@@notagain2856 The case of Deadmau5 was about trademark infringement, it had nothing to do modifications. He was the guilty party, as he copied and modified the Ferrari trademarked badge which was Ferrari's property.
@@DxModel219 No it isn't the same thing. Trademark infringement is a legitimate case for filing a lawsuit and it has nothing to do with ownership of cars.
Sgt is right. A guy crashed his 3m+ enzo (only like 4 or 5 hundred produced) when he reported it. Ferrari built a new 1 to replace it with the same vin # as the wrecked one and kept the production number at 500 like the crash never happened. This has become common practice for Ferrari over the years following. Also done with other rare models of Ferrari. Do some research before calling people liars.
This is every car brand other than Ferrari. Cause it’s your car, you paid for it and now it is your property, with which you can do whatever you please.
You buy a Porsche when you’ve been someone for a long time. You buy an Aston Martin when you have a sense of style & power. You buy a Camry when you DGAF about either of those things & just want a car that’ll reliably get you where you gotta go. And you buy a Lexus LC500 when you want a little bit of everything!
this is so simple to circumvent... Step 1 - Get someone like me (poor asf to buy the ferrari for you) Step 2 - I will sign the deal where I am liable for the modifications - Step 3 - I will sell you the car without any further agreement and keep a fee on that... Now you can modify whatever you like and I am not responsible for it either...
@@Trikipum Actually in Europe, if the Ferrari is exposed in a dealership, they cant prevent me from buying it or they might face legal discriminatory actions
Using a junkyard Ferrari engine won’t get you in any trouble either even if you twin turbo it. It’s anything in-situ in an actual Ferrari vehicle that gets them upset. Only the big custom modifiers like Mansory and Novitec can do so because they have big contracts with Modena
This is why i wont ever buy a Ferrari and id rather buy a Lamborghini at least Lamborghini arnt assholes like Ferrari is im working toward a aventador SVJ
@@moist_iguanaEnzo was a real douchbag. Hell, tractor maker Lamborghini made an off-the-cuff remark on how his tractor’s clutches were better than anything that Ferrari could produce and the feud was on and Lambos were born.
@@areid609 Doesn't matter. Courts have repeatedly nullified things like arbitration clauses, EULAs, etc. when they determine that having such things causes outright harm to the consumer.
@@sirmy-tdog7211you may think that but some ferrari dealerships (not all tho) put a lien on the title for the first year (they inform you of this before purchasing the car so its legal), you do not own the vehicle for the first year even if you pay cash. Because they have a lien on the title, it acts like a leased car and you cannot modify a car you do not own.
@@PerennialWheat Wasn't aware of that. Kinda BS tbh. I'd be curious to see how well that practice would hold up in court if someone was really willing to push them about it. Too many other cars available that are as good or better to bother putting up with that shit IMO. Thanks for the info.
I don’t think the cease and desist necessary means they will sue for monetary value, they will just bar you from purchasing any other Ferraris at a dealership and not allow you to repair your car because they have total control on all parts, meaning if something breaks, you need to pull used parts off another car, hope you can find something in the aftermarket or you’re screwed 🤷♂️
Naw…. It’s a way to keep the brand and your vehicle valuable. It’s yours but you have to respect the name. They don’t take your car from you like the government takes your home.
It’s a Ferrari. 99.9 percent of people buy it because it is a Ferrari which means you’re in the Ferrari owners club. It’s funny to see the “purrari” as a joke but legitimately changing the car like that shouldn’t be tolerated. Ferrari did nothing wrong with this rule. If you don’t like it, buy a different car.
Yes! Finally somebody who understands that Ferrari isn't a little car company that makes cars for rich people! They're a titan of racing with 90 years of racing history and innovations, drivers, cars, records, and victories preceding every model they build. What does lamborghini have? Oh... yeah. Ferrari's blueprint. Except they decided to add godawful AWD to it. And make the cars uglier. 😂
That still doesn't give them the right to sue people for modifications made to a car they sold, imagine if Ford or Chrysler did that, both companies have a long racing lineage and big brand names and yet they don't care what people do to there cars, it's just pompous rich people trying to dictate what other people do with their own private property. No one would stand for it if Ford did it so why do you stand for it when it's Ferrari?
@@lukazupie7220 most people don't buy apartments they rent them. But if you have the funds to buy apartment or a condo you can do whatever you want inside the apartment.
@TwinShards If you're a US citizen, it's as easy as just ignoring Ferrari and doing whatever you want with your property. Their lawyers are toothless in the US, worst they can is write you an angry letter 😆
I agree it’s a dogshit company and policy, but they sign a legal agreement when buying them. They’re bound to that contract from that moment on. Again it’s absurd and I wish people had never given in to their terms. But it is what it is now.
I don’t think that’s necessarily true anymore because they can go after people for crazy paint jobs and trying to like sell shoes or other other products with the Ferrari in the background regardless, if they’re the first owner or not
@@globalautobahn1132In the US maybe, but good luck to Ferrari trying to do that against someone who buys a second hand Ferrari in any of the EU countries. There are far stricter rules here to protect consumers from idiotic practices like this. And no company is too big to escape these rules, just look at Apple who have just gotten a 2 billion dollar fine for abusive appstore rules.
@@user-ch6lb5iu9rthey should take pride in the fact that they could own it in the first place. Most people won’t be able to own a supercar at all in their lifetime
If you've ever had the displeasure of working on a ferrrari, they have exactly two engineers, who have a collective IQ of 7, are inbred, and constantly drunk when doing the designs of anything non bodywork
@@owenlealeven if someone who is able to afford not one but many Ferraris, the company won't just let any rich stranger buy the car. They do a background check. Someone who is famous and respected and many more things. So yea.
At that point, do you even own the car? You might as well trade it in for a Lamborghini or a McLaren. At least those manufacturers understand that when the customer buys the car out right, it's no longer the company's.
When you buy a ferrari from an official retailer you sign a sale contract where you agree not to modify the car in such ways. And this is if you manage to purchase a ferrari from an official retailer in the first place cause there's a pretty long waiting line (for exemple if you manage to get in line now for a ferrari purosangue you'll get it in 2026). If you purchase your ferrari second hand and you never signed any sale contract with Ferrari then you can modify it like you want!
Why would you want to modify a Ferrari it's perfection y'know, Lamborghinis are ugly as hell so its understandable why no one takes those cars seriously and just do whatever... Ferrari is more like an influential people's toy, it's not even supposed to be on the market, they're mainly a F1 Team. Even if it was selling 0 cars to the common rich it doesn't matter because they're supposed to just make exclusive few units for the people that financially support it. They only sell to get easy money from wannabes. Thats why you dont modify it, you're just buying a dream that you're from the group
@@-.369.- yes and people often fail to mention that certain bugatti, mercedes, and aston martin like the Valkyrie also require the buyer to sign a sales contract on the fact that he will not modify the car! Certain contracts also forbid the buyer to sell the car as second hand cause it can only be sold back to the brand. It's a pretty standard procedure among really exclusive cars with very low production count and a lot of demand
@@maxbobbigamesjust to add, Ferrari's XX program is even more demanding for buyers contracts. If you own one of their XX vehicles (not the new SF90 XX, the real XX cars) you can decide the price of what the car will be sold at, but Ferrari are the decision makers in who will have the option, and eventually buy the car. The owners have no say in who the car is sold to.
@@-.369.- I modify them for a living, custom rebuilds / bc the engines are junk, turbo set ups full race prep for hill climb, time attack and circuit racing. They are largely thrown together junk cars from factory. We do a lot or re-engineering to make them work for a season. The quality of block casting from mb and Lamborghini is substantially better. Also since Lamborghini is now a product of vag the manufacturing quality control is better. Largely the supercars market ( Ferraris) is full of lavish looking slow junk. Raw data shows this at events constantly like world time attack, for example, hill climbing events etc. no supercars finish in the top 20. Ever. It’s evos, lotus exiges, wrc built golf’s/polos, Lancia deltas, factory backed sti cars, focus wrc cars, Audi Quattro 5 cylinder cars, Nissan gtrs, radical sr3 and radical sr8s . The exceptions are the 918, Vulcan , Valkyrie amr pro, zonda r .
I'm assuming it's a clause in the sales contract, since that's the only way I could possibly imagine them having any grounds whatsoever to sue. So if that's the case, when a customer gets sued by Ferrari for 'unapproved' modifications, they are literally getting what they paid for.
@@jic1 I'd imagine this would apply to a lease or if he was otherwise making payments on it, in which case he doesn't fully own the car yet and if the car was repossessed Ferrari would have better chance selling a virgin car. If he signed something that said he can't modified the car even after he owns it that's getting into a grey area. How long? What happens if he sells that car and then buys it back? I don't think Ferrari has a reasonable case to dictate to others how they use their property since the car no longer belongs to them. In other words, I don't think that part of the contract holds up under scrutiny.
@@177SCmaro You seem to be saying that if a clause in a contract doesn't cover all possible circumstances, it can't be enforceable in *any* circumstance. I'm not a lawyer, but I can't see how that could possibly be the case.
@@jic1 No, I'm saying this one aspect of this contract is unreasonable and thus invalid. It's irrational to dictate the use of property after it's no longer your property. That conflicts with the very concept of "property" i.e. the right to the exclusive use and disposal of something. If I sold you my house and put in the contact you can never paint it white it's a meaningless stipulation since it's not my right to dictate the use of your property.
@@dodoz44Yes sir he is, and a damn great man, comedian, and car collector at that. I still watch his movie Collision Course with Pat Morita (Mr. Mayagi). It's a really funny movie if you haven't seen it.
You are free to do anything with the car , Ferrari claimed defamation and copyright infringement because Deadmouse played with their trademark which is unlawful
@@patrik5543 if you think about it, it's like changing the colors in a movie along with the movie title and character names while everything else in the movie is the same, sounds weird, but it's defacing a brand type thing.
owner of lambo wasn't in ferrari. he was making tractors back then, and bought ferraris with the money he was making. got angry at the garbage clutch, and made his own super cars.
Lamborghini casually ripping the V12 out of a GTO and using it to power a heavier, worse handling, terrible looking Miura, but then making their AWD snap-oversteer wedge-shaped machines for the next 60 years, make the Aventador which gets popular among rappers but gets raped by Ferraris at trackdays, then seeing another failed attempt they go borrowing a V10 from parent company VW Audi, throw it into an ugly and terribly balanced Gallardo, realize they fucked that up but it sold well so they make the Huracan and on the side make an entire car out of Carbon Fiber for no reason and put the motor into their GT3 racing homologation car... and lose to Ferrari- but they take one record with the Performante (respect), and then stealing aspects from all manufacturers in 2021 to develop their LMDh vomit green endurance racer and .. lose in the 2023 and 2024 season, to Ferrari, Cadillac, and Porsche. Yeah, i think lamborghini is way better than ferrari. Ferrari did improve their clutches, though. So i guess his plan worked out in the end. "We're like Ferrari but we're fat cows and suck at racing!" No wonder they dont care if you destroy their cars.
@@captain_context9991 Uhm, u do realize when those fat bastard know and CAN and are capable of making jewels for dirt cheap if they WANT? Like the new C8 Z06? That think is a monster for the money you pay out of the box.
@captain_context9991 Would you like to start putting this all into context, Captain? America is the land of Size Matters. Go big, or enjoy your tiny train in Europe. Yes, the Ford Focus sucks. Have you tried our V8? We also have V10’s - not like you’d ever see it, because going big breaks the poor bank of any European. Hell, we still have our trucks from the 80’s rolling on stock engines in a few pockets. And if it stopped working @ 400,000 miles, we could always do an LS swap to keep our V8 vehicle a-vrooming. USA is THE land of excess.
@@flyingturret208thecannon5 Yeah I do marketing and I have given several talks on these things. How America is GREAT only in size. But not in any other aspect of greatness. Its not just supercars and GT cars America cant make, its every aspect of the mass market manufacturing industry. America is about cater-for-all, use-and-throw, easily forgettable, instantly replaceable, squeaky plastic, third world built consumer commodities for the ever impoverished, frantically flag-waving bewildered masses. Built by uneducated, unskilled, untrained workers, bottlefed on conspiracies and patriotism. Because educated, skilled people cost money. You want them willing to work minimum wage without healthcare, overtime, unions, paid leave, guaranteed pension, the list goes on... People whos only shot at the American dreeeeeeam is to get hurt at work so they can sue for a billion. When Americans get money, they will never again drive, wear, eat, or buy any American product. When Americans get money, its 100% European top-end quality and luxury products all the way. MURCAAAA, F YEAH!!
Some bodywork that are too extreme are sued, though. Ferrari ordered The F40 Barchetta and Pininfarina P4/5 to have the badges removed. They changed their mind on the latter after seeing the car in real life. And apparently Ferrari removed the F40 LB from the official registry of F40s, still just a rumor though.
Zero motorcycles already does this. Pay us a monthly charge and we will unlock all the bikes features you stop and you have an overweight overpriced scooter.
@@AndrewF321 Yeah and that logic may work for when someone’s coming in to buy a car, but it should never go past that once they already own it. That works just as much for the buyer because if they’re spending all that money to give to Ferrari, it’s theirs to have and to change. Which plays a big part in why their revenue statistics have gone down the past few years when it comes to actual car sales. But don’t get me wrong, I agree with you, but the people have spoken, based on the revenue statistics.
Recently, Forza Motorsport removed a bodykit upgrade for one of the Ferraris in the game. Looks like Ferrari is now going after Game Studios for offering customization options for Ferrari cars in games.
There a reason why you can't find Ferrari in NFS most wanted, beside other famous car in same class like Lamborghini, Porsche, Corvette, Aston Martin, and etc, 15 years ago I didn't have a clue why that's happen, but now everything is make sense.
Ferrari litterally created Lamborghini because he was a stuck up dousche who didn't trust the insight of a tractor manufacturer. Ford's racing division was also created through a similar exchange. You'd think they'd learn, only a matter of time till they get owned once again, can't wait to see what crazy crap that'll create m
This is one of the best parts of living in Brazil, in Brazilian law, if you buy something, this something now is totally yours, and no one, even the manufacturer, can do anything against it, it I buy a Ferrari and totally mess up the Ferrari will never be able to sue me
The car is beautiful as is, I highly doubt you would come up with any modifications that would improve on the aesthetics, and California is a thousand times better than whatever BS Red state you come from. 5th largest economy in the world! Highest GDP out of any state!
ERRR WRONG. You start a partnership with Ferrari. You become part of the family when you sign that contract. They're italians, dude, its about respect.
How the heck can you tell someone that they can’t modify whatever they want after spending 6+ figures for it. This is the main reason why I didn’t buy a home in subdivision with an HOA.
One does not simply buy a Ferrari. For starters, most Ferraris are initially leased with an option to buy. But to get to either, you enter into a contractual relationship with Ferrari under which you agree to abide by a set of terms that include not modifying the car without permission, or reselling the car. Ferrari owners are expected to be partners and brand ambassadors. Ferraris typically escape this trap in a few years, but then good luck getting repair parts or service from Ferrari or one of their authorized aftermarket manufacturers. I have a neighbor with a 1984 308 GTB who ran into this issue when he needed a replacement vacuum line. Surprisingly, Ferrari was extremely accommodating once he proved the car wasn't stolen or otherwise modified, and not only did they establish a relationship with him to keep his car in good running order, they sent him some free schwag. Bottom line, if you want to roll with the boys from Maranello, you need to roll with the boys form Maranello.
@@andrewakrause As a certain agriculturalist from Santa Agata, Bolognese figured out, the place you need to look into for Ferrari parts is a tractor spare parts shop.
@@MetalGearBronyaThe other comment was, “Why do I have to buy one of their crappy cars so that I can buy the one that I want later?” If you were a billionaire and wanted to buy their top car, they would say no. You have to buy a lower car, prove that you are worthy and then apply for one of the rare cars later. To be fair, Ford does this with the GT. However, this was mostly, so that you didn’t flip it, but all manufacturers want their halo cars owned by responsible adults.
A C&D does NOT AT ALL mean you "have to" remove said items. Even getting sued only means you go to court and have a Judge hear the matter. If what you're doing is NOT against the law, the judge will tell Ferrari to go away.
1. Don’t have a RUclips linking you to your Ferrari 2. Conceal your VIN number on your driver window 3. Have flippable plates for when people at car meets take pictures Who gonna find you
Back on the day this rich guy my dad knew had a 308 that broke down constantly. He had the car crushed and hired a local metal sculptor artist made it into a coffee table. He would tell guests look how He made something useful out of a pile of junk.
So somebody crushed a car that was $80,000 when new and that's going for up to $200,000 at auction these days to make a table just because it broke down a few times and he wanted to be an ass. One I don't believe it two if he did he's maybe dumber than forest gump.
Do work to your home without a permit and let me know what happens. Think you own your home? Don't pay taxes and see what happens. Making a payment on pretty much anything and miss a few. It's clear people don't realize they do not own as much as they think.
@DioOdinson Also the comparison is thinking you own something when you do not. Trying to say it's a bad comparison makes no sense as that is the whole point of the video and people's responses. The government has confiscated homes that have been modified for illegal activities. But stay within the narrow scope of a bank only and ignore the ways it can be done using other laws and means. People lost homes by simply setting up some mylar, lights, watering systems, and lining the floors for a draining system.
@patchesohoulihan9826 wrong, If the car(any car) is paid off in full ie you are not leasing it or have a loan on it. You can modify it however you see fit that does not infringe on any trademarks like Deadmaus did with with Purrari emblem. That was the only issie there was TM issues with the nameplate mods
@@fadyeltamimi nope, that would be Volkswagen, which owns Audi, Porsche and Bugatti. Also, How are you going to compare cars that avg low-to-mid six figures and are produced in higher number to a company that makes one model at a time, in low numbers at $4-5 million per car? Ferrari doesn't care about shoving 8 turbos on a 30 cylinder engine, sorry.
@@David-lm7ownot like it’s a secret…. Ferrari is well aware as they’ve brought it to the dealer trying to get a recall done and published it all over RUclips
They can't do shit to those outside of their country unless it's law compliant So yeah, pretty much anywhere in the world you can do whatever you want with ya car
@@BB_deez And there is Emelia Hartford's widebody 458. And that one has also been back to Ferrari for work, without any hissy fits. The video is just full of bullshit internet myths.
@@narrativeless404usually what would actually happen is ferrari blacklists these people from buying more of their cars from official dealers or try to buy back the car from them. If its the former, unless you want another ferrari you can just ignore it, and even then, theres always second hand dealers and auctioners, even for high luxury stuff, you might have to overpay though, but depending on how rich you are you dont care if thats the only way to get it. Funny thing, other manufacturers do similar deals with some of their more exclusive cars, like the contract where you agree not to heavily modify it or sell it second hand, the latter usually has an expiration because this measure exists to prevent scalpers selling such exclusive cars on a proffit to another rich guy that just didnt get selected for the program or missed the queu for whathever reason but is still rich enough to have such a thing.
Why would you change the exaust of a Ferrari that’s literally one of the best qualitys lol, if you can’t build your engine or body then just get a bone stock car no point in my opinion
I’m sensing that @blue_water_jim isn’t currently in the market for purchasing an actual Ferrari. But we’re obviously most grateful to see him sharing his thoughts… 😮💭
They don't, unless the Car in question was somehow leased/Rented out Which they do have certain methods to prevent quick flip sales on limited editions. But if you bought a regular Ferrari, at sticker price, bought it out right? You can do to it whatever you want.. They have NO legal means (But you'll never buy another Ferrari from any dealer.. but that's not a legal issue)
The guy who made this video doesn't know enough about the topic. The cease and desist is basically saying, if you stop whatever you're doing, we'll let you continue to buy from ferrari dealerships. If you ignore the cease and desist, you're not going to be sued, you're just going to be banned from buying anything from a ferrari dealership.
They can sue for any reason they like, doesn’t mean they have a chance to win. In America, you have the right to do with your personal property whatever you wish.
@@jairox75, contacts can not hold up in court. You sound like the people after the 13th amendment who were like "I'll just get them to sign a contract legalizing owning them as slaves". Illegal terms on contract, don't hold up.
Yes and no. They can suit you and it's on the air if you win or not, but what would you chooses?. Spend years on the court paying legal fees to beat Ferrari on it or just remove what they ask to remove and move on with your life?. Is not about proving you're right, is about dealing with the nuisances of a legal case. For Ferrari is whatever they are giga billion rich, but do you?. Their tactics is just strong arm you and mentality fatigue you into say "Whatever man. Here. Take the car and reverse it"
Id litterally just ignore the lawsuits bro. In this scenario. im an American who owns a car and they are just some angry dudes in Italy. Got no say here. @@RomnysGonzalez
A cease & desist means absolutely nothing. It is their way of saying: "We really have no grounds for a lawsuit...but we would appreciate it if you stopped." If you responded to the cease & desist with: "No. I will see you in court." I guarantee they would just drop it. Zero chance they would win that case.
So owning a Ferrari is similar to owning a home in an HOA neighborhood
Ya fk them
good analogy.
Bruh 💀
Overpriced and freedom stifling
No, a Ferrari is ALOT more special.
Ill modify whatever i want on my car
You’ll lose
Not when your ferrari still under lease and you signed an agreement to not modify your ferrari within a time period. Things that deadmau5 did btw
@@notagain2856 The case of Deadmau5 was about trademark infringement, it had nothing to do modifications. He was the guilty party, as he copied and modified the Ferrari trademarked badge which was Ferrari's property.
@@JuanOne11modification of trademark. who cares same shit
@@DxModel219 No it isn't the same thing. Trademark infringement is a legitimate case for filing a lawsuit and it has nothing to do with ownership of cars.
If I spend $500,000+ I’m aloud to do what I want
If the company sued me, I would just wrap it around a telephone pole and collect the insurance money
Fun fact; if you crach one of the more rare models, you will get a new one from Ferrari, because the number of cars needs to remain the same
@@SgtMclupus that makes no sense, and I don't think that's true.
@@SgtMclupus can you cite where you got that from? Sounds like total BS to me.
Sgt is right. A guy crashed his 3m+ enzo (only like 4 or 5 hundred produced) when he reported it. Ferrari built a new 1 to replace it with the same vin # as the wrecked one and kept the production number at 500 like the crash never happened. This has become common practice for Ferrari over the years following. Also done with other rare models of Ferrari. Do some research before calling people liars.
@@j4cko56 ^
If Ferrari sues, I'll hire FORD as my lawyer
WE GETTIN CORRUPT LAWYERS WITH THIS ONE 🗣️🗣️🔥🔥
@@iowasucks9494 bruuuuu
History repeats itself.
You can't afford the clothes on your back
Ford does the same thing with the Ford GT …
Lamborghini: "Here's the keys to your car. Go nuts."
Yep. Lambo knows me the world knows who they are. Ferrari just wants their name to stay on the cars
Lamborghini was founded on that basic principle! 😎
This is every car brand other than Ferrari. Cause it’s your car, you paid for it and now it is your property, with which you can do whatever you please.
*cough* Volkswagen auto group *cough*
@@mocsmore1308yep that's true.its was my favourite until i come to know rules of it
“You buy a Ferrari when you want to be someone, you buy a Lamborghini when you ARE someone” famous words
You buy a Porsche when you’ve been someone for a long time.
You buy an Aston Martin when you have a sense of style & power.
You buy a Camry when you DGAF about either of those things & just want a car that’ll reliably get you where you gotta go.
And you buy a Lexus LC500 when you want a little bit of everything!
@@zsu-23-4shilka2you acquire a beat-to-shit corolla when you need a car that won’t die
@@quakxy_dukx *_YOU HOT DAMN RIGHT HAHAHAHAHA_*
No other way around🤣🤣🤣 nice try
this is so simple to circumvent... Step 1 - Get someone like me (poor asf to buy the ferrari for you) Step 2 - I will sign the deal where I am liable for the modifications - Step 3 - I will sell you the car without any further agreement and keep a fee on that... Now you can modify whatever you like and I am not responsible for it either...
but they wont sell it to someone who is poor... they actually check who you are before selling it to you...
@@Trikipum Actually in Europe, if the Ferrari is exposed in a dealership, they cant prevent me from buying it or they might face legal discriminatory actions
The guy who twin turbod his LaFerrari is a savage
Using a junkyard Ferrari engine won’t get you in any trouble either even if you twin turbo it. It’s anything in-situ in an actual Ferrari vehicle that gets them upset. Only the big custom modifiers like Mansory and Novitec can do so because they have big contracts with Modena
Are you calling a Laferrari a junkyard Ferrari? Crazy bro considering that you are driving a Honda civic @@chrisdooley1184
Its a photoshopped image lmao
I bet that pissed Ferrari off lol
@misterbanshee7992 no its not it belonged to Deadmau5
Lamborghini: “do you need help with those mods?”
Why they enticed DeadMau5 to get one!
So like do anything to the car that changes it in really any way anyone would wanna change it. Got ya
Let's remember the fact that Lamborghini sent literal OEM headlights to a dude making a 3D printed Lambo
This is why i wont ever buy a Ferrari and id rather buy a Lamborghini at least Lamborghini arnt assholes like Ferrari is im working toward a aventador SVJ
@@moist_iguanaEnzo was a real douchbag. Hell, tractor maker Lamborghini made an off-the-cuff remark on how his tractor’s clutches were better than anything that Ferrari could produce and the feud was on and Lambos were born.
You don’t own the Ferrari, Ferrari owns you
Ferrari has no legal grounds for a cease and desist or sueing if you modify your car that you have paid for
It's in the fine print you sign when you purchase it
@@areid609 Doesn't matter. Courts have repeatedly nullified things like arbitration clauses, EULAs, etc. when they determine that having such things causes outright harm to the consumer.
@@sirmy-tdog7211you may think that but some ferrari dealerships (not all tho) put a lien on the title for the first year (they inform you of this before purchasing the car so its legal), you do not own the vehicle for the first year even if you pay cash. Because they have a lien on the title, it acts like a leased car and you cannot modify a car you do not own.
@@PerennialWheat Wasn't aware of that. Kinda BS tbh. I'd be curious to see how well that practice would hold up in court if someone was really willing to push them about it. Too many other cars available that are as good or better to bother putting up with that shit IMO. Thanks for the info.
I don’t think the cease and desist necessary means they will sue for monetary value, they will just bar you from purchasing any other Ferraris at a dealership and not allow you to repair your car because they have total control on all parts, meaning if something breaks, you need to pull used parts off another car, hope you can find something in the aftermarket or you’re screwed 🤷♂️
Ferrari: “You pay for the car. You maintain the car. But we own the car.”
well yes kinda
Yup
Naw…. It’s a way to keep the brand and your vehicle valuable. It’s yours but you have to respect the name. They don’t take your car from you like the government takes your home.
@@Will-216how does someone modifying the thing they own affect the rest of the brand? This is just corporate overreach
You own the car. Ferrari owns the brand.
Ferrari: No you can't rename our car to Purrari!
Lamborghini: Here are the keys to our Nyanborghini.
There's a rumors says he's banned by Lamborghini...
Purracan
Didn’t lambo blacklist Tom Cruise cuz he embarrassed them when he couldn’t figure out how to open the door?
@@ArsonistArborist It was Bugatti.
@@meimphisto oh yeah, that’s right. My bad
I paid for the car, I own the car, and all do whatever the fuck I want with it.
It’s a Ferrari. 99.9 percent of people buy it because it is a Ferrari which means you’re in the Ferrari owners club. It’s funny to see the “purrari” as a joke but legitimately changing the car like that shouldn’t be tolerated. Ferrari did nothing wrong with this rule. If you don’t like it, buy a different car.
I agree partly with Ferrari, Ferrari has a very strict brand name, and don’t want people rebadging their work
Yes! Finally somebody who understands that Ferrari isn't a little car company that makes cars for rich people!
They're a titan of racing with 90 years of racing history and innovations, drivers, cars, records, and victories preceding every model they build.
What does lamborghini have?
Oh... yeah. Ferrari's blueprint. Except they decided to add godawful AWD to it. And make the cars uglier. 😂
@@eptitranxisticementionscers Ferrari actually cares about their cars
That still doesn't give them the right to sue people for modifications made to a car they sold, imagine if Ford or Chrysler did that, both companies have a long racing lineage and big brand names and yet they don't care what people do to there cars, it's just pompous rich people trying to dictate what other people do with their own private property. No one would stand for it if Ford did it so why do you stand for it when it's Ferrari?
Damn imagine buying something and not owning it.
Can't wait to get the season 2 battle pass for my car's features already built in but software locked.
@@AgentBBBBattle pass 💀
ClownNite but real
You but the apartment and you can’t change the outside look of it, for example.. you also can’t cut your own money😀
@@lukazupie7220 most people don't buy apartments they rent them. But if you have the funds to buy apartment or a condo you can do whatever you want inside the apartment.
Nothing is owned in life nothing when we die someone else keeps it we take nothing with us no matter what..every thing in life is just a rental 😂
Deadmau said: “fuck it” and got a Lamborghini Huracan, and named it the Purracan, just to get in Ferrari’s face
🤣🤣🤣you are so delusional.. Obviously Ferrari give a fuck about him !
He is legendary for that, “cease and desist from my wrap? Fine, I’ll just go to your competitor and soend more money”
@fatdogamer
Rest assured, Ferrari gives zero fks what you wrap a Lamborghini in 😆
And this is why i will never own a Ferrari even if i get rich. If i can't own my car then that's not my car.
@TwinShards
If you're a US citizen, it's as easy as just ignoring Ferrari and doing whatever you want with your property. Their lawyers are toothless in the US, worst they can is write you an angry letter 😆
Ferrari: you pay me a lot of money for the car and I decide what things you do with it.Period.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
''Officer its stock i swear, its a ferrari"
I’d modify my car the way I want. If they sue, I’d counter sue for company overreach intimidation and harassment.
I agree it’s a dogshit company and policy, but they sign a legal agreement when buying them. They’re bound to that contract from that moment on. Again it’s absurd and I wish people had never given in to their terms. But it is what it is now.
Goodluck
Good luck x2
Just get a Lamborghini.
Yeah, I guess you didn't read the contract before signing the paperwork at the Ferrari dealership. It is right there on page 150.
If buying is not owning then stealing is legal
You dont buy a Ferrari. You lease one.
Only possible in USA. You can straightpipe your shit, but otherwise have less freedom than in fucking GERMANY.
Say that to my ripped version of Microsoft Office from 2010
IM THE POTATO
I like your thinking
"You bought the car, but dont you dare modify it or we'll sue you!"
The guy that modified his Ferrari he put wide body kits and changed the engine
Lamborghini: "here's the keys to your new car and a complimentary bottle of champagne, enjoy"
"here's the keys to your new car and a complimentary machine gun, enjoy" FULL RAMBO MODE
@@PhonkMachine220YTthat's Toyota with the Hilux
Aint even a reason to get mo power outta one of them lmao
Nono, champagne first.
jk ofc lol
@@kaiseseeingthings I was referencing the Rambo Lambo meme for the LM002 lmao
You can do whatever you want if you’re not the original purchaser of the car
I don’t think that’s necessarily true anymore because they can go after people for crazy paint jobs and trying to like sell shoes or other other products with the Ferrari in the background regardless, if they’re the first owner or not
@@globalautobahn1132and probably the bigger Ferraris Laferrari, Enzo, F40 etc
@@globalautobahn1132In the US maybe, but good luck to Ferrari trying to do that against someone who buys a second hand Ferrari in any of the EU countries. There are far stricter rules here to protect consumers from idiotic practices like this. And no company is too big to escape these rules, just look at Apple who have just gotten a 2 billion dollar fine for abusive appstore rules.
Not if you sign a contract saying otherwise.
Probably because they can't track you down 😂
the only way for the lawsuit to actually go through is if this was stated in some sort of legally binding agreement (contract)
"u buy a ferrari when u wanna be someone, u buy Lamborghini when u ARE someone"
Imagine buying a car you don't actually own lmao
Like everyone? Try not paying your property tax on it and see what the IRS does.💀
@@user-pl9vf4ri2zWhen they said that, they meant that one would buy a Ferrari only to find out they can't customise it in the way they want
@@user-ch6lb5iu9rthey should take pride in the fact that they could own it in the first place. Most people won’t be able to own a supercar at all in their lifetime
Imagine buying a house that you don't actually own 😂☠️
@@FlexedNoosenah this stupid ass company is a shit hole
Ferrari has more lawyers than engineers...
I say they're more competent in sending cease and desist letters than in competing for championships at Formula 1
Or welders 🤷🏻♂️
More lawyers than clutches and ash trays.
If you've ever had the displeasure of working on a ferrrari, they have exactly two engineers, who have a collective IQ of 7, are inbred, and constantly drunk when doing the designs of anything non bodywork
@@LeTiramiSergal I was looking for this comment 😢 at least Ferrari can do one thing right, being a McLaren fan is even worse
“The final designer is the customer”
Same thing happened to Joel Zimmerman (better known as deadmau5)
lesson here?
don't buy a Ferrari.
noted.
As if you could ever afford a Ferrari.
@@owenlealeven if someone who is able to afford not one but many Ferraris, the company won't just let any rich stranger buy the car. They do a background check. Someone who is famous and respected and many more things. So yea.
It’s a lesson many, I included won’t ever have to worry about anyways soo.. 🤷♂️
@@owenlealyou’re acting like Ferraris are super expensive
agree on you AHHAHAHAH
@@TheD16
The nerve of that company to think what you paid for is still somehow theirs is insane.
Not true legally it’s still yours
@@dddd-uk4vn if you can be told what to do with it, you don't own it.
It's not about the car but the branding, Ferrari claimed defamation and copyright infringement and rightfully so . Hope this clears things out .
@@fpfilms6609 it clears nothing up, it's still buying a car that the manufacturer is essentially claiming ownership of.
you dont get it clearly, ferrari is a club not just a car manufacturer, you disrespect the club you pay
Stradman legit put a liberty walk kit on his 458 spyder
oh he got sued too
Oh I didn't know
Ferrari about to become like airbus at the Dubai air show 💀
“i bought the car so i own the car”
Ferrari: well yes, but actually no
You own the car. Ferrari owns the brand.
@@ast-og-lostaIf you can’t do whatever you want with something, you don’t own it, plain and simple.
They changed the emblem and color, it not the Ferrari brand, it's just some dude
So u shit in toilet so that shit is yours...why need someone else come to take it away....?@@ast-og-losta
@@lomein2186but they got butthurt
Whistlingdiesel "Hey hold my beer..." 😂😂
Ferrari was like what just happened it was only a cease and desist letter, WD was like 🖕yeah sure DIP decease in Peace Ferrari F8 😅
he did NOT add googly eyes to that horse.
DDE
@@jerrynovak8795 beat me to it 😂
whistlindiesel: i dont know man... it looks like a bet for me
The gray widebody looks so sick
At that point, do you even own the car? You might as well trade it in for a Lamborghini or a McLaren. At least those manufacturers understand that when the customer buys the car out right, it's no longer the company's.
When you buy a ferrari from an official retailer you sign a sale contract where you agree not to modify the car in such ways. And this is if you manage to purchase a ferrari from an official retailer in the first place cause there's a pretty long waiting line (for exemple if you manage to get in line now for a ferrari purosangue you'll get it in 2026).
If you purchase your ferrari second hand and you never signed any sale contract with Ferrari then you can modify it like you want!
Why would you want to modify a Ferrari it's perfection y'know, Lamborghinis are ugly as hell so its understandable why no one takes those cars seriously and just do whatever... Ferrari is more like an influential people's toy, it's not even supposed to be on the market, they're mainly a F1 Team.
Even if it was selling 0 cars to the common rich it doesn't matter because they're supposed to just make exclusive few units for the people that financially support it.
They only sell to get easy money from wannabes.
Thats why you dont modify it, you're just buying a dream that you're from the group
@@-.369.- yes and people often fail to mention that certain bugatti, mercedes, and aston martin like the Valkyrie also require the buyer to sign a sales contract on the fact that he will not modify the car! Certain contracts also forbid the buyer to sell the car as second hand cause it can only be sold back to the brand. It's a pretty standard procedure among really exclusive cars with very low production count and a lot of demand
@@maxbobbigamesjust to add, Ferrari's XX program is even more demanding for buyers contracts. If you own one of their XX vehicles (not the new SF90 XX, the real XX cars) you can decide the price of what the car will be sold at, but Ferrari are the decision makers in who will have the option, and eventually buy the car. The owners have no say in who the car is sold to.
@@-.369.- I modify them for a living, custom rebuilds / bc the engines are junk, turbo set ups full race prep for hill climb, time attack and circuit racing.
They are largely thrown together junk cars from factory. We do a lot or re-engineering to make them work for a season. The quality of block casting from mb and Lamborghini is substantially better. Also since Lamborghini is now a product of vag the manufacturing quality control is better.
Largely the supercars market ( Ferraris) is full of lavish looking slow junk. Raw data shows this at events constantly like world time attack, for example, hill climbing events etc. no supercars finish in the top 20. Ever. It’s evos, lotus exiges, wrc built golf’s/polos, Lancia deltas, factory backed sti cars, focus wrc cars, Audi Quattro 5 cylinder cars, Nissan gtrs, radical sr3 and radical sr8s .
The exceptions are the 918, Vulcan , Valkyrie amr pro, zonda r .
"yes judge he bought the car and we want to control how he modifies it"
Sad thing is the way lobbying and corporate greed is entwined within our government, they’d probably side with the corporation 😂
I'm assuming it's a clause in the sales contract, since that's the only way I could possibly imagine them having any grounds whatsoever to sue. So if that's the case, when a customer gets sued by Ferrari for 'unapproved' modifications, they are literally getting what they paid for.
@@jic1 I'd imagine this would apply to a lease or if he was otherwise making payments on it, in which case he doesn't fully own the car yet and if the car was repossessed Ferrari would have better chance selling a virgin car.
If he signed something that said he can't modified the car even after he owns it that's getting into a grey area. How long? What happens if he sells that car and then buys it back? I don't think Ferrari has a reasonable case to dictate to others how they use their property since the car no longer belongs to them.
In other words, I don't think that part of the contract holds up under scrutiny.
@@177SCmaro You seem to be saying that if a clause in a contract doesn't cover all possible circumstances, it can't be enforceable in *any* circumstance. I'm not a lawyer, but I can't see how that could possibly be the case.
@@jic1
No, I'm saying this one aspect of this contract is unreasonable and thus invalid.
It's irrational to dictate the use of property after it's no longer your property. That conflicts with the very concept of "property" i.e. the right to the exclusive use and disposal of something.
If I sold you my house and put in the contact you can never paint it white it's a meaningless stipulation since it's not my right to dictate the use of your property.
So basically... I buy the car. I OWN the car. It's MY car. But if I modify MY car to make it how I want it, I'll get sued? That's crap.
Sue me and convince a judge. Ain’t no way you can stop me from modifying my property.
No wonder Jay Leno won’t buy a Ferrari.
You also have to purchase car A, before they will allow you to purchase car B, I believe that’s why J won’t buy a Ferr-turd.
Their service is terrible , parts are absurd to replace .
It's a giant scam, and Jay is a man of principle.
@@dodoz44Yes sir he is, and a damn great man, comedian, and car collector at that. I still watch his movie Collision Course with Pat Morita (Mr. Mayagi). It's a really funny movie if you haven't seen it.
That's not why Jay doesn't buy Ferraris. And even if Jay did buy one, I'm pretty sure he won't modify it.
Imagine giving the company 500 000 euros for your car and then the company will sue you.
😂
You are free to do anything with the car , Ferrari claimed defamation and copyright infringement because Deadmouse played with their trademark which is unlawful
@@fpfilms6609 So, like he made is car, with the same design, but different brand?
@@fpfilms6609that won’t stand in court….
@@patrik5543 if you think about it, it's like changing the colors in a movie along with the movie title and character names while everything else in the movie is the same, sounds weird, but it's defacing a brand type thing.
looks like this is ferrari's official downfall 〽️
If It's paid for straight up. Ferrari can piss off
The owner of Lamborghini did start his company simply because Enzo Ferrari didn't listen to his complaints so this makes sense.
owner of lambo wasn't in ferrari. he was making tractors back then, and bought ferraris with the money he was making. got angry at the garbage clutch, and made his own super cars.
Then came Pagani
good point
Where did OP say he was In Ferrari?@@alphenhousplaysgames4565
Lamborghini casually ripping the V12 out of a GTO and using it to power a heavier, worse handling, terrible looking Miura, but then making their AWD snap-oversteer wedge-shaped machines for the next 60 years, make the Aventador which gets popular among rappers but gets raped by Ferraris at trackdays, then seeing another failed attempt they go borrowing a V10 from parent company VW Audi, throw it into an ugly and terribly balanced Gallardo, realize they fucked that up but it sold well so they make the Huracan and on the side make an entire car out of Carbon Fiber for no reason and put the motor into their GT3 racing homologation car... and lose to Ferrari- but they take one record with the Performante (respect), and then stealing aspects from all manufacturers in 2021 to develop their LMDh vomit green endurance racer and
.. lose in the 2023 and 2024 season, to Ferrari, Cadillac, and Porsche.
Yeah, i think lamborghini is way better than ferrari. Ferrari did improve their clutches, though. So i guess his plan worked out in the end.
"We're like Ferrari but we're fat cows and suck at racing!"
No wonder they dont care if you destroy their cars.
Ferrari doesn't like people showing all the ways their cars can be made better.
Haha and AMERICA known for the worst cars in the world, are qualified to make a Ferrari better? Wow.
@@captain_context9991 yeah because italian cars are widely known for their reliability
@@captain_context9991 Uhm, u do realize when those fat bastard know and CAN and are capable of making jewels for dirt cheap if they WANT? Like the new C8 Z06? That think is a monster for the money you pay out of the box.
@captain_context9991
Would you like to start putting this all into context, Captain?
America is the land of Size Matters. Go big, or enjoy your tiny train in Europe. Yes, the Ford Focus sucks. Have you tried our V8?
We also have V10’s - not like you’d ever see it, because going big breaks the poor bank of any European. Hell, we still have our trucks from the 80’s rolling on stock engines in a few pockets. And if it stopped working @ 400,000 miles, we could always do an LS swap to keep our V8 vehicle a-vrooming.
USA is THE land of excess.
@@flyingturret208thecannon5
Yeah I do marketing and I have given several talks on these things. How America is GREAT only in size. But not in any other aspect of greatness. Its not just supercars and GT cars America cant make, its every aspect of the mass market manufacturing industry.
America is about cater-for-all, use-and-throw, easily forgettable, instantly replaceable, squeaky plastic, third world built consumer commodities for the ever impoverished, frantically flag-waving bewildered masses.
Built by uneducated, unskilled, untrained workers, bottlefed on conspiracies and patriotism. Because educated, skilled people cost money. You want them willing to work minimum wage without healthcare, overtime, unions, paid leave, guaranteed pension, the list goes on... People whos only shot at the American dreeeeeeam is to get hurt at work so they can sue for a billion.
When Americans get money, they will never again drive, wear, eat, or buy any American product. When Americans get money, its 100% European top-end quality and luxury products all the way.
MURCAAAA, F YEAH!!
I am pretty sure i can do what i want to it if i buy an overpriced car.
Nah not the fact that I live right where the intro was down in Miami. I’ve been to that mall so much times😂
Ferrari will sue you for modding their car
Lamborghini will help you mod theirs.
Congratulations... BOTH of those lines are 100% wrong.
But still Ferrari are faster
@@RichGuy-oh7vzr u 12?
Ferrari is for the man that jist became rich, lambo is for those who are rich!!!
@@moisesmunoz5549
People who are really rich, buy both.
The absolute audacity of them wanting to sue people for modifying their own cars is remarkable
It's called a contract, and no you can't just buy one, they will tell you to go for a used model
im pretty sure its more you cant display emblems on the car if its modified because they no longer see it as a ferrari.
@@fantasia3660 also the opposite, putting your logo in a ferrari
@@ivanclementecabreraYou can go into basically ferrari dealership and buy an sf90
@@Cle_M3 You can ask...and you won't get it
As they should...for ANY modifications.
Yes. You're welcome, you don't have to watch the rest of the video.
I’m 99% sure Ferrari doesn’t sue for body work and engine work. DDE is a prime example.
Facts
Yup, just take a look at their 599's or the F12.
It is because they are used Ferraris. If they were bought new Ferrari would have their titties in a bunch.
Also emelia hartford
Some bodywork that are too extreme are sued, though. Ferrari ordered The F40 Barchetta and Pininfarina P4/5 to have the badges removed. They changed their mind on the latter after seeing the car in real life.
And apparently Ferrari removed the F40 LB from the official registry of F40s, still just a rumor though.
Next up Ferrari charges u a subscription to own their cars after fully paying for it
Don't give them ideas 🥴
BMW and Mercedes are already doing this and trying to bring it to the US
@NathanMalnaa where?? 🤦♂️
@@NathanMalnaaFunny bit, however untrue it might be, still funny. Unless you have the source I don’t care.
Zero motorcycles already does this. Pay us a monthly charge and we will unlock all the bikes features you stop and you have an overweight overpriced scooter.
Purrari shouldve been an exception ☹️that was such an iconic build😔🙏
There's loads of companies out there that's modifying Ferraris and nobady heard them getting lawsuits for example liberty walk and many more.
Imagine being a judge and your next case is someone being sued by Ferrari because they changed the emblem on a car they OWN.🤦🏻♂️
Yea it’s silly but Ferrari makes so much money they can afford to be very selective with their who they allow to drive their cars
@@AndrewF321 Yeah and that logic may work for when someone’s coming in to buy a car, but it should never go past that once they already own it. That works just as much for the buyer because if they’re spending all that money to give to Ferrari, it’s theirs to have and to change. Which plays a big part in why their revenue statistics have gone down the past few years when it comes to actual car sales. But don’t get me wrong, I agree with you, but the people have spoken, based on the revenue statistics.
You are not buying a Ferrari, but renting a Ferrari at the purchase price.
😄😄😄 Well-spoken...
I'll do WHATEVER I WANT with *my own* property.
They would loose in court. The judge will throw it out so fast it would make Enzo blush.
Recently, Forza Motorsport removed a bodykit upgrade for one of the Ferraris in the game. Looks like Ferrari is now going after Game Studios for offering customization options for Ferrari cars in games.
Also in need for speed heat the only modifications for the ferrar 458 italia are the bodykits used on the GT3 race car
Weirdos, taking the fun out of sports cars when thats the entire point
@@itz_iper2317 it's been like that since NFS15
There a reason why you can't find Ferrari in NFS most wanted, beside other famous car in same class like Lamborghini, Porsche, Corvette, Aston Martin, and etc, 15 years ago I didn't have a clue why that's happen, but now everything is make sense.
Ferrari are the reason there is limited destruction of the vehicles in Forza. Ferrari don't even want to depict a car being damaged.
Ferrari is like a spoiled highschool kid that gets mad at whatever you say 😂
Hey that's why Lamborghini exists and Ford's high performance division got so fierce
Ferrari litterally created Lamborghini because he was a stuck up dousche who didn't trust the insight of a tractor manufacturer.
Ford's racing division was also created through a similar exchange.
You'd think they'd learn, only a matter of time till they get owned once again, can't wait to see what crazy crap that'll create m
Liberty walk: Well well well😅😅😅
This is one of the best parts of living in Brazil, in Brazilian law, if you buy something, this something now is totally yours, and no one, even the manufacturer, can do anything against it, it I buy a Ferrari and totally mess up the Ferrari will never be able to sue me
That is dumb. This is my property now. I can do whatever I want! What is this California?
😂😂😂California
The car is beautiful as is, I highly doubt you would come up with any modifications that would improve on the aesthetics, and California is a thousand times better than whatever BS Red state you come from. 5th largest economy in the world! Highest GDP out of any state!
@@He_sees_all What are you laughing at? Your broke ass wishes you could afford to live here.
@walmartpimp2 actually in CA and fxck newsom
@@walmartpimp2go back to pimping at Walmart No.2 😂
You don't own a Ferrari, Ferrari owns you.
ERRR WRONG.
You start a partnership with Ferrari. You become part of the family when you sign that contract. They're italians, dude, its about respect.
@@eptitranxisticementionscers simp
How the heck can you tell someone that they can’t modify whatever they want after spending 6+ figures for it. This is the main reason why I didn’t buy a home in subdivision with an HOA.
I believe if you own the car and are not making payments on it or leasing it you can do whatever u want to the car
Deadmau5: putting a fake badge in a ferrari
Ferrari: You are hearing for my lawyers
LB works: Cutting F40 body to make it wide
Ferrari: Yo that's sick
Are your lawyers deaf?
They go F off, you buy a Ferrari you own it and can do what you want with it. That’s absolutely insane.
You obviously should never own a Ferrari.
@@bigchief4044And better off for it, why would I want to own a half a million dollar chastity cage?
One does not simply buy a Ferrari. For starters, most Ferraris are initially leased with an option to buy. But to get to either, you enter into a contractual relationship with Ferrari under which you agree to abide by a set of terms that include not modifying the car without permission, or reselling the car. Ferrari owners are expected to be partners and brand ambassadors. Ferraris typically escape this trap in a few years, but then good luck getting repair parts or service from Ferrari or one of their authorized aftermarket manufacturers. I have a neighbor with a 1984 308 GTB who ran into this issue when he needed a replacement vacuum line. Surprisingly, Ferrari was extremely accommodating once he proved the car wasn't stolen or otherwise modified, and not only did they establish a relationship with him to keep his car in good running order, they sent him some free schwag. Bottom line, if you want to roll with the boys from Maranello, you need to roll with the boys form Maranello.
I believe neither Eric nor you will anytime soon @@bigchief4044
@@andrewakrause As a certain agriculturalist from Santa Agata, Bolognese figured out, the place you need to look into for Ferrari parts is a tractor spare parts shop.
In Japan they do whatever tf they want, get any mod you want
Counter sue. They don't got the money to fight over property rights.
Jay Leno gave good answers when he was asked why he would never buy a Ferrari.
What did he say?
"I will not buy a Ferrari"@@horatiohuffnagel7978
@@horatiohuffnagel7978in short they gave the worst customer service ever, so he bought a McLaren.
@@MetalGearBronyaThe other comment was, “Why do I have to buy one of their crappy cars so that I can buy the one that I want later?” If you were a billionaire and wanted to buy their top car, they would say no. You have to buy a lower car, prove that you are worthy and then apply for one of the rare cars later. To be fair, Ford does this with the GT. However, this was mostly, so that you didn’t flip it, but all manufacturers want their halo cars owned by responsible adults.
@@jamesdellaneve9005Porsche just started doing this as well. Which is pathetic.
You forgot to mention that is only while lease is still active, no person in world can sue you for modifying car you purchased and 100% own lol
Facts
Yet
they still will.
That makes no sense at all. Ferrari doesn't own it, the bank does. Same as you owning it
@@RazzRGthey will try but very few of those cases actually made it through court. Most get thrown out because how stupid this is.
A C&D does NOT AT ALL mean you "have to" remove said items. Even getting sued only means you go to court and have a Judge hear the matter. If what you're doing is NOT against the law, the judge will tell Ferrari to go away.
1. Don’t have a RUclips linking you to your Ferrari
2. Conceal your VIN number on your driver window
3. Have flippable plates for when people at car meets take pictures
Who gonna find you
Someone should sue Ferrari for pretending to have any say on private property.
They do have a say because when you purchase the car you sign an agreement so you literally agree to it 😂
@@Lacnofavors then you’re not a customer, you’re married
@@Muscovy7 good point 😂
@@LacnofavorsWhich is exactly what they need to be sued for. Too bad there aren't any billionaire modders.
The only use that "agreement" is good for is toilet paper and has zero power unless enforced by a court of law( hint: it won't be) @@Lacnofavors
Back on the day this rich guy my dad knew had a 308 that broke down constantly.
He had the car crushed and hired a local metal sculptor artist made it into a coffee table. He would tell guests look how He made something useful out of a pile of junk.
Wow what a lie
@bggoliath5110 I know right? I've literally heard this story before.
So somebody crushed a car that was $80,000 when new and that's going for up to $200,000 at auction these days to make a table just because it broke down a few times and he wanted to be an ass. One I don't believe it two if he did he's maybe dumber than forest gump.
@@88chevyg20 he was a heart surgeon what’s your giggy ? Sounds like the drive through.
@@ouigisboredroom What?
Counter suing will be cool. I'll modify whatever on anything I own
Tuners get sued too. Enzo sued Köenig Specials in the 80s to have all Ferrari emblems removed.
Pimp my Ferrari? Cancelled! 😂😂😂
Ferrari reps in court: "Ladies and gentlemen we give you X-Zibit A" lol
So I spend over 200k on a car for the company to tell Me I'm not allowed to do what I want MY car. THIS is why Lamborghini 😂
Do work to your home without a permit and let me know what happens. Think you own your home? Don't pay taxes and see what happens. Making a payment on pretty much anything and miss a few. It's clear people don't realize they do not own as much as they think.
@@patchesohoulihan9826cars don't have such taxes and modifying your home doesn't allow anyone to take it away or sue you. What a stupid comparison.
@DioOdinson The Government can confiscate a vehicle to sell for unpaid taxes. Or did you forget that?
@DioOdinson Also the comparison is thinking you own something when you do not. Trying to say it's a bad comparison makes no sense as that is the whole point of the video and people's responses. The government has confiscated homes that have been modified for illegal activities. But stay within the narrow scope of a bank only and ignore the ways it can be done using other laws and means. People lost homes by simply setting up some mylar, lights, watering systems, and lining the floors for a draining system.
@patchesohoulihan9826 wrong, If the car(any car) is paid off in full ie you are not leasing it or have a loan on it. You can modify it however you see fit that does not infringe on any trademarks like Deadmaus did with with Purrari emblem. That was the only issie there was TM issues with the nameplate mods
How do they know??
Do they hire stalkers to make sure you aren’t doing anything to it??!!
Thank you for this information as I and many others definitely want to Mode their Ferrari 😊
Meanwhile Lamborghini actually embraces all these things.
Also, not able to hold a candle to a Ferrari in terms of history, passion or performance.
@@aloysiusdevadanderabercrom6401dont forget that lamborghini also make the bugatti cars soo thing again
@@fadyeltamimi nope, that would be Volkswagen, which owns Audi, Porsche and Bugatti.
Also, How are you going to compare cars that avg low-to-mid six figures and are produced in higher number to a company that makes one model at a time, in low numbers at $4-5 million per car?
Ferrari doesn't care about shoving 8 turbos on a 30 cylinder engine, sorry.
@@aloysiusdevadanderabercrom6401 Last time I checked, VAG also owns Lamborghini.
@@rednecksnredlines That's what i meant. I meant to say ALSO, but you're 100% right. Thanks for the correction.
Meanwhile DDE is out there making a heavily modified twin turbo F12 drift car and turn it into a beater
Don’t be a 🐀
@@David-lm7ownot like it’s a secret…. Ferrari is well aware as they’ve brought it to the dealer trying to get a recall done and published it all over RUclips
They can't do shit to those outside of their country unless it's law compliant
So yeah, pretty much anywhere in the world you can do whatever you want with ya car
@@BB_deez And there is Emelia Hartford's widebody 458. And that one has also been back to Ferrari for work, without any hissy fits. The video is just full of bullshit internet myths.
@@narrativeless404usually what would actually happen is ferrari blacklists these people from buying more of their cars from official dealers or try to buy back the car from them. If its the former, unless you want another ferrari you can just ignore it, and even then, theres always second hand dealers and auctioners, even for high luxury stuff, you might have to overpay though, but depending on how rich you are you dont care if thats the only way to get it.
Funny thing, other manufacturers do similar deals with some of their more exclusive cars, like the contract where you agree not to heavily modify it or sell it second hand, the latter usually has an expiration because this measure exists to prevent scalpers selling such exclusive cars on a proffit to another rich guy that just didnt get selected for the program or missed the queu for whathever reason but is still rich enough to have such a thing.
Why would you change the exaust of a Ferrari that’s literally one of the best qualitys lol, if you can’t build your engine or body then just get a bone stock car no point in my opinion
Tell them see you in court. Big companies threats and no action will happen.
Meanwhile some guy in a 240sx racing with 80% of the body cut out and a V8 stuff in it…
If i paid for the car, I'll do whatever I damn well please to it.
Getting sued doesn't mean you're gonna lose but it'll cost you extra for sure
I’m sensing that @blue_water_jim isn’t currently in the market for purchasing an actual Ferrari. But we’re obviously most grateful to see him sharing his thoughts… 😮💭
@EasyTiger.01343 nobody gives a fuck what you think either buddy.
What makes you think you can just walk in and buy one lol
Lol but they’re different. It’s probably somewhere in the paperwork you sign that you can’t make the brand look bad.
I’m pretty sure they will also sue you if you make your car pink or light blue.
Thanks for the info! I was just thinking to buy one :))
What grounds do they have to sue them? It's literally their property.
They don't, unless the Car in question was somehow leased/Rented out
Which they do have certain methods to prevent quick flip sales on limited editions.
But if you bought a regular Ferrari, at sticker price, bought it out right?
You can do to it whatever you want.. They have NO legal means
(But you'll never buy another Ferrari from any dealer.. but that's not a legal issue)
@@stijnvandamme76 with a policy like that who would actually wanna by a car from a company like that for that price..
The guy who made this video doesn't know enough about the topic. The cease and desist is basically saying, if you stop whatever you're doing, we'll let you continue to buy from ferrari dealerships. If you ignore the cease and desist, you're not going to be sued, you're just going to be banned from buying anything from a ferrari dealership.
@@stijnvandamme76you can't modify body or engine on any leased or rented car. That has nothing to do with Ferrari
@@metaleggman18 They could just get strawman buyers to buy it for them.
They can sue for any reason they like, doesn’t mean they have a chance to win. In America, you have the right to do with your personal property whatever you wish.
Wrong,when you buy these cars you need to sign and guess what
@@jairox75, contacts can not hold up in court. You sound like the people after the 13th amendment who were like "I'll just get them to sign a contract legalizing owning them as slaves". Illegal terms on contract, don't hold up.
Yes and no. They can suit you and it's on the air if you win or not, but what would you chooses?. Spend years on the court paying legal fees to beat Ferrari on it or just remove what they ask to remove and move on with your life?.
Is not about proving you're right, is about dealing with the nuisances of a legal case. For Ferrari is whatever they are giga billion rich, but do you?.
Their tactics is just strong arm you and mentality fatigue you into say "Whatever man. Here. Take the car and reverse it"
Id litterally just ignore the lawsuits bro. In this scenario. im an American who owns a car and they are just some angry dudes in Italy. Got no say here. @@RomnysGonzalez
Screw them, if I buy and pay for my own item they don’t get to dictate my ownership rights. Will never support them
A cease & desist means absolutely nothing. It is their way of saying:
"We really have no grounds for a lawsuit...but we would appreciate it if you stopped."
If you responded to the cease & desist with:
"No. I will see you in court."
I guarantee they would just drop it.
Zero chance they would win that case.