Magnus Carlsen vs Fabiano Caruana | Game 2 - 2018 World Chess Championship
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024
- World Chess Champion Magnus Carlsen of Norway defends his title against challenger Fabiano Caruana of the United States in Game 2 of the 2018 World Chess Championship match that is being held in London. It's a best of 12 games where the first player to earn 6.5 points earns the lion's share of a $1.14 million prize pool, and the title of "World Chess Champion". Both players entered game 2 with a half-point each. Is it normal for the black side to at some point be pressing in these top level games? No, but this has thus far been the story in this championship with a revisit to a rook and pawn endgame.
PGN:
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 d5 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 Be7 5. Bf4 O-O 6. e3 c5 7. dxc5 Bxc5 { D37 Queen's Gambit Declined: Harrwitz Attack, Main Line } 8. Qc2 Nc6 9. a3 Qa5 10. Rd1 Rd8 11. Be2 Ne4 12. O-O Nxc3 13. bxc3 h6 14. a4 Ne7 15. Ne5 Bd6 16. cxd5 Nxd5 17. Bf3?! { (0.57 → -0.22) Inaccuracy. Best move was Nxf7. } (17. Nxf7 Kxf7 18. Bh5+ Kg8 19. Bxd6 Rxd6 20. c4 Bd7 21. cxd5 Bxa4 22. Qa2 Rxd5 23. Bg4 Bxd1) 17... Nxf4 18. exf4 Bxe5 19. Rxd8+ Qxd8 20. fxe5 Qc7 21. Rb1 Rb8 22. Qd3 Bd7 23. a5 Bc6 24. Qd6 Qxd6 25. exd6 Bxf3 26. gxf3 Kf8 27. c4 Ke8 28. a6 b6 29. c5 Kd7 30. cxb6 axb6 31. a7 Ra8 32. Rxb6 Rxa7 33. Kg2 e5 34. Rb4 f5 35. Rb6 Ke6 36. d7+ Kxd7 37. Rb5 Ke6 38. Rb6+ Kf7 39. Rb5 Kf6 40. Rb6+ Kg5 41. Rb5 Kf4 42. Rb4+ e4 43. fxe4 fxe4 44. h3 Ra5 45. Rb7 Rg5+ 46. Kf1 Rg6 47. Rb4 Rg5 48. Rb7 Rg6 49. Rb4
Internet Chess Club (ICC)
Software: Blitzin
bit.ly/179O93N
I'm a self-taught National Master in chess out of Pennsylvania, USA who was introduced to the game by my father in 1988 at the age of 8. The purpose of this channel is to share my knowledge of chess to help others improve their game. I enjoy continuing to improve my understanding of this great game, albeit slowly. Consider subscribing here on RUclips for frequent content, and/or connecting via any or all of the below social medias. Your support is greatly appreciated. Take care, bye. :D
★ LIVESTREAM / chessnetwork
★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
★ GOOGLE+ google.com/+Che...
★ PATREON / chessnetwork
★ DONATE www.paypal.com...
2018 World Chess Championship playlist:
ruclips.net/p/PLQsLDm9Rq9bGybC78VlSZR8BKvbIUAiw8
Thank you for your continued support of this channel. ❤️
Can i play chess with you
Thanks so much for covering the championship! I really appreciate your insightful commentary and pop-quizzes.
Thanks for sharing,man!
Theres a typo in the description... Cauranas name
ChessNetwork thank you please cover the rest of the championship.
One of the best analysis and commentators.
THE best. I don't know if anyone else is close.
@@EricSmyth4Christ Watch Chess24. They have Svidler and Grischuk commentating and analyzing. They are both extremely knowledgeable and Grischuk is really funny too. Jerry does very good work but you just can't compare to these guys in any metric. There's also coverage with Yasser Seirawan and Maurice Ashley on St. Louis Chess Club that is also better than Jerry's in terms of analysis and interest (they have people calling them during the boring parts of the game and asking questions for example).
The way Jerry explains about pieces and movements, it's almost as if they have lives. Makes it so interesting.
"But the bishop's got something to say about that" Hahahaha
I agree with you 100%
Man your commitment is crazy, thanks for all the content, hope you don't burn yourself out ahaha
I started watching Jerry around 8 years ago when I was first trying to learn Chess, way before he had that "click" sound in his intros lmao. I think it's safe to assume that as long as there's interesting stuff to cover he'll be here to create content for us.
Jerry was a chess engine before chess engines were even a thing :)
Zoe TheCat He won't burn out, but his voice will if we're going by the last world championship lmao
The accuracy is just insane! Makes for boring looking games, but the levels these two are playing at is just crazy.
I've seen way more boring than this. I thought the moment where Caruana offered Carlsen a fork was pretty exciting. We were all trying to figure out what would happen if he accepted.
I think the awesome part is what they dont play
I genuinely found both this game and game 1 super interesting. As Tobias said, the interesting thing in these games has been the moves that both players opted against.
What's funny is i don't find it boring at all like most people have been saying. I see two strong players neck and neck, pushing each other to the top of their game. The epitome of a matchup for the Champion title. If it were a complete blowout on one side, I wouldn't be nearly as interested.
Once again, thanks for awesome videos delivered quickly.
Best chess commentator out there!!.......tried watching three other vids for this game, and quit all three because the commentators continually went off on endless and irrelevant lines that were nothing to do with the actual game!!
what about agadmator
@@notHahaShorts what about agadmator?
@@Mustafa-vu5ke; @winter sun what about agadmator?
Winter sun Well, I watch both and subscribed them .. :) Here are few differences I observed ... Agamator covers bit more chess history , footages of matches/players along with reasonable game analysis and variations... Whereas Jerry jumps directly into the game and analyses it in more depth by showing few extra variations and tactical ideas for the viewers :)
While watching agamator channel you basically get to visualise the whole Tournament scenario in general , while watching Jerry’s makes you feel you gained more knowledge...
And one more thing.. If you scroll down to the comments on Jerry’s channel, you get to see more discussions on variations , board positions , doubts etc... which shows people here are looking for more knowledge, where the comments at agamator channel are more about his dog😅, speakers, players’ suits and emotional stuffs (good actually) which means people there are mostly like to enjoy the show:)
.. So, If you are a viewer of both keep it up:) both of their commentaries are incomparable 😎
Best chess channel ever. Thanks for the great effort.
This is the first championship I have really paid attention to, and im impressed in the RUclips chess community, and how fast and well it covers the games.
Both games this far have been so even, and that mistake graph really shows how good both players are.
Thank you for the rank/file labels today
I had an opening blunder to the start of these games. ☺️
I follow many reviewers, but you’re the best for many reasons Jerry! Good Job
I have very quickly started appreciating all the thought that goes into your thumbnails. Everything is there for a reason.
your explanations are really great. for a noob like me, its nice to have a window into whats going on so I can begin to appreciate the skill of the players and the subtlety and drama of the games.
wow jerry this is probably the best chess video ever, you're getting ridiculously good at this commentary stuff
very crisp and clear explanations. extremely prefer your easy style. Absolutely Best!
And to think I have senior thesis due soon, damn you Jerry!
I have an AP English class... i'm not religious, but i'll definitely be praying for you tonight
Same
Who doesn't? :)
you have the best analysis of every single chess channel! bravo!
Kings can come out and play now that the Queens are gone. Applies everywhere
Love you Jerry! Thanks for everything!
👍🏼
Best chess channel on RUclips. Keep up the great work.
damn, jerry can make any mundane thing interesting as hell. no i don't mean this game's boring or something but jerry's analysis takes it to another level.
dropagemonem to the naked eye chess is really boring, it’s not like American football where it’s obvious to even brainlets that something significant happened, like a fumble or interception
Have been watching live the 2 games from you and post analysis. Thank you for all the work from Seattle, WA, USA.
Jerry, I really enjoy your analyses of these games, and am learning something from every video. Keep up the good work. Ray
Im starting to feel that this match is similar to what we would have seen should Fischer-Karpov 1975 occurred.
Fischer would have won that
we will sadly never know.
You're just amazing Jerry, every day i'm waiting for your analyses although I watch many youtube chess channels. Thanks for your vidéos you're the best chess analyst ever.
Jerry: "How do you defend against that?" :-)
cant wait for game 3!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO MAGNUS! great video as always, ive watched EVERY video you've posted for the past year! i hope to start my own chess stream soon.
Thank you Matt.
Thank u So much Mr. jerry u have extremely out standing explanation skill about the games. thank u so much man.
What a good commentator! He explains very well. Thanks!
Another great video, keep it up. Thanks Jerry!
Enjoyed the video a lot and learn a lot more :) Great stuff. From a breton viewer
Very clear analysis, congratulations. Thanks to you I went much deeper in this game than I did in real time.
What a draw-matic match!
Great Game! Nice to see this on youtube!
Thank you so much for those videos.
jerry, soooo grateful for your analyses and insights. thank you so much. best in the biz.
Jerry, thank you for your coverage of the WCC 2018.
Yes i agree, your coverage is, or was, awesome. I checked a number of channels before choosing yours. The main issue I had with other channels, was the unnecessary shouting that they started suddenly. I was like I came here to watch chess, not a football match.
Great commentary, as always!
This one came down to a nail biter!! Love it, thank you!! Peace ✌- Zach Van Harris JR
Love the vids, Jerry, been a sub and fan for over 5 years!
Thank you Gabriel
Thank you for the analysis Jerry
As always superb!
Thank you very much Sir!!
I liked before I even watched.
Hi Jerry.. Thanks for this Video.. Love you from India.. 🇮🇳🇮🇳
analysis fine , but I would suggest first show the whole match ? then go through some options-it helps to grasp the development of the match, then possibilities
After a long long time Carlsen isn't losing rating in games he hasn't won
Will be following this match through jerry. I watched jerry and then john for game one yesterday, and not to butt heads but i like jerry's level of detail more. Rewatching the game through john was just a rehash with less, it was too glazed over. Love that jerry follows a few lines and variations, makes me appreciate the game more with roughly the same video runtime.
2:45 I find this change of moves very interesting, especially because, in a similar position (early queen move pining the king) against Kasparov, Carlsen (who was a kid) played Nd2.
I love watching chess videos. But I often lose track between real moves (what happened in the game) and proposed moves. Would it be possible to distinguish on screen (possibly through use of colors or glowing graphics?) a proposed move vs. an historic (real) move?
Doug Renalds typically he moves the pieces himself when he proposes moves and the computer moves for him for the real game
if you are listening it should be clear enough, but i do like this idea anyway. wouldn't fancy the extra editing to do it though
@@TonyGStarcraft , I do agree it should be clear enough, but sometimes I get lost in scenarios that are played out 7 and 8 moves ahead, and I find myself thinking, "Wait. Is this the real game, or a proposed outcome of a possible move?" I notice that all moves on the board are outlined in blue. The originating square and the destination square are both outlined in blue when a piece moves. If that color was blue for real moves and another color like red or orange for "scenario" moves, it would achieve the idea I'm forwarding.
Having said that, I do not envy the editor of these videos, and I can imagine her/him smacking their forehead and saying, "Dude. Just follow along."
@@OblivionCST , can the viewer tell the difference between those on-screen? My apologies if this is a stupid question.
Lots of "Poisoned stuff" for Fabiano to avoid. Thanks for pointing that out during analysis.
8:49 would Nc4 be a good move?
Love the channel. Keep up the good work :D
Qxc3, exhange of queens then the knight on c3 can always take the bishop on e2 with check
No because q:c3 q:c3 N:f3 and e2 is hanging, ithought that this is the tactical idea that he meant
Ben Finegold said you were 1400 at his stream in match 1.I don't believe that's true at all. You explain the games better than some GM's.
Super nice video. Thank you.
I am not watching this because it's world chess championship. I am watching this because you have uploaded it Jerry. I desperately keep waiting for your analysis of any game
Hi Jerry Thank you for the coverage! :)
Hi wasp. Welcome! :)
Terrific analysis. Thank you.
Nice shot. As we say in Brazilian way "Jerry's understanding is an absurd" meaning you are beast explaining.
Nice game, nice comments
☺
Nice analysis as always. But i have a question:
Why is 17. Nc4 not an Option?
Great stuff thanks Jerry
its great that jerry does the analysis, but thankfully there is 2X speed to listen to it, :):0:)
dammit Jerry! I missed you . keep up the work
Excellent lucid analysis.
Your commentaries are excellent. You really explain things properly and don't go too fast. I'll be watching more!
Woody Harrelson played the first move of Game 1. Your voice reminds me of his a bit.
Thank you
18:56 Correct me if I'm wrong, but what if after 37: *Ke8*, then white rook gives *Re6* check?
Can White steal a pawn by 39: *Rxe5*?
Great analysis. Thanks
2 of the most accurate players in history!
Somebody help me, What's wrong with 17. Nc4? Forking the Queen and Bishop... it looks like you're just going to pick up the exchange?
Thanks for the analysis :)
Best chess commentary on the net
Hi Jerry thanks for the content! Before I say something, I am not a good chess player, just happens that very recently I started to be interested in it because it's a fascinating game with a huge history, but I don't even play 😅. So that said; what about f3 pinning e4 at 19:19 ? I tried to put it on a board and give it a go but, I'm just not good enough to see what could happen
Rook to a2+ , King has to move a away then black king takes f3
@@xfilercuba so, pretty much caruana had a better position because no matter what Magnus does (other than drawing by repetition) he would start to lose... Let's say draw by repetition doesn't exist and you are obliged to make a different move after the second repetition, if no blunder is done, caruana would have won, right? I mean I'm not trying to say anything about the players, it's just an example related to this specific position in order to try to understand the chess game better. It means that somehow caruana played a better game so far and Carlson is the one who is cornered in this case, unlike the first match
Thanks, Jerry
Best analysis. good!
Two or three years back Karjakin was the challenger and it was a LOT of draws until the rapid decided the match. Wonder if Caruana gets the same "criticism" of playing boring if this turns out to develop similarly.
Great Coverage Jerry! Go to CN on twitch no matter what!
In the variation where the white rook goes to g6 (19:01) and the black king is on e8, cant the rook make a check and grab the e5 pawn?
Good plan insight analysis for both sides of the board. I like that...
I learn a lot with you. Sir.
From Canada.
Thanks Jerry!!
Much more exciting than the 2016 games, then again, with the 2016 games many saw a 100% level game, no advantage almost anywhere, these positions are much more dynamic than the bog standard Spanish endgame openings
Any chance off showing material advantage in the dead space on the left. I'm a newb, sorry.
I definitely need my 2nd cup of coffee before unpausing the video at your first pop quiz (at 8:38, after black's 16th move). It took me minutes to figure out why white's 17: Nc4 would not be a good idea. I could of course make it an Irish coffee. That wouldn't improve my skills, but I wouldn't mind my failures quite as much.
I like that in both games it's black with the distinct advantage. I'm excited for some wins on black later in the match haha
I notice that in both games, Black was pressing White. Is it because the White side gets overconfident and accidentally makes a small mistake?
I don’t think overconfident is the right word here. This is world #1 and #2 playing a high stake match, I’m sure they’d know better XD
Spotting new Jerry's thumbnails is like spotting gemstones in a pile of hay.
I can't see why queen takes at 9:24 isn't a mistake because of bf3 from White. If Black took with the pawn he would maintain the double attack against a4, but maybe his king is a bit airy?
9:40 why not Nc4? Your bishop is hit twice defended once (by pawn), blacks bishop is hit twice defended once (by Rook) , but you're also on blacks queen. There's no check or unveiled attack from the resulting position, black would have to flee with the queen and you could exchange Bishop and Knight for Bishop and Rook?
Can someone explain for what "average centipawn loss" means? Thank you in advance
Great game dude
Thanks Jerry!
Welcome MD! 👍🏼😎
Jerry should be commentating officially this WCC.
He brings so much on table for Chess community.
Jerry’s analysis is more for serious players who are looking to improve. WCC will have many new people from outside the chess community watching, and I think Jerry’s analysis would bore most of those people.
I really love Jerry’s analysis, but it isn’t for everybody. I think an exciting and outgoing commentator would be better in this case
I don’t get why the times always changing, going down i get, but why do they get more time on their clock ?
At 8:40, I would've moved the white bishop to D3. Either the black King will have to move, or the bishop will have to be blocked by the F7 or G7 pawns. Bishop takes the pawn. It doesn't matter which. Pawn takes the bishop. Queen takes the pawn...but then bishop takes Queen. OR move white bishop to H5. Black now has to move the King or block the bishop with the pawn. Otherwise, it will be check the next move when the bishop takes the F7 pawn. The King could only move right or left leaving an opening for the white Queen to cross the board to H. If the King moves left. The Queen goes to H7. Checkmate in two moves. King goes to H8. White knight to G6, check. Pawn takes Knight. Queen takes pawn. The king is screwed.
Respect goes out to Fabi and Carlsen.
Yeah 12 draws in a raw
why not to play knight c4 in that pause you made?
Queen has to move, you can later take bishop on d6 with either knight or bishop and still be protected by the other one. Also qeen doesn't have a good move either, if she goes up, you move knight and have discover attack with light square bishop, b6 is in knight's range, if she moves to c7, you take that bishop on d6 with your bishop and keep her on the run, if she goes b5, you take her with a pawn and if she goes c5, again you move dark bishop to d6, at which point the only place she can run to is c6. I mean whatever you put on d6 can be taken by the rook, but still you can retake it with the other pice, so effectively you change ds bishop and a knight for ds bishop and a rook.
Despite the draw I still think it was a great game. A lot of times draws are as instructive as wins or loses. What I find instructive here is that Carlsen must have considered the endgame right after the queen exchange perfectly holdable while I would have seen it as somewhat tricky or unpleasant for white at first. I would have probably been thrown off by the fact that 4 vs 3 pawns is less drawish than 3 vs 2 and white`s worse pawn structure.
Whenever I watch your videos, I'm now always expecting Alphazero to give a word of wisdom at the end.
MogMovies lol, those are truly memorable
That stuck bishop on the French...poor guy
Great chess analysis
Hi Jerry, pls recommend some books on opening, middle and endgame..
At 19:22, I believe it’s move 44, why does white move h2-h3 instead of f2-f3?
19:00 - the hypothetical presented with the Rook moving to g6 and the King moving to e8. Jerry states that there is no way to win a pawn. But could you not play Re6+ and after the King reacts you could pick up the e Pawn. Or am I missing something?
it can be blocked with the rook. rook takes pawn or rook exchange leaves you at a disadvantage as white.