Quality Risk Management ICH Q9(R1)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 окт 2024
  • Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @hitendrakumarshah3718
    This training session help viewers to learn -
    Brief introduction of the topic and scope
    Brief on ICH Quality Guidelines
    Understanding guideline for Quality Risk Management
    Updates in new version of guideline ICH Q9 (R1)
    Understanding of - Managing your risk has its own rewards.
    Role of ICH Q9 with ICH Q8 and ICH Q10
    Practical understanding on QRM process and how to perform QRM by FMEA tool.
    Action Priority Tablet concept/Heat map matrix
    Vote of Thanks - Q&A session
    If you need an example for how to use FMEA tool - Go through the link of video (10 minutes duration). At the last - I have given the practical example.
    Link: • Quality Risk Management

Комментарии • 44

  • @muralig5272
    @muralig5272 28 дней назад +1

    Dear sir,
    I learned from your video lot of things (process validation, equipment qualification, cleaning validation etc) it's very useful my career, I have gained knowledge day by day.till am learning risks assessment,etc..,,,. Thank you very much sir

  • @maasanjana
    @maasanjana Год назад +2

    Well presented, sir. Thank you for your efforts to educate the pharma community.

  • @susheelashenoy2651
    @susheelashenoy2651 Год назад +1

    Thank you sir for your efforts to make us understand the guideline requirement in common language. This video is really helpful. 🙏🙏🙏

  • @babjigubbala85
    @babjigubbala85 Год назад +1

    Thank you sir for a very simple explanation of very complicated subject

  • @Mohammed-mw8wg
    @Mohammed-mw8wg Год назад +1

    Excellent presentation sir. Thank you very much indeed

  • @smarikapanwar9300
    @smarikapanwar9300 Год назад +1

    Very well explained Sir, Thanks for updating us.

  • @hitendrakumarshah3718
    @hitendrakumarshah3718  Год назад

    @Diego Rafael Monterroza Hernandez
    ​We need focus on thing can go wrong during the manufacturing process and not in the sampling process during validation. Of course, we need to perform separate risk assessment of sampling activity

  • @ArunThakur-qf5th
    @ArunThakur-qf5th Год назад +1

    Very good information sir, send one more presentation on cleaning validation and APQR

    • @hitendrakumarshah3718
      @hitendrakumarshah3718  Год назад

      You can go through below links for these topics -
      ruclips.net/video/zA5xsWR9IU8/видео.html
      ruclips.net/user/livemFC3XNes-pA?feature=share
      ruclips.net/user/live2I_H5SsTSuQ?feature=share
      ruclips.net/user/livezBLqRZ5DXV4?feature=share

  • @hitendrakumarshah3718
    @hitendrakumarshah3718  Год назад

    @Srinivasulu Bhavanasi
    ​The severity can be reduced by making change in the product manufacturing

  • @nitindubey6170
    @nitindubey6170 10 месяцев назад +1

    Excellent explanation ❤

    • @hitendrakumarshah3718
      @hitendrakumarshah3718  10 месяцев назад

      Thank you for your kind comment. Please share this link with your colleagus so that, they can also get benefit from the video learning.

  • @surajsinghbhandari6
    @surajsinghbhandari6 Год назад +1

    I love your vedios sir. thanks for such like vedios

  • @maheshsaglawe
    @maheshsaglawe Год назад +2

    Great session sir

  • @jayapaulgottimukkala5287
    @jayapaulgottimukkala5287 Год назад +1

    53:46 In proactive based Risk assessment, how to determine the risk score for the probability of occurrence. As the hazard is new there won’t be any past instances . Can we give as 0 in those cases while calculating RPN.

    • @hitendrakumarshah3718
      @hitendrakumarshah3718  11 месяцев назад

      You can not give zero in case of past instances. In case of new things, you can get the information based on - other site information, development and other areas.

  • @hitendrakumarshah3718
    @hitendrakumarshah3718  Год назад

    @amit gupta
    ​The risk can be reduced.

  • @shashishekhar4090
    @shashishekhar4090 7 месяцев назад +1

    Nice and thanks

  • @mayurkale5357
    @mayurkale5357 11 месяцев назад +1

    Good sir... Keep it up 💯

  • @MohammadDawdieh
    @MohammadDawdieh Год назад +1

    15:41 The first step in the risk assessment should be Hazard identification instead of risk identification e.g.,. In the overview of a typical QRM Figure , a terminology change as referred to by quality risk management Q9(R1) Final version Adopted on 18 January 2023. It is as follows:
    “Changing the risk management process from risk identification to hazard identification”.

  • @sandipjedhe724
    @sandipjedhe724 Год назад +1

    Any example tobe mentioned to understand

    • @hitendrakumarshah3718
      @hitendrakumarshah3718  11 месяцев назад

      You can through the link - ruclips.net/video/Egkk6AoJSvg/видео.htmlsi=MBFRo7cWLw1cNFFp

  • @ashokchowdary623
    @ashokchowdary623 Год назад +1

    Can you please differentiate the risks while performing the functional risk assessment for the software as part of CSV and risk assessment made while new instrument coming to facility and can a new server and what type of risk assessment is performed while shifting the server from one location to another location types of risk can you please elaborate

    • @hitendrakumarshah3718
      @hitendrakumarshah3718  Год назад +1

      The FRA - focusses on the risks related to the computerised system functioning. Means what are the possibility of functionalities go wrong. While in other cases, you need to evaluate all.

  • @smarikapanwar9300
    @smarikapanwar9300 Год назад +1

    Sir,Can you please conduct training on ICH Q6

  • @SonuYadavBawaliya1
    @SonuYadavBawaliya1 Год назад +1

    Good evening sir

  • @v.nagasrilakshmiswaroopa7204
    @v.nagasrilakshmiswaroopa7204 Год назад +1

    I couldn't able to find the link in the description for practical application of FMEA

  • @KB-sg4qi
    @KB-sg4qi Год назад +1

    30 Min substance