Roe v. Wade | National Constitution Center | Khan Academy
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- Keep going! Check out the next lesson and practice what you’re learning:
www.khanacadem...
A deep dive into Roe v. Wade, a 1973 Supreme Court case that extended the right of privacy to a woman's decision to have an abortion, while recognizing compelling state interests in potential life and maternal health. In this video, Kim Kutz Elliott discusses the case with AUL Senior Counsel Clarke Forsythe and Professor Melissa Murray.
To read more about constitutional law, visit the website of the National Constitution Center. On this site, leading scholars interact and explore the Constitution and its history. For each provision of the Constitution, experts from different political perspectives coauthor interpretive explanations when they agree and write separately when their opinions diverge.
View more lessons or practice this subject at www.khanacadem...
Khan Academy is a nonprofit organization with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. We offer quizzes, questions, instructional videos, and articles on a range of academic subjects, including math, biology, chemistry, physics, history, economics, finance, grammar, preschool learning, and more. We provide teachers with tools and data so they can help their students develop the skills, habits, and mindsets for success in school and beyond. Khan Academy has been translated into dozens of languages, and 15 million people around the globe learn on Khan Academy every month. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, we would love your help! Donate or volunteer today!
Donate here: www.khanacadem...
Volunteer here: www.khanacadem...
Privacy as a right is not in the text. Therefore it doesn't exist! Neither is the right to contraception!
Pharmacist do not have to sell birth control if it goes against their religious convictions. If you want birth control you can go to another state, or practice oral or anal sodomy!😊
Nicely done.
What I want to know IS the intend over textual Interpretation people, what is with a case like Brown v. Bord of Education, certainly it was thoght that those laws wear legal at the time it was passed and not incompassed, it was only the (social-/interlectual) realistation that things WEARN'T logicaly possible to both be true, the spirit and writing of the law and the assumed constitutionaly, so the assumption was decided wrong. Then why dosn't the same equal treatment apply?
I love reading YT comments. In this video there are no comments on the Roe decision itself. The only comments so far are related to the science and morality of abortion. I’m pro-choice but Roe was a terrible decision based upon the fundamental cannons of judicial interpretation. I would say Roe (from a constitutional standpoint) is right up there with Plessy v Ferguson in terms of judicial overreach.
Are you a happy camper now that it is over turned? One step closure to the slaves you've always wanted 🤗
Of course Roe v. Wade should be overturned since the right to privacy doesn't apply here since the unborn baby is a separate body from the woman's, being genetically distinct and developing as a separate entity.
Exactly! They claim it's the woman's body so it has to be her choice. Well it's not her body because she doesn't have two blood types or two sets of legs or two brains (None of she has an abortion.) and she doesn't have two hearts. Of course there are many. More reasons but those are good ones.
@Jody Miranda Nope. You shouldn't have the right to murder someone, just because he or she is dependent on your body.
@@ender2664 A parasite is of a different species and causes permenant harm to its host. It's not a parasite. And since when did I agree to the idea that being able to live separately is required to be a person?
@@ender2664 I don't think your comment could be any more ironic, considering I explained why a fetus doesn't meet the criteria for a parasite. Criteria I found a couple years ago when I..... wait for it.. . LOOKED IT UP. You should take your own advice since you don't know the definition.
@@ender2664 Those wouldn't be parasites then, genius lololol.