the pedophilia Pritam scored an own goal. That’s why he let the matter go. Understand?
believe the Ministers are working for Singaporeans, and they deserve to be well paid But I can't understand why we pay $192k to MP. They only meet the people 3 hours a week and offer a listening ear. That is all
The identity of Singapore is love and kindness based upon proper knowledges, beyond religions, cultures, nationalities and races. Democracy without proper knowledges will develop a disconcerted and widespread disputes in small dots. Whilst this innovative order is to allow love and kindness having its function towards LGBT, it also deter improper knowledge for LGBT to have complete democracy in Singapore. The PAP can lost its governing power, but cannot lost its proper knowledge of a democratic Singapore
Pritam, Pritam, Pritam… You must understand that MPs are people who will be involved in shaping policies and such. It would be a disaster if you let a pro-immorality candidate into the Parliament. So no, please drop this nonsense advocating for that.
So all PAP members are in favour of sex between men including those Muslims MPs and ministers, not discounting the fact that Islam prohibits such things and curses those who indulge in those kind of activities.... Let the Muslim members in the PAP stand up and make their positions clear on this matter... Any Muslims who support such things have indeed lost their faith!!!
If a candidate actively participates in a forum that allows conversations about underage sex or paedophiliac behaviours, then i would support the questioning of his/her intentions. I think shanmugam was perfectly reasonable in his reply.
Consent or not ,pay or not,we are going to have a gay club soon. Another new business n revenues for the gov,just like carbon tax in disguise of climate change prevention. Human race will be extinct soon just like other creatures before us. Too greedy ....
The minister completely missed the point of what Pritam Singh was asking.
The Law Minister dodged a question regarding the aspersion and PAP’s stance on gays standing for elections. Then he claimed that the opposition party member shifted goal posts. That’s how I see this clip.
Anyone who watched this heavily edited patchwork should watch the uncut version.
Strong question posed by Singh and let wait for next GE to see if there is such candidates .
How come raeshaa Khan not questioned yet for lying in the partliment
This guy is so slippery. Not willing to answer straight up questions while accusing others of shifting the goal post. Very slippery indeed.
Very slithery...you mean?😂 spinning and spinning...dare not tell the truth.
I put myself in a position for "everyone", everyone to feel for oneself in a hypothesis of/for truth in search for an understanding for acceptance. This is it :
You are a woman having everything of a woman within you BUT everyone insisted that you must be a man OR you are a man having everything of a man within you BUT everyone insisted that you must be a woman. Feel it.
These are incidents where wisdom elaborates acceptance, a gift from God for allowing space to refine the complexity of existence, the Cosmo as a whole.
Not every good lawyer can win in a debate...When they are cornered...The only thing they can do is twist and turn...And They are trained to do that...
Pritamh is also a lawyer
PS should be able to take him on anytime. 👏👏👏👏
PS👍 KS going to bit around the bushes 😊
What is good character? I think PAP minister need to define that clearly.
Both being lawyers can spar till cows come back without commiting any straight answer - wasting taxpayers' money, most disgusting.
Pritam Singh should just ask Shanmugam in the latter's own style which is "just answer in a simple Yes or No, please" and stick to that. Shanmugam claims he can't make decisions as he is not the PM but he is amongst the first ones to have an opinion about anything and everything...even standing up to protect his party members. The hypocrisy is so overpowering!
Pritam Singh has more balls then the entire PAP put together. This is like the late Karpal Singh of Msia...who stood by his principles till his death. Without Karpal, the DAP has completely lost its principles.
Unexpectedly question become unrelavant question. A question become a question. A question is answered with a question. Finally no answer. Conclusion is no answer is a answer. Its been answered.
he forget so he is corret in scoring points for pap .
Mr Singh💪👍
He may not be around longer after this coming elections. The ruling party played politics.
Well done Workers Party and especially to Mr Pritam Singh! The FACT that Mr Shanmugam does not even DARE to state category that ALL Singaporeans, REGARDLESS of race, language, religion and SEXUAL ORIENTATION has already itself shown what the PAP’s position was on this issue! That not all Singaporeans are seen and treated EQUALLY with what should be their ENTITLED Civil liberties as a citizen of this country! Not to mention the fact that PAP loves to Character Assassinate their political opponents using the state media as a tool for their agenda.
Well done my foot......
PAP good stand there. With morality as a basis.
The opposite party trying to be the woke party can recruit all your gay candidates for all you like, who is to stop you? But why has this any relevance to how PAP recruits its own candidates?
Both talking in circles and the issues were never addressed at all ..... more about making the issues political .......
What is the meaning of 'aspersion'?
I was thinking the same😊 about to Google
As usual Pappigs flip its prata when cornered and forever contradict its own bullshit policies just to win the argument....
2:00 Pritam asked “what’s the relevance of the viewpoint in sex with boys”. How did the PAP flip the prata?
@@CalvinK300 Listen to the reply man....
@@hagisno I heard but I don’t see the prata. That’s why I asked you for your interpretation. In fact if you have good observation, Pritam didn’t pursue this line of argument. In other words, by bringing up the pedophilia Pritam scored an own goal. That’s why he let the matter go. Understand?
@@hagisno you must be oppig
@@burhan999 You must be Pappigs idiotic voters ....
believe the Ministers are working for Singaporeans, and they deserve to be well paid
But I can't understand why we pay $192k to MP. They only meet the people 3 hours a week and offer a listening ear. That is all
Grossly overpaid.
Looks like WWE ? A very positive debate and it's good for singapore.
This is meritocracy.
I am surprised by the PAP minister. ermmmmmmm politicians.
The identity of Singapore is love and kindness based upon proper knowledges, beyond religions, cultures, nationalities and races. Democracy without proper knowledges will develop a disconcerted and widespread disputes in small dots. Whilst this innovative order is to allow love and kindness having its function towards LGBT, it also deter improper knowledge for LGBT to have complete democracy in Singapore. The PAP can lost its governing power, but cannot lost its proper knowledge of a democratic Singapore
Pritam, Pritam, Pritam…
You must understand that MPs are people who will be involved in shaping policies and such.
It would be a disaster if you let a pro-immorality candidate into the Parliament.
So no, please drop this nonsense advocating for that.
So all PAP members are in favour of sex between men including those Muslims MPs and ministers, not discounting the fact that Islam prohibits such things and curses those who indulge in those kind of activities....
Let the Muslim members in the PAP stand up and make their positions clear on this matter...
Any Muslims who support such things have indeed lost their faith!!!
Shanmugham rockzz
By dodging?
If a candidate actively participates in a forum that allows conversations about underage sex or paedophiliac behaviours, then i would support the questioning of his/her intentions. I think shanmugam was perfectly reasonable in his reply.
Gay, pedophila n incest sex, aren’t these sexual orientation or preference? 🤔
Consent or not ,pay or not,we are going to have a gay club soon.
Another new business n revenues for the gov,just like carbon tax in disguise of climate change prevention.
Human race will be extinct soon just like other creatures before us.
Too greedy ....
They are the same, but some hypocrites will deny them.
Its perversion...
Mr PAP Lite, Reigning Party loves an 'Opposition' like you
If he had said is just admit like a gentlemen and not to twist and turn his way out
😅can't stand in discussion with pritam.
How to answer a question without answering a question.
Azab nanti...
Shan keep on flipping..anything but answering the answer....I will vote WP for life
HAHAHA....BRO ONLY ARSENAL FOR LIFE....PARTY CAN CHANGE😂😂😂
As usual...nothing new