GWPs, Emission Factors, & Carbon vs. CO2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 янв 2025

Комментарии • 42

  • @leonejoubert2878
    @leonejoubert2878 4 года назад +2

    Great explanation on how to derive the Co2 equivalent!

  • @jonlaban4272
    @jonlaban4272 2 года назад +1

    Thanks for this simple explainer video

  • @alihamdani6605
    @alihamdani6605 5 лет назад +1

    This helps me a lot, thanks very much ben

  • @廖城城
    @廖城城 8 лет назад +2

    Good presentation! Thanks a lot!

  • @vibahat580
    @vibahat580 9 лет назад +2

    Thank you, it helps me to understand more about emission

  • @pajarobobo
    @pajarobobo 3 года назад +1

    Really helpful video.

  • @omkarmungekar5655
    @omkarmungekar5655 2 месяца назад

    which links to folow to know more ?

  • @MonyAngelus
    @MonyAngelus 5 лет назад +1

    Very valuable video kindly post some videos on biomass

  • @globalwarming360
    @globalwarming360 9 лет назад +1

    Good job. I am a physics and chemistry major and I have also studied Global Warming. For those of you that are watch this is the facts.

  • @faicornelius2601
    @faicornelius2601 3 года назад +1

    Thank you so much bro….you’re awesome in explaining 👌😊👏

  • @lucasvillamor4409
    @lucasvillamor4409 Год назад

    GWP change with time? I understand GWP are a practical measure, not a theoretical one. This means that how much more heat methane traps than carbon dioxide depends on how much or both those gases there is in the atmosphere. Am I right? Is that why different green organizations constantly update GWPs?

  • @ottard
    @ottard 2 года назад

    I am looking for an explanation of Emission Factors. Did he mention it in the video?

  • @balqisramadhillah9630
    @balqisramadhillah9630 Год назад

    Great insight from C vs CO2. Just realized that carbon emission is not necessarily refers to emission of carbon dioxide. becasue each hold different emission rate..? cmiiw

  • @tedgraves6366
    @tedgraves6366 Год назад

    Diesel fuel and Gasoline are different weights of fuels. . . To obtain the same weight of a gas, a larger volume is required than a liquid. . .

  • @Nomad-pz2tj
    @Nomad-pz2tj 5 лет назад +3

    What is the GWP of vater vapour?

  • @Nomad-pz2tj
    @Nomad-pz2tj 5 лет назад +2

    If i know right vater vapour is the strongest and highest concentrated greenhouse gas,not the co2.

    • @WadcaWymiaru
      @WadcaWymiaru 5 лет назад

      None of them is...

    • @Nomad-pz2tj
      @Nomad-pz2tj 4 года назад

      @@WadcaWymiaru I have recently heard in a video that in avarage vater vapour cause 60, co2 20 and etc gases 20 percent the green house effect.

    • @WadcaWymiaru
      @WadcaWymiaru 4 года назад +2

      @@Nomad-pz2tj
      The "greenhouse gas effect" is proven WRONG, here is how i found it(after graduating meteorology subject):
      upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Atmospheric_Transmission.png
      There are only two wavelengths where CO2 acts as a GHG (around 4 microns and 15 microns)
      and they are quite narrow, and represent less than 5 percent of the total spectral range
      of earth's natural radiative heat to space.
      Now equal concentration to define energy density:
      Water vapor concentration: 10 000 ppm (average) or 1%
      Carbon dioxide concentration: ~400 ppm (average) or 0.04%
      10 000/400 = 25 or 1/25 ~0.05
      0.05 x 5% = 0.002
      We know greenhouse gases increase global temperature by 33 °C.
      33°C x 0.002 = 0.06°C
      total influence of Carbon Dioxide is 0.06°C.
      Let's use *Ideal Gas Law*
      PV=nRT
      Earth 100% CO2
      T = 101.3 / (8.314 x 1.225/44) =437.63 K (result in absolute temperature)
      437.63K - 273.15=163.85 °C (conversion to Celsius)
      163.85 x0.04%=0.06°C ! (Earth CO2 heating, this is not a ghg effect!)
      That agree with my previous calculation for "greenhouse gas effect" !

    • @Nomad-pz2tj
      @Nomad-pz2tj 4 года назад

      @@WadcaWymiaru It is a very low influence by co2.

    • @WadcaWymiaru
      @WadcaWymiaru 4 года назад +2

      @@Nomad-pz2tj
      Yes. Energy MUST be conserved since Earth is in thermall equilibrium state.
      The CO2 has maybe 0.341 W/m of additional heating.
      That 0.06°C equals 0.16F°, source: *University of Chicago MODTRAN radiation code.*
      Let's do other planets:
      Venus:
      T=9200/8.314 x 65/43.35 = 737.99 K or ~464°C
      Titan:
      T=146.7/8.314 x 5.25/28 = 94.1K or -179°C
      Let's see evidence on other worlds:
      ruclips.net/video/BuTmHCRJovc/видео.html
      This formula also works at a pressure of 23 trillion kPa (the center of the Sun);
      (For an ionized core we use 0.62 for molar mass);
      T = PM/Rρ
      = 2.3 x 10^13 kPa x 0.62/8.314 x 153,000
      = 11 million Kelvin
      Clark, D. B. (1989). The ideal gas law at the center of the sun. J. Chem. Educ, 66(10), 826.

  • @pedram4967
    @pedram4967 10 лет назад

    Thank you so much !

  • @kirkcunningham9214
    @kirkcunningham9214 5 лет назад

    thank you brother

  • @henryjanicky4978
    @henryjanicky4978 3 года назад

    Full of b.s.. Any gases which forms in atmosphere trups Sun ruys in both direction so the more trups heat the more trups sunrays cuming in ? It's work in both directions, dosent it ?

  • @donpinwill7258
    @donpinwill7258 3 года назад +1

    Big problem with the GWP figures because CO2 is not a constant when it comes to it's heating ability. The amount it heats depends on the l of CO2 already in the atmosphere. e.g. 1 ton of CO2 at 200ppm will do much more heating per ton than at 500ppm. This is the logarithmic property of CO2. Therefore all GWP figures are flawed because CO2 heating ability is not a constant - it becomes less and less as CO2 levels rise.

  • @mikewazowskigaming3029
    @mikewazowskigaming3029 4 года назад

    Infa red not infra red

  • @khaliddvidal7381
    @khaliddvidal7381 5 лет назад

    This is scary !

  • @KIIDKYAAS
    @KIIDKYAAS 3 года назад

    CO2 has a very small effect

  • @samiraakbarova1853
    @samiraakbarova1853 2 года назад +1

    Thank you so much!