The fishiest part was when he said "I don't work on Saturday so I wasn't driving that day", then when it came out that it was on a Wednesday his GF said that he walks to work. It doesn't prove anything about the collision, but it does show that they're liars.
So having to sue somebody in court is more convenient for you than being a grown adult and talking to him when he tried to let you know about the incident this woman is crazy delusional. She needs a mental help.
I think it is more plausible that the plaintiff back up into the black car, and probably never even hit it,just wanted her previously damaged bumper fixed for free. Cause let's say it was the black car driving into the red,why would she leave it there ,instead of backing away. I think there both nice enough people,same with the boyfriend but the plaintiff should have had to pay the defendant harrassment counter sue.
It strikes me odd that the defendant's boyfriend approached the plaintiff and said "our cars got into a situation" before she was able to id who owned the car. They definately "hit" her car on purpose.
Yes, and I was upset that JM did not circle back to that to see if he would admit that he approached her because that was the proof right there if he admitted it.
For the plaintiff to be crying and say I need an apology and the defendant give it I believe the plaintiff for other reasons too She looks like she don’t mess with nobody and please don’t nobody mess wit her
I got the opposite vibe lol I feel like she's wishing someone would 😆 I'd never follow someone for flipping me off!! Then scream and cry till they apologize....nope lol
The defendant is lying through her teeth.... On the morning of the incident why didn't she come to the door then? If someone comes to my door accusing me of hitting them I'd sure as heck wanna see who it is.......she never came out.... How'd the judge miss that part???
Wait first dude said it was on a Saturday, he doesn’t work on saturdays therefore he wasn’t driving the car. Then they get busted on the day & all of a sudden “he walks to work” someeethinggs fishy lol
@@latricebrown7942 right. The way she was smiling the whole time, especially during the “after the verdict” you can tell she’s happy she got away with it.
Again JM was wrong. The plaintiff proved her case by a preponderance of the evidence. The defendants tried to lie about the day of the week. JM is biased.
Plaintiff story of events is certainly plausible she just had a hard time articulating her story and the way defendants were smirking makes me believe the plaintiff even more. She had pictures and even made a police report defendants didn’t have much of a counter story, I think judge was too involved with incident prior to what the case was really about, the damage to plaintiffs car.
Soooo, I wanna be friends with this plaintiff! She is intelligent, well spoken, funny as all hell & best of all does NOT lay down and take lies, deceit nor shenanigans! She is entertaining without even trying 😅🤣😂
Just by the defendant saying he walks to work after he tried to say he don’t work on saturdays tells they did it bc he was saying that clearly bc he drives the car
Plaintiff should be a model she has 100% Beautiful clear dark skin and those cheek bones to die for - You go girl ❤❤😅 oh an I think the defendant did damage her car. No one parks that close an don’t get out and look.
Hmmmmm I think the defendant parked like that on purpose. Ain’t no coincidence. The plaintiff is definitely out there & animated but I don’t think she’s the kinda crazy to do something like that. I mean even the defendant said during the stop sign incident the plaintiff was crying for an apology, not cussing her out lol
I swear, following behind someone is always a bad idea. Because you really don't know if they have a weapon or anything...From a gun to a black belt in karate, anything could be used to kick your butt if you got too close or tried to otherwise hurt them. And heck, even just a loud honk or flipping the bird while passing could initiate road rage. If someone's about to pull in front and they don't see you, of COURSE, you'd want to let them know by honking. But flipping the bird or something just isn't a good idea.
That's absolutely RIDICULOUS! She has a picture of the cars touching - if this happens to anyone, what are we supposed to do to prove it?? I must disagree with Judge Milian on this one
Get witnesses regarding who parked there first. Or what time they saw one or both cars coming to park. Whether the Plaintiff drove in the Defendant's car or otherwise. Surveillance camera in the area can also help. Immediately calling the police to the scene is critical. Taking pictures with dates appearing on the photos helps. Be consistent with your Witness Statement and testimony on court. Bring all the evidence you wish to rely on.
I've worked in parking enforcement, and unfortunately this is true. We get parking complaints all the time, people are parked too close and if we come out we give both vehicles a ticket because we can not prove who was there first.... You can always dispute your ticket. And if you have a video footage, there, you have it
It’s giving nutty vibes. You get into with someone In traffic and last that day or the next day the parked in front of you saying your car hit theirs is so ironic and strange.
I believe the plaintiff. She had her evidence and did the right thing to file for the damages, also she even apologized to the defendant weeks earlier from that incident. The defendants were lying and couldn’t even keep their story straight about when he went to work. That should’ve proved enough right there that they damaged the plaintiffs car, also because the defendant was so angry weeks earlier at the stop sign.
I just got done on another episode, talking about how people get really mad when you try to pass them. So here's a excellent example of that happening. Harvey asked about road rage, and a man admitted a car was trying to pass him and HR got very angry and wouldn't let him then slammed on his brakes on the guy. I'm 67 and I've seen this happen all my life.
1. The fact that the plaintiff contemplated suing because she thought it may seem “petty” and 2. the fact that the defendant admittedly referred to her out her name (which lets you know that she was still mad) and 3. The fact that the boyfriend went to talk to her on 2 occasions about their cars being involved in an incident (never going after her for hitting their car). Let’s me know that the defendant hit her car. I think that if judge would have asked them to elaborate on what was mentioned during that conversation, some of the truth would have come out. Because if I thought you hit my car and you tell me you don’t have time to speak, I would say “we don’t have to speak, just give me your insurance information”. 🤷🏽♀️
The defendant and that thick neck looks like the man to me🤷🤦 Edit: then she starts talking and I see those big hands/wrist and wide chest. Then the heavy brow bone. Blue shirt is 100% a born male
IMO when the defendant said “I don’t work on Saturday so I didn’t drive it that morning.” Then it changed to “he walks to work because it’s right around the corner.” As soon as they realized it was a Wednesday they gave away that they did it.
Judge didn't even think that the defendant planned all of this was even an option yet the plaintiff making it all up was an option 🤔 I think the defendant did do this on purpose
The female defendant shushed the male defendant which is VERY telling. It's a shame the judge didn't notice that but she was busy interrupting his statement.
Judge the plaintiff was scared to talk to this strange man on the street, she did not know his intentions, he could hit her and run. Judge she cannot admit this in court and show fear. The defendant was having fun with all this. It is a pity that the defendant was not offended in some way by the judge.
The only thing that isnt making sense to me is…if the defendant did hit the plaintiffs car on purpose, why leave the car parked there. Its like setting yourself up to get caught and have to pay for the damage..
On street parking , hitting a bumper (plate) is quite common, and it will happen to everyone and it is inevitable. Why do you think it’s called a “bumper”? And a backup camera is essential. Secondly, nobody sticks around if they bump into someone else’s car while parking. They will park somewhere else. Thirdly $1100 for a license plate frame? Somebody wants to make money. Bumps like that happen to everybody - they just leave it and move on.
The fishiest part was when he said "I don't work on Saturday so I wasn't driving that day", then when it came out that it was on a Wednesday his GF said that he walks to work. It doesn't prove anything about the collision, but it does show that they're liars.
The plaintiff actually did a good job explaining everything in an animated way.
So having to sue somebody in court is more convenient for you than being a grown adult and talking to him when he tried to let you know about the incident this woman is crazy delusional. She needs a mental help.
The way the Plaintiff mimicked the Defendant’s voice, then we finally hear the Defendant’s voice is actually deep like that 😂😂😂
Listen to 8:16 😂😂😂 when the crowd realized her voice was like tht lol
The way the plaintiff is explaining the incident is very entertaining😭
Good ol jersians lol
I thought she was going to win her case
I think 🤔 she was drunk or a drunken
She should go into standup comedy
Extremely … 😂 I have watched this about 4 times in total
Her imitating the lady voice and then hearing the actual voice made me laugh loud af
💀💀💀
😂😂😂🍌
Right I’m weak😂😂😂😂😂
The audience laughs too 😂
😂😂😂😂😂
The plaintiff is a nice lady regardless of her entertaining animated storytelling. She's pleasant and sweet.
When she said she was doing her laundry 🧺🧦👕& it wasn't a good time 💀JM must not know about public laundromats🙃
@@payableondeath9091 exactly lol and even though she was frustrated she took a breath and calmly explained her story
Yea, as long as you stay on her hood side.
I think it is more plausible that the plaintiff back up into the black car, and probably never even hit it,just wanted her previously damaged bumper fixed for free. Cause let's say it was the black car driving into the red,why would she leave it there ,instead of backing away. I think there both nice enough people,same with the boyfriend but the plaintiff should have had to pay the defendant harrassment counter sue.
You must be being sarcastic,
Also, the plaintiff should be a lawyer … she was definitely on top of her stuff and had her facts together…
oh yeah she's lawyer material,
She’s a nut ball. She follows somebody who flipped her off and demanded an apology.
It strikes me odd that the defendant's boyfriend approached the plaintiff and said "our cars got into a situation" before she was able to id who owned the car. They definately "hit" her car on purpose.
Yes, and I was upset that JM did not circle back to that to see if he would admit that he approached her because that was the proof right there if he admitted it.
Right! OMG the judge missed that! I'm surprised!!!
Judge when you live in an apartment and a washer is available you gotta move quickly lol
Yes she has lived in an apartment, before she got married. You just missed the memo. LMAO!
LMAOOOO FACTS
@@trekgirl65 right! So she knows you gotta get to the washer asap lol
For the plaintiff to be crying and say I need an apology and the defendant give it I believe the plaintiff for other reasons too
She looks like she don’t mess with nobody and please don’t nobody mess wit her
I got the opposite vibe lol
I feel like she's wishing someone would 😆
I'd never follow someone for flipping me off!! Then scream and cry till they apologize....nope lol
@@mandylynnhoff because you’re a judgmental pos
@@mandylynnhoff lol 😂
@@mandylynnhoffright. Lady is crazy asf
God bless the plaintiff & her lil daughter
The plaintiff is a good example of never judge a book by its cover.
This case was hilarious! Both the plaintiff and defendant are completely crazy and the guy Harvey interviewed was high as a kite!
So right he was Riding High or LOWWWW LOL
LMFAOOO
High for sure!!
But the plaintiff looks crazier.
High as a mf kite
“What were you doing, curing cancer!!” 😂😂😂😂
The defendant is lying through her teeth.... On the morning of the incident why didn't she come to the door then? If someone comes to my door accusing me of hitting them I'd sure as heck wanna see who it is.......she never came out.... How'd the judge miss that part???
The plaintiff had me ROLLING. I believe her tho
She deserved to win she's telling the truth defendant did it on purpose and still smiling
The defendants were clearly guilty
Wait first dude said it was on a Saturday, he doesn’t work on saturdays therefore he wasn’t driving the car. Then they get busted on the day & all of a sudden “he walks to work” someeethinggs fishy lol
Right!!!
I just knew based off that she would at least give her something. I guess I was wrong
@@latricebrown7942 right. The way she was smiling the whole time, especially during the “after the verdict” you can tell she’s happy she got away with it.
Add to that, he was the one that first talked to the plaintiff about the cats and suggested going through insurance.
Again JM was wrong. The plaintiff proved her case by a preponderance of the evidence. The defendants tried to lie about the day of the week.
JM is biased.
Plaintiff should be on stage at a comedy club, she is very entertaining!
The plaintiff seems sweet regardless of how animated she is lol
Yup
No way, she is a complete wackadoodledoo
I love the plantiff she reminds me of me auntie just a good kind hearted soul
I hate it’s canceled. Somebody tell judge Milian to just start a RUclips court show. Everybody else is doing it 😭
Right and she should
I am not aware of anyone doing it. Please name some of these people.
Who else is?
JM got💰👜 she wants the🛥life
@@amgooder This did not last long.
Plaintiff story of events is certainly plausible she just had a hard time articulating her story and the way defendants were smirking makes me believe the plaintiff even more. She had pictures and even made a police report defendants didn’t have much of a counter story, I think judge was too involved with incident prior to what the case was really about, the damage to plaintiffs car.
The defendant will get what's coming to them.
Thank you for posting so often, I love people's court
Of course they are from Jersey 😂 We different 😂
The defendant , young , rude brat again. So many of them. Roadrage. Crazy entitled folks. Dangerous folks
I’m 2 drinks in and mannnn this was entertaining!! I’m gonna miss this show 😂😢😢
😂😂😂😂
Cheers, LG. 🤣🥃🥃😂
What are you drinking?
I was drinking too cape cod
Drinking red wine in London, cheers guys🍷🍷
This is funny! The plaintiff is very entertaining!
The couple looks mismatched
Very....I will keep my opinion to myself...Poverty
@@ABi-xu5zqyeah your opinion wasn’t very smart
No I don't, not really... I had an opinion but it wasn't that.
The plaintiff should be a comedian! She's hilarious and should win!
Soooo, I wanna be friends with this plaintiff! She is intelligent, well spoken, funny as all hell & best of all does NOT lay down and take lies, deceit nor shenanigans! She is entertaining without even trying 😅🤣😂
BEST CASE EVER 😂😂😂😂😂
She was silly 😂😂
Just by the defendant saying he walks to work after he tried to say he don’t work on saturdays tells they did it bc he was saying that clearly bc he drives the car
Dang I feel bad for the plaintiff. But at least she knows she did all she could.
I love the plaintiff’s energy
She seems sweet
Defendant looked all quiet and demure until she opened her mouth ! 😂😮
Right 😂🤣 I was confused at first why the plaintiff was using that deep voice for her… but then it made sense
I was like she definitely said that
Plaintiff is giving Eddie Griffin looks. Body language, and style lol
👍🏿👍🏿
Plaintiff should be a model she has 100% Beautiful clear dark skin and those cheek bones to die for - You go girl ❤❤😅 oh an I think the defendant did damage her car. No one parks that close an don’t get out and look.
Your absolutely right
Hmmmmm I think the defendant parked like that on purpose. Ain’t no coincidence. The plaintiff is definitely out there & animated but I don’t think she’s the kinda crazy to do something like that. I mean even the defendant said during the stop sign incident the plaintiff was crying for an apology, not cussing her out lol
I'm going to miss this show. 😢
Me too
Me three.
Same I guess we gotta keep re-watching episodes 😩
What do u mean? Is the show cancelled?
@@cookiekirkland8689 I'm wondering the same thing
I swear, following behind someone is always a bad idea. Because you really don't know if they have a weapon or anything...From a gun to a black belt in karate, anything could be used to kick your butt if you got too close or tried to otherwise hurt them.
And heck, even just a loud honk or flipping the bird while passing could initiate road rage. If someone's about to pull in front and they don't see you, of COURSE, you'd want to let them know by honking. But flipping the bird or something just isn't a good idea.
Exactly! There are some real wackadoodles in this world. Road rage could end in disaster.
This entire case was comedy 😂🤣
Judge was wrong on this one‼️
She's been getting it writing a lot lately!! Ok, why didn't the defending file a claim
Ima miss this show been around since I was born
Wth is this plaintiff on? “Not a good time for me”
The defendant needs to learn some respect !Love the Judge!
The plaintiff telling the story is priceless
Judge Judy would have ruled for the plaintiff
Loved the Plaintiff!
Ms piggy jus can't stop laughing
Road rage audience member talking to Harvey looks like he smokes a lot of weed.
“I’m still a good person and love everybody.”
🤔 Most good people don’t need to say that.
That's absolutely RIDICULOUS! She has a picture of the cars touching - if this happens to anyone, what are we supposed to do to prove it?? I must disagree with Judge Milian on this one
Get witnesses regarding who parked there first. Or what time they saw one or both cars coming to park. Whether the Plaintiff drove in the Defendant's car or otherwise.
Surveillance camera in the area can also help. Immediately calling the police to the scene is critical.
Taking pictures with dates appearing on the photos helps.
Be consistent with your Witness Statement and testimony on court. Bring all the evidence you wish to rely on.
Exactly! I don't understand what other proof she needed! She took photos and made a police report! JM got this one all the way wrong.
I've worked in parking enforcement, and unfortunately this is true. We get parking complaints all the time, people are parked too close and if we come out we give both vehicles a ticket because we can not prove who was there first.... You can always dispute your ticket. And if you have a video footage, there, you have it
The guys says lets talk about your car…. I don’t have time I’ll doing my laundry 😮.
The plaintiff acts a little gangsta! Lol
this is INSANE 😂😂😂 i’m hollering
She’s so happy to come to court did the judge give you bad news😂😂😂😂😂. This lady has too many excuses the judge does not want to hear you
Having car insurance will definitely save you a trip to the court room 🤣
Um no because you still have a deductible to pay…people sue for their deductible
The way they are looking at the plaintiff in the background when she first walks in is so wrong
It’s giving nutty vibes. You get into with someone In traffic and last that day or the next day the parked in front of you saying your car hit theirs is so ironic and strange.
I'm sorry but I thought this was 3 young men 🤣
Was not expecting that deep “hey everyone…” 😂😂
Some of what the plaintiff was saying really didnt make sense but the defendant was smirking at the end like she got away with it.
True
people's court is cancelled but I hope another network picks up this show. It's great!
There will no other network picking this up, this is the last season and no more from the production company, Budget cuts. LMAO!
It would be nice if the show continues
@@jeanettecox3911 Hopefully another network picks it up
“B YOU NEED TO LEARN HOW TO DRIVE XY&Z!!” Lmaoooo I needed this entertainment! I’m mad because I know that’s how I sound telling stories! 😂
Looking at the comments everyone loved the plaintiff lol.
If the plaintiff drove into the Defendant's car, someone would have seen it and Defendants would have counterclaimed for something 🤔
Exactly
Ding ding ding!! Exactly!
Agree
She should’ve asked her neighbors if they had any ring camera footage
This judge sometimes urks me I wish she just dismissed it instead of ruling because now who suppose to fix the car now
Lmao Omg... And the Oscar 🏆 winner is... 😂😂🤣
I believe the plaintiff. She had her evidence and did the right thing to file for the damages, also she even apologized to the defendant weeks earlier from that incident. The defendants were lying and couldn’t even keep their story straight about when he went to work. That should’ve proved enough right there that they damaged the plaintiffs car, also because the defendant was so angry weeks earlier at the stop sign.
The name of the 'game' is EVIDENCE. You need that to prove your case on the preponderance of probabilities in a civil case. Once you fail that😢
This was fun to watch!
Imma miss you Judge Milian and your staff at People's Court.
Warm hugs from katrinka in the San Francisco Bay Area ❤️🌴
I just got done on another episode, talking about how people get really mad when you try to pass them. So here's a excellent example of that happening. Harvey asked about road rage, and a man admitted a car was trying to pass him and HR got very angry and wouldn't let him then slammed on his brakes on the guy. I'm 67 and I've seen this happen all my life.
Also, the defendant didn't deny that she pulled up afterwards.
1. The fact that the plaintiff contemplated suing because she thought it may seem “petty” and 2. the fact that the defendant admittedly referred to her out her name (which lets you know that she was still mad) and 3. The fact that the boyfriend went to talk to her on 2 occasions about their cars being involved in an incident (never going after her for hitting their car). Let’s me know that the defendant hit her car. I think that if judge would have asked them to elaborate on what was mentioned during that conversation, some of the truth would have come out. Because if I thought you hit my car and you tell me you don’t have time to speak, I would say “we don’t have to speak, just give me your insurance information”. 🤷🏽♀️
Lesbian ex lovers
Spot on
Plaintiff is nuts.
I think so too.
Something is tellin me that the plaintiff is telling the truth.....
I thought it was a MAN entering the courtroom...😒 AND. I wasnt ready for the defendants voice either... 🤣 just messy
I thought so too
😂
I knew it was a woman 😂😂
The defendant and that thick neck looks like the man to me🤷🤦
Edit: then she starts talking and I see those big hands/wrist and wide chest. Then the heavy brow bone. Blue shirt is 100% a born male
It is a man ain’t it
IMO when the defendant said “I don’t work on Saturday so I didn’t drive it that morning.” Then it changed to “he walks to work because it’s right around the corner.” As soon as they realized it was a Wednesday they gave away that they did it.
Yea they lying
Lmao she got the audience AND me cracking upppp ! 😭😂😂
Judge didn't even think that the defendant planned all of this was even an option yet the plaintiff making it all up was an option 🤔 I think the defendant did do this on purpose
The defendant saw her car and was still upset about the stop sign so she decided shed be a close parker.
Marilyn what the hell, what more evidence did you want? She provided everything short of a signed confession
That's exactly what I'm saying! Very disappointed in her ruling.
0:54!!! Miss mamas in the back was already angry!!!
I love the plaintiff!! 😂❤
She was funny 😂😂😂
The plaintiff is seriously giving off Charlie Murphy energy! 😂
The female defendant shushed the male defendant which is VERY telling. It's a shame the judge didn't notice that but she was busy interrupting his statement.
Funny that she had to compliment the crazy lady at the end. I think she was worried she'd go and try to kill them in their sleep :D
The defendant came in on some goofy shit laughing
Judge the plaintiff was scared to talk to this strange man on the street, she did not know his intentions, he could hit her and run. Judge she cannot admit this in court and show fear. The defendant was having fun with all this. It is a pity that the defendant was not offended in some way by the judge.
Alright. I didn't know that she was scared.
@@NellieKAdaba it is logical, every woman would be scared.
Plaintiff looks like Charlie Murphy lol
Ikr lol
I only had to watch a few seconds of testimony to detect probable dishonesty. "I kindly knocked on the door." Uh huh.
I believe the plaintiff
There’s people who will literally pull a gun on you for flipping them off, or other road rage.
She tried
I think the Plaintiff should have got something as her car was definitely damaged.
The plaintiff seems like a person who tells the truth to a fault.
The only thing that isnt making sense to me is…if the defendant did hit the plaintiffs car on purpose, why leave the car parked there. Its like setting yourself up to get caught and have to pay for the damage..
On street parking , hitting a bumper (plate) is quite common, and it will happen to everyone and it is inevitable. Why do you think it’s called a “bumper”? And a backup camera is essential.
Secondly, nobody sticks around if they bump into someone else’s car while parking. They will park somewhere else.
Thirdly $1100 for a license plate frame? Somebody wants to make money.
Bumps like that happen to everybody - they just leave it and move on.
Soo,The Landlady didn't have time to do any Refreshing, since as one tenant moves OUT, NEW tenant moves IN..🤯🤯🤯