d-q theory : AC to DC transformations

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
  • To access the translated content:
    1. The translated content of this course is available in regional languages. For details please visit nptel.ac.in/tr...
    The video course content can be accessed in the form of regional language text transcripts, books which can be accessed under downloads of each course, subtitles in the video and Video Text Track below the video.
    Your feedback is highly appreciated. Kindly fill this form forms.gle/XFZh...
    2. Regional language subtitles available for this course
    To watch the subtitles in regional languages:
    1. Click on the lecture under Course Details.
    2. Play the video.
    3. Now click on the Settings icon and a list of features will display
    4. From that select the option Subtitles/CC.
    5. Now select the Language from the available languages to read the subtitle in the regional language.

Комментарии • 58

  • @RamKumar-hm2vi
    @RamKumar-hm2vi Год назад +1

    He is not a Professor bhai, he is a GOD of DQ Transformation.
    Such a Easy explanation in 13 minutes video

  • @imadsalih8740
    @imadsalih8740 3 года назад +2

    Appreciate...how interesting and easy to understand when the teacher is really a teacher...

  • @chuckjls
    @chuckjls 3 месяца назад

    Such an excellent and clear explanation. Thank-you, Professor.

  • @prateeknaryal4031
    @prateeknaryal4031 Год назад

    very nice explanation by Umanand Sir. Big fan from a very long time.

  • @shahbazkhan-jj7ve
    @shahbazkhan-jj7ve 3 года назад

    Best explanation of these topic so far..

  • @Aaqib_Qureshi
    @Aaqib_Qureshi 4 года назад +1

    Best explanation. I am a big fan of Umanand sir. Hope to work with him one day

  • @shashwatsingh2682
    @shashwatsingh2682 Год назад

    Excellent explanation!

  • @CarlosHenrique-gx9hx
    @CarlosHenrique-gx9hx Год назад

    Thank you so much, greetings from Brazil

  • @rahulvirmani2235
    @rahulvirmani2235 5 лет назад

    Very Nice and simple explanation sir....

  • @esbenmadsen5220
    @esbenmadsen5220 3 года назад +2

    There is an error in this video. On the drawing seen at 1:40 b is defined as sin(x+(2/3)*pi), however, on the phase plot b and c are switched. You can see this because when a is 0 (sin(0)=0), b should be a positive value (sin(0+(2/3)*pi)>0), and likewise c should be negative. The answer is that b and c are switched from the vector plot to the phase plot. The result is that with the transformation that is presented, the ab vector should be going clockwise.

    • @rajensama
      @rajensama 3 года назад +1

      You are right but most of the video , not only in this one, has done so. Phase B and C are switched.

  • @emen1371
    @emen1371 10 месяцев назад

    Great explanation. Thanks

  • @Attexi
    @Attexi 5 лет назад +1

    It's a really good explanation. Thanks!

  • @حميدالحاتمي-ع2غ
    @حميدالحاتمي-ع2غ 2 месяца назад

    Why there is no factor of 2/3 in the Clark transformation?

  • @miftahulislam1291
    @miftahulislam1291 5 лет назад

    Amazing explanation Sir

  • @praveens4278
    @praveens4278 2 года назад +1

    Why acb is used instead of abc..in Clark transformation..

  • @bezibedie4259
    @bezibedie4259 Год назад

    Well explain sir. Please can you the zero component of the DQZ transform ?

  • @arthurenricocecidossantos1212
    @arthurenricocecidossantos1212 2 года назад +2

    At 5:42 you magically changed the phase sequence from abc (as you can see at 5:24) to acb. Please explain why we need to do that in order to the transformation work corectly

  • @vijayapriyas1026
    @vijayapriyas1026 11 месяцев назад

    Good morning sir,Thank you so much for your valuable explanation, may I know how Rab (alpha beta) is transferred into Rdq. I don't know the concept behind that sir.

  • @lukecurran1198
    @lukecurran1198 2 года назад

    thank you

  • @xichenjiang7799
    @xichenjiang7799 4 года назад +2

    The best thing I learned: how to draw three-phase.

  • @grpagobo
    @grpagobo 4 года назад

    thanks prof. appreciate the clear explanation.

  • @drnsksai
    @drnsksai 5 лет назад

    really good

  • @adelsalam9735
    @adelsalam9735 3 года назад

    THANKS

  • @durgaprasadchary5733
    @durgaprasadchary5733 4 года назад +1

    If we transfer ABC to dqo, can we control active nd reactive components

  • @AxElKo440
    @AxElKo440 5 лет назад +2

    Good lesson, but I don't understand where do I get ρ angle in the AlphaBeta to DQ transformation. Could you advise me please sir?

    • @obaidurrahman1303
      @obaidurrahman1303 5 лет назад

      alphabetha is a fixed plance where as dq is rotating, and hence the angle is added to give a point of reference of the rotation

  • @abhisekrout976
    @abhisekrout976 4 года назад

    Thank you very well explained!!

  • @rajeshbnarasimha934
    @rajeshbnarasimha934 6 лет назад

    super sir...

  • @HOOHA333
    @HOOHA333 4 года назад

    Hi All,I did not get one thing here, Why does alpha and beta frame needs to have imaginary and real components ?

  • @dineshth6711
    @dineshth6711 4 года назад

    Thank you, sir.
    Very good explanation

    • @monikalohana5812
      @monikalohana5812 4 года назад

      can anyone plz guide me that why negative e^-je is taken when converting from alpha beta to dq axis ?

    • @dineshth6711
      @dineshth6711 4 года назад

      @@monikalohana5812
      Watch this video ma (from 15:00 minutes)
      ruclips.net/video/UC5XjoHNQis/видео.html

  • @ginebro1930
    @ginebro1930 4 года назад

    Thanks!

  • @smadnan6283
    @smadnan6283 4 года назад

    Thnku sir

  • @yashrajsharma1
    @yashrajsharma1 3 года назад

    Thankyou

  • @بشارمحمد-د3ز
    @بشارمحمد-د3ز 6 лет назад

    Thank you...with regards

  • @Manster-minds
    @Manster-minds 3 года назад

    Life saver

  • @farhan.mukhtiar
    @farhan.mukhtiar 2 года назад

    Sir i can't understand the 0.5 point.

  • @ammarali4197
    @ammarali4197 6 лет назад

    Thank you so much

  • @rubenboros
    @rubenboros 5 лет назад

    Thank you!

  • @pedrotorres8317
    @pedrotorres8317 5 лет назад

    Thank you for the clear explanation!

  • @rajeshjami3317
    @rajeshjami3317 5 лет назад

    thank you sir

  • @sagexiao8281
    @sagexiao8281 6 лет назад

    thank u, sir!

  • @명승호-v5w
    @명승호-v5w 6 лет назад

    thank you !

  • @monikalohana5812
    @monikalohana5812 4 года назад +1

    can anyone plz guide me that why negative e^-je is taken when converting from alpha beta to dq axis ?

    • @atmanandmaya2090
      @atmanandmaya2090 4 года назад +1

      because dq-axis reference frame lag space vector...….see dq-axis theory vedio of design of photovoltaic systems

    • @curly0117
      @curly0117 4 года назад

      @@atmanandmaya2090 shouldn't it be cos(-p) +j*sin(-p) at 10:10?

  • @bradlymcnell9466
    @bradlymcnell9466 5 лет назад

    how does that negative .5 became positive while multiplying with cos 60. It should be negative 0.25 right?
    so negative .25 and negative .25 sums up and give -0.5 which overall gives 0.5 and not 1.5
    Am i wrong?

    • @lutosronnie
      @lutosronnie 4 года назад

      If you look at the original phasors of b, or c, cos 60 of these phasors would lie along the x-axis but facing in the opposite direction to phase a. Therefore, the resultant is a - b - c. But b and c are negative 0.25. So the resultant becomes 1 - (-0.25) - (-0.25) = 1.5

    • @maheshpadmanabh6564
      @maheshpadmanabh6564 4 года назад +1

      We use vector addition and not algebraic sum.

  • @amitkumarpandey8956
    @amitkumarpandey8956 2 года назад

    please use Hindi language

  • @VaibhavPrakashSrivastava
    @VaibhavPrakashSrivastava 3 года назад

    Thanks

  • @kangkandas2468
    @kangkandas2468 3 года назад

    thank you sir

  • @brammekeful
    @brammekeful 4 года назад

    Thanks!

  • @leoli8164
    @leoli8164 4 года назад

    Thank you!