It's unfortunate the most people who go through the western medical educational training don't think in terms of Self-Directed thinking. What I mean by that is most accept what is being taught to them as being true, and think in those terms. This happens from the very early schooling years right through until and through the PhD level. People learn not how to think originally, but rather think how to learn and accept what is being taught, know how to regurgitate what was taught, and know how to demonstrate what they learned (accepted at face value) in order to pass their current level and progress within the system. This happens all the way to PhD and afterwards, when they learn how to keep in the consensus if working within the University or in the related industry. Of course some original thinking is allowed during those schooling years and post school - but only if it doesn't rock the boat of the consensus. Otherwise those people lose their positions whether it is an academic or industry position, or if along the way in their schooling, the original thinking is too much off the consensus or academic curriculum. I've just wrote all this as a preamble because heading straight into the point is too hard for most people to consider and have knee jerk responses instead of actual consideration. The point is that in the entire history in the field of so called 'virology', never has a single scientific study or research project ever actually demonstrated that there is such a thing as a virus that causes disease/illness. This is true for any type of named so called virus. People balk at hearing such a thing and could immediately point out to the thousands of so called papers that point to this or that. The issue with such an approach is that people only give a cursory glance at such papers citing the authors conclusions rather than going into the details to verify whether it is true or not. Also, people assume just because someone has a degree, that it automatically means they know what they are talking about. That may be true in many cases but not in all. What is taught in our education system is not a black and white matter. Some things taught are true, but not all; e.g. Viruses don't exist(as they are commonly held to be believed). The earth is round, not flat. What this all means is that there is no such thing as STDs if you consider an STD to mean an illness/sickness that has been caused by a virus that was passed from one person to the next. The only 'sickness' that one could get through sex is that of a bacterial infection and the resulting complications. The degree of those complications aggravated by ones own personal hygiene, diet and health due to lifestyle and the participating partner as well.
So the Dr. kept on repeating that it's safe to have multiple sex partners, the tone specificed that it's safe girls have fun just ask him to wear condom. One partner is good enough Doc let's not promote Multiple partners.
Mam mein unmarried hoon ...meri ghar mein 2tarikh ko puja h dec 6 ko periods date tha lekin nhi hoa ...toh abhi puja ki beech mein hojaye toh problem hoga ... isliye 5din delay karna chatihu periods koo ...toh konsa tablet best for me plz ek suggestion dijiye mujhe. . jiska side effects hair fall ki taraf Aisa kuch na ho. Bataye na mam konsa tab best..🙏🙏
Very informative , really . Kudos to making safe sex less of a taboo
Really Amazing♥️❣️
It's unfortunate the most people who go through the western medical educational training don't think in terms of Self-Directed thinking. What I mean by that is most accept what is being taught to them as being true, and think in those terms. This happens from the very early schooling years right through until and through the PhD level. People learn not how to think originally, but rather think how to learn and accept what is being taught, know how to regurgitate what was taught, and know how to demonstrate what they learned (accepted at face value) in order to pass their current level and progress within the system. This happens all the way to PhD and afterwards, when they learn how to keep in the consensus if working within the University or in the related industry.
Of course some original thinking is allowed during those schooling years and post school - but only if it doesn't rock the boat of the consensus. Otherwise those people lose their positions whether it is an academic or industry position, or if along the way in their schooling, the original thinking is too much off the consensus or academic curriculum.
I've just wrote all this as a preamble because heading straight into the point is too hard for most people to consider and have knee jerk responses instead of actual consideration.
The point is that in the entire history in the field of so called 'virology', never has a single scientific study or research project ever actually demonstrated that there is such a thing as a virus that causes disease/illness. This is true for any type of named so called virus.
People balk at hearing such a thing and could immediately point out to the thousands of so called papers that point to this or that. The issue with such an approach is that people only give a cursory glance at such papers citing the authors conclusions rather than going into the details to verify whether it is true or not.
Also, people assume just because someone has a degree, that it automatically means they know what they are talking about. That may be true in many cases but not in all. What is taught in our education system is not a black and white matter. Some things taught are true, but not all; e.g. Viruses don't exist(as they are commonly held to be believed). The earth is round, not flat.
What this all means is that there is no such thing as STDs if you consider an STD to mean an illness/sickness that has been caused by a virus that was passed from one person to the next.
The only 'sickness' that one could get through sex is that of a bacterial infection and the resulting complications. The degree of those complications aggravated by ones own personal hygiene, diet and health due to lifestyle and the participating partner as well.
I am a 30 years old virgin, I follow 'no relationship = no sex', can't think of multiple partners. That's just weird.
You are girl or boy ?
@@Ayisha4889 doesn't matter
@@VM-ee5hc please tell me 🥺🥺🥺🙏🙏🙏
It's not weird. It's just not for you(multiple partners and/or sex outside 'relationship') - and that's all that matters and is perfectly fine too.
Men of your age are marrying younger chicks 21 -25 so don't worry you'll get good partner.......
good information
So the Dr. kept on repeating that it's safe to have multiple sex partners, the tone specificed that it's safe girls have fun just ask him to wear condom. One partner is good enough Doc let's not promote Multiple partners.
I don’t think even condoms protect from every std 100 percent though ?!
💯💯
Dr tanushree mam kitna cute Hain😭😭... please marry me 😭😭
Thank you ma'am 😊
Thanks
Is dental dams are flavour or non flavour
REALLY 👌👌👌👌👌
Mam mein unmarried hoon ...meri ghar mein 2tarikh ko puja h dec 6 ko periods date tha lekin nhi hoa ...toh abhi puja ki beech mein hojaye toh problem hoga ... isliye 5din delay karna chatihu periods koo ...toh konsa tablet best for me plz ek suggestion dijiye mujhe. . jiska side effects hair fall ki taraf Aisa kuch na ho. Bataye na mam konsa tab best..🙏🙏
Hi dear
Try to avoid it. I was in similar situation and took a pill to delay it. Now I have hormonal imbalance and I have gained hell lot of weight.
@@tanyasharma3906 oooo ok mam
@@mistiidas2422
Matlab ye mera experience tha, ho sakta hai aapko suit kar jaye...pehle hi kisi Gynaecologist se consult kijiyega
What is rti
Pandey is caste name
Hindi mai bholo
अखबार का सही अध्ययन:ruclips.net/video/mU2ZwN4LrS0/видео.html.... .......
i love you