Pushover Analysis Using SAP2000
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- 🌟 Full Courses Available! Enhance your skills today! 🌟
📘 STAAD Pro: The Ultimate Beginner's Guide
Unlock the secrets of STAAD Pro with our comprehensive beginner's guide. Perfect for those starting their journey in structural analysis!
bit.ly/2ZHmhFw
🏢 ETABS Mastery: Structural Design Simplified
Master ETABS with this course designed to make structural design easy and accessible. Gain the skills you need to succeed.
bit.ly/2FG4NT0
🔨 Basics of Civil Engineering in Construction
Dive into the fundamentals of civil engineering with a focus on construction. Ideal for beginners and those looking to refresh their knowledge.
bit.ly/2xmePUM
🛠️ Mastering SAP2000: From Beginner To Pro
Transform from a novice to a pro in SAP2000. This course covers everything you need to know to become an expert in structural analysis.
bit.ly/2D9V1aq
📚 Fundamentals of Structural Analysis: Statics
Strengthen your understanding of statics in structural analysis. A must-have course for anyone serious about structural engineering.
bit.ly/39F414Y
📐 Learn To Read Structural Drawings: With Real Site Videos
Learn how to read structural drawings with real site videos for practical understanding. Perfect for both students and professionals.
bit.ly/2Xw0dkv
If you like my work, buy me a coffee! ☕️😊
[Support Me] paypal.me/Geet...
Get Two months FREE at SkillShare:
skl.sh/2XYlXoU
What is the difference between the use of Ux (acceleration) for pushover case instead of load pattern (Qx), which will be based on the response spectrum (Response spectrum)??
nice video sir.please can you do a video about time history analysis and flat slab design?
Extremely useful tutorial! Thank you!
Thank u soo much sir 😀
Thanx so much for useful video. The analysis for pushover case its not comletetede it just was %34 in your video and i have the same poblem when i do pushover analysis. are you have any advaice to solve this problem?
Best classs ever on you tube
While defining hinges you have chosen ASCE in auto hing type how can I get FEMA in auto hinge type ?
Same problem I'm facing, brother
first, thank you for this video & can you give us the references from where you get this
the video was really informative
It' that right put 5mm not 50 mm?
Sorry i miss understood on that
thank you
How can I identify a certain hinge from the model?
I want to display simply the label of the hinge, so I can identify the hinge in the table.
Q1.Sir why did you place one hinge only at the ground story column at top ?
Can we perform pushover analysis for underground structure by SAP2000? So the push load is added by horizontal soil pressure, ground water pressure etc. but no increment on these force? Thanks
I am confused with interpreting the result of Push Over analysis. Sorry for the basic question, please bear with me.
Once you generated all the possible plastic hinging, in terms of engineering, what would happen next? I mean how will I interpret this result to be used in the final design/ assessment?
Also, I am finding it difficult to wrap my head around the column developing plastic hinge. Isn't that what seismic code is trying to prevent in stating the strong column weak beam requirements?
Would love to hear your thoughts. Btw, thank you for the great video.
Thanks for the response. I appreciate it. My question is how will the result of the Push Over Analysis be used in design (PBD) or in the assessment of existing buildings?
Also, can you please clarify, "hinge formation is the indication of member failure"?
My understanding is that when plastic hinging occurs there is an increase of rotation/displacement without an increase in force. Not necessarily failure because there is a potential stress redistribution. Failure will occur once a hinged member no longer has the means to redistribute the force since other members have exhausted its plastic capacity. I would appreciate clarification on this.
@@engineeringacademy9812 Thank you! Looking forward to it.
You're doing the young engineering community a great favour. Keep it up!
Dear Sir. First of all thank you for your video. Can I ask why do you not consider the hinges at the base of the columns? Thank you
Normally we assume that there is no hinge formation at the base column. You can make hinges there as well.
Please tell me, how to do multi- mode push over by sap 2000? thanks
Sir how to calculate SF for response spectra for FEMA 440 EL
very good
please sir can you explain in details the push over curve
Sir, Why hinges are formed only at joints ?? How do I know hinges are formed in beams or columns??
What about the warnings that came for P-MM interaction surface isnot convex? What does that mean?
I think change size of columns..
Why your pushover curve did not show up to the yielding?
hello... just one question.. After the pushover analysis, can we count the number of plastic hinges formed?
Yeah..but manually.
what about the performance point?
Sir while I m doing nlsa on 3 storey 3 d building(20m x10m) it takes too much time....and lots of null steps generated...so how to resolve it?? please reply... I have corei5 9 th Gen, 240 gb Sdd hdd, 16 gb ddr 4 ram.. system.
There might be problem in modelling. Please check your model.
Sir model checked...it is ok...
What would be other issues for lots of null steps generated???
4:08 why U3 is selected ?
Hi
Now you can join our Facebook group. Click on the link below ot join:
facebook.com/groups/2574131862914436/
Hello sir i have problem in push over analysis plz reply me its urgent i have persentation tomorrow
What is the problem?
Sir do we check result on the basis of intensity like zone 1 zone2 for earthquake after analysis of pushover ??
In results
wrong approach on the gravity. what's the use defining U3 monitored displacement when you apply a full load? also you don't need multiple states. only final state..... then in the push load you want monitored displacement correct but then you click on conjugate displacement. decide which of two..... study before you upload videos.
wrong
Why it is wrong ?