American lawyers are ridiculously complex. There are federal, state, and local laws, and various court decisions from many different levels of courts. So, unfortunately you cant just make a broad statement like that. Each individual state is like its own country.
Cop - "If ANY employee asks you to leave, they can forcibly remove you from the property.". So, you are claiming that a janitor can order me to leave and forcibly remove me from the property? I don't think so. It has to be some responsible for the property, not just any employee.
There he goes with that sentence within reason within reason can be applied to any situation in life but in some situations it could very well be unreasonable and not valid
In SC....ONE employee putting their hands on you to remove a trespasser is legal. But, at a nightclub several bouncers were charged with "Lynching", but it took that many because the customer was extremely intoxicated and out of control. NOW,...if you have a State certified (SLED) security guard, they have "color of law" as long as it's on the property they are paid to protect.
As a representative of the South Eastern Bouncers Association I just personally want to say our patrons and personnel are FIRST and my boys don't play with their safety.Ya gotta go.Peacefully is YOUR responsibility 💯
Section 11.46. 330 - Criminal trespass in the second degree (a) A person commits the crime of criminal trespass in the second degree if the person enters or remains unlawfully (1) in or upon premises; or (2) in a propelled vehicle. (b) Criminal trespass in the second degree is a class B misdemeanor.
Yeah I was just about to say. It’s pretty simple if you’re a private security guard and you’re hired onto a property you are given the same level of authority as the property owner in regards to trespassing laws. Unless otherwise specified by company policy or by the owners request. So if someone comes onto private property and they refuse to leave by law a security guard unless otherwise specified has the legal right to remove them from the property. It’s literally no different than if someone had entered into your home which is a private residence you are able to use reasonable force to remove them. People are just too used to doing anything they want and getting away with it so they record cops in moments like this thinking they got a “gotcha” moment when they literally don’t…. Ask any security company, DPSST representative or police station they will tell you the same thing. The only and I mean the only way you can’t remove someone within your lawful boundaries is if they’re on public property then you cannot physically remove them 🤷🏽♂️
@@MichealAdams-d5l heres the code for Oregon: Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 161.225 allows a person in lawful possession of premises to use physical force to prevent or end criminal trespass or to stop the use of force and violence to commit a felony or arson. This law applies to any real property or building, as defined in ORS 164.205. This law allows private security and guards to use physical force to prevent trespassing if the language "control" includes security guards controlling the premises.
NOT knowing the Law is what makes BAD cops.
Never ask a cop about a law ever. You will get better advice from a preschooler
@@ronfults3844 😅😂😅😂
Correct.
If cops knew the law, there'd be no need for lawyers.
If judges knew the law, there'd be no need for an appeals court.
No shit You are absolutely correct young man.
And if we had no lawbreakers ?
That tyrant is a liar, Security's job is to observe and report. 😂🤪
Greetings from Australia. 🇦🇺
American lawyers are ridiculously complex. There are federal, state, and local laws, and various court decisions from many different levels of courts. So, unfortunately you cant just make a broad statement like that. Each individual state is like its own country.
@johnnytorres277 American security's job is to observe and report, in every state.
Australia was right the first time.
First requirement when applying for a police job is to have a I.Q. within 10 points of plant life.
Or the I.Q. of a windshield wiper.
Definition of a rookie cop
Dumber than a bag of hammers!
Cop - "If ANY employee asks you to leave, they can forcibly remove you from the property.". So, you are claiming that a janitor can order me to leave and forcibly remove me from the property? I don't think so. It has to be some responsible for the property, not just any employee.
and who is going to decide who is responsible for the property?
You are allowed to defend yourself from physical harm, period. This cop is a liar or very ignorant... Maybe both.
no they cant
Arrogance and ignorance in these 2 cops.
Publicly funded street gangs.
😂😂 Where did he get that definition
There he goes with that sentence within reason within reason can be applied to any situation in life but in some situations it could very well be unreasonable and not valid
"Law enforcement is lower than a snake's ball bag." - George Carlin
They put hands on that is assault. No one has the right to put hands anther person in less pervoke.with physical contact
I don't take legal advice, let alone personal choices from people that don't know basic grammar. 🙄
i tell the cops since they assault me without cause then im allow to use force back in self def NO one allowed to assault & get away free
@shanemooney6118 truth hurts don't it?
@@MattHadder but you take legal advice from low iq cops, lol.
@shanemooney6118 the corrupt justice system, yes, they and you are wrong. So, why do you troll instead of having a job?
They stepped right into that one
More customers for my vests with thumb pockets!!!!
please dont try to educate a cop on the law its a waste of time
@shanemooney6118 you don't have a job, so......
In SC....ONE employee putting their hands on you to remove a trespasser is legal. But, at a nightclub several bouncers were charged with "Lynching", but it took that many because the customer was extremely intoxicated and out of control. NOW,...if you have a State certified (SLED) security guard, they have "color of law" as long as it's on the property they are paid to protect.
20 minutes in cop school makes them a lawyer.
Unwanted physical contact is assault
Not if Kenneth was on public property.
I’m so glad I completed school or I would have had to become a cop.
What do you think bouncers do when removing unwanted patrons?
What do you think about that, a cop that doesn't know the law either!?
As a representative of the South Eastern Bouncers Association I just personally want to say our patrons and personnel are FIRST and my boys don't play with their safety.Ya gotta go.Peacefully is YOUR responsibility 💯
"OBSRERVE AND REPORT"!
that cop is correct....
Why do we keep hiring people who don't know jack
If you believe ANYTHING a cop tells you, I have some ocean beachfront property in NEW MEXICO you would be interested in buying.
Earning the hate with every ignorant encounter
Why does this Cop have keys dangling in front of his junk? Looks kind of gay.
Wow…what cop school did they go to?
Dim blue minds hardly working 🙄
I don't think so Tim!
Why it only takes 3-6months of training🇷🇺
Why do they always have their hands in the vest like a little baby why? Real question anyone
Nervous. Their hands go into the best so they can run their nipples, for that warm fuzzy feeling.
That would be best and run.f u autocorrect.
Vest, rub.
That cop is a liar.
Bullogna
The cop is correct.
You should really look into things.
Please provide a reference to a law in this jurisdiction proving your statement. If it is not codified, it is not legal.
Section 11.46. 330 - Criminal trespass in the second degree (a) A person commits the crime of criminal trespass in the second degree if the person enters or remains unlawfully (1) in or upon premises; or (2) in a propelled vehicle. (b) Criminal trespass in the second degree is a class B misdemeanor.
Yeah I was just about to say. It’s pretty simple if you’re a private security guard and you’re hired onto a property you are given the same level of authority as the property owner in regards to trespassing laws. Unless otherwise specified by company policy or by the owners request. So if someone comes onto private property and they refuse to leave by law a security guard unless otherwise specified has the legal right to remove them from the property. It’s literally no different than if someone had entered into your home which is a private residence you are able to use reasonable force to remove them. People are just too used to doing anything they want and getting away with it so they record cops in moments like this thinking they got a “gotcha” moment when they literally don’t…. Ask any security company, DPSST representative or police station they will tell you the same thing. The only and I mean the only way you can’t remove someone within your lawful boundaries is if they’re on public property then you cannot physically remove them 🤷🏽♂️
@@MuscleManLordofBeefHow come?
People such as yourself always make claims but provide actual no evidence for them
@@MichealAdams-d5l heres the code for Oregon: Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 161.225 allows a person in lawful possession of premises to use physical force to prevent or end criminal trespass or to stop the use of force and violence to commit a felony or arson. This law applies to any real property or building, as defined in ORS 164.205. This law allows private security and guards to use physical force to prevent trespassing if the language "control" includes security guards controlling the premises.
So how about a little context - else this video is meanness
Ummmm, I don't think so
How about you just not go where you are not wanted
And yes we actually pay them to be this ignorant 😔, don't you feel safer now he is on the job, if there mouth 👄 is open there lying,
Dumber
Than a box
Of rocks
😎
Lying cop
Yeah just leave
The what if game. Okay, what if those officers got A’s instead of D’s in school, what would they be doing now?
What a pair of witless wonders !!!!
And what's wrong w/ that?
Thats a lie the cop is lying
Liar
Was this public or private property? I hope it was public property 😅
That’s true IF you’re trespassing on PRIVATE property.