My sister got married last year. She paid well over $1,000 for a photographer and videographer. Why someone would think $250 wasn’t going to be crap quality I don’t know.
My brother got a $400 videographer SLASH DJ, for his wedding lol. They got what they paid for, but all things considered, it was good enough. Played a song and then got on the camera, but hey- if the laptop has a good playlist, why not?
Any real wedding videographer is at least $3500. Anything below that is going to be mediocre as hell. Someone charging $1000 or less is as newbie as could be and your going to get a crap product period
@@RiiFT oh absolutely I agree. It wasn't an amazing video but again 250 doesnt even cover the time spent. A bargain for what he got. A full day attendance of taping for 2 employees then an editor would have run this man maybe 50 times what he paid.
@@elkennedy9176 I'm in agreement here, it's actually a pretty well made video capturing all the important parts of the event. It took long hours, a lot of filming and editing to get that result, a huge bargain for $250. ^^
I saw the whole case, his case was dismissed but the defendant should’ve kept her mouth shut when Judy said “That’s the best she could do” and the defendant shook her head no admitting that she didn’t do her best. If it look like you’re winning, don’t say anything stupid nor raise your hands.
I’m surprised Judge Judy didn’t snap at her for raising her hand especially because she was clearly winning the case. Go Braves 2021 World Series Champs Baby lol
Looked like she won. There was no judgement for the plaintiff in the video. Though should have stopped raising her hand, she didn't need to speak, she was going to win.
Maurice, you paid $250 for a videographer...that's way on the cheap end of the scale!! When you pay for cheap, sometimes you get cheap. Too bad, so sad, you got no case.
@@duncreg agreed. I have refunded money twice to customers that weren't satisfied with service they received back when I had staff stepping in on my behalf.
I paid $2600 for my wedding videographer. It was beautiful, I couldn't have asked for more. They paid $250. I'm surprised it wasn't done on an iPhone 🙄
if it was $2500 he most likely would have gotten some money back, since in this case part of the case is about how much he paid; he paid $250, and for a wedding videographer thats a steal, so unless she was crazy her quality was bound to be dipped.
@@jocelyne2634 Saw it now, video wasn't bad. The only bit I thought was bad was at about 3:10 in he first part of this case. Kinda jumped quite a bit showing the guests walking, with multiple jump cuts in a very short time. $250, from 2-3PM-1AM,
The videographer did an extraordinary job filming and her time is certainly worth FAR more than this cheapskate paid her. Some of her editing was a bit too artsy for me but with the footage she had, and the amount of time she spent editing it, if he actually PAID her a FAIR amount, he could have had her reedit the footage to his liking.
I think she did ok, could have been better since the lighting was too dark on some of it..but I think she's going to get better and hope she doesn't give up
My brother just got married and they paid $4,000. $250 definitely sounds dodgy! When you're paying significately lower than market, yes, you GET what you paid for.
I'm a videographer and I know my skill level and charge accordingly. Once I've been doing video for a few more years I'll charge more. It's extremely involved and takes so much time to master. It kills me that people spend $14k on a dress but they don't want to pay more than $1,000 for a videographer!
That's not on him; that's on the person providing the service. Hell, I worked for a company once that did a job for below cost in the belief that they would get significant additional business in the future.
He better NOT go on “the internet” and write about his “terrible experience” because seriously??? All day for $250??? Get real! That’s a steal regardless of quality.
Always include in the contract that you receive all the raw footage shot. Then if you do not like the edit, take the footage to a more qualified video editor and get it edited the way you like. For that price, they were not even paying for hours of editing that it required. Ridiculous.
TERRIBLE advice. No legit and professional photographer or videographer would ever give raw footage. The ONLY time I sell raw footage is when clients are famous or want a NDA and pay $1000s per image for raw photos and copyrights. Otherwise, they are newbies who are not good that offer raw footage or photos
Most don't offer giving the raw footage, that's how they make their money. However, I'm not sure if videographers, especially for this case, don't. If anything, they should have at minimum asked instead of pulling this bs.
Pay more for a videographer, period! He got what he paid for ! That’s what he gets. You paid more for everything else than the person capturing the day for years to come. Ugh
Jude Judy to plaintiff, “ You mean you would’ve been happy if she’d charged you more? She didn’t charge you $250 for that product. She charged you for that product because that’s the best she can do!!” 💯🔥🔥
Well, I thought the video reflected very well what kind of wedding it was, and it looked very good - certainly very good for just $250 ! Dont know what he is complaini g about at all
I do videography on the side but not weddings. Usually I work for bands. For $250 they would get two hours of my time and no editing and no interviews. My cousin does weddings. I don’t know what he charges.
I remember watching the entire case. Her video was not that bad and I do not think that she was trying to cheat the Plaintiffs. She had good ideas, but I think that with experience she shall improve.
@@bettinamicheli8003 Absolutely, my sister payed $2000 for the videographer at her wedding. $250 is insanely low budget, so he definitely got what he payed for, and that's his fault for not doing his due diligence.
@@itsnadaaaa I'm sure not even Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg would pay no damn 10k for a "videographer." If you pay that much you're definitely doing it for the vanity, not the quality, and deserve to get scammed.
@@MenteMaestra91 I'm not saying I would personally pay $10,000 lmao, but high quality photographers and videographers do charge thousands to take pictures at weddings. $250 could literally be recording something on your phone. You can't sue someone because you didn't like the quality, the videographer did the job he was paid for. His fault for not doing his research lmao
That's completely irrelevant; why does no one understand that? If I promise you a Rolls Royca for $20K I can't give you a Honda instead and get away with it. In my experience of 8y being part-owner of a small business, you had to charge less and deliver more than the large competitors. You could never, ever, ever deliver #*#&@^ and say "You get what you pay for". You'd be sued to oblivion.
Bruh, i get paid $250 first hour plus $100/hour after as a photographer and i’m just a local teen who is somewhat talented. $250 for a whole day of videoing plus editing... SHEEEEZ BROOO, you lucky thats what you got
My sister didn’t have the budget for a videographer with the experience she would’ve liked, but she had some funds available and put a post online asking if any videographers wanted to do the job for the listed price to gain experience, exposure, work for their portfolio. It was an amazing beach venue, with a carosel in a gorgeous antique building and anyone would love to film/take photos in it. This college kid responded and sent her some work, said he would do it. Let me tell you, he was a huge highlight to the wedding. He was so excited and eager to work, he set up go pros to get multiple angles of the ceremony, came with bubble wands and noise makers to get kids attention and keep them smiling. He was just an amazing person just having him there was a pleasure and we honestly weren’t expecting anything over the top. Within 48 hours he had already edited a huge portion and sent us a preview. It was out of this world!! We couldn’t wait for the full video, which he of course, nailed as well. My sister and her ex have since divorced lol but I will always recommend her videographer and we still love his work. I think it’s tacky to ask for discounts or expect someone to work for less then they’re worth. But if someone is just starting out and offers to work at a reduced rate to gain experience, that’s different. But you as the person hiring them, also need to know your expectations need to be realistic for what they’re capable of. Oh, and we made sure all of the workers we hired ate and were taken care of. We had food trucks, dessert tables, buffet. At one point we even told the photographer, her helper and the videographer sit down, we don’t need pictures of everyone’s mouth full, eat with us! And having them sit and chit chat was so much fun, they got to ask about family, relationships and who to focus the camera on more and stuff.
You've got to be kidding. It was shakey footage and there was too much black and white. I bet that was a nice suit he had one but you can't tell because it's all in black and white
You don't pay for the product only, you pay for the brand, history (past and present) of it, the service and the professionalism, etc. Every transactions is a machine.
Why do people fool themselves into thinking they are going to get the highest quality for the lowest price? That’s like someone trying to sell you a $2 lobster tail and claiming it’s just as good as a $85 lobster. If you want something high quality then be ready to pay for it.
B.S. he got a beautiful video for the price.. Was disappointed J.J. said it was wrong.. Come on..for those long hours there big moments were captured.. He wanted a play by play for 250.00 give me a break.. She should be charging more.. Please keep up ur great work with ppl that do appreciate ur great work.. Cheap cheap cheap to the groom an bride...
I’m floored this guy is complaining. $250?!?! There’s a few parts at the intro that aren’t my personal taste but for $250 I’d be so HYPE to have a video like this of my wedding 😭 and for them to be there nearly 12 hours. I feel bad for that videographer
Having a videographer and photographer for your wedding is a luxury. To have a very good one is expensive. But it's all art and everyone has a different style and vision. That's why you always do your research and look at their work first before deciding.
Since they won't post the full case (which is why I'm glad I didn't subscribe to this channel), I'll tell you - I saw the full case today on tv and the wedding video was crap. It was in black-and-white (altho certain sections were in full color), and please don't get me started on the editing. It was the absolute worst. The videographer is not a professional at all, and the Plaintiff and his husband want their $250 back? PUH-LEASE! They should've checked her references, but instead, the videographer was recommended to them by a friend of theirs. A very messy wedding video and I'm sorry, but they got what they paid for.
Well, of course the video wasn't good, the defendant stated herself she went to school for videography, of course she wasn't seasoned enough to put up a good quality product. $250 is a steal for this kind of product.
I beg to differ. The groom sued her for 1,800 USD which is absolutely ludicrous if you ask me. He did only pay 250$ which is again nothing compared to having her to stand on her feet for about 12 hours (recording the whole ceremony). And also, he did admit that she showed him her work and he was clearly impressed enough to appoint her as the wedding videographer. She must definitely work on sharpening her skills. But as far as money is concerned, the video was certainly worth more than 250 …. My take.
There is no principle in law as "you get what you pay for". YOU GET WHAT WAS PROMISED TO YOU. The video you described fails to live up to the minimum standard of what a reasonable person would assume a wedding video would consist of.
She should've counter claimed and sued him for all of the hour's she spent on his wedding day. The video was not the greatest quality, but like JJ said, He got what he paid for! Atleast she captured all of the key moments and stayed the whole day... He's a trip! Smh
This is why I would NEVER work with an Alphabet club member! Maybe he should've lost some weight and he would have looked better in his Goodwill, pirate suit! 😂😂😂
oooh, that's a low blow. I really think she did a great job. Him and Judge Judy messed up her hustle. I'm still trying to figure out where she messed up other than the spouse wasn't in the vids separately.
I agree. There's a lot of people thinking they are film stars and want to waste thousands in a lavish production that is only of interest to the bride and groom anyway, who are likely to get divorced anyway. You'd never think the world is going to ruin with satanic world leaders and all their harmful ways, while people want to dress up and pretend to be stars. GROW UP @@
If I ordered food and it came out cold, I best be getting my money back or at least a new hot meal. I agree with judge Judy but not with this example. You pay for a hot meal so you should get one. Now if you don’t like the hot meal you chose then that’s on you and you don’t get your money back
0.o as some who does photography and my brother does videography. That is actually really cheap… I would have definitely questioned it, or understood why it’s low quality. Lol
I once had a guy come round to give a quote to tile my bathroom - other quotes were around £500 - but this guy said £180 ‼️ I thought : "whats he gonna do, put adhesive on the wall and throw the tiles at it and hope they stick" I used another guy ... 🙄🙄
My sister got married last year. She paid well over $1,000 for a photographer and videographer. Why someone would think $250 wasn’t going to be crap quality I don’t know.
My brother got a $400 videographer SLASH DJ, for his wedding lol. They got what they paid for, but all things considered, it was good enough. Played a song and then got on the camera, but hey- if the laptop has a good playlist, why not?
I didn’t know they can cost that much but it makes sense when you think about all the edits and other stuff that goes into videography.
we paid around $3000 for video AND photos. $250.. that's video is what they paid for lol
I didn't think it was " crap quality" at all.
For 250, she still turned out a nice video.
Any real wedding videographer is at least $3500. Anything below that is going to be mediocre as hell. Someone charging $1000 or less is as newbie as could be and your going to get a crap product period
250 was a steal for what he got. Thats not even min. Wage. Say thank you and move on.
When it’s your money, you say « thank you » and move on…
A great value for $250, but I do agree it had its issues.
@@RiiFT oh absolutely I agree. It wasn't an amazing video but again 250 doesnt even cover the time spent. A bargain for what he got. A full day attendance of taping for 2 employees then an editor would have run this man maybe 50 times what he paid.
@@elkennedy9176 I'm in agreement here, it's actually a pretty well made video capturing all the important parts of the event. It took long hours, a lot of filming and editing to get that result, a huge bargain for $250. ^^
Right. His big scammin' azz. 😑
I saw the whole case, his case was dismissed but the defendant should’ve kept her mouth shut when Judy said “That’s the best she could do” and the defendant shook her head no admitting that she didn’t do her best. If it look like you’re winning, don’t say anything stupid nor raise your hands.
🤫🤫...DON'T SPEAK!! (In JJS talk)
Such a tailor made moment for that, don't you think?!
@@johnathanpatrick6118 yes, yes it is.
@@rinleddy1082 both.
I’m surprised Judge Judy didn’t snap at her for raising her hand especially because she was clearly winning the case. Go Braves 2021 World Series Champs Baby lol
Looked like she won. There was no judgement for the plaintiff in the video. Though should have stopped raising her hand, she didn't need to speak, she was going to win.
Maurice, you paid $250 for a videographer...that's way on the cheap end of the scale!! When you pay for cheap, sometimes you get cheap. Too bad, so sad, you got no case.
How do you have no case? You didn't get what was promised. In a jury case that had a real judge he'd have won.
@@duncreg agreed.
I have refunded money twice to customers that weren't satisfied with service they received back when I had staff stepping in on my behalf.
I paid $2600 for my wedding videographer. It was beautiful, I couldn't have asked for more.
They paid $250. I'm surprised it wasn't done on an iPhone 🙄
😂😂😂😂😂
It's funny you say that because as I was watching this, I was imagining her walking around with an iPhone.
iPhone cameras are pretty good. They’ve shot lots of decent movies on it. It depends who is behind the lens more than the camera 📷
😂 I like when she hops in her seat and yells with her hands around her mouth. 😂🤣🤣
I literally live for that 😂🤣😂
Classic judge Judy
Me too! I start hollering because JJ is going off!!
My kind of people!! 🤣 🤣 🤣
He's lucky it was only $250, what if it was $2,500? and Judy said "you don't get your money back"
That is why you investigate what you buy before you pay for it.
if it was $2500 he most likely would have gotten some money back, since in this case part of the case is about how much he paid; he paid $250, and for a wedding videographer thats a steal, so unless she was crazy her quality was bound to be dipped.
Dude... From the video shown for 250 she did a GOOD fuckin job in my opinion, u gotta be crazy if you think otherwise
Was there another part to this? I just saw the court case.
Yes exactly!
@@angusking1593 yes there is a first part to it where it shows the video
@@jocelyne2634 Saw it now, video wasn't bad. The only bit I thought was bad was at about 3:10 in he first part of this case. Kinda jumped quite a bit showing the guests walking, with multiple jump cuts in a very short time.
$250, from 2-3PM-1AM,
Agreed!!
The judge crushed her whole career choice in 3 mins 🤭😂
The videographer did an extraordinary job filming and her time is certainly worth FAR more than this cheapskate paid her. Some of her editing was a bit too artsy for me but with the footage she had, and the amount of time she spent editing it, if he actually PAID her a FAIR amount, he could have had her reedit the footage to his liking.
No. You're ignorant. The video was high school level. She had ideas but NO skill.
Wedding videographers are thousands!!!
Exactly!
Judge Judy is such a sweetie.
No, she's not. But she's a damn smart and just woman, and I love her. But no, she's no sweetie lol.
@@MenteMaestra91 yes she is a sweety too. 😏
2:09 LOL he lowkey would sue about the food too 😂
I think she did ok, could have been better since the lighting was too dark on some of it..but I think she's going to get better and hope she doesn't give up
My brother just got married and they paid $4,000. $250 definitely sounds dodgy! When you're paying significately lower than market, yes, you GET what you paid for.
You pay cheap,
you get crappy work.
That's it.
we paid $3000 for videos and photos. everything was done beautifully.
$250? yikes.
How very decadent of you
$250 videographer screams no experience and cheap equipment. I'm a wedding photographer and videographer and cheap clients are the most demanding.
"Ding a ling a ling a ling!!" No truer words have ever been spoken.
“She gave you that product because that was the best she could do” 😂
I'm a videographer and I know my skill level and charge accordingly. Once I've been doing video for a few more years I'll charge more. It's extremely involved and takes so much time to master. It kills me that people spend $14k on a dress but they don't want to pay more than $1,000 for a videographer!
Just watch the raw footage if you're unhappy. $250 wouldn't even cover the shoot.
That's not on him; that's on the person providing the service. Hell, I worked for a company once that did a job for below cost in the belief that they would get significant additional business in the future.
Too much of a sassy queen! You paid $250 and expected a $2500 quality!? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
She didn't just show up for the entire wedding, it still probably took another 8 hours at LEAST to edit that!!
He better NOT go on “the internet” and write about his “terrible experience” because seriously??? All day for $250??? Get real! That’s a steal regardless of quality.
Always include in the contract that you receive all the raw footage shot. Then if you do not like the edit, take the footage to a more qualified video editor and get it edited the way you like. For that price, they were not even paying for hours of editing that it required. Ridiculous.
TERRIBLE advice. No legit and professional photographer or videographer would ever give raw footage. The ONLY time I sell raw footage is when clients are famous or want a NDA and pay $1000s per image for raw photos and copyrights. Otherwise, they are newbies who are not good that offer raw footage or photos
Most don't offer giving the raw footage, that's how they make their money. However, I'm not sure if videographers, especially for this case, don't. If anything, they should have at minimum asked instead of pulling this bs.
Pay more for a videographer, period! He got what he paid for ! That’s what he gets. You paid more for everything else than the person capturing the day for years to come. Ugh
To be fair. For $200 the fact that he has a video at all is amazing. 😂 That's easily a 10x the price product.
It would’ve been interesting to hear what they had discussed before the wedding versus what she ended up producing.
Jude Judy to plaintiff, “ You mean you would’ve been happy if she’d charged you more? She didn’t charge you $250 for that product. She charged you for that product because that’s the best she can do!!” 💯🔥🔥
Well, I thought the video reflected very well what kind of wedding it was, and it looked very good - certainly very good for just $250 !
Dont know what he is complaini g about at all
I thought so too. For $250 that was an awesome video. Who is he kidding?
damn the defendant got roasted by judge Judy 😂
Somehow I believe these are the kind of people that want everything for nothing. I bet they're demanding in restaurants and never leave a tip!
I do videography on the side but not weddings. Usually I work for bands. For $250 they would get two hours of my time and no editing and no interviews. My cousin does weddings. I don’t know what he charges.
That’s the best she can do!! I’m dead 😵
The video was ok for that price.
I remember watching the entire case. Her video was not that bad and I do not think that she was trying to cheat the Plaintiffs. She had good ideas, but I think that with experience she shall improve.
@@UKImmigrationLawGeek Exactly, I wouldn't expect a 25 year old girl to produce something of superior quality especially at that price point.
Please for $250 he got the mental memories like wtf
Lol 😂 $250 it’s a steal 🤣
This case gets two snaps in a circle!
$250? you get what you paid for is right! Most videographers charge over 10k!
Wow do they really 10,000 that's crazy
@@bettinamicheli8003 Absolutely, my sister payed $2000 for the videographer at her wedding. $250 is insanely low budget, so he definitely got what he payed for, and that's his fault for not doing his due diligence.
@@itsnadaaaa I'm sure not even Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg would pay no damn 10k for a "videographer." If you pay that much you're definitely doing it for the vanity, not the quality, and deserve to get scammed.
@@MenteMaestra91 I'm not saying I would personally pay $10,000 lmao, but high quality photographers and videographers do charge thousands to take pictures at weddings. $250 could literally be recording something on your phone. You can't sue someone because you didn't like the quality, the videographer did the job he was paid for. His fault for not doing his research lmao
That's completely irrelevant; why does no one understand that? If I promise you a Rolls Royca for $20K I can't give you a Honda instead and get away with it. In my experience of 8y being part-owner of a small business, you had to charge less and deliver more than the large competitors. You could never, ever, ever deliver #*#&@^ and say "You get what you pay for". You'd be sued to oblivion.
$250 for a videographer?! They could have recorded the entire thing on a flip phone and texted it to me and I would have been happy for $250.
Bruh, i get paid $250 first hour plus $100/hour after as a photographer and i’m just a local teen who is somewhat talented. $250 for a whole day of videoing plus editing... SHEEEEZ BROOO, you lucky thats what you got
I would like to inform this groom that YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR.
I can't believe people pay out big for weddings instead of saving that money for their future, like for the divorce.
😂😂😂
bc its speical lmao they can do what they wantXD ur not paying it XDDD
😂😂😂
Big and lavish weddings are so cringy to me. But to each their own. Lol
This is what happens when everyone says your work is good
Exactly
Pre-divorce ceremonies are too extravagant most times.
My sister didn’t have the budget for a videographer with the experience she would’ve liked, but she had some funds available and put a post online asking if any videographers wanted to do the job for the listed price to gain experience, exposure, work for their portfolio. It was an amazing beach venue, with a carosel in a gorgeous antique building and anyone would love to film/take photos in it. This college kid responded and sent her some work, said he would do it. Let me tell you, he was a huge highlight to the wedding. He was so excited and eager to work, he set up go pros to get multiple angles of the ceremony, came with bubble wands and noise makers to get kids attention and keep them smiling. He was just an amazing person just having him there was a pleasure and we honestly weren’t expecting anything over the top. Within 48 hours he had already edited a huge portion and sent us a preview. It was out of this world!! We couldn’t wait for the full video, which he of course, nailed as well. My sister and her ex have since divorced lol but I will always recommend her videographer and we still love his work. I think it’s tacky to ask for discounts or expect someone to work for less then they’re worth. But if someone is just starting out and offers to work at a reduced rate to gain experience, that’s different. But you as the person hiring them, also need to know your expectations need to be realistic for what they’re capable of. Oh, and we made sure all of the workers we hired ate and were taken care of. We had food trucks, dessert tables, buffet. At one point we even told the photographer, her helper and the videographer sit down, we don’t need pictures of everyone’s mouth full, eat with us! And having them sit and chit chat was so much fun, they got to ask about family, relationships and who to focus the camera on more and stuff.
That video looks like it was taken on a cell phone. LOL!
This man's logic is crazy!
How stupid can you be to think you’re getting a good videographer for $250? 😂 LOL!!!
Where is the rest of the case
Full case please!!
I honestly thought that video was perfectly fine
You've got to be kidding. It was shakey footage and there was too much black and white. I bet that was a nice suit he had one but you can't tell because it's all in black and white
@@weirdnomad8868 for $200 dollars that's quality
You get what you pay for
@@weirdnomad8868 lol what the fuck do you expect with 250?
don’t be shy show us the wedding video
ruclips.net/video/KACir7DxhlM/видео.html
@@badgurl5758 THANK YOU!
@@georgeisonline Welcome 🥰
It's in the description.
@@IsomerMashups thanks 👍
You don't pay for the product only, you pay for the brand, history (past and present) of it, the service and the professionalism, etc. Every transactions is a machine.
Why do people fool themselves into thinking they are going to get the highest quality for the lowest price? That’s like someone trying to sell you a $2 lobster tail and claiming it’s just as good as a $85 lobster.
If you want something high quality then be ready to pay for it.
The video should not have been almost 100% in B&W but probably the lighting was horrible.
I thought it wasn't half bad.
Wedding photography is a $3000 affair on it's own, and when you add video...
B.S. he got a beautiful video for the price.. Was disappointed J.J. said it was wrong.. Come on..for those long hours there big moments were captured.. He wanted a play by play for 250.00 give me a break.. She should be charging more.. Please keep up ur great work with ppl that do appreciate ur great work.. Cheap cheap cheap to the groom an bride...
My cousin is a photographer, and $250 is beyond cheap!
I’m floored this guy is complaining. $250?!?! There’s a few parts at the intro that aren’t my personal taste but for $250 I’d be so HYPE to have a video like this of my wedding 😭 and for them to be there nearly 12 hours. I feel bad for that videographer
McDonalds meal and is thinking he's going to get a cowboy ribeye. Joker
He liked when she said dingaling dingaling 😭😭😭
Having a videographer and photographer for your wedding is a luxury. To have a very good one is expensive. But it's all art and everyone has a different style and vision. That's why you always do your research and look at their work first before deciding.
You pay cheap, you get cheap. Pay artists properly. They're worth the talent.
Since they won't post the full case (which is why I'm glad I didn't subscribe to this channel), I'll tell you - I saw the full case today on tv and the wedding video was crap. It was in black-and-white (altho certain sections were in full color), and please don't get me started on the editing. It was the absolute worst. The videographer is not a professional at all, and the Plaintiff and his husband want their $250 back? PUH-LEASE! They should've checked her references, but instead, the videographer was recommended to them by a friend of theirs. A very messy wedding video and I'm sorry, but they got what they paid for.
Well, of course the video wasn't good, the defendant stated herself she went to school for videography, of course she wasn't seasoned enough to put up a good quality product. $250 is a steal for this kind of product.
@@johnathanpatrick6118 Exactly, and that's why they don't get their money back. They got what they paid for.
I beg to differ. The groom sued her for 1,800 USD which is absolutely ludicrous if you ask me. He did only pay 250$ which is again nothing compared to having her to stand on her feet for about 12 hours (recording the whole ceremony). And also, he did admit that she showed him her work and he was clearly impressed enough to appoint her as the wedding videographer.
She must definitely work on sharpening her skills. But as far as money is concerned, the video was certainly worth more than 250 …. My take.
You must be the groom.
Cheapskate!
There is no principle in law as "you get what you pay for". YOU GET WHAT WAS PROMISED TO YOU. The video you described fails to live up to the minimum standard of what a reasonable person would assume a wedding video would consist of.
I don’t see where the video was bad. Very nice job 👍🏽
When you know that some people want to pay videographer with « exposure » 🤣
Jj said that's the best she could do 😂😂😂
She should've counter claimed and sued him for all of the hour's she spent on his wedding day. The video was not the greatest quality, but like JJ said, He got what he paid for! Atleast she captured all of the key moments and stayed the whole day... He's a trip! Smh
$250 is dog shit for the videographer. He got what he paid for really.
Heads were nodding until she said “you don’t get your money back”😭😂
I agree! I had to pay mine $3500
This is why I would NEVER work with an Alphabet club member! Maybe he should've lost some weight and he would have looked better in his Goodwill, pirate suit! 😂😂😂
'that is just the best she could do' S A V A G E
oooh, that's a low blow. I really think she did a great job. Him and Judge Judy messed up her hustle. I'm still trying to figure out where she messed up other than the spouse wasn't in the vids separately.
I seen nothing wrong with it
I agree. There's a lot of people thinking they are film stars and want to waste thousands in a lavish production that is only of interest to the bride and groom anyway, who are likely to get divorced anyway. You'd never think the world is going to ruin with satanic world leaders and all their harmful ways, while people want to dress up and pretend to be stars. GROW UP @@
Damn. That videographer is like ☠️
250 for a whole day is a steal for sure.
If I ordered food and it came out cold, I best be getting my money back or at least a new hot meal. I agree with judge Judy but not with this example. You pay for a hot meal so you should get one. Now if you don’t like the hot meal you chose then that’s on you and you don’t get your money back
get em judge judy
That queen is something else!
The wedding video is posted. Its actually pretty good!!
That's pretty damn good!
Frankly I think that she was UNDERPAID for that!!!
She was not feeling the opinion of JJ 😂😂😂
0.o as some who does photography and my brother does videography. That is actually really cheap… I would have definitely questioned it, or understood why it’s low quality. Lol
Part 2 where r u
I don’t know why ppl think getting a deal is a good thing it shows that the service may not be the best ! **not always** Don’t refer her anymore
That was best to the price.
IN MY VIEW
The old saying, if it sounds too good to be true, is actually a RED FLAG WARNING that you're going to get the bad end of the offer.
Judge is absolutely correct! I don’t understand why the entire video was in black and white and very dim.
It just HAD to be a dramatic gay guy being ridiculous and suing for this 🙄
I'm guessing that it's very difficult to produce great quality work when your feeling nauseous.
I think it looked pretty good for $250 🤷
I once had a guy come round to give a quote to tile my bathroom - other quotes were around £500 - but this guy said £180 ‼️ I thought : "whats he gonna do, put adhesive on the wall and throw the tiles at it and hope they stick" I used another guy ... 🙄🙄
You gotta pay to play big fella!
coming to court would have cost more
Yeah he should’ve known by the price. However a test run should be done before the wedding at the venue
I don't think some people realize that 250 isn't a lot of money.