@seek mogol so is the trinity stolen from Hinduism ? (Father son spirits) (Shiva Braman Vishnu) Christianity concept of blood sacrifice stolen from Roman paganism
@@blinddriver400 oh so you are late for vedas so only that hindu men is revealing all the truth of vedas so only he accepted what ever he told. you are really blind driver
@@shifataj3479 ur entire religion copied some aspects of all religions No original basis Except for terrorism everything else is copied from other religions
Mh armaan sheikh do you want every person in world to be Muslim? If so every one follows Islam and there is no other religioun left in world ,do you think world will be better?
@@fact_believer4787 arrey bhai its not about muslims hindus etc this is about the right path just read the holy vedas the holy quran and the holy bible they all imphasise only on one god even lord shiva and krisha worshiped lord vishinu which means they also belived in one god and i don't know why people started wirshipping lord shiva and lord krishna according to me they both are prophets
@@lighttheoryllc4337 correct the references maybe, but he misinterprets them and presents the wrong information, i've seen too many people debunk what he has to say on Hinduism. And he's quite manipulative from a non muslim POV from the misinformation he presents.
in india this is the problem among hindus, too much cast system , upper cast lower cast. that is why there are conflicts among hindus regarding their scriptures and beliefs
Muhammad is not mentions in any holy book.. he only mention in zakir naik's speech.. if you want to follow Kalki avtar of almighty you all should worship lord Vishnu.. You all should worship lord Rama.. You all should worship lord Krisna..
@おじゃる丸 lol Quran is a cult which say cut the head of gays !! Bro if you are hindu india have thousands of better book to read which is thousand time better than Quran,!!
@おじゃる丸 yea I have respect But Supreme Court also ban books which are not good !! And if we consider Quran as normal book then it will be the first book to get ban 🤣
I'll tell you the answer folks. In the vedas there's no mention of Mohammad. It was the bhavishya purana where something similar is mentioned. It is said "an illiterate mleccha(foreigner) teacher will appear, Mahamada(very egoistic one) is his name, he'll give religion to his 5th class companions". So this maybe a reference to Mohammad but not surely. So stop saying our sanatan dharma is Islam. Follow your religion quietly and let the others follow their religion. Peace.
I really would like to see Dr Zakit Naik debate with Ravi Zacarias on any religious matters e.g. Oneness of God, Trinity, True religion...etc Hope this will happen.
The Jews answered Him (Jesus), 'For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; and because You, being a man, make yourself out to be God.' ”(John 10:33) Jesus had obviously claimed to be God. So just what had He said to upset His Jewish audience so much? “I and the Father are one.” (John 10:30)
The messiah, never claimed to be All mighty God. You clealry do not know, that what you are quoting is not literal, it is POETRY. I and my Creator are 1, is a poetic statement. Meaning, our message is 1. If, the messiah, wanted to be literal context, he would have just came out and said it... Look I am God, worship me or die. But ALLAH speaks in poetry, and it is forbidden to change the message. So the messiah, above all messengers, would not change, rhe message being revealed to him by ALLAH.
It is overconfidence brother. Tell me how can Vishnu we worship as God be Mohammed Paigambar? How can Shri Krishna who has told to worship Him alone to reach a eternal spiritual world like vaikunta in bhagavad gita be a prophet? Zakir Naik is such a fake scholar He does not have intellect to read the book fully. He reads few lines of the scriptures, byhearts it and then tells you people.
@@musab2023 i have a question which you can forward to zakir naik if you do not know the answer in case. As per Islam this human life is a test to enter into jannath. When God conducts a final test like this, it should be fair. The first reason is there is only one chance as per Islam. Second the life span of each person varies. A fair test is when you keep all the conditions constant. But the conditions of humans who are born on this earth are not same: some are mentally retarted, some deaf (cannot listen to Quran), some dumb (cannot do prayers) and some even born in a tribal forest and no connection with even Muslims to allow them to convert atleast. Why is this partially by God?
@@dhananjayajayaram2485 why should I forward to him? If you want to know the answer ask him directly, and I am least bothered about other religions people , whether they accept Islam or reject it's their choice and I am not zakir Naik to answer anyone.
Please mara aik masla hall Kar dain main nay zoher parni thi par tenshan main magir samj ky start Kar li likn namez main yad Aya main to zoher parni thi phir zoher 4 rkt par ky sajda sahu Kar Diya kya sahe Kiya hugi namez
Bahasa Inggeris adalah bahasa yg mesti untuk di belajar. Maka belajar lah. Muslim yg baik akan menolong muslim yg lain utk memahami tetapi yg lebih baik dr itu ialah bila muslim itu berusaha sendiri utk belajar. Sampai bila kamu mahu meminta minta pertolongan alih bahasa sedangkan ilmu itu luas dr pelbagai bahasa, maka belajar lah kuasai bahasa asing. Adakah kamu berfikir bila Imam Mahdi datang, dia akan mencari ribuan penterjermah utk mengalih bahasa arab pd pengikut akhir zaman?? Apakah kamu masih mahu meminta minta seperti sekarang?
NO ARAB HAS ANY SUPERIORITY OVER AN NON ARAB NEITHER AN NON ARAB HAS ANY SUPERIORITY OVER AN ARAB , NOR ANY BLACK MAN HAS ANY SUPERIORITY OVER AN WHITE MAN NEITHER AN WHITE MAN HAS ANY SUPERIORITY OVER AN BLACK MAN - PROPHET MUHAMMAD ( PBUH)
Why Hindus are not commenting on religious topics like this one??? Is Dr Zakir doing something wrong by exposing the truth from their own scriptures ??? Please wake up n face the truth n save yourself from going to hell !!!
muslims wake up..zakir naik is possessed by saintan ....mohammada mentioned in hindu scriptures is not a real good prophet..read it her www.stephen-knapp.com/mohammed_is_he_really_predicted_in_bhavishya_purana.htm
how stupid can you guys be. just read those lines those books from a real authentic source written by real authetic authors how hard is it to find those texts in internet ? without checking any book without knowing anything regarding those central messages of book you are just commenting.
hinduismfaq.wordpress.com I have collective in this website the reply to the so called controversial questions of Zakir Naik from traditional scholars who have discpilinic succession starting Veda Vyasa who compiled Veda Vyasa. Zakir Naik did not referred translation of Vedas from scholars who have traditional lineage.
The Vedic quotes mentioned within this video does not mention Peophet Muhammad (PBUH) but, again, praises demigods. Words that translates to Muhammad doesn't mean it is talking about Muhammad. Regarding the Caste system, every castes can get education about the Vedic teachings. Vidura was a Shudra and yet he still got Vedic teachings and later on became greater than a brahmana. The caste system worked well back in the olden days. However our scriptures says to abolish the caste system in the age of Kali, our age, coz our scriptures knew the unjust things that would happen if it was kept within society still.
What about Kalki Avatar? Zakir said Muhammed is Kalki Avatar!” “I don’t know if he said so. If yes, I do not understand how Muslims could tolerate Zakir Naik for insulting their Prophet and Quran. Kalki is born with four hands! Did Muhammad have four hands? He is born in a village by name Sambhala (somewhere in Nepal or India) and not in the Middle East. Shambala is accessible only to accomplished yogis and Siddha purushas. His parents will be Brahmins (=Sattvik Vegetarians) of names Vishnuyasha (means God’s glory) and Sumati (means the pious and pure thinking one). Kalki married to the daughter of the King of Simhala Desam (Sri Lanka), Padmawati. Muhammad had 11 wives, but none in the name of Padmawati. Kalki worshipped Shiva to get a Sword. Did Muhammad do like that?” (Incidentally, Kalki is a Tamil word. The Sanskrit name for Kalki is Ghadgi = sword-bearer)
@Mansor Kadir it may be may not be I have never seen you also never seen the God as well, how you people believe that God has no hands , we believe God has multiple hands😊
@Mansor Kadir God has four hands means, he can incarnate in to any form. As per our scriptures he has his presence in every atom of this world. In the mathematics infinity symbol is there , that doesn't mean that is value of infinity but it resembles infinity, in the same manner idols resembles god , but not only idol itself is god.
Kalki is planned such a way, Dharma will change yuga to yuga .. in kaliyuga dharmam only 1 base out of 4. In kaliyuga there is some nonsense fellows who will insult other religion to lead the world.. that's dharmam and peace is vanishes in the world is out of control .. so to bring the Dharma back. Kalki avathar.
This famous quotation is used by the great scholar Zakir Naik to try to prove that Hindus themselves do not know their own religion and scriptures. Shukla Yajur Veda (32.3): न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति यस्य नाम महद्यशः । हिरण्यगर्भ इ्त्येष मा मा हिंसीदित्येषा यस्मान्न जात इत्येषः ॥ na tasya pratimA asti yasya nAma mahadyashah | ‘hiraNyagarbha’ ityeSha ‘mA mA himsId’ityeShA yasmAnna jAta ityeShah || “There is no comparison of him, whose name is Great Glory. As seen in the hymns starting with ‘hiraNyagarbha’, ‘mA mA himsId’, ‘yasmAnna jAta’.” All the traditional commentaries (Zakir Naik did not read commentories of vedas written by acharyas who came from traditional lineage instead used unauthentic commentory ) are unambiguous and unanimous that the word “pratimA” is “pratimAnam” which means “comparison” and not image or idol as zakir naik says. Uvvata’s commentary says: “न तस्य पुरुषस्य प्रतिमा प्रतिमानभूतं किञ्चिद्विद्यते” - “na tasya puruShasya pratimA pratimAnabhUtam kincid vidyate” - The word “pratimA” is explained as “pratimAnabhUtam” i.e. “comparative”. Mahidhara’s commentary says: “तस्य पुरुषस्य प्रतिमा प्रतिमानमुपमानं किञ्चिद्वस्तु नास्ति” - “tasya puruShasya pratimA pratimAnam upamAnam kincid vastu nAsti” - The word “pratimA” is explained as “pratimAnam” and “upamAnam”, which both undoubtedly mean “comparison” or “measuring up”. The ignorance of people who use this mantra for devious deceitful purposes (just for conversion without reading the full book on vedas) is as incomparable as the Great Glorious Hiranyagarbha. So here is one more shloka, which might give some points to ponder that God has spiritual form: Īśo 15 हिरण्मयेन पात्रेण सत्यस्यापिहितं मुखम्। तत्त्वं पूषन्नपावृणु सत्यधर्माय दृष्टये॥१५॥ hiraṇmayena pātreṇa satyasyāpihitaṁ mukham tat tvaṁ pūṣann apāvṛṇu satya-dharmāya dṛṣṭaye O my Lord, sustainer of all that lives, Your real face is covered by Your dazzling effulgence. Kindly remove that covering and exhibit Yourself to Your pure devotee. ¶ more info prabhupada.io/books/iso/15 Īśo 5 तदेजति तन्नैजति तद्दूरे तद्वन्तिके। तदन्तरस्य सर्वस्य तदु सर्वस्यास्य बाह्यतः॥५॥ tad ejati tan naijati tad dūre tad v antike tad antar asya sarvasya tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ The Supreme Lord walks and does not walk. He is far away, but He is very near as well. He is within everything, and yet He is outside of everything. ¶ more info prabhupada.io/books/iso/5 The divine form, pastime, and incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu have been described in Yajur-veda-saṁ hītā 5.15 - “idaṁ viṣṇur vicakrame tredhā nidadhe padaṁ ! samūḍhamasya pā gvaṁ sure….” "The manifested worlds were walked on by i.e. measured by Viṣṇu during the placement of his triple feet!...”. This description denotes the Trivikrama form displayed during the Vāmana-līlā depicted in the 8th Canto of SB and in other purāṇas as well. Thus, the concept of incarnation of the Lord also founds substantiation in Vedas. Rig Veda, 1:22:20 - oṃ tad viṣṇoḥ paramam padam sadā paśyanti sūrayaḥ "All the suras (i.e. the devas or angels like indra, agni, varuna, yama, etc) look always toward the feet of Lord Vishnu." Bhagavad gita 7.23 - Men of small intelligence worship the demigods, and their fruits are limited and temporary. Those who worship the demigods go to the planets of the demigods, but My devotees (Lord Krishna or Vishnu) ultimately reach My supreme planet. When Vedas tell that God is body less it means God do not have material or physical body. But God has spiritual form is mentioned in Puranas and that form has no suffering or decay. So Puranas gives additional information to Vedas and not contradict. People will reject Puranas thinking that it contradicts Vedas ..Even Arya Samaj founder did not consider it seriously but Madhwacharya has considered Puranas seriously and proved that it gives additional information which Vedas do not give it explicitly. That is why Lord Vishnu as Vamana covered the whole universe with just 3 steps (that means God can take a gigantic form as whole universe) and Lord Krishna showed His Vishwa Roopa (universal form where creation is visually seen to be part of God) to Arjuna when bhagavad Gita was presented and even whole universe in His mouth as a child to Yashoda. This is not possible with a material body. Another astonishing truth revealed by Madhwacharya is that some stories of Purana where God is shown in low light is also Leela or divine play .For eg Lord Krishna ends his divine play on earth when a hunter hits the leg of Lord Krishna mistaking it as some bird. In Mahabharatha it is already shown how Lord Krishna protects Arjuna inspite of so many divine astras (weapons) that hit the chariot. After Arjuna got down from chariot, Krishna then got down and then chariot which was hit badly bursted. Now when Lord Krishna has power to stop the divine weapons of demigods like Agni asras from damaging chariot how can a ordinary arrow kill Krishna ? This is done purposely by Krishna to delude the less intelligent people. It is called Asura mohana. We cannot understand the plan of God in our own life then how can we know the plan in His leela (divine play)? There are many such confusing episodes. For example Lord Krishna taking birth from Yashoda when He does not birth. acting as child but mature enough to have divine play with his devotees, etc.
He says according to vedas brhamin come from his head kashtriya from chest vaishya from thighs and sudra from feet but i want to tell you does this verse says bhramin are greater from sudra or sudra are lower then brahim or is this refrence says sudra can not become brhamin he is talking about prush sukt...in pursh sukt actually it's making a whole society ...no one can do nothing without head no one can walk without feet no one can walk without and same about kashtriya...all human beings are equal and i want to tell all my hindus friends that don't watch him he is completely lies he give reference of vedas if you actually go to that verse then you will find another meaning he says about mohmmad in vedas 🤦...and people believe him don't know from where he bought these fake vedas ....he doesn't read authentic vedas why would he he just want to show islam is higher than hinduism..
Hindus get embarrassed about the caste system in the west but when they are together they think it's so great. Quit with the double talk AND double standards. In your heart you know it's wrong.
caste system is no evil. if there was discrimination based on differences it was bad. every society has been having differences. for me caste is good but not discrimination.
@@NewLife-jw9to what you say is true. no castes explained in dharma. caste is just a convenience. people in other countries have last names. which they inherit by birth. why should an indian not inherit something from their parents? naik in his name is something similar which he would pass on to his children if he has them. would you call the children something else other than 'naik family'? wouldnt naik become his 'caste'?
@shafeen taj lies dont last long When u know how much he changes hindu scripture as his wish u will know. He even has changed quran , its not big deal to manipulate hindu scriptures
@shafeen taj english nahi aaya tho hindi me type karo na Mushkil ho raha hai padne k liye Arab me khuran , urdu me tere chacha zakir apne version de raha hai. God is one i believe , and precisely u r talking what i want u to know. One god concept is more than 5 thousand years old, khuran didn't tell u anything new
@@blinddriver400 hahaha so you are speaking in hindi because you don't know English she wrote in short form but u can't able to understand and claims all you know hahaha it is showing that who is uneducated here it is not Than you have to write Then .and that link it is clear about social scholar he is telling wrong about islam and telling about jihadis which means struggle. a struggler went to stop modern education which is not there in history at all hahaha such blind you are i think he only went, he didn't read Quran at all in his life i think so .not the numbers in Quran says about a good Muslim but a entire book tells a muslim to be a good person and main thing one muslim can't say vande mataram which means vandene of mother land, so first of all we respect our mother and allah gave paradise under his feet and her legs are standing upon a land so we didn't say at all and also we only pray to god not to a land which ever created by the god it self .so the only god is the one who deserves to pray not a land .if we die ,we all go towards god it self who have created us. a land only created by god it self, not a land created to god. okay I hope you understand why we won't say vande mataram .
Tere maaa ki choot randi k bachay,tumhara bap fake ha jakar DNA kra.2.5 billions followers within 1400 years aur yahan hindu ka lora ram 5 hazar sal sa 1billion follower ni paida kr skha.whole hinduism is fake
@Hari Om bro go and debate him ok ap jese bht dekhy jo sirf cmnt tk hi bt kr skty na hmari ap say larai h na apki hmsy bt h schai ki ja k debate kro ap pta lg jarle ga sach ap dekhna ni chahty bs
@Hari Om dkho bhai apka ka b mksad h sach dhundna hmara b na apki koi larai h hm sy na hmari ap say wo jahil log hoty jo lrty m yhi bol raha k agr apko lgta h ap thk ap zakir naik ko aproach kro r debate kro unki shrt h debate k lie k ap phly kam az kam 20 hazar ka crowd ikhta kr k apni bt sch sabit kren un m phr m ready hu
Where is MOHAMMED name mentioned in RIG VEDA ??? Rig Veda 1:13:3 = Dear Narāśaṁsa, sweet of tongue, the giver of oblations, I Invoke to this our sacrifice. नराशंसमिह प्रियमस्मिन्यज्ञ उपह्वये। मधुजिह्वं हविष्कृतम्॥ मैं (अस्मिन्) इस (यज्ञे) अनुष्ठान करने योग्य यज्ञ तथा (इह) संसार में (हविष्कृतम्) जो कि होम करने योग्य पदार्थों से प्रदीप्त किया जाता है और (मधुजिह्वम्) जिसकी काली, कराली, मनोजवा, सुलोहिता, सुधूम्रवर्णा, स्फुलिङ्गिनी और विश्वरूपी ये अति प्रकाशमान चपल ज्वालारूपी जीभें हैं (प्रियम्) जो सब जीवों को प्रीति देने और (नराशंसम्) जिस सुख की मनुष्य प्रशंसा करते हैं, उसके प्रकाश करनेवाले अग्नि को (उपह्वये) समीप प्रज्वलित करता हूँ॥३॥ Connotation: - जो भौतिक अग्नि इस संसार में होम के निमित्त युक्ति से ग्रहण किया हुआ प्राणियों की प्रसन्नता करानेवाला है, उस अग्नि की सात जीभें हैं अर्थात् काली जो कि सुपेद आदि रङ्ग का प्रकाश करनेवाली, कराली-सहने में कठिन, मनोजवा-मन के समान वेगवाली, सुलोहिता-जिसका उत्तम रक्तवर्ण है, सुधूम्रवर्णा-जिसका सुन्दर धुमलासा वर्ण है, स्फुलिङ्गिनी-जिससे बहुत से चिनगे उठतें हों तथा विश्वरूपी-जिसका सब रूप हैं। ये देवी अर्थात् अतिशय करके प्रकाशमान और लेलायमाना-प्रकाश से सब जगह जानेवाली सात प्रकार की जिह्वा हैं अर्थात् सब पदार्थों को ग्रहण करनेवाली होती हैं। इस उक्त सात प्रकार की अग्नि की जीभों से सब पदार्थों में उपकार लेना मनुष्यों को चाहिये॥३॥ Rig Veda 1:18:9= I have seen Narāśaṁsa, him most resolute, most widely famed, As ’twere the Household Priest of heaven. नराशंसं सुधृष्टममपश्यं सप्रथस्तमम्। दिवो न सद्ममखसम्॥ मैं (न) जैसे आकाशमय सूर्य्यादिकों के प्रकाश से (सद्ममखसम्) जिसमें प्राणी स्थिर होते और जिसमें जगत् प्राप्त होता है, (सप्रथस्तमम्) जो बड़े-बड़े आकाश आदि पदार्थों के साथ अच्छी प्रकार व्याप्त (सुधृष्टमम्) उत्तमता से सब संसार को धारण करने (नराशंसम्) सब मनुष्यों को अवश्य स्तुति करने योग्य पूर्वोक्त (सदसस्पतिम्) सभापति परमेश्वर को (अपश्यम्) ज्ञानदृष्टि से देखता हूँ, वैसे तुम भी सभाओं के पति को प्राप्त होके न्याय से सब प्रजा का पालन करके नित्य दर्शन करो॥९॥ Connotation: - इस मन्त्र में उपमालङ्कार है। इस मन्त्र में सातवें मन्त्र से ‘सदसस्पतिम्’ इस पद की अनुवृत्ति जाननी चाहिये। जैसे मनुष्य सब जगह विस्तृत हुए सूर्य्यादि के प्रकाश को देखता है, वैसे ही सब जगह व्याप्त ज्ञान प्रकाशरूप परमेश्वर को जानकर सुख के विस्तार को प्राप्त होता है॥९॥पूर्व सत्रहवें सूक्त के अर्थ के साथ मित्र और वरुण के साथ अनुयोगी बृहस्पति आदि अर्थों के प्रतिपादन से इस अठारहवें सूक्त के अर्थ की सङ्गति जाननी चाहिये। यह भी सूक्त सायणाचार्य्य आदि और यूरोपदेशवासी विलसन आदि ने कुछ का कुछ ही वर्णन किया है॥ Rig Veda 1:142:3= He wondrous, sanctifying, bright, sprinkles the sacrifice with mead, Thrice, Narāśaṁsa from the heavens, a God mid Gods adorable. शुचि: पावको अद्भुतो मध्वा यज्ञं मिमिक्षति। नराशंसस्त्रिरा दिवो देवो देवेषु यज्ञिय: ॥ - जो (पावकः) पवित्र करनेवाले अग्नि के समान (अद्भुतः) आश्चर्य गुण, कर्म, स्वभाववाला (शुचिः) पवित्र (यज्ञियः) यज्ञ करने योग्य (नराशंस) नरों से प्रशंसा को प्राप्त और (देवः) कामना करता हुआ जन (देवेषु) विद्वानों में (दिवः) कामना से (मध्वा) मधुर शर्करा वा सहत से (यज्ञम्) यज्ञ को (त्रिः) तीन बार (आ, मिमिक्षति) अच्छे प्रकार सींचने वा पूरे करने की इच्छा करता है, वह सुख पाता है ॥ ३ ॥ Connotation: - जो मनुष्य बालकाई, ज्वानी और बुढ़ापे में विद्याप्रचाररूपी व्यवहार को करें, वे कायिक, वाचिक और मानसिक सुखों को प्राप्त होवें ॥ ३ ॥ Rig Veda 7:2:2= With sacrifice to these we men will honour the majesty of holy Narāśaṁsa- To these the pure, most wise, the thought. inspirers, Gods who enjoy both sorts of our oblations. हे मनुष्यो ! (ये) जो (सुक्रतवः) उत्तम प्रज्ञावाले (शुचयः) पवित्र (धियन्धाः) उत्तम कर्मों के धारण करनेवाले (देवाः) विद्वान् लोग (उभयानि) शरीर और आत्मा के पुष्टिकारक (हव्या) भोजन के योग्य पदार्थों को (स्वदन्ति) अच्छे स्वादपूर्वक खाते और (यज्ञैः) सङ्गति के योग्य साधनों से (यजतस्य) सङ्ग करने योग्य (नराशंसस्य) मनुष्यों से प्रशंसा किये हुए तथा अन्न का भोग करनेवाले के (एषाम्) इनकी (महिमानम्) महिमा की हम लोग (उप, स्तोषाम) समीप प्रशंसा करें ॥२॥ Connotation: - हे मनुष्यो ! तुम को चाहिये कि सदैव विद्वानों के अनुकरण से शरीर और आत्मा के बल को बढ़ानेवाले खानपानों का सेवन किया करो, जिससे तुम्हारी महिमा बढ़े ॥
@dhananjaya Jayaram Do you not see that Brahman has given us the same religion throughout time and history to different people everytime the original was corrupted and lost just like yours? Hinduism used to be Islam. Not the arab Islam, but simply The Truth. You made the divine names of Brahman into seperate gods. The "gods" names are just attributes of The One God, Brahman, Allah ﷻ. A spiritual reformer will come from a foreign land (outside Bharat) with his disciples (companions). His name will be Mahamad (Muhammad). He will dwell in a desert. (Bhavisyath Purana 3:5-8)
@@dhananjayajayaram2485 Lmao if you can't see that that's not Muhammad ﷺ, you're rejecting the truth while it's staring you in the face and you're taking any opinion on the verse that fits your world view. A scripture from more than 7000 years ago, before the Torah mentions a man, literally by name, to come later. It doesn't get any miraculous than that. Wake up sister.
@@dhananjayajayaram2485 The author even agrees that it's a man named Muhammad who's unlettered. Then he says it's not if you read the surrounding texts. Lol, why would it be so accurate about our Prophet and then talk about something completely different to make it look like it's not what it is? If that isn't evidence that hindus changed their scriptures over time then idk what is. The truth is there, but it's surrounded by falsehood. You can't deny that the original text was changed because the original text would've been purely monotheistic and the fact that it prophesies Muhammad ﷺ by name and gives exact characteristics is enough to blunder any explanation othern than it's Muhammad ﷺ. I'll give a example Say I have a revelation from God from 3000 years ago. It originally said "A Man named Muhammad will come and he will be illiterate". 2000 years later someone comes to change it and puts "A man named Muhammad will come and will be unlettered and he will bring the glory to the quadruple god vorhees and the indian land". That example is what happened to the hindu texts. The truth is still there but they added their own stories and additions.
@@yahya2925 if someone has changed the original scripture of bhavishya purana saying that Muhammed of Islam worshipped shiva Linga as told in purana, then they might have done it with the evil purpose to convert Muslims to Hindu religion right? But in the history you do not find any hindu priest or any personality doing it. ...vedaa and puranas are passed as knowledge through unbroken tradition starting from veda Vyasa the original prophet from one priest to priest personally ..so there is very less chance for modification or interpolation Also only a real prophet can say that some parts of Vedas or Purana are modified or interpolated. A propet is one who belongs to the family of angels or devatas and it cannot be Zakir Naik .. example Madhwacharya who is the incarnation of an angel came on earth in priestly family and wrote comenntories on Vedas Ramayana Mahabharat and pointed the part of Vedas and puranas which are corrupted.. because such a person willl be knowing full body of Hindu scriptures word by word .... How can you say that without reading the whole Vedas from a authoritative traditional scholar ? A normal person like Zakir Naik can only guess that there is possibility of prophet Muhammed being mentioned in the scriptures....he cannot conclude that it is Muhammed himself with full over confidence ... I have seen another bad habit of zakir Naik ..he does not read the whole scripture but cherry picks certain lines of text and conclude that it says so..for example verse "na tasya Prathima asti" of yaajurveda is taken out of context by zakir where root meaning of wird Pratima means not image or idol in Sanskrit ....this verse means nobody to equal to God and not that God do not have image...
Masha Allah bhai...kisi ku doubt hai toh plzz yah galiyoon se pehley ek baar padlijiye.... Hum kisi ki mazhab ka mazaak nahi udatey....plzz bhai ek baar check karlo baad mein gaaliyan dena
@ Mohammad affan Ahmed, bahut acchi baat hai ke aap koi mazhab ka mazak nahi udate hain, lekin neeche verses ko dekhiye, aur jawab deejiye, NO FRIENDSHIP WITH CHRISTIANS JEWS AND OTHERS Quran Quran (5:51) - "O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people." Quran (5:80) - "You will see many of them befriending those who disbelieve; certainly evil is that which their souls have sent before for them, that Allah became displeased with them and in chastisement shall they abide." Befriending unbelievers is one sign that a Muslim is bound for Hell. Quran (3:28) - "Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them..." This last part means that a faithful Muslim is allowed to feign friendship if it is of benefit. Renowned scholar Ibn Kathir states that "believers are allowed to show friendship outwardly, but never inwardly." Quran (3:118) - "O you who believe! do not take for intimate friends from among others than your own people, they do not fall short of inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you; vehement hatred has already appeared from out of their mouths, and what their breasts conceal is greater still; indeed, We have made the communications clear to you, if you will understand." This verse not only warns Muslims not to take non-Muslims as friends, but suggests that that the rest of the world is out to get them and can't be trusted. 4:101 says that unbelievers are "open enemies" of Muslims. Quran (9:23) - "O ye who believe! Choose not your fathers nor your brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than faith. Whoso of you taketh them for friends, such are wrong-doers" Even family members are not to be taken as friends if they do not accept Islam. (There are harsher interpretations of this verse. The same (ninth) sura advocates "slaying the unbeliever wherever ye find them"). Quran (53:29) - "Therefore shun those who turn away from Our Message and desire nothing but the life of this world." Quran (3:85) - "And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him, and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers." Quran (3:10) - "(As for) those who disbelieve, surely neither their wealth nor their children shall avail them in the least against Allah, and these it is who are the fuel of the fire." Those who do not believe in Muhammad are but fuel for the fire of Hell (also 66:6, 2:24. 21:98). Quran (7:44) - "The Companions of the Garden will call out to the Companions of the Fire: "We have indeed found the promises of our Lord to us true: Have you also found Your Lord's promises true?" They shall say, "Yes"; but a crier shall proclaim between them: "The curse of Allah is on the wrong-doers" Muslims in heaven will amuse themselves by looking down on non-Muslims in Hell and mocking them while they are being tortured (see 22:19-22). Quran (1:5-7) - "Show us the straight path, The path of those whom Thou hast favored; Not the (path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray" This is a prayer that Muslims are to repeat each day. "Those who earn Thine anger" refers to Jews; "those who go astray" refers to Christians (see Sahih Bukhari (12:749) and Sahih Muslim 34:6448)). Hadith and Sira Sahih Muslim (1:417) - Taken to mean that one's own relatives should not be taken as friends if they are not Muslim. Sahih Muslim (2167) - "Allah's Messenger said: Do not greet the Jews and the Christians before they greet you and when you meet any one of them on the roads force him to go to the narrowest part of it." Abu Dawud (41:4815) - "The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man follows the religion of his friend; so each one should consider whom he makes his friend." Abu Dawud (41:4832) - The Messenger of Allah [said] "Do not keep company with anyone but a believer and do not let anyone eat your food but one who is pious." Sahih Bukhari (59:572) - "O you who believe! Take not my enemies And your enemies as friends offering them (Your) love even though they have disbelieved in that Truth (i.e. Allah, Prophet Muhammad and this Quran) which has come to you."
@@NewLife-jw9to bhai hamey suna saktey ho aap to bataein...agar aap ka dharm saccha hai toh main aapkey dharm mein convert hojaoonga...kuch daleel bataiye...jissey msin aap key wahan mutawajjo hojaoon... Nahi toh main aapko bataoonga ...dharm..kya hai... Bhai aap tayyar hai
@@ahuja1586 to app batnagay k Dharam Kay hai to thik hai bahi may Tayar hu Magar apni bat ko yad rak na k app Dharam may convert Hona Hoga kyu k app nay hi Kaha hai Aur bataoo k tumay Kay Jan na hai hamaray Dharam Kay barami ? Game on 🙏🕉🙏
Klk Veda Vyasa collected the Vedas and Upanishath and compiled it as books ....He also wrote Puranas later....about the quotes on bhavishya purana check the site at httpww.astrojyoti.com/bhavishyapurana-2.htm Even after dividing the Vedas, Srila Vyasadeva did not feel satisfied. Thinking that it will be impossible for the people of Kali-yuga to understand the actual purport of the Vedas, He took the essence of that understanding and compiled a simple literature called the Purana Samhita, in story form. For direct quotes check site gosai.com/writings/the-supremacy-of-srimad-bhagavatam-over-the-vedas
@@mohammedrafi4789 yes mohammad is not kalki avatar But if ur saying mohammad is kalki avatar then what is the proof ? On what basis ur claiming this So plz provide me the source's
Vedic Corruption in 5 ways:- NUMBER 1:999 lost Sukta’s of Rigveda Shaunak Rishi in his Brahddevata, Katyayana’s in his Sarvanukramani,Sayan Acharya and Skand Swami in their Introduction of commentary of Rig Veda Mandal 1 Sukta 99 state that Kashyap rishi is the seer of 1000 suktas, in these suktas the number of mantras(richas/Verses) increase by one. 1. Katyayana’s Sarvanukramani : Katyayana writes on sukt 99 जातवेदस एका । जातवेदस्यम् एतदादीन्येकभूयांसिसूक्तसहस्त्रमेतत्तु कश्यपार्षम् । Rishi Kashyap is the seer of 1000 Jatvedas suktas. 2. Shaunak Rishi’s Brahddevata : . Kashyap rishi is the seer of 1000 sukt addressed to Jatvedas which appear before the sukt addressed to Indra (Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 100). The first sukt of these is “For Jatvedas…(जातवेदसे सुनवाम ……..Rigved Mandal 1 Sukt 99). According to Shakupanithe number of mantras increase by one(in the number of stanzas). (Brahddevata 3 -130 -B) 3.Shadgurushishya’s Vedarth Dipika : According to Shadgurushishya’s writings these Richa’s( verses )were 5,00,499 in number. ऋचस्तु पंचलक्षा स्युः सैकोनशतपंचकम् In light of the above stated facts we can draw the following conclusions 1. Kashyap rishi is the seer of Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 99, Jatvedas sukt. 2. Kashyap rishi is the seer of a total of 1000 Jatvedas sukt, including Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 99,. 3. Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 99 is the first sukt of these 1000 sukt. 4. These 1000 Suktas, of which Kashyap rishi is seer, appear before Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 100. 5. In these sukt the number of mantras increase by one, from which we conclude these 1000 suktas contain a total of 500,500 richa (verses). 6. In the extant Rigveda Samhitas we get only one of these 1000 verses, this leads us to the conclusion that 999 sukt are lost from the Rigveda. Alternatively it can be said that 5,00,499 richa (verses )are lost. The evidences presented above convincingly prove that in the extant Rigveda Samhitas a large number of suktas are missing. NUMBER 2:Vedas were stolen Let me start by sharing with you an interesting yet ludicrous story that is mentioned in the Shanti Parv of Mahabharata; the story of the Vedas being stolen from the Creator of the Worlds by two demons, Madhu and Kaitabha. We read about this in Shanti Parv, Section 348. The two mighty Danavas (demons), having seized the Vedas, quickly dived into the ocean of waters which they saw and proceeded to its bottom. Seeing the Vedas forcibly taken away from him, Brahma Ji became filled with grief, and started wailing. The Vedas were later recovered by Vishu Ji’s timely intervention but still it shows the insecurity of the Vedic texts from the very beginning. If Brahma Ji had memorized the Vedas, how could the Vedas have been stolen? Perhaps his memory was not that strong after all. I only shared this story to give the readers an idea of a book which according to Hindus is the ‘greatest wonder of human civilization’. Truly a wonder it is. NUMBER 3:Missing Verses Nirukta 7:8 talks of a verse offering an oblation to Vishnu and Agni but the verse is not present in Rigveda anywhere. Does this mean Vedas aren't well-preserved as thought and the contents changed over time? NUMBER 4:1131 Vedas? According to the Mahabhasya of Patanjali, there were 21 Shakhas of Rigveda, 9 of Atharvaveda, 101 of Yajurveda (86 of Krishna Yajurveda and 15 of Shukla Yajurveda, according to later authorities) and a 1000 shakhas of Samaveda. All these add to give the figure 1131. All these Shakhas are considered to be Vedas. The words Shakha means a ‘branch’ or a ‘limb’ and refers to a particular traditional text followed, as in the phrase śākhām adhite, (“he recites a particular version of the Veda”). However, out of these 1131 Shakhas, only 11 Shakhas remain alive. As far as Rigved is concerned, only one Shakha, Shaakal Shakha alone remains alive out of the 21 that existed at one time. Another shakha that may have survived is the Bāṣhkala, although this is uncertain. Out of the 101 Shakhas of Yajurveda, only 6 are alive. In fact, Yajurveda is classified broadly into Shukla Yajurveda (White) and Krishna Yajurveda (Black). The former is popular in North India while the later is popular in South India. Shukla Yajurveda is also known as Vajasaneyi. The Vajasaneyi Samhita has forty chapters or adhyayas and there are two extant Shakhas of Shukla Yajurveda viz. Kanvaand Madhyandina. Krishna Yajurveda has 4 extant Shakhas viz. Taittirīya Maitrayani Kaṭhak Kapiṣṭhala There are three surviving Shakhas out of 1000 of the text of the Samaveda Samhita: the Kauthuma Shakha is current in Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Orissa and since a few decades in Darbhanga, Bihar, the Jaiminiya in the Carnatic, Tamilnadu and Kerala, and the Rāṇāyanīya in the Maharastra. Out of the nine Shakhas of Atharvaveda, only two have survived Paippalāda, in regions south to Narmada river Shaunakīya, in regions north to Narmada river What we know today as Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samaveda and Atharvaveda are actually Shakhas from the multitude of other Shakhas. The so called Vedas are never named as Vedas in their hymns. In other words, Rigveda is never called Rigveda in the Rigveda itself. If it be said that in other scriptures they have been called as Vedas, we can respond that so many other things have been called as Vedas also. For example, Ayurveda (Medicine), Sarpaveda (snakes), Dhanurved (weapons), Itihasaveda (History), Puranaveda (Stories). These words are based on Shatapath Brahman 13:4:3. Hence, 1121 versions of Vedas have been lost. If someone will say that the Shakhas are not Vedas but only the explanations/commentaries that would be erroneous. The presently known Vedas are also Shakhas. So are these commentaries or actual Vedas? To say that Shakhas are not the Vedas will be to undermine the present Vedas (read Shakhas) also. Considering the two opposing Shakhas of Yajurveda we may ask, “Is Madhyandina Shakha (Shukla Yajurveda) the original or Taittirīya Shakha (Krishna Yajurveda)?”. The above analysis makes it clear that a large portion of the Vedas has been lost. NUMBER 5:Some more missing Verses. After the collection and codification of Vedas, many different manuscripts gained currency amongst the Brahmin groups. The number of mantras in every manuscript continued to be changed. The current version of Rigveda was collected by Shaakal Rishi and was thus called Shaakal Samhita. It is divided into 10 Mandals (Books). Nirukt 7:8 mentions the following, “There is a joint oblation offered to Agni and Vishnu in the ten books of the Rigveda.” However, in the entire Rigveda, there is not a single mantra jointly praising Agni and Vishnu. What is meant by joint oblation here? An oblation is an offering (Late Latin oblatio, from offerre, oblatum, to offer), a term, particularly in ecclesiastical usage, for a solemn offering or presentation to God. Where is an offering jointly made to Agni and Vishnu, we would like to see? This is a clear evidence that the Rigveda at the time of Yaska Muni had the joint oblation offered to Agni and Vishnu, but it is not found in today’s Rigveda, demonstrating corruption of the text.
Muhammad is not mentions in any holy book.. he only mention in zakir naik's speech.. if you want to follow Kalki avtar of almighty you all should worship lord Vishnu.. You all should worship lord Rama.. You all should worship lord Krisna..
I don't how it is possible for us...But I am hoping and praying to Allah The Almighty that In sha Allah Yaa Rabb someday Dr.Zakir may come to Philippines...I really this Brother of Ours... despite that he is Our Pride... Alhamdulillah.. love to watch him everyday..
Omg!! This guy is lying blatantly about rig veda, rig veda is instructions on ritual to be performed during praying ritual. The Rig Veda/Mandala 1/Hymn 13 "AGNI, well-kindled, bring the Gods for him who offers holy gifts. Worship them, Purifier, Priest. 2. Son of Thyself, present, O Sage, our sacrifice to the Gods today. Sweet to the taste, that they may feast. 3. Dear Narasamsa, sweet of tongue, the giver of oblations, I Invoke to this our sacrifice." Before going on verse 3 read first two, naramasa is referred to agni dev the fire god.
As such Quran can't be learnt without an master, Vedas should also be learnt under their masters. He is giving a lot of misinformation about Vedas just to show Islam is superior. That can't be an intention of true spiritual leader. Shame..
@@entertainmentworld2521 Firstly you have to believe in bhavishya purana in totality not in parts. Kalki avtar is the last avtara and kalki will destroy the whole evil world and then satyayug will begin. You can at the most compare it to 2nd return of jesus ,on day of judgement . After prophet you and me are still living.
Kalki will born at ending of Kaliyuga after 40,000 years of Mahabharata So he will cone me after 35000 years I don't understand why they compare him with their fake Prophet Kalki will not start any Religion he just impose Dharma and will finish sorrow
@@ahmedshoaib1395 You don't even know about Avtar😁. Actually Hindu mathematics is too advanced till date its incomparable Read whole Article he is not connected with your Prophet. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalki Predictions about birth and arrival In the cyclic concept of time (Puranic Kalpa), Kaliyuga is variously estimated to last between 400,000 and 432,000 years. In some Vaishnava texts, Kalki is forecasted to appear on a white horse, at the end of Kaliyuga, to end the age of degeneration and to restore virtue and world order
Change your location in the RUclips settings and Inshallah it will be available... The coward BJP government blocked the channel in India, fearing the number of non-muslims accepting ISLAM... But they don't know that Allaah(SWT) has taken it upon himself to grant hidayah to the truthful people. Allaah(SWT) says in the Glorious Quran in no less than 3 places in Surah Tauba ch:9, V/s:33, Surah Fatah ch:48, V/s:28, and Surah Saff ch:61, V/s:9 ; ' IT IS ALLAAH WHO HAS SENT HIS MESSENGER WITH GUIDANCE AND THE RELIGION OF TRUTH SO THAT IT WILL PREVAIL OVER ALL THE OTHER RELIGIONS, HOWEVER MUCH THE UNBELIEVERS DON'T LIKE IT, AND ENOUGH IS ALLAAH AS WITNESS'.
@@mohammadaarizimamc-viicr-3489 This famous quotation is used by the great scholar Zakir Naik to try to prove that Hindus themselves do not know their own religion and scriptures. Shukla Yajur Veda (32.3): न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति यस्य नाम महद्यशः । हिरण्यगर्भ इ्त्येष मा मा हिंसीदित्येषा यस्मान्न जात इत्येषः ॥ na tasya pratimA asti yasya nAma mahadyashah | ‘hiraNyagarbha’ ityeSha ‘mA mA himsId’ityeShA yasmAnna jAta ityeShah || “There is no comparison of him, whose name is Great Glory. As seen in the hymns starting with ‘hiraNyagarbha’, ‘mA mA himsId’, ‘yasmAnna jAta’.” All the traditional commentaries (Zakir Naik did not read commentories of vedas written by acharyas who came from traditional lineage instead used unauthentic commentory ) are unambiguous and unanimous that the word “pratimA” is “pratimAnam” which means “comparison” and not image or idol. Uvvata’s commentary says: “न तस्य पुरुषस्य प्रतिमा प्रतिमानभूतं किञ्चिद्विद्यते” - “na tasya puruShasya pratimA pratimAnabhUtam kincid vidyate” - The word “pratimA” is explained as “pratimAnabhUtam” i.e. “comparative”. Mahidhara’s commentary says: “तस्य पुरुषस्य प्रतिमा प्रतिमानमुपमानं किञ्चिद्वस्तु नास्ति” - “tasya puruShasya pratimA pratimAnam upamAnam kincid vastu nAsti” - The word “pratimA” is explained as “pratimAnam” and “upamAnam”, which both undoubtedly mean “comparison” or “measuring up”. The ignorance of people who use this mantra for devious deceitful purposes (just for conversion without reading the full book on vedas) is as incomparable as the Great Glorious Hiranyagarbha. So here is one more shloka, which might give some points to ponder that God has spiritual form: Īśo 15 हिरण्मयेन पात्रेण सत्यस्यापिहितं मुखम्। तत्त्वं पूषन्नपावृणु सत्यधर्माय दृष्टये॥१५॥ hiraṇmayena pātreṇa satyasyāpihitaṁ mukham tat tvaṁ pūṣann apāvṛṇu satya-dharmāya dṛṣṭaye O my Lord, sustainer of all that lives, Your real face is covered by Your dazzling effulgence. Kindly remove that covering and exhibit Yourself to Your pure devotee. ¶ more info prabhupada.io/books/iso/15 Īśo 5 तदेजति तन्नैजति तद्दूरे तद्वन्तिके। तदन्तरस्य सर्वस्य तदु सर्वस्यास्य बाह्यतः॥५॥ tad ejati tan naijati tad dūre tad v antike tad antar asya sarvasya tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ The Supreme Lord walks and does not walk. He is far away, but He is very near as well. He is within everything, and yet He is outside of everything. ¶ more info prabhupada.io/books/iso/5 The divine form, pastime, and incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu have been described in Yajur-veda-saṁ hītā 5.15 - “idaṁ viṣṇur vicakrame tredhā nidadhe padaṁ ! samūḍhamasya pā gvaṁ sure….” "The manifested worlds were walked on by i.e. measured by Viṣṇu during the placement of his triple feet!...”. This description denotes the Trivikrama form displayed during the Vāmana-līlā depicted in the 8th Canto of SB and in other purāṇas as well. Thus, the concept of incarnation of the Lord also founds substantiation in Vedas. Rig Veda, 1:22:20 - oṃ tad viṣṇoḥ paramam padam sadā paśyanti sūrayaḥ "All the suras (i.e. the devas or angels like indra, agni, varuna, yama, etc) look always toward the feet of Lord Vishnu." Bhagavad gita 7.23 - Men of small intelligence worship the demigods, and their fruits are limited and temporary. Those who worship the demigods go to the planets of the demigods, but My devotees (Lord Krishna or Vishnu) ultimately reach My supreme planet. When Vedas tell that God is body less it means God do not have material or physical body. But God has spiritual form is mentioned in Puranas and that form has no suffering or decay. So Puranas gives additional information to Vedas and not contradict. People will reject Puranas thinking that it contradicts Vedas ..Even Arya Samaj founder did not consider it seriously but Madhwacharya has considered Puranas seriously and proved that it gives additional information which Vedas do not give it explicitly. That is why Lord Vishnu as Vamana covered the whole universe with just 3 steps (that means God can take a gigantic form as whole universe) and Lord Krishna showed His Vishwa Roopa (universal form where creation is visually seen to be part of God) to Arjuna when bhagavad Gita was presented and even whole universe in His mouth as a child to Yashoda. This is not possible with a material body. Another astonishing truth revealed by Madhwacharya is that some stories of Purana where God is shown in low light is also Leela or divine play .For eg Lord Krishna ends his divine play on earth when a hunter hits the leg of Lord Krishna mistaking it as some bird. In Mahabharatha it is already shown how Lord Krishna protects Arjuna inspite of so many divine astras (weapons) that hit the chariot. After Arjuna got down from chariot, Krishna then got down and then chariot which was hit badly bursted. Now when Lord Krishna has power to stop the divine weapons of demigods like Agni asras from damaging chariot how can a ordinary arrow kill Krishna ? This is done purposely by Krishna to delude the less intelligent people. It is called Asura mohana. We cannot understand the plan of God in our own life then how can we know the plan in His leela (divine play)? There are many such confusing episodes. For example Lord Krishna taking birth from Yashoda when He does not birth. acting as child but mature enough to have divine play with his devotees, etc.
Good or bad... Everything will be there... It's alarm about...vultures... Who don't want diffrenciate about "Dharma" and "Pantha"... And... Who always want to misguide people about Islam... "The Religion of Piece"
learn all the vedas and all puranas first. recite them and then you can read other books. this way you would know what not to follow and what to follow. you would actually know good from bad.
@@ilovemyx1594 he is not even an actor he is an biggest lier on the planet who only knows how to lie on other religious scriptures and brain wash non Muslims
Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd: Allah's Apostle said, "In Paradise there is a tree so big that in its shade a rider may travel for one hundred years without being able to cross it." Al-Bukhari: Volume 8, Book 76, Number 559t
A spiritual reformer will come from a foreign land (outside Bharat) with his disciples (companions). His name will be Mahamad (Muhammad). He will dwell in a desert. (Bhavisyath Purana 3:5-8)
May Allah SWT bless Dr zakir Naik with innumerous health happiness and longevity for the great service he is doing for peace and improving knowledge of all humans
@@mdirfan7796 tab lekin ushko islam qabool krna pedhega to sahi nahi to zabaran krna sahi nahi agar is per razi hai to apne family walo ko aap samjhaye....
*Whenever i prove and shows references from hindu books to sanatan people (hindu) they reply we do not believe on these books, now sanatans are not believing on their books, lol*
@@NewLife-jw9to Alhamdulillah so far based on what i have learned from him is so many thing. Based on what i understand, his discipline are really good. Because in muslim world, to be a scholar are not easy. We must go thru many stage(examination, papers, written books, thesis and so many thing) until they are been recognized by others scholars. From that which is 1) knowlegde 2) discipline and 3) methods he is true and good in his field. Many muslim eventhou they are hafiz(the one who can recite and remembered Al Quran cover to cover) are still not yet can call them scholar. There also have, that we called it as Ustaz and Ulama, means they are like teacher and lecturer. Yet they are still not as a scholar. If u know this discipline, u will know how tough is it.
In quran 25 times jesus name is there why dont u convert t christianity my dear zakir naik ...quran proofs that isa ibn mariyam is nothing but the the son of god ...@ even ur quran accepts this ... why dont u convert jakir bro
Resting isa ibn mariyam is son of god??? You mean Jesus is son of god??? Where in Quran says Jesus is son of god??? Give me reference and I will check it
@@lubnakhan5847 if his name is in quran with great prophet then bible is also correct u have to understand and bible say that ...@ so its proved jesus is the real son of god ..@
@@lubnakhan5847 Quran says jesus will return ...so wat more proves u want is prophet mohmad is coming No he is not but great jesus will arrive ..@ come to christianity my brother... @ Jesus is the son of god
How can u be a proper muslim by reading vedas and agreeing them and talking about vedas and publishing the vedas which is completely prohibited in Quran
@@shiekhfahim6787 u canot speak vedas like ur will and wish who r u to speak vedas what do u know about this culture s it is not a muslims work to teach other religous text
@@praveenpr8453 brother!! Other religion people do research about qur'an....religion is not about..its way of living life....if u knw ur book has 100% rgt scientifically and logically y r u worried???.....u can research qur'an and show a single mistake ....logically and scientifically...atleast he's speaking fact..not against veda's....and islam doesnt prohibit reading veda's....its human being's wish...which religion he wants to follow...☺peace
Kalki is not the prophet PBUH. Prophet is a messenger. KALKI is GOD HIMSELF. All quotes he mentioned is wrong. Ive checked. Millions of messengers saints warriors came. The Caste he mentioned came from Head Chest Stomach legs is all wrong. This means he doesnt know Sanskrit. Vasudeva Kutumbam, eko brahma eko jivah. Is same as One children of GOD and all are equal. Purush Sukta mentions Saints Messengers(Brahman) come HIS forehead, Kshatriyas from his arms meaning warriors, Businessmen meaning traders from his torso meaning Vaishya. And finally Shudras (Skilled Artisans) from His feet, not down class people. People like Zakir Naik who cant read or want to use it for own benefit defame GOD and created Caste System man-made system. Not GOD made
![Natanael Cano x Nueva H - Amapola [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6Q4mnRD5jCw/mqdefault.jpg)
Everyone should know what our creator wants us to do.
“Forgive others as quickly as you expect Allah (God) to forgive you"
@seek mogol
so is the trinity stolen from Hinduism ?
(Father son spirits)
(Shiva Braman Vishnu)
Christianity concept of blood sacrifice stolen from Roman paganism
ruclips.net/video/WKa11G1Jpfs/видео.html
Zakir is too early for kalki
@@blinddriver400 oh so you are late for vedas so only that hindu men is revealing all the truth of vedas so only he accepted what ever he told. you are really blind driver
@@shifataj3479 ur entire religion copied some aspects of all religions
No original basis
Except for terrorism everything else is copied from other religions
@@blinddriver400 so only first human of the world came from our religion not your religion
One day This man will bring all the countries on the right path
Right now he is getting fucked by many countries.and is on list to get ducked by. Many countries.
Yes all countries will kick him out... bloody illiterate...
Mh armaan sheikh do you want every person in world to be Muslim?
If so every one follows Islam and there is no other religioun left in world ,do you think world will be better?
@@fact_believer4787 arrey bhai its not about muslims hindus etc this is about the right path just read the holy vedas the holy quran and the holy bible they all imphasise only on one god even lord shiva and krisha worshiped lord vishinu which means they also belived in one god and i don't know why people started wirshipping lord shiva and lord krishna according to me they both are prophets
@@mharmaansheikh6388 so you mean Islam is the right path and if some one doesn't follows islam has a problem
Ma sha ALLAH
How can anyone be angry with Zakir Naik.
He sacrifices so much time to memorizing and helps answer for free.
Have u checked the references? Chk only one and see if he is right....the first one talks about fire? How mhd fits into fire?
yeah memorising the wrong interpretation of out scriptures😒
@@stanwinx1144 How is it wrong when he reads them verbatim from the book with references to the page number?
@@lighttheoryllc4337 correct the references maybe, but he misinterprets them and presents the wrong information, i've seen too many people debunk what he has to say on Hinduism. And he's quite manipulative from a non muslim POV from the misinformation he presents.
@@stanwinx1144 He does not... And he has PHD
Do you have PHD?
i heard this full lecture long time ago when i was a teen.....after such a long time again, it just make my iman stronger....we love you Dr. Zakir
we are all with you.from moroccooo 💪👍👍💪💪💪💪👍💪💪👍
Morocco 💚💚💚
in india this is the problem among hindus, too much cast system , upper cast lower cast. that is why there are conflicts among hindus regarding their scriptures and beliefs
অসাধারণ একটা মানুষ ডঃ জাকির নায়ক...😍😍দোয়া করি আল্লাহ যেন তাকে নেক হায়াত বাড়িয়ে দিয়...😎
Muhammad is not mentions in any holy book.. he only mention in zakir naik's speech..
if you want to follow Kalki avtar of almighty you all should worship lord Vishnu..
You all should worship lord Rama..
You all should worship lord Krisna..
@@bengalguide4256 Bruh Do Read Your Books Vedas kalki Bhagwad Geeta Muhammad Has been mention in That Clearly And There is OnLy 1 GOD❤
Ahhh, now I know why India banned him. 😅
This is not our culture he is homophobic 😤
@おじゃる丸 india is not for dirty desert cult 😑🙏🏻
@おじゃる丸 lol Quran is a cult which say cut the head of gays !! Bro if you are hindu india have thousands of better book to read which is thousand time better than Quran,!!
@おじゃる丸 yea I have respect
But Supreme Court also ban books which are not good !!
And if we consider Quran as normal book then it will be the first book to get ban 🤣
@おじゃる丸 ok fb?
Love from Bangladesh zakir naik
I'll tell you the answer folks. In the vedas there's no mention of Mohammad. It was the bhavishya purana where something similar is mentioned. It is said "an illiterate mleccha(foreigner) teacher will appear, Mahamada(very egoistic one) is his name, he'll give religion to his 5th class companions". So this maybe a reference to Mohammad but not surely. So stop saying our sanatan dharma is Islam. Follow your religion quietly and let the others follow their religion. Peace.
Bangalore brother hindu word doesn't appear in Vedas or puranas
It's was coined by Ariyans
May Allah accept your striving and bless your family, ameen.
Never ever they did not say dont follow purans because purans are the pillars of Hinduism if there r no puranas there is no culture
I really would like to see Dr Zakit Naik debate with Ravi Zacarias on any religious matters e.g. Oneness of God, Trinity, True religion...etc
Hope this will happen.
RUclips (ruclips.net/video/5Rf8Bu5RMbs/видео.html)
Stop watching Porn
Stop watching porn (18+)
Jazak ALLAH Bhai Masha ALLAH
Gorgeous Video.
Allohu Akbar 👍
The Jews answered Him (Jesus), 'For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; and because You, being a man, make yourself out to be God.' ”(John 10:33)
Jesus had obviously claimed to be God. So just what had He said to upset His Jewish audience so much?
“I and the Father are one.” (John 10:30)
Then y did he pray down by kneeling.
He gave rise to dead by God's permission.
Y did he need permission if he's a God.
Explain.
The messiah, never claimed to be All mighty God.
You clealry do not know, that what you are quoting is not literal, it is POETRY.
I and my Creator are 1, is a poetic statement.
Meaning, our message is 1.
If, the messiah, wanted to be literal context, he would have just came out and said it...
Look I am God, worship me or die.
But ALLAH speaks in poetry, and it is forbidden to change the message.
So the messiah, above all messengers, would not change, rhe message being revealed to him by ALLAH.
What a confident Dr.Zakir Naik with his statements
It is overconfidence brother. Tell me how can Vishnu we worship as God be Mohammed Paigambar? How can Shri Krishna who has told to worship Him alone to reach a eternal spiritual world like vaikunta in bhagavad gita be a prophet? Zakir Naik is such a fake scholar He does not have intellect to read the book fully. He reads few lines of the scriptures, byhearts it and then tells you people.
@@dhananjayajayaram2485 OK just chill and follow your religion
@@musab2023 i have a question which you can forward to zakir naik if you do not know the answer in case. As per Islam this human life is a test to enter into jannath. When God conducts a final test like this, it should be fair. The first reason is there is only one chance as per Islam. Second the life span of each person varies. A fair test is when you keep all the conditions constant. But the conditions of humans who are born on this earth are not same: some are mentally retarted, some deaf (cannot listen to Quran), some dumb (cannot do prayers) and some even born in a tribal forest and no connection with even Muslims to allow them to convert atleast. Why is this partially by God?
@@dhananjayajayaram2485 why should I forward to him? If you want to know the answer ask him directly, and I am least bothered about other religions people , whether they accept Islam or reject it's their choice and I am not zakir Naik to answer anyone.
@@musab2023 okay fine.
Love you dr jakir naik
Please mara aik masla hall Kar dain main nay zoher parni thi par tenshan main magir samj ky start Kar li likn namez main yad Aya main to zoher parni thi phir zoher 4 rkt par ky sajda sahu Kar Diya kya sahe Kiya hugi namez
Niyat Kis namaz ki thi... Phele ye batai
Please indonesian subtitle 🙏🙏🙏
Bahasa Inggeris adalah bahasa yg mesti untuk di belajar. Maka belajar lah. Muslim yg baik akan menolong muslim yg lain utk memahami tetapi yg lebih baik dr itu ialah bila muslim itu berusaha sendiri utk belajar. Sampai bila kamu mahu meminta minta pertolongan alih bahasa sedangkan ilmu itu luas dr pelbagai bahasa, maka belajar lah kuasai bahasa asing.
Adakah kamu berfikir bila Imam Mahdi datang, dia akan mencari ribuan penterjermah utk mengalih bahasa arab pd pengikut akhir zaman?? Apakah kamu masih mahu meminta minta seperti sekarang?
I love you so much sir for allah?
What is your religion friend
Islam
@@RajuRaj-bhuiyan alhamdulillah you are my brother
Amazing brother love from Kerala🇮🇳
Could you please add the turkish subtitle for this video
I wish i could
insha allah some one will make it .
Yeah god made cast system but he never told to discriminate :-)
NO ARAB HAS ANY SUPERIORITY OVER AN NON ARAB NEITHER AN NON ARAB HAS ANY SUPERIORITY OVER AN ARAB , NOR ANY BLACK MAN HAS ANY SUPERIORITY OVER AN WHITE MAN NEITHER AN WHITE MAN HAS ANY SUPERIORITY OVER AN BLACK MAN
- PROPHET MUHAMMAD ( PBUH)
Why Hindus are not commenting on religious topics like this one??? Is Dr Zakir doing something wrong by exposing the truth from their own scriptures ??? Please wake up n face the truth n save yourself from going to hell !!!
not many hindus are dumb to reply to him. they know their religion well.
muslims wake up..zakir naik is possessed by saintan ....mohammada mentioned in hindu scriptures is not a real good prophet..read it her www.stephen-knapp.com/mohammed_is_he_really_predicted_in_bhavishya_purana.htm
mike khan Zakir is a joke
how stupid can you guys be.
just read those lines those books from a real authentic source written by real authetic authors how hard is it to find those texts in internet ?
without checking any book without knowing anything regarding those central messages of book you are just commenting.
hinduismfaq.wordpress.com
I have collective in this website the reply to the so called controversial questions of Zakir Naik from traditional scholars who have discpilinic succession starting Veda Vyasa who compiled Veda Vyasa. Zakir Naik did not referred translation of Vedas from scholars who have traditional lineage.
The Vedic quotes mentioned within this video does not mention Peophet Muhammad (PBUH) but, again, praises demigods. Words that translates to Muhammad doesn't mean it is talking about Muhammad.
Regarding the Caste system, every castes can get education about the Vedic teachings. Vidura was a Shudra and yet he still got Vedic teachings and later on became greater than a brahmana. The caste system worked well back in the olden days. However our scriptures says to abolish the caste system in the age of Kali, our age, coz our scriptures knew the unjust things that would happen if it was kept within society still.
What about Kalki Avatar? Zakir said Muhammed is Kalki Avatar!”
“I don’t know if he said so. If yes, I do not understand how Muslims could tolerate Zakir Naik for insulting their Prophet and Quran. Kalki is born with four hands! Did Muhammad have four hands? He is born in a village by name Sambhala (somewhere in Nepal or India) and not in the Middle East. Shambala is accessible only to accomplished yogis and Siddha purushas. His parents will be Brahmins (=Sattvik Vegetarians) of names Vishnuyasha (means God’s glory) and Sumati (means the pious and pure thinking one). Kalki married to the daughter of the King of Simhala Desam (Sri Lanka), Padmawati. Muhammad had 11 wives, but none in the name of Padmawati. Kalki worshipped Shiva to get a Sword. Did Muhammad do like that?” (Incidentally, Kalki is a Tamil word. The Sanskrit name for Kalki is Ghadgi = sword-bearer)
@Mansor Kadir it may be may not be I have never seen you also never seen the God as well, how you people believe that God has no hands , we believe God has multiple hands😊
Padnawati ka matlab kaya ha?
@@sumaiyayeasmin8931 Padmavathi is the another name of Goddess Lakshmi, which means Residing on lotus( Padma)
@Mansor Kadir God has four hands means, he can incarnate in to any form. As per our scriptures he has his presence in every atom of this world.
In the mathematics infinity symbol is there , that doesn't mean that is value of infinity but it resembles infinity, in the same manner idols resembles god , but not only idol itself is god.
@@manojavam5395 Search meaning of Ayesha
Mother tongue decides human classes and not anything else
Alhamdulillah
I kindly request all Muslim preachers not to meddle with any of the hindu religious matters. It always leads to heavy hate & troll from .... u know.
Kalki is planned such a way, Dharma will change yuga to yuga .. in kaliyuga dharmam only 1 base out of 4. In kaliyuga there is some nonsense fellows who will insult other religion to lead the world.. that's dharmam and peace is vanishes in the world is out of control .. so to bring the Dharma back. Kalki avathar.
This famous quotation is used by the great scholar Zakir Naik to try to prove that Hindus themselves do not know their own religion and scriptures. Shukla Yajur Veda (32.3): न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति यस्य नाम महद्यशः । हिरण्यगर्भ इ्त्येष मा मा हिंसीदित्येषा यस्मान्न जात इत्येषः ॥ na tasya pratimA asti yasya nAma mahadyashah | ‘hiraNyagarbha’ ityeSha ‘mA mA himsId’ityeShA yasmAnna jAta ityeShah || “There is no comparison of him, whose name is Great Glory. As seen in the hymns starting with ‘hiraNyagarbha’, ‘mA mA himsId’, ‘yasmAnna jAta’.” All the traditional commentaries (Zakir Naik did not read commentories of vedas written by acharyas who came from traditional lineage instead used unauthentic commentory ) are unambiguous and unanimous that the word “pratimA” is “pratimAnam” which means “comparison” and not image or idol as zakir naik says. Uvvata’s commentary says: “न तस्य पुरुषस्य प्रतिमा प्रतिमानभूतं किञ्चिद्विद्यते” - “na tasya puruShasya pratimA pratimAnabhUtam kincid vidyate” - The word “pratimA” is explained as “pratimAnabhUtam” i.e. “comparative”. Mahidhara’s commentary says: “तस्य पुरुषस्य प्रतिमा प्रतिमानमुपमानं किञ्चिद्वस्तु नास्ति” - “tasya puruShasya pratimA pratimAnam upamAnam kincid vastu nAsti” - The word “pratimA” is explained as “pratimAnam” and “upamAnam”, which both undoubtedly mean “comparison” or “measuring up”. The ignorance of people who use this mantra for devious deceitful purposes (just for conversion without reading the full book on vedas) is as incomparable as the Great Glorious Hiranyagarbha. So here is one more shloka, which might give some points to ponder that God has spiritual form: Īśo 15 हिरण्मयेन पात्रेण सत्यस्यापिहितं मुखम्। तत्त्वं पूषन्नपावृणु सत्यधर्माय दृष्टये॥१५॥ hiraṇmayena pātreṇa satyasyāpihitaṁ mukham tat tvaṁ pūṣann apāvṛṇu satya-dharmāya dṛṣṭaye O my Lord, sustainer of all that lives, Your real face is covered by Your dazzling effulgence. Kindly remove that covering and exhibit Yourself to Your pure devotee. ¶ more info prabhupada.io/books/iso/15 Īśo 5 तदेजति तन्नैजति तद्दूरे तद्वन्तिके। तदन्तरस्य सर्वस्य तदु सर्वस्यास्य बाह्यतः॥५॥ tad ejati tan naijati tad dūre tad v antike tad antar asya sarvasya tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ The Supreme Lord walks and does not walk. He is far away, but He is very near as well. He is within everything, and yet He is outside of everything. ¶ more info prabhupada.io/books/iso/5 The divine form, pastime, and incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu have been described in Yajur-veda-saṁ hītā 5.15 - “idaṁ viṣṇur vicakrame tredhā nidadhe padaṁ ! samūḍhamasya pā gvaṁ sure….” "The manifested worlds were walked on by i.e. measured by Viṣṇu during the placement of his triple feet!...”. This description denotes the Trivikrama form displayed during the Vāmana-līlā depicted in the 8th Canto of SB and in other purāṇas as well. Thus, the concept of incarnation of the Lord also founds substantiation in Vedas. Rig Veda, 1:22:20 - oṃ tad viṣṇoḥ paramam padam sadā paśyanti sūrayaḥ "All the suras (i.e. the devas or angels like indra, agni, varuna, yama, etc) look always toward the feet of Lord Vishnu." Bhagavad gita 7.23 - Men of small intelligence worship the demigods, and their fruits are limited and temporary. Those who worship the demigods go to the planets of the demigods, but My devotees (Lord Krishna or Vishnu) ultimately reach My supreme planet. When Vedas tell that God is body less it means God do not have material or physical body. But God has spiritual form is mentioned in Puranas and that form has no suffering or decay. So Puranas gives additional information to Vedas and not contradict. People will reject Puranas thinking that it contradicts Vedas ..Even Arya Samaj founder did not consider it seriously but Madhwacharya has considered Puranas seriously and proved that it gives additional information which Vedas do not give it explicitly. That is why Lord Vishnu as Vamana covered the whole universe with just 3 steps (that means God can take a gigantic form as whole universe) and Lord Krishna showed His Vishwa Roopa (universal form where creation is visually seen to be part of God) to Arjuna when bhagavad Gita was presented and even whole universe in His mouth as a child to Yashoda. This is not possible with a material body. Another astonishing truth revealed by Madhwacharya is that some stories of Purana where God is shown in low light is also Leela or divine play .For eg Lord Krishna ends his divine play on earth when a hunter hits the leg of Lord Krishna mistaking it as some bird. In Mahabharatha it is already shown how Lord Krishna protects Arjuna inspite of so many divine astras (weapons) that hit the chariot. After Arjuna got down from chariot, Krishna then got down and then chariot which was hit badly bursted. Now when Lord Krishna has power to stop the divine weapons of demigods like Agni asras from damaging chariot how can a ordinary arrow kill Krishna ? This is done purposely by Krishna to delude the less intelligent people. It is called Asura mohana. We cannot understand the plan of God in our own life then how can we know the plan in His leela (divine play)? There are many such confusing episodes. For example Lord Krishna taking birth from Yashoda when He does not birth. acting as child but mature enough to have divine play with his devotees, etc.
What is Rajnikhant talking about 😂
He says according to vedas brhamin come from his head kashtriya from chest vaishya from thighs and sudra from feet but i want to tell you does this verse says bhramin are greater from sudra or sudra are lower then brahim or is this refrence says sudra can not become brhamin he is talking about prush sukt...in pursh sukt actually it's making a whole society ...no one can do nothing without head no one can walk without feet no one can walk without and same about kashtriya...all human beings are equal and i want to tell all my hindus friends that don't watch him he is completely lies he give reference of vedas if you actually go to that verse then you will find another meaning he says about mohmmad in vedas 🤦...and people believe him don't know from where he bought these fake vedas ....he doesn't read authentic vedas why would he he just want to show islam is higher than hinduism..
Bro we know it's so annoying how he's misguiding people
Hindus get embarrassed about the caste system in the west but when they are together they think it's so great. Quit with the double talk AND double standards. In your heart you know it's wrong.
Caste system is the real enemy of Hindu religion and humanity. #SayNoToCasteSystem #ONLYHUMANITY #Peace #Respect 💖🙏✌️🤘🤙🤝👍👌🇮🇳
Tere is no cast system in Dharama
All was created by humans ?
caste system is no evil. if there was discrimination based on differences it was bad. every society has been having differences. for me caste is good but not discrimination.
@@ilovemyx1594 but how can any be in an cast by birth ?
Where as in Dharama there is no cast system
@@NewLife-jw9to what you say is true. no castes explained in dharma. caste is just a convenience. people in other countries have last names. which they inherit by birth. why should an indian not inherit something from their parents? naik in his name is something similar which he would pass on to his children if he has them. would you call the children something else other than 'naik family'? wouldnt naik become his 'caste'?
@@ilovemyx1594 then y in india cast system is an part of the mejority ?
Chapter 3
Page 13
Volume 7
Dr Zakir Naik loudly barking at every one ☝️
ruclips.net/video/WKa11G1Jpfs/видео.html
Zakir is too early for kali to get eliminated
@shafeen taj lies dont last long
When u know how much he changes hindu scripture as his wish u will know.
He even has changed quran , its not big deal to manipulate hindu scriptures
@shafeen taj english nahi aaya tho hindi me type karo na
Mushkil ho raha hai padne k liye
Arab me khuran , urdu me tere chacha zakir apne version de raha hai.
God is one i believe , and precisely u r talking what i want u to know.
One god concept is more than 5 thousand years old, khuran didn't tell u anything new
@shafeen taj aur ye muslim video zara dekhle
Allah k dua rahe aapke uppar.ruclips.net/video/YzPoFfVF0Cg/видео.html
@@blinddriver400 hahaha so you are speaking in hindi because you don't know English she wrote in short form but u can't able to understand and claims all you know hahaha it is showing that who is uneducated here it is not Than you have to write Then .and that link it is clear about social scholar he is telling wrong about islam and telling about jihadis which means struggle. a struggler went to stop modern education which is not there in history at all hahaha such blind you are i think he only went, he didn't read Quran at all in his life i think so .not the numbers in Quran says about a good Muslim but a entire book tells a muslim to be a good person and main thing one muslim can't say vande mataram which means vandene of mother land, so first of all we respect our mother and allah gave paradise under his feet and her legs are standing upon a land so we didn't say at all and also we only pray to god not to a land which ever created by the god it self .so the only god is the one who deserves to pray not a land .if we die ,we all go towards god it self who have created us. a land only created by god it self, not a land created to god. okay I hope you understand why we won't say vande mataram .
Kalki is not a prophet don't compare him with any fake prophet
Tere maaa ki choot randi k bachay,tumhara bap fake ha jakar DNA kra.2.5 billions followers within 1400 years aur yahan hindu ka lora ram 5 hazar sal sa 1billion follower ni paida kr skha.whole hinduism is fake
Elephant is an animal created by god, not a god. Please dont compare him with god
Prophet Muhammad.. Allahm peaces upon Muhammad and AL Muhammad
Allaahu Akbaar According to the....Not a single Human being will deny the justice of ALLAH your own organs will be A Witness Against you
Zakir naik
True hero
@Hari Om bro go and debate him ok ap jese bht dekhy jo sirf cmnt tk hi bt kr skty na hmari ap say larai h na apki hmsy bt h schai ki ja k debate kro ap pta lg jarle ga sach ap dekhna ni chahty bs
@Hari Om dkho bhai apka ka b mksad h sach dhundna hmara b na apki koi larai h hm sy na hmari ap say wo jahil log hoty jo lrty m yhi bol raha k agr apko lgta h ap thk ap zakir naik ko aproach kro r debate kro unki shrt h debate k lie k ap phly kam az kam 20 hazar ka crowd ikhta kr k apni bt sch sabit kren un m phr m ready hu
@Hari Om india m ban h zakir naik r m islie bol rha k zakir naik ny opn chlng kia hua h debate ka ap sabit kro sb un k agy
@Hari Om lets c i hope zakir naik and u will debate one day
Where is MOHAMMED name mentioned in RIG VEDA ???
Rig Veda
1:13:3 = Dear Narāśaṁsa, sweet of tongue, the giver of oblations, I
Invoke to this our sacrifice.
नराशंसमिह प्रियमस्मिन्यज्ञ उपह्वये। मधुजिह्वं हविष्कृतम्॥
मैं (अस्मिन्) इस (यज्ञे) अनुष्ठान करने योग्य यज्ञ तथा (इह) संसार में (हविष्कृतम्) जो कि होम करने योग्य पदार्थों से प्रदीप्त किया जाता है और (मधुजिह्वम्) जिसकी काली, कराली, मनोजवा, सुलोहिता, सुधूम्रवर्णा, स्फुलिङ्गिनी और विश्वरूपी ये अति प्रकाशमान चपल ज्वालारूपी जीभें हैं (प्रियम्) जो सब जीवों को प्रीति देने और (नराशंसम्) जिस सुख की मनुष्य प्रशंसा करते हैं, उसके प्रकाश करनेवाले अग्नि को (उपह्वये) समीप प्रज्वलित करता हूँ॥३॥
Connotation: - जो भौतिक अग्नि इस संसार में होम के निमित्त युक्ति से ग्रहण किया हुआ प्राणियों की प्रसन्नता करानेवाला है, उस अग्नि की सात जीभें हैं अर्थात् काली जो कि सुपेद आदि रङ्ग का प्रकाश करनेवाली, कराली-सहने में कठिन, मनोजवा-मन के समान वेगवाली, सुलोहिता-जिसका उत्तम रक्तवर्ण है, सुधूम्रवर्णा-जिसका सुन्दर धुमलासा वर्ण है, स्फुलिङ्गिनी-जिससे बहुत से चिनगे उठतें हों तथा विश्वरूपी-जिसका सब रूप हैं। ये देवी अर्थात् अतिशय करके प्रकाशमान और लेलायमाना-प्रकाश से सब जगह जानेवाली सात प्रकार की जिह्वा हैं अर्थात् सब पदार्थों को ग्रहण करनेवाली होती हैं। इस उक्त सात प्रकार की अग्नि की जीभों से सब पदार्थों में उपकार लेना मनुष्यों को चाहिये॥३॥
Rig Veda
1:18:9= I have seen Narāśaṁsa, him most resolute, most widely famed,
As ’twere the Household Priest of heaven.
नराशंसं सुधृष्टममपश्यं सप्रथस्तमम्। दिवो न सद्ममखसम्॥
मैं (न) जैसे आकाशमय सूर्य्यादिकों के प्रकाश से (सद्ममखसम्) जिसमें प्राणी स्थिर होते और जिसमें जगत् प्राप्त होता है, (सप्रथस्तमम्) जो बड़े-बड़े आकाश आदि पदार्थों के साथ अच्छी प्रकार व्याप्त (सुधृष्टमम्) उत्तमता से सब संसार को धारण करने (नराशंसम्) सब मनुष्यों को अवश्य स्तुति करने योग्य पूर्वोक्त (सदसस्पतिम्) सभापति परमेश्वर को (अपश्यम्) ज्ञानदृष्टि से देखता हूँ, वैसे तुम भी सभाओं के पति को प्राप्त होके न्याय से सब प्रजा का पालन करके नित्य दर्शन करो॥९॥
Connotation: - इस मन्त्र में उपमालङ्कार है। इस मन्त्र में सातवें मन्त्र से ‘सदसस्पतिम्’ इस पद की अनुवृत्ति जाननी चाहिये। जैसे मनुष्य सब जगह विस्तृत हुए सूर्य्यादि के प्रकाश को देखता है, वैसे ही सब जगह व्याप्त ज्ञान प्रकाशरूप परमेश्वर को जानकर सुख के विस्तार को प्राप्त होता है॥९॥पूर्व सत्रहवें सूक्त के अर्थ के साथ मित्र और वरुण के साथ अनुयोगी बृहस्पति आदि अर्थों के प्रतिपादन से इस अठारहवें सूक्त के अर्थ की सङ्गति जाननी चाहिये। यह भी सूक्त सायणाचार्य्य आदि और यूरोपदेशवासी विलसन आदि ने कुछ का कुछ ही वर्णन किया है॥
Rig Veda
1:142:3= He wondrous, sanctifying, bright, sprinkles the sacrifice with mead,
Thrice, Narāśaṁsa from the heavens, a God mid Gods adorable.
शुचि: पावको अद्भुतो मध्वा यज्ञं मिमिक्षति। नराशंसस्त्रिरा दिवो देवो देवेषु यज्ञिय: ॥
- जो (पावकः) पवित्र करनेवाले अग्नि के समान (अद्भुतः) आश्चर्य गुण, कर्म, स्वभाववाला (शुचिः) पवित्र (यज्ञियः) यज्ञ करने योग्य (नराशंस) नरों से प्रशंसा को प्राप्त और (देवः) कामना करता हुआ जन (देवेषु) विद्वानों में (दिवः) कामना से (मध्वा) मधुर शर्करा वा सहत से (यज्ञम्) यज्ञ को (त्रिः) तीन बार (आ, मिमिक्षति) अच्छे प्रकार सींचने वा पूरे करने की इच्छा करता है, वह सुख पाता है ॥ ३ ॥
Connotation: - जो मनुष्य बालकाई, ज्वानी और बुढ़ापे में विद्याप्रचाररूपी व्यवहार को करें, वे कायिक, वाचिक और मानसिक सुखों को प्राप्त होवें ॥ ३ ॥
Rig Veda
7:2:2= With sacrifice to these we men will honour the majesty of holy Narāśaṁsa-
To these the pure, most wise, the thought. inspirers, Gods who enjoy both sorts of our oblations.
हे मनुष्यो ! (ये) जो (सुक्रतवः) उत्तम प्रज्ञावाले (शुचयः) पवित्र (धियन्धाः) उत्तम कर्मों के धारण करनेवाले (देवाः) विद्वान् लोग (उभयानि) शरीर और आत्मा के पुष्टिकारक (हव्या) भोजन के योग्य पदार्थों को (स्वदन्ति) अच्छे स्वादपूर्वक खाते और (यज्ञैः) सङ्गति के योग्य साधनों से (यजतस्य) सङ्ग करने योग्य (नराशंसस्य) मनुष्यों से प्रशंसा किये हुए तथा अन्न का भोग करनेवाले के (एषाम्) इनकी (महिमानम्) महिमा की हम लोग (उप, स्तोषाम) समीप प्रशंसा करें ॥२॥
Connotation: - हे मनुष्यो ! तुम को चाहिये कि सदैव विद्वानों के अनुकरण से शरीर और आत्मा के बल को बढ़ानेवाले खानपानों का सेवन किया करो, जिससे तुम्हारी महिमा बढ़े ॥
@dhananjaya Jayaram Do you not see that Brahman has given us the same religion throughout time and history to different people everytime the original was corrupted and lost just like yours? Hinduism used to be Islam. Not the arab Islam, but simply The Truth. You made the divine names of Brahman into seperate gods. The "gods" names are just attributes of The One God, Brahman, Allah ﷻ.
A spiritual reformer will come from a foreign land (outside Bharat) with his disciples (companions). His name will be Mahamad (Muhammad). He will dwell in a desert. (Bhavisyath Purana 3:5-8)
here is the reference of mohammed in hinduism www.stephen-knapp.com/mohammed_is_he_really_predicted_in_bhavishya_purana.htm
@@dhananjayajayaram2485 Lmao if you can't see that that's not Muhammad ﷺ, you're rejecting the truth while it's staring you in the face and you're taking any opinion on the verse that fits your world view. A scripture from more than 7000 years ago, before the Torah mentions a man, literally by name, to come later. It doesn't get any miraculous than that. Wake up sister.
@@dhananjayajayaram2485 The author even agrees that it's a man named Muhammad who's unlettered. Then he says it's not if you read the surrounding texts. Lol, why would it be so accurate about our Prophet and then talk about something completely different to make it look like it's not what it is? If that isn't evidence that hindus changed their scriptures over time then idk what is. The truth is there, but it's surrounded by falsehood. You can't deny that the original text was changed because the original text would've been purely monotheistic and the fact that it prophesies Muhammad ﷺ by name and gives exact characteristics is enough to blunder any explanation othern than it's Muhammad ﷺ. I'll give a example
Say I have a revelation from God from 3000 years ago. It originally said "A Man named Muhammad will come and he will be illiterate". 2000 years later someone comes to change it and puts "A man named Muhammad will come and will be unlettered and he will bring the glory to the quadruple god vorhees and the indian land".
That example is what happened to the hindu texts. The truth is still there but they added their own stories and additions.
@@yahya2925 if someone has changed the original scripture of bhavishya purana saying that Muhammed of Islam worshipped shiva Linga as told in purana, then they might have done it with the evil purpose to convert Muslims to Hindu religion right? But in the history you do not find any hindu priest or any personality doing it. ...vedaa and puranas are passed as knowledge through unbroken tradition starting from veda Vyasa the original prophet from one priest to priest personally ..so there is very less chance for modification or interpolation
Also only a real prophet can say that some parts of Vedas or Purana are modified or interpolated. A propet is one who belongs to the family of angels or devatas and it cannot be Zakir Naik .. example Madhwacharya who is the incarnation of an angel came on earth in priestly family and wrote comenntories on Vedas Ramayana Mahabharat and pointed the part of Vedas and puranas which are corrupted.. because such a person willl be knowing full body of Hindu scriptures word by word .... How can you say that without reading the whole Vedas from a authoritative traditional scholar ? A normal person like Zakir Naik can only guess that there is possibility of prophet Muhammed being mentioned in the scriptures....he cannot conclude that it is Muhammed himself with full over confidence ...
I have seen another bad habit of zakir Naik ..he does not read the whole scripture but cherry picks certain lines of text and conclude that it says so..for example verse "na tasya Prathima asti" of yaajurveda is taken out of context by zakir where root meaning of wird Pratima means not image or idol in Sanskrit ....this verse means nobody to equal to God and not that God do not have image...
Masha Allah bhai...kisi ku doubt hai toh plzz yah galiyoon se pehley ek baar padlijiye....
Hum kisi ki mazhab ka mazaak nahi udatey....plzz bhai ek baar check karlo baad mein gaaliyan dena
Mohammad aur Kalki avatar dono alag alag hai
Zakir Naik jhoot bol rah hai
May khud ek Hindu hu aur Zakir Naik ko jhoota bi sabit Kar sak taa hu
@ Mohammad affan Ahmed, bahut acchi baat hai ke aap koi mazhab ka mazak nahi udate hain, lekin neeche verses ko dekhiye, aur jawab deejiye,
NO FRIENDSHIP WITH CHRISTIANS JEWS AND OTHERS
Quran
Quran (5:51) - "O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."
Quran (5:80) - "You will see many of them befriending those who disbelieve; certainly evil is that which their souls have sent before for them, that Allah became displeased with them and in chastisement shall they abide." Befriending unbelievers is one sign that a Muslim is bound for Hell.
Quran (3:28) - "Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them..." This last part means that a faithful Muslim is allowed to feign friendship if it is of benefit. Renowned scholar Ibn Kathir states that "believers are allowed to show friendship outwardly, but never inwardly."
Quran (3:118) - "O you who believe! do not take for intimate friends from among others than your own people, they do not fall short of inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you; vehement hatred has already appeared from out of their mouths, and what their breasts conceal is greater still; indeed, We have made the communications clear to you, if you will understand." This verse not only warns Muslims not to take non-Muslims as friends, but suggests that that the rest of the world is out to get them and can't be trusted. 4:101 says that unbelievers are "open enemies" of Muslims.
Quran (9:23) - "O ye who believe! Choose not your fathers nor your brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than faith. Whoso of you taketh them for friends, such are wrong-doers" Even family members are not to be taken as friends if they do not accept Islam. (There are harsher interpretations of this verse. The same (ninth) sura advocates "slaying the unbeliever wherever ye find them").
Quran (53:29) - "Therefore shun those who turn away from Our Message and desire nothing but the life of this world."
Quran (3:85) - "And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him, and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers."
Quran (3:10) - "(As for) those who disbelieve, surely neither their wealth nor their children shall avail them in the least against Allah, and these it is who are the fuel of the fire." Those who do not believe in Muhammad are but fuel for the fire of Hell (also 66:6, 2:24. 21:98).
Quran (7:44) - "The Companions of the Garden will call out to the Companions of the Fire: "We have indeed found the promises of our Lord to us true: Have you also found Your Lord's promises true?" They shall say, "Yes"; but a crier shall proclaim between them: "The curse of Allah is on the wrong-doers" Muslims in heaven will amuse themselves by looking down on non-Muslims in Hell and mocking them while they are being tortured (see 22:19-22).
Quran (1:5-7) - "Show us the straight path, The path of those whom Thou hast favored; Not the (path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray" This is a prayer that Muslims are to repeat each day. "Those who earn Thine anger" refers to Jews; "those who go astray" refers to Christians (see Sahih Bukhari (12:749) and Sahih Muslim 34:6448)).
Hadith and Sira
Sahih Muslim (1:417) - Taken to mean that one's own relatives should not be taken as friends if they are not Muslim.
Sahih Muslim (2167) - "Allah's Messenger said: Do not greet the Jews and the Christians before they greet you and when you meet any one of them on the roads force him to go to the narrowest part of it."
Abu Dawud (41:4815) - "The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man follows the religion of his friend; so each one should consider whom he makes his friend."
Abu Dawud (41:4832) - The Messenger of Allah [said] "Do not keep company with anyone but a believer and do not let anyone eat your food but one who is pious."
Sahih Bukhari (59:572) - "O you who believe! Take not my enemies And your enemies as friends offering them (Your) love even though they have disbelieved in that Truth (i.e. Allah, Prophet Muhammad and this Quran) which has come to you."
@@NewLife-jw9to bhai hamey suna saktey ho aap to bataein...agar aap ka dharm saccha hai toh main aapkey dharm mein convert hojaoonga...kuch daleel bataiye...jissey msin aap key wahan mutawajjo hojaoon...
Nahi toh main aapko bataoonga ...dharm..kya hai...
Bhai aap tayyar hai
@@ahuja1586 to app batnagay k Dharam Kay hai to thik hai bahi may Tayar hu
Magar apni bat ko yad rak na k app Dharam may convert Hona Hoga kyu k app nay hi Kaha hai
Aur bataoo k tumay Kay Jan na hai hamaray Dharam Kay barami ?
Game on
🙏🕉🙏
@@ahuja1586 Ari Kay hua Bhai app nay ABI tak jawab Nahi deya
Jawab doo chaloo pata laga Tay hai k such Kay hai
🙏🕉🙏
Zakir is great scholar of comparative religion with gift of the gab.
Zakir Naik is the biggest lier on the planet
New Life some people tell lies about him.. you are of them
@@lubnakhan5847 then prove me wrong
Let's see who is the real lier me or ur zakir Naik
So face the truth
Guys!!!
Doctor Zakir Naik,s accent is pretty difficult for me
and the accent for the one who ask the question is even harder!!!!!!
In Naik's defense, he is a joke.
@@prophetmuhammad1970 hey dickhead! You are a joke. Matter of fact you are brainless jerk
@@abdullahalrakib7654 actually Muhammad and his Allah are original joke
For me, Deedat accent is more difficult, Dr. Zakir accent is loud and clear..
@@संदिपमांडे-य1य u might be a sudra🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Klk Veda Vyasa collected the Vedas and Upanishath and compiled it as books ....He also wrote Puranas later....about the quotes on bhavishya purana check the site at httpww.astrojyoti.com/bhavishyapurana-2.htm
Even after dividing the Vedas, Srila Vyasadeva did not feel satisfied. Thinking that it will be impossible for the people of Kali-yuga to understand the actual purport of the Vedas, He took the essence of that understanding and compiled a simple literature called the Purana Samhita, in story form. For direct quotes check site gosai.com/writings/the-supremacy-of-srimad-bhagavatam-over-the-vedas
Clever hindu must think what says your book? Then come to right path?
Zakir Naik is the lier
Kalki avatar is not mohammad
@@NewLife-jw9to give us the proof.
@@mohammedrafi4789 first u prove that ur mohammad is kalki avatar
@@NewLife-jw9to hey man up u r the only one who claimed he's not kalki avatar, that's what we send us the proof.
@@mohammedrafi4789 yes mohammad is not kalki avatar
But if ur saying mohammad is kalki avatar then what is the proof ? On what basis ur claiming this
So plz provide me the source's
How to view other videos of this channel...
Vedic Corruption in 5 ways:-
NUMBER 1:999 lost Sukta’s of Rigveda
Shaunak Rishi in his Brahddevata, Katyayana’s in his Sarvanukramani,Sayan Acharya and Skand Swami in their Introduction of commentary of Rig Veda Mandal 1 Sukta 99 state that Kashyap rishi is the seer of 1000 suktas, in these suktas the number of mantras(richas/Verses) increase by one.
1. Katyayana’s Sarvanukramani :
Katyayana writes on sukt 99
जातवेदस एका । जातवेदस्यम् एतदादीन्येकभूयांसिसूक्तसहस्त्रमेतत्तु कश्यपार्षम् ।
Rishi Kashyap is the seer of 1000 Jatvedas suktas.
2. Shaunak Rishi’s Brahddevata :
.
Kashyap rishi is the seer of 1000 sukt addressed to Jatvedas which appear before the sukt addressed to Indra (Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 100). The first sukt of these is “For Jatvedas…(जातवेदसे सुनवाम ……..Rigved Mandal 1 Sukt 99). According to Shakupanithe number of mantras increase by one(in the number of stanzas). (Brahddevata 3 -130 -B)
3.Shadgurushishya’s Vedarth Dipika :
According to Shadgurushishya’s writings these Richa’s( verses )were 5,00,499 in number.
ऋचस्तु पंचलक्षा स्युः सैकोनशतपंचकम्
In light of the above stated facts we can draw the following conclusions
1. Kashyap rishi is the seer of Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 99, Jatvedas sukt.
2. Kashyap rishi is the seer of a total of 1000 Jatvedas sukt, including Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 99,.
3. Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 99 is the first sukt of these 1000 sukt.
4. These 1000 Suktas, of which Kashyap rishi is seer, appear before Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 100.
5. In these sukt the number of mantras increase by one, from which we conclude these 1000 suktas contain a total of 500,500 richa (verses).
6. In the extant Rigveda Samhitas we get only one of these 1000 verses, this leads us to the conclusion that 999 sukt are lost from the Rigveda. Alternatively it can be said that 5,00,499 richa (verses )are lost.
The evidences presented above convincingly prove that in the extant Rigveda Samhitas a large number of suktas are missing.
NUMBER 2:Vedas were stolen
Let me start by sharing with you an interesting yet ludicrous story that is mentioned in the Shanti Parv of Mahabharata; the story of the Vedas being stolen from the Creator of the Worlds by two demons, Madhu and Kaitabha. We read about this in Shanti Parv, Section 348. The two mighty Danavas (demons), having seized the Vedas, quickly dived into the ocean of waters which they saw and proceeded to its bottom. Seeing the Vedas forcibly taken away from him, Brahma Ji became filled with grief, and started wailing. The Vedas were later recovered by Vishu Ji’s timely intervention but still it shows the insecurity of the Vedic texts from the very beginning. If Brahma Ji had memorized the Vedas, how could the Vedas have been stolen? Perhaps his memory was not that strong after all. I only shared this story to give the readers an idea of a book which according to Hindus is the ‘greatest wonder of human civilization’. Truly a wonder it is.
NUMBER 3:Missing Verses
Nirukta 7:8 talks of a verse offering an oblation to Vishnu and Agni but the verse is not present in Rigveda anywhere.
Does this mean Vedas aren't well-preserved as thought and the contents changed over time?
NUMBER 4:1131 Vedas?
According to the Mahabhasya of Patanjali, there were 21 Shakhas of Rigveda, 9 of Atharvaveda, 101 of Yajurveda (86 of Krishna Yajurveda and 15 of Shukla Yajurveda, according to later authorities) and a 1000 shakhas of Samaveda. All these add to give the figure 1131. All these Shakhas are considered to be Vedas. The words Shakha means a ‘branch’ or a ‘limb’ and refers to a particular traditional text followed, as in the phrase śākhām adhite, (“he recites a particular version of the Veda”).
However, out of these 1131 Shakhas, only 11 Shakhas remain alive. As far as Rigved is concerned, only one Shakha, Shaakal Shakha alone remains alive out of the 21 that existed at one time. Another shakha that may have survived is the Bāṣhkala, although this is uncertain. Out of the 101 Shakhas of Yajurveda, only 6 are alive. In fact, Yajurveda is classified broadly into Shukla Yajurveda (White) and Krishna Yajurveda (Black). The former is popular in North India while the later is popular in South India. Shukla Yajurveda is also known as Vajasaneyi. The Vajasaneyi Samhita has forty chapters or adhyayas and there are two extant Shakhas of Shukla Yajurveda viz. Kanvaand Madhyandina. Krishna Yajurveda has 4 extant Shakhas viz.
Taittirīya
Maitrayani
Kaṭhak
Kapiṣṭhala
There are three surviving Shakhas out of 1000 of the text of the Samaveda Samhita:
the Kauthuma Shakha is current in Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Orissa and since a few decades in Darbhanga, Bihar,
the Jaiminiya in the Carnatic, Tamilnadu and Kerala,
and the Rāṇāyanīya in the Maharastra.
Out of the nine Shakhas of Atharvaveda, only two have survived
Paippalāda, in regions south to Narmada river
Shaunakīya, in regions north to Narmada river
What we know today as Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samaveda and Atharvaveda are actually Shakhas from the multitude of other Shakhas. The so called Vedas are never named as Vedas in their hymns. In other words, Rigveda is never called Rigveda in the Rigveda itself. If it be said that in other scriptures they have been called as Vedas, we can respond that so many other things have been called as Vedas also. For example, Ayurveda (Medicine), Sarpaveda (snakes), Dhanurved (weapons), Itihasaveda (History), Puranaveda (Stories). These words are based on Shatapath Brahman 13:4:3.
Hence, 1121 versions of Vedas have been lost. If someone will say that the Shakhas are not Vedas but only the explanations/commentaries that would be erroneous. The presently known Vedas are also Shakhas. So are these commentaries or actual Vedas? To say that Shakhas are not the Vedas will be to undermine the present Vedas (read Shakhas) also. Considering the two opposing Shakhas of Yajurveda we may ask, “Is Madhyandina Shakha (Shukla Yajurveda) the original or Taittirīya Shakha (Krishna Yajurveda)?”.
The above analysis makes it clear that a large portion of the Vedas has been lost.
NUMBER 5:Some more missing Verses.
After the collection and codification of Vedas, many different manuscripts gained currency amongst the Brahmin groups. The number of mantras in every manuscript continued to be changed. The current version of Rigveda was collected by Shaakal Rishi and was thus called Shaakal Samhita. It is divided into 10 Mandals (Books).
Nirukt 7:8 mentions the following,
“There is a joint oblation offered to Agni and Vishnu in the ten books of the Rigveda.”
However, in the entire Rigveda, there is not a single mantra jointly praising Agni and Vishnu. What is meant by joint oblation here? An oblation is an offering (Late Latin oblatio, from offerre, oblatum, to offer), a term, particularly in ecclesiastical usage, for a solemn offering or presentation to God. Where is an offering jointly made to Agni and Vishnu, we would like to see? This is a clear evidence that the Rigveda at the time of Yaska Muni had the joint oblation offered to Agni and Vishnu, but it is not found in today’s Rigveda, demonstrating corruption of the text.
Zazakallah khairan....
God bless and Protect you scheikh
RUclips (ruclips.net/video/5Rf8Bu5RMbs/видео.html)
Stop watching Porn
Stop watching porn (18+)
*لا إله إلا ﷲ*
الحمدلله
Muhammad is not mentions in any holy book.. he only mention in zakir naik's speech..
if you want to follow Kalki avtar of almighty you all should worship lord Vishnu..
You all should worship lord Rama..
You all should worship lord Krisna..
Denying the truth I see
I don't how it is possible for us...But I am hoping and praying to Allah The Almighty that In sha Allah Yaa Rabb someday Dr.Zakir may come to Philippines...I really this Brother of Ours... despite that he is Our Pride... Alhamdulillah.. love to watch him everyday..
The cast system of Hinduism u know is absolutely wrong. Read the holy Gita u will know
Omg!! This guy is lying blatantly about rig veda, rig veda is instructions on ritual to be performed during praying ritual.
The Rig Veda/Mandala 1/Hymn 13
"AGNI, well-kindled, bring the Gods for him who offers holy gifts.
Worship them, Purifier, Priest.
2. Son of Thyself, present, O Sage, our sacrifice to the Gods today.
Sweet to the taste, that they may feast.
3. Dear Narasamsa, sweet of tongue, the giver of oblations, I
Invoke to this our sacrifice."
Before going on verse 3 read first two, naramasa is referred to agni dev the fire god.
As such Quran can't be learnt without an master, Vedas should also be learnt under their masters. He is giving a lot of misinformation about Vedas just to show Islam is superior. That can't be an intention of true spiritual leader. Shame..
Superb memory.. Masha Allah..
Kalki avtar and prophet Muhammad are not same
Pl have some clarity
if you know explain pls
@@entertainmentworld2521
Firstly you have to believe in bhavishya purana in totality not in parts.
Kalki avtar is the last avtara and kalki will destroy the whole evil world and then satyayug will begin.
You can at the most compare it to 2nd return of jesus ,on day of judgement .
After prophet you and me are still living.
Kalki will born at ending of Kaliyuga after 40,000 years of Mahabharata
So he will cone me after 35000 years
I don't understand why they compare him with their fake Prophet
Kalki will not start any Religion he just impose Dharma and will finish sorrow
@@kingsman7761 tell me where its written he will be born after 40,000 years
@@ahmedshoaib1395 You don't even know about Avtar😁.
Actually Hindu mathematics is too advanced till date its incomparable
Read whole Article he is not connected with your Prophet.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalki
Predictions about birth and arrival
In the cyclic concept of time (Puranic Kalpa), Kaliyuga is variously estimated to last between 400,000 and 432,000 years. In some Vaishnava texts, Kalki is forecasted to appear on a white horse, at the end of Kaliyuga, to end the age of degeneration and to restore virtue and world order
Why this channel is removed while its video can be seen
Change your location in the RUclips settings and Inshallah it will be available...
The coward BJP government blocked the channel in India, fearing the number of non-muslims accepting ISLAM...
But they don't know that Allaah(SWT) has taken it upon himself to grant hidayah to the truthful people. Allaah(SWT) says in the Glorious Quran in no less than 3 places in Surah Tauba ch:9, V/s:33, Surah Fatah ch:48, V/s:28, and Surah Saff ch:61, V/s:9 ;
' IT IS ALLAAH WHO HAS SENT HIS MESSENGER WITH GUIDANCE AND THE RELIGION OF TRUTH SO THAT IT WILL PREVAIL OVER ALL THE OTHER RELIGIONS, HOWEVER MUCH THE UNBELIEVERS DON'T LIKE IT, AND ENOUGH IS ALLAAH AS WITNESS'.
@@shaikmohammedmansoor i already changed it brother😄😅
@@talhaimam1928 👍
Hare krishna 🙏
Proud to be a Sanatani❤️🤍🇧🇩
As per Vedas,kalki avatar is meant to come at the end of world.But if we consider Mohammed as kalki,then the world would have ended 1400 years ago
So if in 2020 , we have nuclear weapons then during the end of world you will fight with Sword
@@mohammadaarizimamc-viicr-3489 I encourage you to apply the same logic while reading your scripts.kudos🕵️🤘
@@mohammadaarizimamc-viicr-3489 This famous quotation is used by the great scholar Zakir Naik to try to prove that Hindus themselves do not know their own religion and scriptures. Shukla Yajur Veda (32.3): न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति यस्य नाम महद्यशः । हिरण्यगर्भ इ्त्येष मा मा हिंसीदित्येषा यस्मान्न जात इत्येषः ॥ na tasya pratimA asti yasya nAma mahadyashah | ‘hiraNyagarbha’ ityeSha ‘mA mA himsId’ityeShA yasmAnna jAta ityeShah || “There is no comparison of him, whose name is Great Glory. As seen in the hymns starting with ‘hiraNyagarbha’, ‘mA mA himsId’, ‘yasmAnna jAta’.” All the traditional commentaries (Zakir Naik did not read commentories of vedas written by acharyas who came from traditional lineage instead used unauthentic commentory ) are unambiguous and unanimous that the word “pratimA” is “pratimAnam” which means “comparison” and not image or idol. Uvvata’s commentary says: “न तस्य पुरुषस्य प्रतिमा प्रतिमानभूतं किञ्चिद्विद्यते” - “na tasya puruShasya pratimA pratimAnabhUtam kincid vidyate” - The word “pratimA” is explained as “pratimAnabhUtam” i.e. “comparative”. Mahidhara’s commentary says: “तस्य पुरुषस्य प्रतिमा प्रतिमानमुपमानं किञ्चिद्वस्तु नास्ति” - “tasya puruShasya pratimA pratimAnam upamAnam kincid vastu nAsti” - The word “pratimA” is explained as “pratimAnam” and “upamAnam”, which both undoubtedly mean “comparison” or “measuring up”. The ignorance of people who use this mantra for devious deceitful purposes (just for conversion without reading the full book on vedas) is as incomparable as the Great Glorious Hiranyagarbha. So here is one more shloka, which might give some points to ponder that God has spiritual form: Īśo 15 हिरण्मयेन पात्रेण सत्यस्यापिहितं मुखम्। तत्त्वं पूषन्नपावृणु सत्यधर्माय दृष्टये॥१५॥ hiraṇmayena pātreṇa satyasyāpihitaṁ mukham tat tvaṁ pūṣann apāvṛṇu satya-dharmāya dṛṣṭaye O my Lord, sustainer of all that lives, Your real face is covered by Your dazzling effulgence. Kindly remove that covering and exhibit Yourself to Your pure devotee. ¶ more info prabhupada.io/books/iso/15 Īśo 5 तदेजति तन्नैजति तद्दूरे तद्वन्तिके। तदन्तरस्य सर्वस्य तदु सर्वस्यास्य बाह्यतः॥५॥ tad ejati tan naijati tad dūre tad v antike tad antar asya sarvasya tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ The Supreme Lord walks and does not walk. He is far away, but He is very near as well. He is within everything, and yet He is outside of everything. ¶ more info prabhupada.io/books/iso/5 The divine form, pastime, and incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu have been described in Yajur-veda-saṁ hītā 5.15 - “idaṁ viṣṇur vicakrame tredhā nidadhe padaṁ ! samūḍhamasya pā gvaṁ sure….” "The manifested worlds were walked on by i.e. measured by Viṣṇu during the placement of his triple feet!...”. This description denotes the Trivikrama form displayed during the Vāmana-līlā depicted in the 8th Canto of SB and in other purāṇas as well. Thus, the concept of incarnation of the Lord also founds substantiation in Vedas. Rig Veda, 1:22:20 - oṃ tad viṣṇoḥ paramam padam sadā paśyanti sūrayaḥ "All the suras (i.e. the devas or angels like indra, agni, varuna, yama, etc) look always toward the feet of Lord Vishnu." Bhagavad gita 7.23 - Men of small intelligence worship the demigods, and their fruits are limited and temporary. Those who worship the demigods go to the planets of the demigods, but My devotees (Lord Krishna or Vishnu) ultimately reach My supreme planet. When Vedas tell that God is body less it means God do not have material or physical body. But God has spiritual form is mentioned in Puranas and that form has no suffering or decay. So Puranas gives additional information to Vedas and not contradict. People will reject Puranas thinking that it contradicts Vedas ..Even Arya Samaj founder did not consider it seriously but Madhwacharya has considered Puranas seriously and proved that it gives additional information which Vedas do not give it explicitly. That is why Lord Vishnu as Vamana covered the whole universe with just 3 steps (that means God can take a gigantic form as whole universe) and Lord Krishna showed His Vishwa Roopa (universal form where creation is visually seen to be part of God) to Arjuna when bhagavad Gita was presented and even whole universe in His mouth as a child to Yashoda. This is not possible with a material body. Another astonishing truth revealed by Madhwacharya is that some stories of Purana where God is shown in low light is also Leela or divine play .For eg Lord Krishna ends his divine play on earth when a hunter hits the leg of Lord Krishna mistaking it as some bird. In Mahabharatha it is already shown how Lord Krishna protects Arjuna inspite of so many divine astras (weapons) that hit the chariot. After Arjuna got down from chariot, Krishna then got down and then chariot which was hit badly bursted. Now when Lord Krishna has power to stop the divine weapons of demigods like Agni asras from damaging chariot how can a ordinary arrow kill Krishna ? This is done purposely by Krishna to delude the less intelligent people. It is called Asura mohana. We cannot understand the plan of God in our own life then how can we know the plan in His leela (divine play)? There are many such confusing episodes. For example Lord Krishna taking birth from Yashoda when He does not birth. acting as child but mature enough to have divine play with his devotees, etc.
Wait you’re NOT a computer???
Love u sir. Soo much
Masha Allah
RUclips (ruclips.net/video/5Rf8Bu5RMbs/видео.html)
Stop watching Porn
Stop watching porn (18+)
Sirrrrrrrr😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
How to ask question from Dr Zakir Naik??
JESUS SAVES FROM DEATH FROM HELL
Nope, Jesus can't save from death or hell.
nope he cant Only Allah can Jesus is only messnger of Allah
Equality in humanity , not superiority or difference classes of people to be easily suppressed the weak
بارك الله فيك
Mashallah Dr.Naik.zindabad !!
You know he's a joke, right?
@@prophetmuhammad1970 not bigger than you
JESUS WASNT A KILLER
Allah sabhi non Muslims ko Islam ke taraf aane ka hidayat de. Ameen.
😂😂
Good or bad... Everything will be there...
It's alarm about...vultures... Who don't want diffrenciate about "Dharma" and "Pantha"... And... Who always want to misguide people about Islam... "The Religion of Piece"
learn all the vedas and all puranas first. recite them and then you can read other books. this way you would know what not to follow and what to follow. you would actually know good from bad.
Do u know what r Vedas ?
U believe ur zakir Naik is true
But in reality zakir Naik k biggest lier on the planet
@@NewLife-jw9to zakir is a good actor. that is all. he is not truth seeker. at least in my opinion.
@@ilovemyx1594 he is not even an actor he is an biggest lier on the planet who only knows how to lie on other religious scriptures and brain wash non Muslims
@@NewLife-jw9to most of the people who ask questions look like goats prior to the festival.
@@NewLife-jw9to come to Malaysia, do debate with Dr Zakir Naik and proved him as u said.
अल्लाह ताला से दुआ है कि अल्लाह ताला आपको फिर हिंदुस्तान वापस लाए अम्नो अमान के साथ, ताकि हिंदुस्तान में
तबलीग का काम जारी रहे।
Ha jarur aye... Gaad todi jaegi yaha uski
dakwah is rasul work. N you must follow his sunnah.
I didn't even watch the video i directly came to the comment section 🤭
24794 SoniConsentes what is this 😐
Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd:
Allah's Apostle said, "In Paradise there is a tree so big that in its shade a rider may travel for one hundred years without being able to cross it."
Al-Bukhari: Volume 8, Book 76, Number 559t
A spiritual reformer will come from a foreign land (outside Bharat) with his disciples (companions). His name will be Mahamad (Muhammad). He will dwell in a desert. (Bhavisyath Purana 3:5-8)
www.stephen-knapp.com/mohammed_is_he_really_predicted_in_bhavishya_purana.htm
channel kyu band hogaya...?
May Allah SWT bless Dr zakir Naik with innumerous health happiness and longevity for the great service he is doing for peace and improving knowledge of all humans
Ameen
Assalamualeikum sir ji me ek ladki se shadi krna chata hu but ger Muslim ha bo bhi mujhse shadi krna chati ha ap help kr skte ho ap..
Bro ye masla ushke family Walo per depend krta hai ki woh maan to thik hai nahi to zabaran shadi nahi krna....
@@medicolearn bo maan gaye ha but mere family bale nahi man rhe ha bhai
@@mdirfan7796 tab lekin ushko islam qabool krna pedhega to sahi nahi to zabaran krna sahi nahi agar is per razi hai to apne family walo ko aap samjhaye....
Islam qubool krne ke liye ready ha bo
@@mdirfan7796 Love Jihad kro
*Whenever i prove and shows references from hindu books to sanatan people (hindu) they reply we do not believe on these books, now sanatans are not believing on their books, lol*
Know The Knowledge the book says mohammed is the devil. Have u read it
I m a Hindu show me the reference I will answer u
But in return u have to answer to my questions on ur islamic scriptures
What do u say ?
@@NewLife-jw9to what do u want to ask about Islam?
@@mnikhsanrahman5008 there r many things
But the main thing is how true is ur zakir Naik
@@NewLife-jw9to Alhamdulillah so far based on what i have learned from him is so many thing. Based on what i understand, his discipline are really good. Because in muslim world, to be a scholar are not easy. We must go thru many stage(examination, papers, written books, thesis and so many thing) until they are been recognized by others scholars. From that which is 1) knowlegde 2) discipline and 3) methods he is true and good in his field.
Many muslim eventhou they are hafiz(the one who can recite and remembered Al Quran cover to cover) are still not yet can call them scholar.
There also have, that we called it as Ustaz and Ulama, means they are like teacher and lecturer. Yet they are still not as a scholar.
If u know this discipline, u will know how tough is it.
Good ans sir i am a hindu i love ❤😘ans
Allah is The Almighty
Sirrrrr😍😍😍😍😍
Deedat ++
4 prakar k karmo ko janm Diya tha na ki caste system ka
Explain Quran 5:5;4:29...
5:5 says women are lawful for u if u marry them and give them dowry.
4:29 says Muslims can trade but should not steal other's properties.
In quran 25 times jesus name is there why dont u convert t christianity my dear zakir naik ...quran proofs that isa ibn mariyam is nothing but the the son of god ...@ even ur quran accepts this ... why dont u convert jakir bro
Resting isa ibn mariyam is son of god??? You mean Jesus is son of god??? Where in Quran says Jesus is son of god??? Give me reference and I will check it
@@lubnakhan5847 if his name is in quran with great prophet then bible is also correct u have to understand and bible say that ...@ so its proved jesus is the real son of god ..@
@@lubnakhan5847 Quran says jesus will return ...so wat more proves u want is prophet mohmad is coming No he is not but great jesus will arrive ..@ come to christianity my brother... @ Jesus is the son of god
@@lubnakhan5847 jesus is Itself a part of Allah ...
Who told you this story?
God?😅
Zakir naik needs to debate with real scholars.
Recently a woman shut him up. it's all over social media.
You should retire now. 😀
Link please
Kalki Purana mentioned that mhd was a demon reincarnated. Kalki is yet to be born.
Marvelous
What is in rigveda is what how you percieve
Wrong answer sab equal h bhagwan ke liye ye insano ne aeisa kra tha jo mhabharat hone ke bad khatam ho gya karan ki wajah se
Watch the video again and try to understand with your brain not emotionally
@@napoleon8688 don't believe this zakir Naik he is the biggest lier on the planet
Then if u think u a more wise. Why not u do a debate with Dr Zakir Naik.
@@mnikhsanrahman5008 Arya Samaj has challenged zakir Naik for many times since from 2004
But ur coward zakir Naik always runs away form the truth
@@mnikhsanrahman5008 aeisa jaraurat pra to jarur karungi but mujhse jyada intelligent baithe h or ye ek normal insan se kisi ko koi fark nhi parta
Maasah allah
How can u be a proper muslim by reading vedas and agreeing them and talking about vedas and publishing the vedas which is completely prohibited in Quran
Reading vedas or any other book isn't prohibited....
@@shiekhfahim6787 u canot speak vedas like ur will and wish who r u to speak vedas what do u know about this culture s it is not a muslims work to teach other religous text
@@shiekhfahim6787 if he had that much of he can become hindu or elese wat is the meaning of kalma
@@shiekhfahim6787 talking about vedas is prohibited as he is a muslim
@@praveenpr8453 brother!! Other religion people do research about qur'an....religion is not about..its way of living life....if u knw ur book has 100% rgt scientifically and logically y r u worried???.....u can research qur'an and show a single mistake ....logically and scientifically...atleast he's speaking fact..not against veda's....and islam doesnt prohibit reading veda's....its human being's wish...which religion he wants to follow...☺peace
Kalki is not the prophet PBUH. Prophet is a messenger. KALKI is GOD HIMSELF. All quotes he mentioned is wrong. Ive checked. Millions of messengers saints warriors came. The Caste he mentioned came from Head Chest Stomach legs is all wrong. This means he doesnt know Sanskrit. Vasudeva Kutumbam, eko brahma eko jivah. Is same as One children of GOD and all are equal. Purush Sukta mentions Saints Messengers(Brahman) come HIS forehead, Kshatriyas from his arms meaning warriors, Businessmen meaning traders from his torso meaning Vaishya. And finally Shudras (Skilled Artisans) from His feet, not down class people. People like Zakir Naik who cant read or want to use it for own benefit defame GOD and created Caste System man-made system. Not GOD made