Detergent in the past had no enzyme in them, but it was the gold standard for anything that needed degreasing. It was alkaline and Phosphate-base. Came along eutrophication issue, Phosphate detergent is phased out and is replaced by 'eco' one. In that same era, high pH was the issue, and then pH neutral one is born. Due to marketing, manufacturers or makers boast their detergent has enzyme/s. Similar to that period, Sodium Percarbonate was introduced. These have their own new issues. Solving an issue to create a new issue. Vicious cycle. Nothing is resolved. Alkaline and Phosphate detergent is still used until this day for valid reasons. High pH is generally very to extremely effective against organic matter. Depending on which base is used, Sodium/Potassium Hydroxide is excellent in disintegrating organic matter, and saponify fats making soap and hence directly increasing detergency. High pH generally protects metals. Same reason why the most effective (drain) declogger is alkaline. Many people argue that low pH can do all that. Unless a surfactant is especially made to be effective at low pH (Yes, there are), I am not seeing any detergent having low pH and still be effective in cleaning anything. Acid corrodes metal a lot more than base which is the main reason why only acid is used to remove rust and to passivate certain metals. In modern time such as now, scaremongering activist claiming to love science. Their science is pseudoscience and junk science. They spread nonsense such as mixture of Acetic Acid (vinegar) and Sodium Bicarbonate (baking soda) is the best cleaner, most effective degreaser, world's most powerful declogger, and above all, the safest on children and skin. When those two chemicals are mixed, in the presence of water, makes Sodium Acetate. Sodium Acetate is a salt, a salt that does not clean the slightest. Save that money and put in crisp. And then the natural & organic & ferment activist. They swear lemon or lime works wonders. Might as well throw in some kombucha and kimchi. Those DIY ferment, that thing stinks to high heaven and laden with pathogens. How is that thing even safe on children and skin! Of course, that particular activist always says "No one dies. No one gets sick". Just like Cx*VID when it initially began, certain countries claimed to have zero mortality. How is this even possible? The whole world nearly believed that citizens of those countries had some sort of innate genetic power. Truth is -- sick and death never were reported nor recorded. Those were very poor, frighteningly uneducated, and highly corrupt countries. Almost North Korea-like. There is no "powerful AND safe" stuff exists in the universe or universes. We are living in a rather black and white universe. Humans 'invent' grey areas to appease and to justify our discomfort and insecurity.
@@lesliearellano958 My opinion does not matter. No body's opinion matters. Similarly, hearing something and getting something right are different things. Sodium Lauryl Sulfate is the gold standard of all surfactants to cleaning anything. You may or may not know the demonisation of it, but it is still in many products, companies which propagate bad science still put it in their products, scaremongers (absolutely stupid hypocrites) that refuse to update themselves nor learn still use it. Soap is actually the gold standard. But it has many disadvantages are the reasons as to why synthetics are created. Necessity is the mother of invention. Anything synthetics are much safer and way more cost-effective than au naturel & au organik stuff. A basic bar of soap nowadays is stupid expensive simply because it is "natural". Again, scaremongering stupid either refuse to learn or willfoolly ignore the fact that nature is cruel. Try eating poison hemlock, rub poison ivy on the skin. Let us not be that extreme, people applying that innocent Aloe vera or soy bean pulp on their skin have different levels of irritations. Oh, soap is synthetic too! Soap does not exist naturally. Many insist saponin is natural soap. This is wrong. Saponin is not soap. Soap is not saponin. Just because its Latin name has soap in it does not mean it is soap. Is heart an ear 'ear' is in the word? Is chair a strand/bunch of hair because 'hair' is in the word? Soy bean contains high level of saponin. Surprise! How many idiots nowadays literally use soy bean and anything with saponin as "soap" still living a so-called "healthy/vibrant life"? Believe none of what they say. There are two kinds of damaging people: 1) People that never do/try anything that they preach, encourage, suggest, or insist. They pretend to do it. They pretend to be expert in the subject matter. The leader of the blind can be half blind or fully blind. 2) People that damage themselves intentionally obscure and eschew the negative side of their BS practices. Telling you only positive side of their fate. This is called count the hits and ignore the misses. Intellectual dishonesty.
@@lesliearellano958 Your useless question deserves equally useless information and a long rant. Ask any sane humans the same and you will get similar answers. Like asking "What is the best way to be a troller". Or "troll" depending on how much of a semantics troll you are.
@@realchristopher4334 no people actually give advice on things they have found to be useful. Stop hating life, find beauty in it you are here for a reason.
'Biological' is not the right terminology. Biological detergent means detergent is alive. Much like anti-science people saying Formaldehyde is inorganic and unnatural when it is completely natural and organic, and is found in many, if not most, living things. They should stop eating anything as they are ingesting high concentration of Formaldehyde. But oh well. Those are marketing terminologies and distortions to getting money from certain group of people. Advertisements and marketing have been exploiting human fears. The more fearful one is, the more willing he or she will spend.
Detergent in the past had no enzyme in them, but it was the gold standard for anything that needed degreasing. It was alkaline and Phosphate-base. Came along eutrophication issue, Phosphate detergent is phased out and is replaced by 'eco' one. In that same era, high pH was the issue, and then pH neutral one is born.
Due to marketing, manufacturers or makers boast their detergent has enzyme/s. Similar to that period, Sodium Percarbonate was introduced. These have their own new issues. Solving an issue to create a new issue. Vicious cycle. Nothing is resolved.
Alkaline and Phosphate detergent is still used until this day for valid reasons. High pH is generally very to extremely effective against organic matter. Depending on which base is used, Sodium/Potassium Hydroxide is excellent in disintegrating organic matter, and saponify fats making soap and hence directly increasing detergency. High pH generally protects metals. Same reason why the most effective (drain) declogger is alkaline.
Many people argue that low pH can do all that. Unless a surfactant is especially made to be effective at low pH (Yes, there are), I am not seeing any detergent having low pH and still be effective in cleaning anything. Acid corrodes metal a lot more than base which is the main reason why only acid is used to remove rust and to passivate certain metals.
In modern time such as now, scaremongering activist claiming to love science. Their science is pseudoscience and junk science. They spread nonsense such as mixture of Acetic Acid (vinegar) and Sodium Bicarbonate (baking soda) is the best cleaner, most effective degreaser, world's most powerful declogger, and above all, the safest on children and skin. When those two chemicals are mixed, in the presence of water, makes Sodium Acetate. Sodium Acetate is a salt, a salt that does not clean the slightest. Save that money and put in crisp.
And then the natural & organic & ferment activist. They swear lemon or lime works wonders. Might as well throw in some kombucha and kimchi. Those DIY ferment, that thing stinks to high heaven and laden with pathogens. How is that thing even safe on children and skin! Of course, that particular activist always says "No one dies. No one gets sick". Just like Cx*VID when it initially began, certain countries claimed to have zero mortality. How is this even possible? The whole world nearly believed that citizens of those countries had some sort of innate genetic power. Truth is -- sick and death never were reported nor recorded. Those were very poor, frighteningly uneducated, and highly corrupt countries. Almost North Korea-like.
There is no "powerful AND safe" stuff exists in the universe or universes. We are living in a rather black and white universe. Humans 'invent' grey areas to appease and to justify our discomfort and insecurity.
Which detergents are best to use in your opinion?
@@lesliearellano958 My opinion does not matter. No body's opinion matters. Similarly, hearing something and getting something right are different things.
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate is the gold standard of all surfactants to cleaning anything. You may or may not know the demonisation of it, but it is still in many products, companies which propagate bad science still put it in their products, scaremongers (absolutely stupid hypocrites) that refuse to update themselves nor learn still use it.
Soap is actually the gold standard. But it has many disadvantages are the reasons as to why synthetics are created. Necessity is the mother of invention. Anything synthetics are much safer and way more cost-effective than au naturel & au organik stuff. A basic bar of soap nowadays is stupid expensive simply because it is "natural". Again, scaremongering stupid either refuse to learn or willfoolly ignore the fact that nature is cruel. Try eating poison hemlock, rub poison ivy on the skin. Let us not be that extreme, people applying that innocent Aloe vera or soy bean pulp on their skin have different levels of irritations.
Oh, soap is synthetic too! Soap does not exist naturally. Many insist saponin is natural soap. This is wrong. Saponin is not soap. Soap is not saponin. Just because its Latin name has soap in it does not mean it is soap.
Is heart an ear 'ear' is in the word?
Is chair a strand/bunch of hair because 'hair' is in the word?
Soy bean contains high level of saponin. Surprise! How many idiots nowadays literally use soy bean and anything with saponin as "soap" still living a so-called "healthy/vibrant life"? Believe none of what they say. There are two kinds of damaging people:
1) People that never do/try anything that they preach, encourage, suggest, or insist. They pretend to do it. They pretend to be expert in the subject matter. The leader of the blind can be half blind or fully blind.
2) People that damage themselves intentionally obscure and eschew the negative side of their BS practices. Telling you only positive side of their fate. This is called count the hits and ignore the misses. Intellectual dishonesty.
@@realchristopher4334 such a long rant with no useful information.
@@lesliearellano958 Your useless question deserves equally useless information and a long rant. Ask any sane humans the same and you will get similar answers. Like asking "What is the best way to be a troller". Or "troll" depending on how much of a semantics troll you are.
@@realchristopher4334 no people actually give advice on things they have found to be useful. Stop hating life, find beauty in it you are here for a reason.
We can't use bio here in the USA, not exactly sure why??
tysm this is so cool
Good experiment
Please explain biological detergent please
'Biological' is not the right terminology. Biological detergent means detergent is alive. Much like anti-science people saying Formaldehyde is inorganic and unnatural when it is completely natural and organic, and is found in many, if not most, living things. They should stop eating anything as they are ingesting high concentration of Formaldehyde.
But oh well. Those are marketing terminologies and distortions to getting money from certain group of people. Advertisements and marketing have been exploiting human fears. The more fearful one is, the more willing he or she will spend.
Aa vidioma Kai samjatu nathi ke Bhai su keva mage chhe