Glad someone else likes this movie. Most people's reviews are negative. I think a lot of younger viewers are put off by the slow pace....which is a shame because this is one of the few "remakes" of an original film that stands on its own. Loved your review!
The trick with the mirror, door, and shadow mentioned at 15:54 really is a neat way to show a vampire's lack of reflection. I loved the way it was done in this film... unfortunately, during the ensuing dialogue scene (at least in the German version) Klaus Kinski's face very obviously appears in the top right hand corner of the mirror next to Lucy, undercutting the impact of the previous effect.
Nice review, Sean! I'm actually watching this right now, for the first time, on Turner Classic Movies. One thought that just hit me...with silent movies of this era, so much of it looks and feels like home movies, which makes the film all the more creepier to me. I find myself feeling like I'm watching something real, unlike a modern film.
Another excellent review. You are of course right - Herzog picks up on the plague and infection aspects of the novel. But actually Stoker's van Helsing is, like that of Herzog, initially determined on a scientific approach. It's something that has been chucked out the window since.
Nice video and review but I can't believe no mention of Isabel Adjani as Lucy ?! Not only does she deliver a stunning performance but her mere presence adds tons of atmospheric beauty to the stellar imagery, she has to be one of the most haunting beauties to ever grace a movie screen and even though she is never a vampire in the film she is the perfect image of a ghostly femm fatale.
Could have sworn I had nothing but high praise for her for all the reasons you describe, but I may have got sidetracked with the multitude of other things I wanted to discuss with the film. Regardless, I couldn't agree more - she was stunning in both beauty and performance.
Did like some of the aspects of this film, but prefer the original 1922 original. P.S. When you were talking about Van Helsing being accused of Dracula's murder, it reminded me of when Van Helsing was accused of Dracula's murder in Dracula's Daughter. Makes me wonder if the makers of this film were inspired by that film at all.
I need to see this remake. I loved the silent film and this looks great. Now I been following a newer remake that was on kickstarter. From the people who made the 2005 remake, Which they call it a remix, of The Cabinet Of Dr. Caligari. (I haven't seen the remake or the original.) This remake stars Doug Jones as Count Orlok, which I think its a better name then Dracula. It isn't out yet but I have been following and can't wait to watch it. It's called Nosferatu Remix, btw.
Jarvey Rocks-I heard about that, I might need to check that out cause I'm a huge fan of Doug Jones work in Guillermo Del Toros movies. I heard Robert Eggers who made The Witch is trying to get to remake Nosferatu as well, if he does he should maybe try and get Doug Jones to play Count Orlok again, he's a great fit for the role.
If you look at how about 99% of movies are remade today ... just don't. The 1922 and 1979 versions are absolute classics - each in their own way. I highly doubt any director today could top that. And if you cant do that a remake is just money making.
Hello, thanks for reviewing this amazing movie. Very nice and in depth review. I have a question: I bought the ''wrong'' Blu Ray of this movie. Do you happen to know where I would be able to find the one you have in the video? Thanks very much
I was baffled by this movie actually. Kinski's vampire lacks any sort of charismatic presence. It seems like Herzog actually wanted portray the vampire as pitiful creature and freak of nature. Which could work if he actually wrote a story about it and not just inserted scenes into the 1922 script. The most shocking to me was actually, when every time Dracula appeared and I suddenly realized this is a movie with a vampire...also this has to have the most ridiculous and pointless Renfield of all adaptations... This movie also has such awkward music accompaniment. Rheingold prelude kinda works in the mountainous scene (although building up into nothing), less so in the scene when Dracula is dragging coffins out of the ship (wtf)...also I didn't get that folk song during Harker's journey...the choir music works the most, although silence is the best accompaniment to most scene (which Herzog fortunately realized).
Have you watched Klaus Kinski in Vampire in Venice? A 1988 film which was supposed to have been the sequel to Nosferatu - The Vampyer, but had a troubled production. From what I remember, it was a good, but nowhere near as good as Herzog’s remake.
I have that film on DVD. It's super hard to find. It's quirky and plays like an arthouse film. I quite liked it. Both Kinski and Plummer were fantastic.
I have a copy of Nosferatu in Venice and it's a fantastic movie, although not terribly scary. It was originally intended as a follow up to the 1979 film, but Kinski didn't want to spend several hours a day in makeup, like he had to for the 1979 film. Besides which he was preparing for his film "Paganini" and was growing his hair long for that and didn't want to go through having all his hair shaved off again. There were other problems, such as several changes of directors, but the acting was good, and I really enjoyed seeing Christopher Plummer in the "Van Helsing" role. Kinski, despite his usual cantankerous treatment of the film staff, was amazing in the role, although his characterization of Nosferatu in this version lacked the subtlety of the 1979 film. A very enjoyable film nonetheless, and definitely worth watching.
Another movie that was filmed in twice at the same time in two languages (English/Arabic) is The Message/الرسالة ("al-Risalah") but used two different crew of actors. Filmed shot for shot the same though same lines on the same sets.
Truly though, watch the German version is by far the better. Maybe it's because the actors aren't as familiar/skilled in the language, but the Inglisch is stilted. It's sucked the poetry out of it, if you'll allow the pun. The beauty and atmosphere is in the German.
Tod Browning's Dracula (1931) English and Spanish versions. American/English cast, Spanish cast. Also, "pulls his teeth back"? Really, humans can do that? Perhaps you meant his lips! And, it was Mina's vanity makeup table which was not in the bathroom.
The situation with 1931 Dracula isn't the same thing though. Two completely different cast/crew using the same sets and script. This was the same cast/crew doing both version. Obviously "pulls his teeth back" was a slip of the tongue. And whatever, it was in another room behind a door, allowing them to do that clever shot. The cleverness of the shot was the point.
This needs a modern remake. Modern shots and scenes could make this movie way more scary. Set in a modern time the plague could be rehashed as a drug resistant bacteria. I wrote a screenplay on my Notes app in my iPhone on how I picture this modern movie looking like but chances are my movie will never be made. A shitty cash grab attempt will probably be made in the next decade when Vampires are all the rage again.
"Nosferatu" is a masterpiece. However, was it necessary for you to give away all the plot points and the twist ending, as part of a mere review? Thumb down for your sin.
As I was addressing specific plot points to discuss my thoughts on the film, yes it was absolutely necessary. How am I supposed to provide context for what I am discussing without citing specific examples from the film? At no point did I say or imply this was a spoiler-free review.
Glad someone else likes this movie. Most people's reviews are negative. I think a lot of younger viewers are put off by the slow pace....which is a shame because this is one of the few "remakes" of an original film that stands on its own. Loved your review!
I've got to give it a look
Awesome review, seriously. This film needed an in depth review badly
Happy to oblige! Glad I finally got off my duff and checked this one out, it's been on my radar for years.
Zaranyzerak hey can you do a Dracula movie review for the 1979 version with frank Langella ?
Why, yes! Yes, I can. Stay tuned! ;)
Love your back ground
this film awakens the imagery of those castles shrouded in fog left in the forest to be forgotten only the cold nights and wolves cries
Werner Herztog commentaries are usually very interesting, he's an intelligent and cultured guy.
The trick with the mirror, door, and shadow mentioned at 15:54 really is a neat way to show a vampire's lack of reflection. I loved the way it was done in this film... unfortunately, during the ensuing dialogue scene (at least in the German version) Klaus Kinski's face very obviously appears in the top right hand corner of the mirror next to Lucy, undercutting the impact of the previous effect.
Nice review, Sean! I'm actually watching this right now, for the first time, on Turner Classic Movies. One thought that just hit me...with silent movies of this era, so much of it looks and feels like home movies, which makes the film all the more creepier to me. I find myself feeling like I'm watching something real, unlike a modern film.
Another excellent review. You are of course right - Herzog picks up on the plague and infection aspects of the novel. But actually Stoker's van Helsing is, like that of Herzog, initially determined on a scientific approach. It's something that has been chucked out the window since.
Love this one like a deadly ballet ❤
Nice video and review but I can't believe no mention of Isabel Adjani as Lucy ?! Not only does she deliver a stunning performance but her mere presence adds tons of atmospheric beauty to the stellar imagery, she has to be one of the most haunting beauties to ever grace a movie screen and even though she is never a vampire in the film she is the perfect image of a ghostly femm fatale.
Could have sworn I had nothing but high praise for her for all the reasons you describe, but I may have got sidetracked with the multitude of other things I wanted to discuss with the film. Regardless, I couldn't agree more - she was stunning in both beauty and performance.
Ahh.....So good.
Hell yes Such a great movie!!! Both are!!
Great review!! This movie made me feel so so uneasy
Cape fear was another great remake. Nosferatu the Vampyre is a pretty great film, perfect acting, perfect cinematography, very good story.
Did like some of the aspects of this film, but prefer the original 1922 original. P.S. When you were talking about Van Helsing being accused of Dracula's murder, it reminded me of when Van Helsing was accused of Dracula's murder in Dracula's Daughter. Makes me wonder if the makers of this film were inspired by that film at all.
I read that Herzog saw only Nosferatu and The Fearless Vampire Killers in terms of this topic
my favorite Vampire movie of all time !!!
Original is still better
@@logansmovieoutlet9622 Maybe. But both are fantastic.
@@logansmovieoutlet9622 both are fantastic.:D
I like that Mina's name in this is Lucy and her death doesn't go in vain.
I need to see this remake. I loved the silent film and this looks great. Now I been following a newer remake that was on kickstarter. From the people who made the 2005 remake, Which they call it a remix, of The Cabinet Of Dr. Caligari. (I haven't seen the remake or the original.) This remake stars Doug Jones as Count Orlok, which I think its a better name then Dracula. It isn't out yet but I have been following and can't wait to watch it. It's called Nosferatu Remix, btw.
Jarvey Rocks-I heard about that, I might need to check that out cause I'm a huge fan of Doug Jones work in Guillermo Del Toros movies. I heard Robert Eggers who made The Witch is trying to get to remake Nosferatu as well, if he does he should maybe try and get Doug Jones to play Count Orlok again, he's a great fit for the role.
If you look at how about 99% of movies are remade today ... just don't. The 1922 and 1979 versions are absolute classics - each in their own way. I highly doubt any director today could top that. And if you cant do that a remake is just money making.
Harker....is actually now Dracula
Why they switched the name? Pretty obvious and pretty easy: Lucy means light.
Hello, thanks for reviewing this amazing movie. Very nice and in depth review.
I have a question: I bought the ''wrong'' Blu Ray of this movie. Do you happen to know where I would be able to find the one you have in the video? Thanks very much
Pretty sure I just bought it on amazon.
Also the fly remake!!!
Yes! Another fantastic one for sure!
Zaranyzerak goes without saying,and don’t forget the Blob remake.
I was baffled by this movie actually. Kinski's vampire lacks any sort of charismatic presence. It seems like Herzog actually wanted portray the vampire as pitiful creature and freak of nature. Which could work if he actually wrote a story about it and not just inserted scenes into the 1922 script. The most shocking to me was actually, when every time Dracula appeared and I suddenly realized this is a movie with a vampire...also this has to have the most ridiculous and pointless Renfield of all adaptations...
This movie also has such awkward music accompaniment. Rheingold prelude kinda works in the mountainous scene (although building up into nothing), less so in the scene when Dracula is dragging coffins out of the ship (wtf)...also I didn't get that folk song during Harker's journey...the choir music works the most, although silence is the best accompaniment to most scene (which Herzog fortunately realized).
Popol Vul did the music
Have you watched Klaus Kinski in Vampire in Venice?
A 1988 film which was supposed to have been the sequel to Nosferatu - The Vampyer, but had a troubled production.
From what I remember, it was a good, but nowhere near as good as Herzog’s remake.
I have that film on DVD. It's super hard to find. It's quirky and plays like an arthouse film. I quite liked it. Both Kinski and Plummer were fantastic.
@@ontologicallysteve7765 oh well its on youtube
I have a copy of Nosferatu in Venice and it's a fantastic movie, although not terribly scary. It was originally intended as a follow up to the 1979 film, but Kinski didn't want to spend several hours a day in makeup, like he had to for the 1979 film. Besides which he was preparing for his film "Paganini" and was growing his hair long for that and didn't want to go through having all his hair shaved off again. There were other problems, such as several changes of directors, but the acting was good, and I really enjoyed seeing Christopher Plummer in the "Van Helsing" role. Kinski, despite his usual cantankerous treatment of the film staff, was amazing in the role, although his characterization of Nosferatu in this version lacked the subtlety of the 1979 film. A very enjoyable film nonetheless, and definitely worth watching.
Another movie that was filmed in twice at the same time in two languages (English/Arabic) is The Message/الرسالة ("al-Risalah") but used two different crew of actors. Filmed shot for shot the same though same lines on the same sets.
the clock was really cool !
Bill Skarsgard is next to play Nosferatu!
Werner Herzog is pronounced Vair-ner Hairt-sohk. Just FYI
Truly though, watch the German version is by far the better. Maybe it's because the actors aren't as familiar/skilled in the language, but the Inglisch is stilted. It's sucked the poetry out of it, if you'll allow the pun. The beauty and atmosphere is in the German.
Venasneazle! Volkswagen! Blaupunt!
inconsistent movie. Some shots are absolutely incredible. And others are just comically bad. The good parts make it worth a watch though
defiantly under rated movie
Tod Browning's Dracula (1931) English and Spanish versions. American/English cast, Spanish cast. Also, "pulls his teeth back"? Really, humans can do that? Perhaps you meant his lips! And, it was Mina's vanity makeup table which was not in the bathroom.
The situation with 1931 Dracula isn't the same thing though. Two completely different cast/crew using the same sets and script. This was the same cast/crew doing both version. Obviously "pulls his teeth back" was a slip of the tongue. And whatever, it was in another room behind a door, allowing them to do that clever shot. The cleverness of the shot was the point.
Haha it's a not funny german cliche, na it's okay.
This needs a modern remake. Modern shots and scenes could make this movie way more scary. Set in a modern time the plague could be rehashed as a drug resistant bacteria. I wrote a screenplay on my Notes app in my iPhone on how I picture this modern movie looking like but chances are my movie will never be made. A shitty cash grab attempt will probably be made in the next decade when Vampires are all the rage again.
There is one but its been in post production for 2 years
The Strain!
As long as they don't fill it with fucking jump scares, people running towards the screen and loud noises...
"Nosferatu" is a masterpiece. However, was it necessary for you to give away all the plot points and the twist ending, as part of a mere review? Thumb down for your sin.
As I was addressing specific plot points to discuss my thoughts on the film, yes it was absolutely necessary. How am I supposed to provide context for what I am discussing without citing specific examples from the film? At no point did I say or imply this was a spoiler-free review.
This was a pretty good review