Excel Challenge: Expand grouped Intervals -Reduce Function

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 июл 2024
  • Expand grouped intervals in Excel is at the heart of this challenge. The reduce function is key to making the solution work.
    00:00 Introduction
    00:19 problem statement
    00:46 Visualizing the problem
    01:43 TEXTSPLIT & helper functions
    04:14 Brief overview of REDUCE function
    08:00 Solution in one cell
    12:40 Extending Solution using MAP
    13:34 Concluding thoughts
    docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...

Комментарии • 31

  • @IvanCortinas_ES
    @IvanCortinas_ES 2 месяца назад +4

    Origin = You don't understand the process.
    Victor Momoh appears and applies logic using functions in Excel.
    Result = You understand the process.
    Thank you for another explanation gift.

    • @ExcelMoments
      @ExcelMoments  2 месяца назад

      hahaha, I ove this breakdown 😁😁 Thanks for the feedback and kind words

  • @InTheLongRunRedux
    @InTheLongRunRedux Месяц назад +1

    Really happy to have found this channel! Your step-by-step explanations are so clear and easy to understand. Looking forward to working through the past and future challenges!

  • @ohdjrp4
    @ohdjrp4 11 дней назад +1

    That is why I am subscribed to this channel Mr. Momo! Thanks!

  • @HauiUSA
    @HauiUSA 2 месяца назад +1

    I love how well-structured this video is, building up a complex formula with easy-to-follow intuitive steps all the way up to the implementation of the MAP. Educationally and didactically so useful.

    • @ExcelMoments
      @ExcelMoments  2 месяца назад

      Thanks for the feedback on the video. I could not have written it better

  • @bevonclarke
    @bevonclarke 2 месяца назад +1

    Another master explanation! Thank you

    • @ExcelMoments
      @ExcelMoments  2 месяца назад +1

      Thank you for the feedback

  • @petercompton538
    @petercompton538 2 месяца назад +1

    Lovely solution! I have not used MAP or REDUCE much so far, so that was really useful. Thanks Victor

    • @ExcelMoments
      @ExcelMoments  2 месяца назад

      MAP is much easier to use. It simply takes a transformation or calculation, and it applies same to every element in the Array. REDUCE takes a little getting used to

  • @jazzista1967
    @jazzista1967 2 месяца назад +2

    Hellooo Victor!!!! Excellent video and GREAT EXPLANATION as always. Before i see your solution, i stop the video and i say to myself: Ok, he needs to do some kind of split and somehow use the sequence function to generate a list of numbers etc. But then i say HOW is he going to use those pieces of information? Then, I play the full video and digest your solution. I will be playing this video a few more times (Maybe 10 more times) to understand the entire solution.
    The beauty of the video is the construct of the sequence using the MIN and the MAX minus one putting it in nesting LET (... That was genius (well, at least to me!). Thanks Victor and congratulations for your new milestone on your 5K subscribers. All the best my dear friend!

    • @ExcelMoments
      @ExcelMoments  2 месяца назад

      You seem to always have the solutions figured out. Thanks for your comments always

    • @jazzista1967
      @jazzista1967 2 месяца назад

      Hahaha Hello Victor... not quite: i have to watch your solution a few times to grasp all the concepts shown in your solution.... What i really like is the way you break down the problem into pieces so that the not so genius like me can understand. Thanks for your postings. I have learned from you quite a few tricks and patterns. Take care.

  • @rtrbs8383
    @rtrbs8383 2 месяца назад +1

    Greetings, Victor Sir...I greatly appreciate it.This Excel challenge series was something I was really looking forward to and loving.🤩😍

    • @ExcelMoments
      @ExcelMoments  2 месяца назад +1

      Yea, I always look forward to the series as well. I am glad you love it and learn from the series

    • @rtrbs8383
      @rtrbs8383 2 месяца назад +1

      @@ExcelMoments Always...looking forward more videos like this....

  • @Fxingenieria
    @Fxingenieria Месяц назад +1

    Espectacular !!!

  • @Mark-sf4kh
    @Mark-sf4kh 2 месяца назад +1

    Love this!

  • @ankursharma6157
    @ankursharma6157 2 месяца назад +1

    Thank You!

  • @spilledgraphics
    @spilledgraphics 2 месяца назад +1

    minute 1:25 - the beauty and blocks...? maybe the beauty of solving a problem in blocks? 😁

    • @ExcelMoments
      @ExcelMoments  2 месяца назад

      It was actually "Building Blocks"

    • @spilledgraphics
      @spilledgraphics 2 месяца назад

      @@ExcelMoments Buildimg or Building 😁.... loving the good laughs at 10:40 🙌

    • @spilledgraphics
      @spilledgraphics 2 месяца назад

      @@ExcelMoments Victor, I'm going to study this formula a lot! a good refresher to get back at building new Excel charts with Dynamic arrays. I'm intrigued by a LET being inside a LET, yet amazed by this tutorial of yours! bravoo myfriend!

  • @williamarthur4801
    @williamarthur4801 2 месяца назад

    I've still not really figured how this works, I managed all the numbers, so say 12, 16 - 18 = 12 - 18,
    it's the splitting and then re splitting, I shall persevere breaking bits down. 🤔🤔

  • @nadermounir8228
    @nadermounir8228 2 месяца назад +1

    Thanks Victor. Why didn’t we use Scan or Map instead of Reduce? Reduce should give us the last step only which is 81 in your example and not the full array isn’t ?

    • @ExcelMoments
      @ExcelMoments  2 месяца назад +1

      Lets take a case where we need the final result of stacking a,b,c,d together. SCAN gives the intermediate steps
      Scan Step 1:a
      Scan Step 2; a&b
      Scan Step 3: a&b&c
      Scan Step 4: a&b&c&d
      So if you need the final result which is Step 4, then thats where a REDUCE comes in to get the last step because step1,2,3 are not relevant in this case

    • @nadermounir8228
      @nadermounir8228 2 месяца назад +1

      @@ExcelMoments understand now it is because I need the final Vstack result which the 4 numbers stacked together and not the first then the first and the second then the first,second and the third etc. Thanks Victoria for the explanation