In slide 5, i don’t understand the logic between: 1. it was held that D did not rise to the level of actionable misrepresentation 2. the claimant actually believed the statements in the prospectus is true. Would you please explain more? Thank you very much!
I have question = Is it a "Fraudulent Misrepresantation" if the other people is lying or not telling the truth in their explanation about the contract, in order I sign the contract.. and then I realize that they cheat me.. and they still hardly stubborn stay with their own old excuses and opinions (but it is obviously manipulation or lying excuses). And their explanation words were not in the contract
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Contract Law Defenses: Fraudulent & Nonfraudulent Misrepresentation [LEAP Preview]](/img/1.gif)
In slide 5, i don’t understand the logic between: 1. it was held that D did not rise to the level of actionable misrepresentation 2. the claimant actually believed the statements in the prospectus is true. Would you please explain more? Thank you very much!
I have question =
Is it a "Fraudulent Misrepresantation" if the other people is lying or not telling the truth in their explanation about the contract, in order I sign the contract.. and then I realize that they cheat me.. and they still hardly stubborn stay with their own old excuses and opinions (but it is obviously manipulation or lying excuses).
And their explanation words were not in the contract