China's Radical Stealth Ship Showcases New Technology

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • China experimental naval ship has started sea trials. We discuss all the interesting devices found onboard, which are new to the Chinese Navy.
    Want to support my work?
    / eurasianavalinsight
    www.buymeacoff...
    Keywords: PLAN, PLA, frigate, corvette, Luneberg lens, military

Комментарии • 383

  • @francescozambaldi8212
    @francescozambaldi8212 3 месяца назад +72

    I'm not expert in naval warfare but this is a really good looking warship. Bravo China

    • @user-uv1ee1ib7f
      @user-uv1ee1ib7f 3 месяца назад +1

      Just a toy warship .

    • @francescozambaldi8212
      @francescozambaldi8212 3 месяца назад +8

      @@user-uv1ee1ib7f Sincerely i don't knw, as said i'm not an expert by any mean

    • @liuliwuyugmail
      @liuliwuyugmail 2 месяца назад

      ​@@user-uv1ee1ib7f I mean yeah it's in the name of the thing? But still good looking.

    •  2 месяца назад +10

      @@user-uv1ee1ib7f Shut up CIA bot. Tell your boss Bob you suck at your job

    • @sohailasghar8684
      @sohailasghar8684 2 месяца назад

      ​@@user-uv1ee1ib7fhow could you know that? I mean west , specially US compete with china , now everyone saying its crap ,
      When its crap , why US built alliences against china

  • @jinz948
    @jinz948 3 месяца назад +26

    Thanks for the continuous updates, thank you 🎉🎉🎉

  • @redblueyankee8343
    @redblueyankee8343 3 месяца назад +190

    What a good design I hope Vietnam can buy it to replace our current old Petyas. And love to my Sinosphere brothers

    • @duongle1606
      @duongle1606 3 месяца назад +32

      I don't think Vietnam will ever buy Chinese military equipment any time soon. Vietnam has been balancing their relationship with US and China. Buying Chinese military equipment is against their policies

    • @Shipspotting_Vietnam
      @Shipspotting_Vietnam 3 месяца назад

      Vietnam will never buy weapons from China!

    • @sleefy2343
      @sleefy2343 3 месяца назад +24

      @@duongle1606well Chinese don’t sell their weapons though
      They would rather sell useful things like things that are not weapons

    • @szh4494
      @szh4494 3 месяца назад +21

      @@duongle1606 Thailand has stuff from both US and China. They also do drills with both countries

    • @duongle1606
      @duongle1606 3 месяца назад +2

      @@szh4494 what does that have to do with with Vietnam?

  • @phils4634
    @phils4634 3 месяца назад +104

    With China's massive investment in robotics, I wonder how long it will be before we see at least partial robotic assembly in their shipyards? A potential future where high quality, absolutely reproducible shipping is churned out with the same ease (and speed) of commercial trucks and buses? Big savings on finished vessels for commercial buyers, and possibly an "almost production line" scale of output for PLA naval assets, especially smaller size vessels.

    • @douginorlando6260
      @douginorlando6260 3 месяца назад +16

      I read somewhere it’s already here. China’s Cruise ship rooms for thousands of tourists were already being finished with robots. It might be the next cruise ship being constructed, not the last ship.

    • @phils4634
      @phils4634 3 месяца назад +12

      @@douginorlando6260 Extensive use of robotics have led China from being a major net importer of cars to being THE world's largest EV producer in less than a decade, with BYD now being probably the world's largest "consumer-spec" EV producer. There would appear to be no fundamental reasons why such "economies of extensive automation" cannot be applied to shipping. This would also apply to repair too - obviously of strategic interest and importance in a wartime scenario.

    • @sustainablerenewableintegr8311
      @sustainablerenewableintegr8311 3 месяца назад +7

      America will be having bloody diarrhea if China ever reached that level 😂

    • @xuansu9036
      @xuansu9036 3 месяца назад +9

      You wouldn’t see it in the shipyard itself. It’s more likely to be used in the factories that provide modules to the yard. Putting ship together requires a lot of internal work that large robots aren’t suitable for, and probably a lot of variation that need to be fixed while been assembled. Modules on the other hand, are much smaller and could take advantage of robots to reduce those variations.

    • @user-zr3zn5yi7o
      @user-zr3zn5yi7o 3 месяца назад

      ​@@phils4634中国的老百姓比以前富有一些了,那些非常辛苦的工作年轻人根本不愿意干。所以用机器人代替是必然的。

  • @250_YZ
    @250_YZ 3 месяца назад +48

    Mission réussie sur la lune, puis ce nouveau navire hitech. Et en projet, le vaisseau spatial de 800 mètres de long. À l'avenir, les universités chinoises attireront plus d'étudiants du monde entier, que les universités américaines.

    • @davidbowden8362
      @davidbowden8362 2 месяца назад

      At least one can study in China without protesters.

  • @he-man168
    @he-man168 3 месяца назад +21

    wow! it,s so smooth

  • @Excalabur50
    @Excalabur50 3 месяца назад +16

    From what I could see in one of the photos you showed of the wake of the ship you can see the exhaust out the back of the mast area, so it doesn't look like it has a water level exhaust, which stands to reason why the mast is blackened.

    • @mysygisun3335
      @mysygisun3335 2 месяца назад +2

      確かにそうですね、
      マスト後部の黒ずみは。ディーゼル廃棄に因る黒ずみに見えますね。
      当然ガスタービンの排気もマスト後部に出るという事😊でしょう。

  • @tvgerbil1984
    @tvgerbil1984 3 месяца назад +9

    It looks more like a mini version of the Japanese Mogami Class Frigate than anything else. The Mogami's have relatively low price tag for mass production. It makes perfect sense for China to build this experimental ship first to iron out design issues before mass production begins.

    • @timothychung4811
      @timothychung4811 3 месяца назад +2

      Pretty much 055 updated.

    • @cn-digu
      @cn-digu 2 месяца назад

      你脑子没事?

    • @xtt-o8y
      @xtt-o8y 2 месяца назад

      傻逼

    • @ivanborgia3384
      @ivanborgia3384 5 дней назад

      Are you serious? There‘re two facts: 1. The Mogami-class still has no VLS 2. The Mogami-class is a class of ships built with civilian standards for mass deployment.

  • @jogo798
    @jogo798 3 месяца назад +8

    Why not use Integrated Propulsion System instead of Combined Gas and Diesel Propulsion ?

    • @user-mc2oc6jw9q
      @user-mc2oc6jw9q 3 месяца назад

      C C P are not smart enough to copy advanced semi conductors, they would not know how to invent nuclear powered propulsion

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 месяца назад

      no reason that it isn't already doing so. IEP tends to be buggy but since its a technology test platform reliability isn't a concern.

  • @fernandofernandito3055
    @fernandofernandito3055 22 дня назад

    Gas and diesel use two propellers obviously go faster that single propeller...
    This channel is good to give away what PLAN has under their sleeves...

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 14 дней назад

    The designation of warships differ around the world, and can be quite confusing! For instance, the type 55 is called a destoyer, but is clearly a cruiser, my own country had three throughdeck cruisers that were clearly small aircraft carriers! Many so called frigates today, could also be categorised as destroyers !

  • @tonysia6474
    @tonysia6474 3 месяца назад +10

    Great ship. This will change China naval ships designs in the future to adapt to the modern sea warfare where stealth tech will rule the wave.
    Great China. 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳👍👍👍👍👍♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

  • @iamscoutstfu
    @iamscoutstfu 2 месяца назад +1

    5:03
    That looks like a water line exhaust plume to me.
    But theres also exhaust near the rear of the bridge.
    It may be running both?
    It looks more like an LVO testbed than anything else. No wet deck doors, no mission bay, no actual landing pad or hangar doors for the helo.
    It looks like it only has the equipment necessary to sail and test radar returns on common PLAN equipment.

  • @cabasadefogo9533
    @cabasadefogo9533 3 месяца назад +17

    What a beautiful design. Meanwhile US navy DDGX not scheduled til 2032. The new billion dollar frigate Constitution class based on existing FRAMM design from Italy has been delayed due to faulty design changes per Business Insider. Yes you heard correct, they are so incompetent that they tried to change the existing FRAMM design, but instead of finishing the changes before building starts. They started building thinking they can fit the design changes while ship is constructing. LOLOL vs PLAN building experimental ships to test design then fully implementing them.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 месяца назад +2

      aestetically its very much a 2020s design while the constellation looks like something produced at the turn of the millennium.

    • @Triggatra4258
      @Triggatra4258 3 месяца назад +1

      Are you paid to suck china's d***? Or you love the taste? 😂😂 BOTH.

  • @ragabara1031
    @ragabara1031 3 месяца назад +2

    Reading through other comments, I think this needs to be said:
    1. This Chinese ship is a proof of concept
    2. The visual characteristics being discussed may only be one major differentiator for the project stakeholders
    3. The covered concepts don't need to be restricted to the technological domain. They can be of a wide range: economic, industrial, fiscal, manpower, combat, etc. on the tactical, operational, and strategic levels.
    We don't know the priorities of this project, so there's no point in dismissing it based on surface-level information. All we know is that the Chinese have decided that the concepts being incorporated into the ship are worthy enough to be proven.

    • @williamblomster2387
      @williamblomster2387 3 месяца назад

      this is all bullshit

    • @mysygisun3335
      @mysygisun3335 2 месяца назад

      船級として056Aの名称が見られるようですので、
      主船体船型は、056型のままで、
      056型の上部をステルス線形とした、主砲のステルス化、
      高速発揮用のウオータージェット化が主なようですね。
      056型コルベット自体は、全艦海警艦移管をするということでしょうか。

  • @AmirShafeek
    @AmirShafeek 3 месяца назад +19

    Love from Florida 🇺🇲👍🏾🇨🇳

  • @douginorlando6260
    @douginorlando6260 3 месяца назад +9

    So instead of a radar reflection the size of a ship, its reflection is only the size of a bus or a car? Or even a refrigerator? I don’t get the idea behind stealth for huge ships … once in line of sight of radar, how can it hide? Even if it reduces reflection by 99.9% it’s still big

    • @xiaofengwang9541
      @xiaofengwang9541 3 месяца назад +7

      Do you know that the Earth is round?

    • @Cannoli_JJ
      @Cannoli_JJ 3 месяца назад +2

      减少被击中的概率或者直接让雷达无法瞄准。🧐

    • @UsaidAhmed-mb5ws
      @UsaidAhmed-mb5ws 3 месяца назад

      Lets say you get in on radar and you want to hit in but its moving and they thing you are hitting it with requires guidance system it cant guide it self correctly if radar signature is not accurate i think

    • @UsaidAhmed-mb5ws
      @UsaidAhmed-mb5ws 3 месяца назад

      ​@@Cannoli_JJyes

    • @mydad156
      @mydad156 3 месяца назад

      It present in radar is the same size of hundred of fishing ships near it, difficult to distinguish it from fishing ships around from radar.

  • @multipolarworldorder
    @multipolarworldorder 3 месяца назад +3

    The previous type 56B corvette was a low cost ship and had separate anti ship missile pods and no VLS. It was designed for anti submarine operations close to China so a VLS system was not required. It had a towed array and helicopter. This new proto type looks like it is to replace the type 56B and it has a VLS system which extends it operation potential.

    • @ivanborgia3384
      @ivanborgia3384 5 дней назад

      Not entirely like that, the Type 056 was primarily designed to replace outdated missile boats and patrol vessels, not strong enough on anti submarine. It's just a transitional model and most of them have now been transferred to the Coast Guard.

    • @multipolarworldorder
      @multipolarworldorder 5 дней назад

      @@ivanborgia3384 The 56A were transferred to the Coast Guard. They had no anti submarine towed array like the 56B.

  • @Tanubtanu
    @Tanubtanu 3 месяца назад +13

    Look like a testing ship to test out Visby-class's radar characteristics, but the idea of a stealth ship along with carrier battlegroup seems dumb unless they are working on a stealth version of Type 22 missile boat which makes more sense.

    • @but_at_what_cost
      @but_at_what_cost 3 месяца назад

      海军真正地决战军舰,恰恰是076这样地小平顶和这种小型控制成本地隐身防空舰。

    • @user-yt5xc2sn3d
      @user-yt5xc2sn3d 3 месяца назад +1

      yeah, stealth don't mean much in battlegroup, but it always good when it needs to operate independently

    • @williamblomster2387
      @williamblomster2387 3 месяца назад

      need to build a higher mast to be able to see over the horizon like pre WW2 battleships

    • @but_at_what_cost
      @but_at_what_cost 3 месяца назад +2

      @@williamblomster2387 地平线的事交给长续航无人机

    • @alexpan8138
      @alexpan8138 3 месяца назад +4

      this is a test platform for the "Dreadnaught" 全能舰 concept developed by scientist Ma Weiming , it will be more than 10000 ton , have Rail Gun, strategic Laser and Tactic Laser, numerous VLS which can launch all konds of hypersonic missiles, and can be a command center for Drones. Carriers might become slow moving targets during conflict of great powers, and are only useful against small countries with insufficient missile powers.

  • @olov87
    @olov87 3 месяца назад +5

    CN really like Swedish Corvette style 🧐

  • @multipolarworldorder
    @multipolarworldorder 3 месяца назад +2

    Do away with the front Gun and extend the raised platform so the number of VLS cells can be increased to 48 at least. Make sure there is a towed sonar array and dipping sonar as well.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 месяца назад +2

      interesting concept. A mini arsenal ship that costs much less than a submarine or destroyer but has at least heavy frigate levels of firepower. It'd have to work as part of a battlegroup though since its sensors wouldn't be able to make full use of all that firepower

    • @ivanborgia3384
      @ivanborgia3384 5 дней назад

      @@hughmungus2760 PLAN has conducted some relevant research on arsenal ship, but it doesn't seem to fit their system.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 5 дней назад

      @@ivanborgia3384 The PLAN seems to prefer to disperse their risk rather than put all their eggs in one basket like the US.

    • @ivanborgia3384
      @ivanborgia3384 4 дня назад

      @@hughmungus2760 In their concept, it is called "technological reserve," exploring all possibilities, equipping suitable technologies, and archiving unsuitable ones for future restart of research or reference.

  • @LaminatedLama
    @LaminatedLama 3 месяца назад +3

    Love your videos. Would love it you wanted to cover other parts of the PLA

  • @寒鱼
    @寒鱼 3 месяца назад +8

    以后会不会放大作为全能舰,缩小作为无人舰

    • @wision888
      @wision888 3 месяца назад +1

      absolutely

  • @royssche
    @royssche 2 месяца назад +2

    Visby class?

  • @OperaRotas-ik2xz
    @OperaRotas-ik2xz 3 месяца назад +2

    Excellent 👍

  • @fatdoi003
    @fatdoi003 3 месяца назад +6

    this maybe the next gen design for all types of warships.... all they need is stretch the boat out and wider....

    • @craylin
      @craylin 3 месяца назад

      Only small ships need ultimate stealth design.Large ships cannot be stealthy.

    • @timothychung4811
      @timothychung4811 3 месяца назад

      I am curious if they will do that and if this is a study for a new model more powerful than 055 they have talked about.

  • @shengzhong2662
    @shengzhong2662 3 месяца назад +14

    试验舰,用来测试各种子系统,新技术

  • @waynef9314
    @waynef9314 2 месяца назад

    It's there own copy of the Zumwalt Destroyer's. You can see that they didn't want to make it to noticable. So the front of the ship is like others.

    • @UniversalMusicLtd584
      @UniversalMusicLtd584 Месяц назад +1

      Looks more like Visby to me. Like the child of Visby and Zumwalt...

  • @BrandyHeng007
    @BrandyHeng007 3 месяца назад +1

    Semi Submarine, hiding below sea level, so it's truly sheath design

  • @alexpan8138
    @alexpan8138 3 месяца назад +3

    这是为 马伟明院士的 全能舰 做测试呢

  • @arveduilastking546
    @arveduilastking546 2 месяца назад

    It has some similarities with the swedish stealth corvette.

    • @dennyliu7494
      @dennyliu7494 2 месяца назад

      The back of the Visby Class Corvette is an over-extended helicopter platform, not very practical.

  • @damjanforjanic
    @damjanforjanic 3 месяца назад +1

    Looks crazy good...

  • @arthurchen8162
    @arthurchen8162 3 месяца назад +2

    I just guess that this new beautiful ship is for stealth function test.

    • @kesai119
      @kesai119 2 месяца назад

      Experimental ships, our style is that the first ship is usually used for experiments to verify some parameters and standards. Generally speaking, a third ship of the same type is the production version.

    • @arthurchen8162
      @arthurchen8162 2 месяца назад

      @@kesai119 Thank you. I hope all tests are going well

  • @justme6275
    @justme6275 3 месяца назад +1

    amazing looking ship 🥰

  • @Erik-rp1hi
    @Erik-rp1hi 3 месяца назад +3

    I think Naval News is good. They sure travel the world. They get interviews with higher ups.

  • @AccordGTR
    @AccordGTR 21 день назад

    Great target for Brahmos

  • @lancewood1410
    @lancewood1410 3 месяца назад +3

    The west always thinks they know more than even the manufacturer. I'll call it whatever i want because i made it :)

  • @nicolamastascusa8173
    @nicolamastascusa8173 2 месяца назад

    I mean, can it be considered that the PLAN uses the term 'light frigate' to indicate a 'corvette' class because Chinese lacks a specific term for 'corvette'? There are specific terms for 'frigate', 'destroyer' and 'cruiser', which are literally translated as 护卫舰 'protector vessel', 驱逐舰 'expulsion vessel', and 巡洋舰 'cruise vessel', respectively. Is there a specific Chinese term for 'corvette that you know?

    • @user-or5qt4ht8r
      @user-or5qt4ht8r 2 месяца назад +1

      Yes,中國护卫舰是指擁有防空,對舰功擊,反潛性能的2000 -5000吨水平的綜合保护舰,5000吨以上的叫驱逐舰,沒有設定巡洋艦'

    • @ivanborgia3384
      @ivanborgia3384 5 дней назад

      Conceptually, PLAN has a series of hierarchical indicators to classify ships into different categories
      1st Class: Aircraft carrier, battleship, cruiser and nuclear submarine
      2nd Class: Destroyers, frigates, conventional submarines and large landing ships
      3rd Class: Large missile boats, anti-submarine boats, mine sweepers and medium-sized landing ships
      Sure in Chinese there‘s no such term for corvette, it's called light frigate(轻型护卫舰) or patrol vessel(巡逻舰) sometimes but it's informal, there is only one type in the strict sense which is Frigate(护卫舰).

  • @LIONIQ-foxhound
    @LIONIQ-foxhound 3 месяца назад +1

    LONG LIVE CHINA LONG LIVE PLA...

  • @BrandonMeyer1641
    @BrandonMeyer1641 3 месяца назад +2

    Resembles design traits of the zumwalt. Stealth of surface vessels is only advantageous under certain conditions.

    • @user-or5qt4ht8r
      @user-or5qt4ht8r 2 месяца назад

      大船隐身就很多余,最不經打的裝備,
      1. 坦克,2直升机,3大船

  • @user-ug4yr8er9g
    @user-ug4yr8er9g 3 месяца назад +3

    ВМФ НОАК 🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪

    • @user-xf7mu2xu4r
      @user-xf7mu2xu4r 3 месяца назад

      你是俄罗斯的华侨还是华裔,我不理解把自己账号头像设置成别的国家国旗的人是什么成分,包括有些非美国人头像是美国国旗🤔

  • @stevek4813
    @stevek4813 3 месяца назад +2

    The raised deck for the VLS would also reduce the firing arc of the bow gun

    • @Daedy
      @Daedy 3 месяца назад +2

      Not really. Note how tapered the platform is. It's clear they've already accounted for that.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 месяца назад

      my primary concern is that getting rid of the CWIS makes it quite vulnerable to swarming drone attack. It also seems to lack any ability to deal with USVs which are proving to be quite a menace in littoral waters.

  • @psiregar
    @psiregar 2 месяца назад

    Looks like Sweden’s Visby corvette to me

  • @dorpus
    @dorpus 3 месяца назад +2

    The USA built those kind of ships 10 years ago and abandoned them because they were too fragile and constantly broke down.

    • @ianchen8582
      @ianchen8582 2 месяца назад +1

      What? Are you referring to the Freedom class littoral combat ship?

    • @user-ro4gc4es5u
      @user-ro4gc4es5u 2 месяца назад

      放你妈那狗屁

  • @6haha
    @6haha 3 месяца назад +1

    It is just a test unit

  • @blisteringstars
    @blisteringstars 2 месяца назад

    looks like a big visby-class

  • @patrickrain1914
    @patrickrain1914 3 месяца назад

    Chinese navy: lol.My new toy🎉

  • @vahapcakmak2313
    @vahapcakmak2313 3 месяца назад

    Very good

  • @Galileo1491
    @Galileo1491 3 месяца назад +3

    A masterpiece of the proletariat

  • @LuobingSong
    @LuobingSong 3 месяца назад

    a design very similar to Sweden corvette, which has been prove to be stealthy, for me i prefer a proved design in the stage of ship building instead of some fancy thing like DDG1000, came up with more trouble after enlisted.
    however it is actually a experimental ship, the size of the bridge is too small for sealing, from my calculation, a 2200 ton corvette requires more than 8 operater in the bridge, i am not a professional sailor and thats a estimation
    i actually prefer put vertical launcher in the middle of hull and put bridge much forward, which is more favorable for operating ships in narrow water, and there will be one less stage on the ship and more stealthy
    this actually indicate one thing, China tend to add vls launcher in to corvette
    there is a critical question for peoples navy in the next 20 years, with extended range of our navy, most large combat ship maybe deployed on the ocean, however Japanese navy and US navy are still close to Chinese coastline, even after the final part of Chinese liberation war, the Taiwan.
    still need some kind of service ship and a coastline fleet to protect Chinese coastline and keep balance of east Asia, i think this kind of thing along with missile boat fleet and air force can cover this thing
    US navy may retreat from east Asia in 2050s, before new balance was established between Pacific ocean, China responsible for keep peace of east Asia before they go, after that China and east Asia will totally get rid of risk of war, and thats the time when these ship ready to retired
    maybe there will be a new missile boat replace old type 22, lets see

  • @ncs2000
    @ncs2000 3 месяца назад

    looks like Visby class

  • @christophmahler
    @christophmahler 2 месяца назад

    After the cancellation of the Zumwalt-class program and the LCS programs, maybe the US Navy should by it's cruiser replacements from China, instead of Italy...

    • @WhyyouSodesperate
      @WhyyouSodesperate 2 месяца назад

      Buying weapons from enemies is not possible dude
      Do you think USA want to buy ship that possibly to be TROJAN HORSE
      or SABOTAGED
      And no way Chinese will sell their ship to their enemies
      Your advice is very oxymoron ideas ever

    • @christophmahler
      @christophmahler 2 месяца назад

      @@WhyyouSodesperate
      "Your advice is very oxymoron ideas ever"
      You have learned to translate a statement from the English language into Your own, but You don't read enough in order to pick up stances like sarcasm...
      The Chinese bought into US research of biological weapons in Wuhan, why shouldn't - after a military coup - US admirals buy from the most cost effective yards to maintain the Monroe Doctrine...

  • @SenorBastardo1348
    @SenorBastardo1348 3 месяца назад +5

    I wonder if the emphasis on stealth in the satellite age doesn't potentially indicate that the Chinese are confident they can eliminate satellite coverage?

    • @tuputapu877
      @tuputapu877 3 месяца назад +4

      Satellite age is ancient now since the fifties. So you're saying the U.S stealth destroyers were useless considering not only China but Russia and many other countries have had satellites in space for decades?

    • @SenorBastardo1348
      @SenorBastardo1348 3 месяца назад +4

      @@tuputapu877 No, Im not saying that. Satellite's have full coverage night and day. Im implying that the Chinese may be confident they can counter that surveillance by shooting the satellite's down. This applies to the US too btw, but the Russians are the furthest ahead in anti-satellite missiles (which they have 100% shared with the Chinese).

    • @thehumus8688
      @thehumus8688 3 месяца назад +2

      Satelite dont have 24 hour coverage
      Most reconaisance Satelite was orbiting the earth every 12 or 24 hours. with like at most half an hour of observation time window - Thats the "Delay" of information gathering via satelite
      they not look down all the time in real time, like Command and conquer

    • @johnmarick6974
      @johnmarick6974 3 месяца назад

      @@tuputapu877 yes, they are and were useless, one of the reasons the US stopped building them

    • @SenorBastardo1348
      @SenorBastardo1348 3 месяца назад

      @@thehumus8688 Dude....obviously 1 satellite...thats why you have a network. Why do you think starlink can provide continuous internet connectivity. They have thousands of them....and yes they can look at 1 spot 24/7 365 now.

  • @hyhhy
    @hyhhy 3 месяца назад

    I wonder how good the stealth is.

  • @mcknight3483
    @mcknight3483 3 месяца назад +1

    Seems to be a combination of the type 45 of the british for the mast design. The main gun from the zumwalt and the hull design from the modern lcs of the US. Reverse engeneering is not as perfect as the original, though.

  • @FghggjkjFhhcghj
    @FghggjkjFhhcghj 3 месяца назад +2

    เยี่ยม

  • @ethanha4869
    @ethanha4869 2 месяца назад

    这个口音听着很亲切^^

  • @wlyiu4057
    @wlyiu4057 3 месяца назад

    We are only half way through 2024.

  • @kangbule
    @kangbule 2 месяца назад

    My news: This is just a mini experimental ship

  • @hcjet
    @hcjet 3 месяца назад +1

    模拟针对隐身目标的识别与攻击战术实验平台而已

  • @drandersjiang
    @drandersjiang 3 месяца назад

    022 Corvette replacement?

    • @bearpolo3618
      @bearpolo3618 3 месяца назад

      No, there is another smaller one, only 280 tons displacement, yet carries more arsenal with integrated AESA radar system.

    • @VashtheStampede007
      @VashtheStampede007 3 месяца назад

      022 is not a corvette. It is a missile boat lol. And 022 is not useful on its own due to limitations in sensory due to tiny size, and lack of area air defense. I would think it might be a good idea to have multiple 022 detached from a cruiser or amphibious assault ship, while operating under the air defense umbrella of the fleet, it can increase targets for the enemies and might sneak a few anti ship missiles in the direction of enemy surface combatants

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 месяца назад

      The CSSC A2000 seems to be a better candidate for that

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 месяца назад

      @@VashtheStampede007 Missile boats these days are probably going to be deathtraps in a war because of dual use AAM/AshM like the SM6. They're going to have to be unmanned or be seriously stealthy to survive.

    • @drandersjiang
      @drandersjiang 3 месяца назад

      @@VashtheStampede007 Oops, yes you are right. I meant 056.

  • @leapdrive
    @leapdrive 2 месяца назад +1

    Another external copy of American high tech ships, the Zumwalt Class. Does an external copy mean internal designs are at the same level? We don’t think so!

    • @MrSchwabentier
      @MrSchwabentier 2 месяца назад +1

      looks nothing like the Zumwalt. You should check out the swedish Visby Class Corvettes. Then you know where they copied from

    • @leapdrive
      @leapdrive 2 месяца назад

      @@MrSchwabentier , a copy is a copy is a copy.

    • @MrSchwabentier
      @MrSchwabentier 2 месяца назад +2

      @@leapdrive still not a zumwalt copy

    • @gavinhu9904
      @gavinhu9904 2 месяца назад +1

      You may have to see a doctor about your eyes or your brain

    • @leapdrive
      @leapdrive 2 месяца назад

      @@gavinhu9904 , misidentifying what copy it is does not prove eye or brain issue. It’s just misidentification. Your diatribe is simply an attempt to cover you real issue - of making inferior copies.

  • @honfmeilingfleet957
    @honfmeilingfleet957 3 месяца назад +1

    now i am waiting this Ship added to Modern Warships game

  • @Absolut531kmh
    @Absolut531kmh 3 месяца назад

    The stealth turret looks like it would potentially be a Electromagnetic Ammunition turret, which the PLA is running tests with it as we speak.

    • @Cannoli_JJ
      @Cannoli_JJ 3 месяца назад +1

      中国军方已经实验了新型电磁炮能击穿100公里外8cm的装甲,不过目前体型不适合小型舰船。🧐

  • @noelacosta2245
    @noelacosta2245 2 месяца назад

    chinese made design are more on physical appearance but nothing on performance

  • @rubiconklbrutorowman7577
    @rubiconklbrutorowman7577 Месяц назад +1

    It is baby size US Zumwalt!

  • @UndoEverything
    @UndoEverything 2 месяца назад

    This ship has resemblance to Zumwalt destroyer. China is a hope for poor countries.
    Don't take me wrong. Wheel is already invented, so no need to invent again. Just make it more long lasting. That's it.

  • @jeseolouizerondael3906
    @jeseolouizerondael3906 Месяц назад +1

    A copycat of Visby Corvette 😂😂 as usual

  • @georgepoitras3502
    @georgepoitras3502 2 месяца назад

    Looks just like they bought the plans for the US Littoral combat ship and copied it. They know those were removed from service because they suck right?🤣🤣😂😂

  • @Trayagain97
    @Trayagain97 3 месяца назад

    Visby class? 😂

  • @reynaldomercado2920
    @reynaldomercado2920 2 месяца назад

    Might be old content in a new skin

  • @capespring
    @capespring 3 месяца назад +1

    Visby-class corvette

  • @burprobrox9134
    @burprobrox9134 3 месяца назад

    It’s really silly for any US adversary to build stealth, any large ship will be tracked real-time via satellite. The tracking data can be disseminated to allies on order in any escalation. It might be useful against local enemies such as Vietnam, but even they are now sharing data with the US. I can’t think of any reason to build an actual deployable version of this. It will definitely help them to build better radars and learn how to see better, but useless in combat

    • @laowantongchau
      @laowantongchau 3 месяца назад +10

      So why did the US build the Zumwalt?

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 месяца назад

      stealth makes sense in littoral waters because of the ground clutter and civilian traffic. If the ship looks like a fishing boat on radar most navies are going to have to double check to make sure they aren't shooting an actual fishing boat.

    • @kameraldbahrul3432
      @kameraldbahrul3432 3 месяца назад +1

      ​@@laowantongchau for wasting tax

  • @user-pb4gl5dh4p
    @user-pb4gl5dh4p 3 месяца назад +1

    It's a FREM copy.

    • @georgeeagle872
      @georgeeagle872 3 месяца назад

      Lol. You're talking sh8t

    • @kinwai27271
      @kinwai27271 3 месяца назад

      Outside look alike doesn't mean inside is the same

  • @commodorce6431
    @commodorce6431 3 месяца назад

    Elongated Visby class

  • @tonbopro
    @tonbopro 2 месяца назад

    technology demonstrator

  • @jon_nomad
    @jon_nomad 3 месяца назад

    Look absolutely like the Swedish "Visby" Class corvette.

    • @but_at_what_cost
      @but_at_what_cost 3 месяца назад +3

      维斯比很好,但是太小了,才700吨,武器只有炮。

  • @davegruujohn2168
    @davegruujohn2168 2 месяца назад

    Looks like copy swedish visby class

  • @focksnight
    @focksnight 2 месяца назад

    一听这口语,就知道是大陆北方人😂

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  2 месяца назад

      Lol, no. You are mistaken actually :)

  • @vanshanand3946
    @vanshanand3946 3 месяца назад

    Finnally stealth ship

  • @mikevoltamp6146
    @mikevoltamp6146 3 месяца назад +2

    Tufu-Dreg for sure, experimental or not.

    • @kinwai27271
      @kinwai27271 3 месяца назад +6

      You mad?😂

    • @fzmoifzmoi2575
      @fzmoifzmoi2575 3 месяца назад +1

      Regurgitating Fallen Gong Cult propaganda makes you irreversibly imbecilic..

    • @laowantongchau
      @laowantongchau 3 месяца назад +2

      Hope you feel better soon 😂

    • @petardsforeveryone
      @petardsforeveryone 3 месяца назад

      At least spell it correctly if you're attempting the platitudinous joke.

    • @chengzhang9175
      @chengzhang9175 3 месяца назад +1

      you need a psychiatrist

  • @Sundeep_x
    @Sundeep_x 2 месяца назад

    Tofu army

  • @greenisnice9345
    @greenisnice9345 3 месяца назад

    I'm an amateur about these. I heard that China's submarine technology is still ten years behind the U.S.A.'s. Is this true? Just curious.

    • @XkMeng
      @XkMeng 3 месяца назад +6

      China's nuclear submarines may be lagging behind by more than 10 years, but this is related to China's strategy. They do not need to go to the other side of the earth. China's conventional submarines are very advanced.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 3 месяца назад +1

      subs are most mysterious type.... no one knows much about them..... super classified bunch of boats...

    • @chingtuckmeng1122
      @chingtuckmeng1122 3 месяца назад +3

      100000 behind usa no #1

    • @user-yt8gu1cl5x
      @user-yt8gu1cl5x 3 месяца назад

      Several years ago China built a very large plant to produce nuclear submarines. That should indicate that it considered its technology to be advanced enough to be at least near the level of US. Perhaps based on assistance from Russia.

    • @jxmai7687
      @jxmai7687 3 месяца назад +1

      中国有可能在寻求弯道超车的方法,不会跟着美国的尾巴发展的,总有超越的时候,拭目以待吧。

  • @user-gf6wo3lb1i
    @user-gf6wo3lb1i 17 дней назад

    They just copied LCS (Little Crappy Ship)

  • @30cm27
    @30cm27 2 месяца назад

    Copied from Japanese warships。。。もがみ型護衛艦,30FFM

  • @faerak
    @faerak 3 месяца назад

    Copy of Zumwalt

  • @Zerpentsa6598
    @Zerpentsa6598 3 месяца назад

    Was it built to sell tofu around the SCS? 🤣🤣🤣

    • @zulkanainbaharuddin2185
      @zulkanainbaharuddin2185 3 месяца назад +10

      More to take curry masalla.😂😂😂

    • @julianchung9215
      @julianchung9215 3 месяца назад

      Thats all you can say? Weak insult from a person with a small brain...

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 3 месяца назад +2

      slum curry masalla

    • @petardsforeveryone
      @petardsforeveryone 3 месяца назад

      don't worry about it -- it's a fishing boat.

    • @kesai119
      @kesai119 2 месяца назад

      I think motorcycles in India are great, they can accommodate more than 10 people. This is something that our country cannot do.

  • @verypleasantguy
    @verypleasantguy 3 месяца назад +1

    It's a decoy !

  • @Tyteagas
    @Tyteagas 2 дня назад

    Sweden design copycat chinese😂

  • @clintcasera8758
    @clintcasera8758 2 месяца назад

    Copy deaign from other country

    • @billngo7197
      @billngo7197 2 месяца назад

      Like who's China copies from itsel🙄

  • @karlk7070
    @karlk7070 2 месяца назад

    Zumwalmart

  • @user-xw5fs3ye2w
    @user-xw5fs3ye2w 3 месяца назад +1

    中国的雷达非常优异,我希望把这个舰艇做成无人艇 自动巡航在太平洋做电子侦查并且有防空拦截 反舰打击😂

  • @paulantony4598
    @paulantony4598 3 месяца назад

    Visby's big Chinese sis...

  • @AchwaqKhalid
    @AchwaqKhalid 2 месяца назад

    What a load of BS!!! You lost all credibility when you said _"Naval News"_ wasn't a credible source of information 😅

  • @user-xq8qx6bg2j
    @user-xq8qx6bg2j 3 месяца назад

    🈶🀄🈶🉑🈵♥🌷

  • @captain54526
    @captain54526 2 месяца назад

    BS !

  • @wongjimmy9195
    @wongjimmy9195 3 месяца назад

    小你小你 不講道理

  • @DreamsofAmber
    @DreamsofAmber 3 месяца назад

    Hah...junk- let me see it turn at highspeed without hull integrity failure

  • @williamblomster2387
    @williamblomster2387 3 месяца назад

    too small to be a good tourist cruise ship,,need to put in more cabins

  • @aaabbb-ff1sp
    @aaabbb-ff1sp 3 месяца назад +1

    Change the narrator...you will get more subscribers 🙄

    • @danielmartin7838
      @danielmartin7838 3 месяца назад +4

      I like the narrator. He’s a large part of what keeps me personally returning