We design a circuit like this to capture the huge back EMF spike. A 6 volt input from the signal generator can spike to 600% of Back EMF from the coil. We had the idea to catch then re-use that energy as the input to the primary winding of high-turns-ratio step up transformer. The thinking was, we can use the 6vp-p or we can use the much higher back EMF spike as the input to a transformer's primary winding. We are choosing a 'pass-through' capacitor that has a very low Xc (capacitive reactance) at the frequency we are using; so we're not using the capacitor to store the Back EMF pulse, just to pass it to the other circuit. As usual, your description is easy to follow - thank you.
Was just discussing your video with a mate and feel that if you just mix fine sand , titanium dioxide and epoxy together probably a far better way to get the mix consistent without air bubbles ! Add sand to titanium first and mix well. This will disperse the titanium dioxide very evenly which is the main problem to address. Next add your epoxy and stir slowly to avoid bubbles forming . This mix should avoid most bubbles forming anyway . Now pour from one vessel to another. Only pour down the side wall and let run down . This will prevent bubbles from forming !!! This will help even the mix out . Silicone sand has a k value of 11
@@MasterIvo could u check putting a graphite or even a pencil inside a secondary Tesla coil to check as it already produces voltage and frequency and check at the top what voltage and current it will produce graphite being diamagnetic nd a conductor and as it acts like a anode it shd though its not a DC current would like ur experience though and if u can make a circuit without touching the coil whose inside it is so placed,
@@MasterIvo another thing as William beaty explained would u do an experiment to c how Tesla made 1000 times the voltage with just 100 turns on the secondary as compared to 10 turns on the primary and explain the process
@@MasterIvoif you want to make sure you have no air bubbles, you must cure the epoxy mixture in a pressure pot or vacuum chamber. They are both very cheap and excellent for casting your own solid state electronic components. The pressure pot will shrink the air bubbles, and the vacuum chamber will remove them entirely, however the vacuum can cause the mixture to boil. I would try the pressure pot first, then if that does not produce satisfactory results, purchase the vacuum chamber.
Hi, try adding a tungsten tip from a tig welder on your resistor discharge device, a ground sharp point makes for a secure connection and last a long time. Great idea with the stick!. Body diodes help the majority of industry protect their circuits, they have also become prevalent in modern IGBT's . Not many of us seek our impulses to bring the most disruptive discharges possible.
Seeing the current of L3 amplified from the coil capacitor discharge. I want to see what happens in a traditional tesla coil setup with this methodology. Also working on some spark experiments to show the difference between positive and negative voltage
@@MasterIvo So you can see what radiant effects manifest at the output of the tesla coil? Is that right? Where will you be when you turn it on for the first time?
Electric Radiant effects are hard to "see". I can see the current amplification. but you can also feel the fields. So I will stay at least a meter away when I will turn the high voltage system on.
I would surmise that since the word has been used as an umbrella term for unseen forces ,. anything unseen like cosmic rays , particles, plasma etc . would be aether in physics . The word aether is also used in a spiritual sense but once again meaning the unseen/ unknown
@@chrisrosenkreuz23 particles are as far as I can work out are emergent phenomena of aether that are given form through field interactions and then still only become particles when measured at a singular point in time. I would say that the use of the word aether is probably a little general as we don't know how many fields exist that we have not measured or even reliably detected so far, so I suppose the original comment is fairly accurate in that it seems to be a label for unknown more fundamental levels of reality. Particle is only a term to describe a measured energetic reaction of the universe to certain field activitiy at a specific moment, in my opinion, not fundamental at all, fields seem to be a fundamental 'force' but what the fields are and what substrate they act on seems to be the question. Particle physics seems to only measure what pops out of the universe when bits of itself vibrate with other bits. Does this sound about right to you? I am not a physicist by any stretch but have a bit of an interest.
The way i see tuning, is to get the maximum voltage output. Is this correct as i assume maximum voltage output equats to highest effeciency and therefore resonance. Is this correct?
@@MasterIvo yes well that is power I actually mean but in this instance of reading from the oscilloscopes voltage spikes i can only refer to them at this point but once we have a load i guess adjustments for resonance will have to be made again for peak output power. I guess that will depend on what is driven by this power be it resistive load or something other!
yes, pure resistive load is easier to calculate power (rectified to DC). with resonance the positive and negative power are normally in balance and result in a total zero power. But you can disturb this resonant power balance, which results in real power.
The voltage spikes that you get are not higher than 4kv? I wonder if a basic beer bottle capacitor bank would be more fit for experimenting. I suspect the voltage spikes could go through your caps right now. Who knows what scalar waves can do really.. thanks for sharing as always! Super interresting!
We The People are figuring this matrix out. We The People from every nation. Thanks Ivo!
Fantastic explanation Ivo. The mark of understanding a topic is an easily understood explanation.. Learning heaps :)
Thanks thats the goal
We design a circuit like this to capture the huge back EMF spike. A 6 volt input from the signal generator can spike to 600% of Back EMF from the coil.
We had the idea to catch then re-use that energy as the input to the primary winding of high-turns-ratio step up transformer. The thinking was, we can use the 6vp-p or we can use the much higher back EMF spike as the input to a transformer's primary winding.
We are choosing a 'pass-through' capacitor that has a very low Xc (capacitive reactance) at the frequency we are using; so we're not using the capacitor to store the Back EMF pulse, just to pass it to the other circuit.
As usual, your description is easy to follow - thank you.
pass it through a plate
Was just discussing your video with a mate and feel that if you just mix fine sand , titanium dioxide and epoxy together probably a far better way to get the mix consistent without air bubbles ! Add sand to titanium first and mix well. This will disperse the titanium dioxide very evenly which is the main problem to address. Next add your epoxy and stir slowly to avoid bubbles forming . This mix should avoid most bubbles forming anyway . Now pour from one vessel to another. Only pour down the side wall and let run down . This will prevent bubbles from forming !!! This will help even the mix out . Silicone sand has a k value of 11
Thanks for the tip!
@@MasterIvo could u check putting a graphite or even a pencil inside a secondary Tesla coil to check as it already produces voltage and frequency and check at the top what voltage and current it will produce graphite being diamagnetic nd a conductor and as it acts like a anode it shd though its not a DC current would like ur experience though and if u can make a circuit without touching the coil whose inside it is so placed,
@@MasterIvo another thing as William beaty explained would u do an experiment to c how Tesla made 1000 times the voltage with just 100 turns on the secondary as compared to 10 turns on the primary and explain the process
@@MasterIvoif you want to make sure you have no air bubbles, you must cure the epoxy mixture in a pressure pot or vacuum chamber. They are both very cheap and excellent for casting your own solid state electronic components. The pressure pot will shrink the air bubbles, and the vacuum chamber will remove them entirely, however the vacuum can cause the mixture to boil. I would try the pressure pot first, then if that does not produce satisfactory results, purchase the vacuum chamber.
@@bill4639 indeed, I have a vacuum chamber. But a pressure pot could indeed be used to compress the left over air bubbles
Thank you for sharing this important info 😉
My pleasure
Wonderful, clear explanation. Thank you
Nice education, thanks. I especially appreciate your openness about the mistakes that you make yourself 😉.
thanks, yes making mistakes is how I learn
Hi, try adding a tungsten tip from a tig welder on your resistor discharge device, a ground sharp point makes for a secure connection and last a long time. Great idea with the stick!. Body diodes help the majority of industry protect their circuits, they have also become prevalent in modern IGBT's . Not many of us seek our impulses to bring the most disruptive discharges possible.
I ordered some tungsten tips but for another experiment. To show the difference between positive and negative voltage discharges
@@MasterIvo looking forward to your results!
I was waiting, for more than one hour, for it, you give all the program in the description, and the show was very short, only the end was showed.
Sorry to hear that. RUclips doesn't work perfectly. Refreshing the page sometimes helps
It's OK, I watch it now. Thank you.
Divinci - cool!
What are the next steps in your project you are excited about Ivo?
Seeing the current of L3 amplified from the coil capacitor discharge.
I want to see what happens in a traditional tesla coil setup with this methodology.
Also working on some spark experiments to show the difference between positive and negative voltage
@@MasterIvo wonderful . I would suggest to see how this works on electrolysis . U can try hooking up to some HHO kit and check the gas output.
@@MasterIvo So you can see what radiant effects manifest at the output of the tesla coil? Is that right? Where will you be when you turn it on for the first time?
Electric Radiant effects are hard to "see". I can see the current amplification. but you can also feel the fields.
So I will stay at least a meter away when I will turn the high voltage system on.
Ken Wheeler was talking recently about what the Aether was "made of". Do you you have any ideas or sources of info?
Intersting I'll have yi take a look.
The Aether is there. But what it is? I can only guess:
Spirit
Conciousness
Inertia
Hello. Is it not the structure of the universe, at the Plank length?
or Planck, Max ?
I would surmise that since the word has been used as an umbrella term for unseen forces ,. anything unseen like cosmic rays , particles, plasma etc . would be aether in physics .
The word aether is also used in a spiritual sense but once again meaning the unseen/ unknown
@@azarahwagner2749 nah not particles
@@chrisrosenkreuz23 particles are as far as I can work out are emergent phenomena of aether that are given form through field interactions and then still only become particles when measured at a singular point in time. I would say that the use of the word aether is probably a little general as we don't know how many fields exist that we have not measured or even reliably detected so far, so I suppose the original comment is fairly accurate in that it seems to be a label for unknown more fundamental levels of reality.
Particle is only a term to describe a measured energetic reaction of the universe to certain field activitiy at a specific moment, in my opinion, not fundamental at all, fields seem to be a fundamental 'force' but what the fields are and what substrate they act on seems to be the question.
Particle physics seems to only measure what pops out of the universe when bits of itself vibrate with other bits.
Does this sound about right to you? I am not a physicist by any stretch but have a bit of an interest.
The way i see tuning, is to get the maximum voltage output. Is this correct as i assume maximum voltage output equats to highest effeciency and therefore resonance. Is this correct?
Yes, except it is not output. With resonance the energy is transformed back and forth between magnetic and dielectric field (current and voltage)
@@MasterIvo wouldn’t that translate to maximum power output?
Not necessarily. Power is depended on voltage and current.
But it makes sense the power is maximum when the resonant voltage is maximum
@@MasterIvo yes well that is power I actually mean but in this instance of reading from the oscilloscopes voltage spikes i can only refer to them at this point but once we have a load i guess adjustments for resonance will have to be made again for peak output power. I guess that will depend on what is driven by this power be it resistive load or something other!
yes, pure resistive load is easier to calculate power (rectified to DC).
with resonance the positive and negative power are normally in balance and result in a total zero power. But you can disturb this resonant power balance, which results in real power.
The voltage spikes that you get are not higher than 4kv? I wonder if a basic beer bottle capacitor bank would be more fit for experimenting. I suspect the voltage spikes could go through your caps right now. Who knows what scalar waves can do really.. thanks for sharing as always! Super interresting!
Yes, max 3.5kV impulses. Mostly limited by the gate driver IC. But I know how to get higher.
@@MasterIvo alright!
You are playing the circuit tuning like a musical stringed instrument, eg like a Violin... imo...
Thanks :)
yo
yoyo
One hand! Good safety law! Electroboom is always shocking himself! Unpleasant and one day his heart stops.
Electroboom is fake, he is a good actor, he just blows up small capacitors. Very entertaining until you know the truth
Divinci - cool!