302.II.3A: Intro to Constructible Numbers

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 дек 2024

Комментарии • 24

  • @Matt-yu8xc
    @Matt-yu8xc Год назад +1

    I LOVE that you know what straightedge music is!!!!

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 4 месяца назад

      I didn't know what it was until just now when I came across your comment and looked it up.

  • @stapleman007
    @stapleman007 2 года назад +1

    I got broken compass PTSD from highschool. The lead would be unusably dull, the spike would be wobbly or missing, and the joint would be so loose my arcs and circles would turn out as spirals.

  • @riccardoventrella
    @riccardoventrella 9 лет назад +5

    Hi Mr Salomone,
    thanks for your fantastic and really effective videos. I'd really like to have something like this
    when studying on my own elliptic curves, modular forms or reciprocity laws.
    I've just a small question, if possible. You told the straight edge is not a ruler, and this makes a lot
    of sense (also in projective geometry you can use some similar construction without the need
    of a metric at all, I guess) but I cannot figure out how you was able to draw the "1" segment
    within your proof of multiplicative closure with similar triangles.
    You have not a ruler and you have not used the compass neither, so how we were able
    to deduce the "1" segment out of the 2 original numbers, without measuring them?
    Trying to refine better: is there a "fast" way to get a "unit" segment from a couple constructible numbers
    using just the compass and the straight edge?
    My feeling you have to have a couple of them in order to establish a ratio between them, and then
    deduce the unit from that ratio, somehow. But if the ratio between the 2 is not "rational", how
    you can deduce the unit from it?
    EDIT: thinking of it deeply: of course there are infinite units...choosing one them just means
    rescaling the lengths upon it. So probably you just chose one unit segment and put
    it on the left of the first segment, am I right?
    Hope my question will not sound too stupid.
    Best and thanks
    Ricky

    • @MatthewSalomone
      @MatthewSalomone  9 лет назад +3

      Yeah, I realize I could have been more up front about that, but you're right: we couldn't have constructed segments of length k1 and k2 to begin with unless we started (somewhere on the page, unseen) with a segment of length 1. So wherever that segment was, go set your compass to its length and copy it into place. Good question!

    • @riccardoventrella
      @riccardoventrella 9 лет назад

      Thanks Mr Salomone, for your quick answer.

  • @dcterr1
    @dcterr1 4 года назад +2

    Very good, educational video! Very understandable and good use of graphics. You made a mistake early on though. The large cube has a volume of 3√3 V, not 3V.

  • @jamesmnolan
    @jamesmnolan 5 лет назад

    Small point but at time 8:08 you show the difference (in red) as k1 - k2 but I think it should be k2 - k1. Unless you're allowing for negative numbers (negative lengths?) which maybe you are...

  • @AsBi1
    @AsBi1 4 года назад +1

    Very helpful video.

  • @AxiomTutor
    @AxiomTutor 8 лет назад +1

    Very nice video, what software did you use? I can imagine using some kind of presentation software but how do you get a mixture of that with hand-drawings and clean, accurate constructions?

  • @ThefamousMrcroissant
    @ThefamousMrcroissant Год назад

    The multiplication argument was really difficult to follow. Probably because geometry has been a while, but I'm not seeing the ratios occur in either triangle

    • @힌둥-q7b
      @힌둥-q7b Год назад

      The ratio 1/k2 from small triangle is equal to the ratio k1/p from large triangle.

  • @ivokroon1099
    @ivokroon1099 8 лет назад

    3:40
    Did you mean: side length sqrt(2A)?
    The area is 2A, so the side length is the square root...

    • @dannyn6036
      @dannyn6036 5 лет назад

      Ivo Kroon that’s what I thought too

  • @SapnaKumari-tr8yl
    @SapnaKumari-tr8yl 2 года назад

    thanks a lot sir 🙏🏻

  • @adurgh
    @adurgh 6 лет назад

    The demonstration for the product k1 k2 = P was confusing to me. k1 and 1 are not sides of the pink triangle. We need to include the two small right triangles on the left as well to show how the ratio works.

  • @AxiomTutor
    @AxiomTutor 8 лет назад

    When I try to use the similarity of the triangles, by comparing the horizontal edge to the altitudes I get (1+k1+k2+p)/(1+k1+k2) = (1+k1)/1 which can simplify to p = (1+k1+k2)(k1) which implies (1+k1)k1 = 0 if p = k1*k2. This seems problematic, I wonder if I'm misunderstanding what you labeled as p.

    • @AxiomTutor
      @AxiomTutor 8 лет назад

      Wait, I think I misunderstood that k1 and k2 are laid on top of each other, not put end-to-end. Edit, no, I'm extremely confused about which segment is labeled with what length.

  • @emirhanzengin6871
    @emirhanzengin6871 6 лет назад

    I got p as k1^2 + k1*k2 if p represents the length of the orange line.

  • @rhke6789
    @rhke6789 2 года назад +1

    multiplication as explained cannot be understood. Better: 1. draw a line length 1, mark it, and extend until it is length a, at the zero point, make a line right angle up and perpendicular with length b. 2. complete the triangle by adding 3rd side, hypotenuse. 3. From end of a, put a line parallel to the hypotenuse to close the larger similar triangle. 4. Call the vertical length of the larger triangle p. Now you can see b:1 as p:a or b/1=p/a or ba=p.

  • @davidkwon1872
    @davidkwon1872 5 лет назад +1

    The volume with a length of a long diagonal is 3*sqrt3 V?

  • @harshchaudhary6984
    @harshchaudhary6984 3 года назад

    but k1 and 1 ain't the sides of the smaller triangles........

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 4 месяца назад

    Oh man, this video was triangularwesome! 👍📐