we need a macrobiotic carbon sequestering solution, like what happened during the Paleoproterozoic era, quadrillions of microbes incorporating carbon in their cellular architecture.
another important thing is international cooperation, because if one country does this like they own the planet (probably _cough_ china) it's basically an act of environmental warfare
They would make much bigger difference if they'd build steel manufacturing plant or other highly energy dependent factories in Iceland. I don't understand why Iceland is so keen on helping fossil industry drill more and more.
The problem cannot be tackled by 1 type of solutions, like planting trees. As such any solution that reduces more carbon to enter the atmosphere or remove it from the atmosphere is helping. Yes this is taking a lot energy, but Iceland is lucky that they have the ability to create electricity from Geothermal sources than they use domestically. As such this electricity can be used for Carbon Capture.
Agree. Seems like spending those € on this would have multiple more benefits. ruclips.net/video/xbBdIG--b58/видео.htmlsi=tbqRqCL-uhVMYgdn Capture carbon with vegetation. Slow desertification. Better food security.
Because trees alone can't get the expected results in the given amount of time. Industrial processes caused the problem and it will also fix the problem. Yes trees are important but the damage is already done and trees would struggle to do so naturally. Trees was never meant to handle unregulated exhaust systems on a global scale. Trees can be planted after the bulk of the damage is cured.
Because farmers might make money from trees but corporations, Venture and vulture capitalists will make money charging us to clean up the mess they made.
Planting trees alone isn’t a viable solution to making an impact on CO2 in the atmosphere. Yeah, we gotta restore nature. But removing CO2 emissions from the atmosphere shouldn’t be the main motivation and planting trees is probably one of the least important actions to take to restore nature. Sometimes we even have to remove trees to do proper nature restoration. Technologies like the ones in the video have a lot more potential in the long term because technology can often be vastly more efficient than nature at one specific task. If we want to use nature to sequester CO2 we gotta look at something like bio-engineering algae or ocean fertilisation.
Well, Alberta will be the perfect place to have .They have a lot of area to make geothermal plant for electricity .Any area that has a heat source will be great .
I guess you must have skipped the video entirely, there's a part of it which explains the business model and, if you had watched it, you wouldn't appear dumb before the Internet
The science is far from clear...
One of your MANY volcanos puts out more than you can EVER clean from the air- foolish
This is a colossal waste of money.
Fantastic news, we must employ all possible means to stop climate change
we need a macrobiotic carbon sequestering solution, like what happened during the Paleoproterozoic era, quadrillions of microbes incorporating carbon in their cellular architecture.
another important thing is international cooperation, because if one country does this like they own the planet (probably _cough_ china) it's basically an act of environmental warfare
but if an individual instantiates the event, oh, now we're talking!
They would make much bigger difference if they'd build steel manufacturing plant or other highly energy dependent factories in Iceland. I don't understand why Iceland is so keen on helping fossil industry drill more and more.
The problem cannot be tackled by 1 type of solutions, like planting trees. As such any solution that reduces more carbon to enter the atmosphere or remove it from the atmosphere is helping. Yes this is taking a lot energy, but Iceland is lucky that they have the ability to create electricity from Geothermal sources than they use domestically. As such this electricity can be used for Carbon Capture.
Why are we not spending all these millions on planting trees?
Agree. Seems like spending those € on this would have multiple more benefits.
ruclips.net/video/xbBdIG--b58/видео.htmlsi=tbqRqCL-uhVMYgdn
Capture carbon with vegetation.
Slow desertification.
Better food security.
Because trees alone can't get the expected results in the given amount of time. Industrial processes caused the problem and it will also fix the problem. Yes trees are important but the damage is already done and trees would struggle to do so naturally. Trees was never meant to handle unregulated exhaust systems on a global scale. Trees can be planted after the bulk of the damage is cured.
Because farmers might make money from trees but corporations, Venture and vulture capitalists will make money charging us to clean up the mess they made.
@@kvm1992laughable
Planting trees alone isn’t a viable solution to making an impact on CO2 in the atmosphere.
Yeah, we gotta restore nature. But removing CO2 emissions from the atmosphere shouldn’t be the main motivation and planting trees is probably one of the least important actions to take to restore nature. Sometimes we even have to remove trees to do proper nature restoration.
Technologies like the ones in the video have a lot more potential in the long term because technology can often be vastly more efficient than nature at one specific task.
If we want to use nature to sequester CO2 we gotta look at something like bio-engineering algae or ocean fertilisation.
Biggest BS project 🤡🤡
4k tons per year 🤣🤣🤣
Well, Alberta will be the perfect place to have .They have a lot of area to make geothermal plant for electricity .Any area that has a heat source will be great .
Wondering how much CO2 goes into building and maintaining a carbon capture plant...
So far I can remember I watched this video atleast 2 years back.. sigh..
Duuuuumb dumb duuumb dumb
CLOWN WORLD
Ugh. The conspiracy theorist anti-science losers found this comment section
What a big waste of money, who is going to be responsible for this facility!
I guess you must have skipped the video entirely, there's a part of it which explains the business model and, if you had watched it, you wouldn't appear dumb before the Internet
1st
Iceland should pay back the support from the netherlands!
Around 4 billion euros... where is that money