d-q theory : AC to DC transformations
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
- To access the translated content:
1. The translated content of this course is available in regional languages. For details please visit nptel.ac.in/tr...
The video course content can be accessed in the form of regional language text transcripts, books which can be accessed under downloads of each course, subtitles in the video and Video Text Track below the video.
Your feedback is highly appreciated. Kindly fill this form forms.gle/XFZh...
2. Regional language subtitles available for this course
To watch the subtitles in regional languages:
1. Click on the lecture under Course Details.
2. Play the video.
3. Now click on the Settings icon and a list of features will display
4. From that select the option Subtitles/CC.
5. Now select the Language from the available languages to read the subtitle in the regional language.
He is not a Professor bhai, he is a GOD of DQ Transformation.
Such a Easy explanation in 13 minutes video
Appreciate...how interesting and easy to understand when the teacher is really a teacher...
And it only took 13-14 minuts
Such an excellent and clear explanation. Thank-you, Professor.
very nice explanation by Umanand Sir. Big fan from a very long time.
Best explanation of these topic so far..
Best explanation. I am a big fan of Umanand sir. Hope to work with him one day
Excellent explanation!
Thank you so much, greetings from Brazil
Very Nice and simple explanation sir....
There is an error in this video. On the drawing seen at 1:40 b is defined as sin(x+(2/3)*pi), however, on the phase plot b and c are switched. You can see this because when a is 0 (sin(0)=0), b should be a positive value (sin(0+(2/3)*pi)>0), and likewise c should be negative. The answer is that b and c are switched from the vector plot to the phase plot. The result is that with the transformation that is presented, the ab vector should be going clockwise.
You are right but most of the video , not only in this one, has done so. Phase B and C are switched.
Great explanation. Thanks
It's a really good explanation. Thanks!
Why there is no factor of 2/3 in the Clark transformation?
Amazing explanation Sir
Why acb is used instead of abc..in Clark transformation..
Well explain sir. Please can you the zero component of the DQZ transform ?
At 5:42 you magically changed the phase sequence from abc (as you can see at 5:24) to acb. Please explain why we need to do that in order to the transformation work corectly
Good morning sir,Thank you so much for your valuable explanation, may I know how Rab (alpha beta) is transferred into Rdq. I don't know the concept behind that sir.
thank you
The best thing I learned: how to draw three-phase.
@Hilario Shehan scammers
thanks prof. appreciate the clear explanation.
really good
THANKS
If we transfer ABC to dqo, can we control active nd reactive components
Good lesson, but I don't understand where do I get ρ angle in the AlphaBeta to DQ transformation. Could you advise me please sir?
alphabetha is a fixed plance where as dq is rotating, and hence the angle is added to give a point of reference of the rotation
Thank you very well explained!!
super sir...
Hi All,I did not get one thing here, Why does alpha and beta frame needs to have imaginary and real components ?
Thank you, sir.
Very good explanation
can anyone plz guide me that why negative e^-je is taken when converting from alpha beta to dq axis ?
@@monikalohana5812
Watch this video ma (from 15:00 minutes)
ruclips.net/video/UC5XjoHNQis/видео.html
Thanks!
Thnku sir
Thankyou
Thank you...with regards
Life saver
Sir i can't understand the 0.5 point.
Thank you so much
Thank you!
Thank you for the clear explanation!
thank you sir
thank u, sir!
thank you !
can anyone plz guide me that why negative e^-je is taken when converting from alpha beta to dq axis ?
because dq-axis reference frame lag space vector...….see dq-axis theory vedio of design of photovoltaic systems
@@atmanandmaya2090 shouldn't it be cos(-p) +j*sin(-p) at 10:10?
how does that negative .5 became positive while multiplying with cos 60. It should be negative 0.25 right?
so negative .25 and negative .25 sums up and give -0.5 which overall gives 0.5 and not 1.5
Am i wrong?
If you look at the original phasors of b, or c, cos 60 of these phasors would lie along the x-axis but facing in the opposite direction to phase a. Therefore, the resultant is a - b - c. But b and c are negative 0.25. So the resultant becomes 1 - (-0.25) - (-0.25) = 1.5
We use vector addition and not algebraic sum.
please use Hindi language
Thanks
thank you sir
Thanks!
Thank you!