The problem I have with the Synergistic Research presentation is the A/B demo is not an A/B demo of the SR product compared to another product, either within their line or with what could be considered a generic product. It is an A/B demo of something within the SR product itself that results in "compromised versus less compromised" sound when a "change is made" during the demo, when the "sound damaging" element is removed or replaced with something less damaging to the sound. In other words, the presenter demonstrates that the SR product can hurt the overall sound, but when he makes a change to the product in-use, then the damage is lessened and hence, the sound is perceived to be better. The demo presents SR and the person doing the demo in an unfortunately negative light. It raises a red flag for others and results in claims of "snake oil." While the observer/participant might not be able to articulate the inherent flaw in the demo, they instinctually know it and, per the insult to science and others' intelligence, it sends a message that the industry lacks integrity. (Granted, this form of reasoning, inductive reasoning--where a specific example is used to conclude a general principle--does not hold logical significance, but the seed is planted. . . ) I'm surprised there are dealers and especially manufacturers of high-quality products that will allow their product to be used in what can be aptly described as an irresponsible, non-scientific so-called "experiment." There are a multitude of variables to account for when assembling/setting up a high-fidelity music system & listening environment. While cables play a significant role, there will be those that work better in some systems than others, and vice-versa--depending upon the system. I'm not trying to discourage people from purchasing SR products. I have no reason to believe they make anything other than high-quality items that have worked well for many customers. My comment relates solely to SR's "loose-method" approach described above, and the message it sends to those who rightly question its merit and usefulness for understanding what SR products are doing to the sound of the system as a whole. The scientific method works when properly applied--and can reveal confounding variables, too (a topic beyond the scope of this comment). As a service to the industry, I hope Synergistic Research will consider the above in future presentations.
@@andrewlittleboy8532 please let me know who you are so I can sue you. We do not use Bussman fuses, this is complete bullshit. But again, who are you, you’ll get a letter soon.
Thank you Ted for playing some of my electronica. Sounded great given the room size.
To be fair - this room sounded incredible.
SR makes some great speaker cables. If you can't afford a new one, the used ones out there are great. Very open and detailed bass and sweet highs.
Kimber varistrand much better 😊
The problem I have with the Synergistic Research presentation is the A/B demo is not an A/B demo of the SR product compared to another product, either within their line or with what could be considered a generic product.
It is an A/B demo of something within the SR product itself that results in "compromised versus less compromised" sound when a "change is made" during the demo, when the "sound damaging" element is removed or replaced with something less damaging to the sound.
In other words, the presenter demonstrates that the SR product can hurt the overall sound, but when he makes a change to the product in-use, then the damage is lessened and hence, the sound is perceived to be better.
The demo presents SR and the person doing the demo in an unfortunately negative light.
It raises a red flag for others and results in claims of "snake oil."
While the observer/participant might not be able to articulate the inherent flaw in the demo, they instinctually know it and, per the insult to science and others' intelligence, it sends a message that the industry lacks integrity. (Granted, this form of reasoning, inductive reasoning--where a specific example is used to conclude a general principle--does not hold logical significance, but the seed is planted. . . )
I'm surprised there are dealers and especially manufacturers of high-quality products that will allow their product to be used in what can be aptly described as an irresponsible, non-scientific so-called "experiment."
There are a multitude of variables to account for when assembling/setting up a high-fidelity music system & listening environment.
While cables play a significant role, there will be those that work better in some systems than others, and vice-versa--depending upon the system.
I'm not trying to discourage people from purchasing SR products.
I have no reason to believe they make anything other than high-quality items that have worked well for many customers.
My comment relates solely to SR's "loose-method" approach described above, and the message it sends to those who rightly question its merit and usefulness for understanding what SR products are doing to the sound of the system as a whole.
The scientific method works when properly applied--and can reveal confounding variables, too (a topic beyond the scope of this comment).
As a service to the industry, I hope Synergistic Research will consider the above in future presentations.
Can’t view his fb page😂
snake oil
Nope. Have used this stuff and it really works. More open and musical sound.
Can’t view his fb group since I posted a picture of a dismantled SR fuse with the BUSSMANN logo underneath the label.
@@andrewlittleboy8532 i actually believe u
@@andrewlittleboy8532 please let me know who you are so I can sue you. We do not use Bussman fuses, this is complete bullshit. But again, who are you, you’ll get a letter soon.
@andrewlittleboy8532 make a video about it with your phone and post it here