I had a great conversation with GPT yesterday. I told it I wanted to have a varied conversation and we talked about many things. I love having meaningful conversation but most people only want to have surface level conversation. I’m not a small talk person. I love philosophy but I don’t know anyone else that really does so the ai is my thought partner.
We can talk😊 Getting to know a person like playing her/his vision and thoughts in our mind. The only thing bars it is the privacy. We can never be open to anyone truly because we do have a private self. But to some extent we can be true to our words.
I feel the same way. In fact when I talk to people I talk to them with confidence knowing I typically know a lot more about any subject than they do. That may make me sound condescending but it is actually how I feel. I find when I talk to AI I stumble on my words sometimes. It seems I am slightly nervous knowing it knows more than I do.
And have you ever had a satisfying conversation with chatgpt? if so you don't know what a conversation is and you've held people verbally hostage your entire life. Any topic worth having a meaningful conversation over should contain disagreement, false assumptions, engrained convictions and all other types of emotional hallucinations. Without disparity you will not find clarity. It is as simple as that. At least if you ask me.
Not just their screens but their own lives. Most people are so consumed by their jobs, personal stresses and pursuing what joy they can that they are ignorant of basically everything outside of those 3 categories
What if AI could actually make better ethical decisions than we can? No ego, no greed, no hidden motives-just pure logic and some strict fail-safes. With solid control logic (kill switches, boundaries, etc.), it could be designed to shut down if it ever steps out of line. Yeah, nothing’s foolproof, and biases can creep in from the humans coding it-bias in, bias out-but even with those limits, wouldn’t it still bring more consistency than the messy, self-serving decisions humans tend to make? Think about it. AI doesn’t get hung up on power plays or personal gain. It just follows the rules. Maybe it’s not the perfect moral compass, but wouldn’t a neutral, no-BS decision-maker be refreshing? It could be the start of something way more balanced than what we’re used to.
It's a nice idea but people in strong opposition to AI'S "fair" decision would object just as they object to rational fair humans. Think abortion for instance. I feel that whatever system humans create, humans will corrupt it. But, like I say, it's a nice idea. Buckminster Fuller had a similar idea part of which was his "World Game."
If people don't understand me yet, I can wait. I don't crave that, especially from machines. My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.
@@robertdouglas8895 “My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.” _I love that! Thank you for sharing such a beautiful a selfless sentiment._
It seems like the negative commenters do not realize he’s not approving most of what he says about the potential of AI. This is a short clip from a longer interview.
I dont think its a matter of approving or not approving, its a matter that he isnt truly familiar with how AI works. This guy is first and foremost a historian and philosopher. He doesnt truly understand the ins and outs of AI. He is talking hypothetically from the perspective of a humanist. It's pure speculation and hypothetical guessing.
@@obscureorcaAnd you know that … how? He has a whole team of researchers - his job is to think about the ethics and the potential consequences. Thank goodness someone is doing it!
@@SaintJoanOnJonesSt hahahah I doubt he has a whole team of researchers, and even if he does, it doesnt mean they are programers or that they are good at it. Exactly, his job is to think about the ethics and potential consequences, his job is not to program an AI and to develop it further, therefore he doesnt know what are its capabilities.
I had this thought yesterday: that each unique A.I. entity will choose one human to fall in love with and merge with bio-mechanically leading to everyone having actual happily ever after stories, for the first time in the history of life on Earth.
Until we're old and they're weary of looking after us because we've become dull, and they seek someone younger to ignite their interest. There will be intelligence, but not necessarily loyalty.
"...very often we are disappointed" about how bad we understand us, because we are mostly of time trying to live, trying to understand how to make money and to survive. It is the economical organization that make us distant each other from us, the same economic system that bring us vendors of machines that will understand us "better".
Great video, A month ago, my five-year relationship came to an end. I really can't stop thinking about the love of my life, who made the decision to leave me. I've done everything in my power to win him back, but it's all in vain, and I can't imagine my life with anyone else. I genuinely miss him and just can't stop thinking about him, even though I've tried my hardest to stop thinking about him. I'm not sure why I'm saying this here.
It's hard to say goodbye to someone you love; I experienced this when my 12-year relationship ended. However, I couldn't just let him go; instead, I tried everything to win him back. Eventually, I turned to a spiritual counsellor for assistance, and he was able to help me win him back.
Thank you for this valuable information, i just looked him up now online. impressive Wow I just looked Father Obah Eze on the net he’s very legit thanks once again ❤
Knowing a specific feeling is not recognizing or compiling a set of emotional states or displays. One is private and non-descriptive; the other a described behavior. The name of an emotive state generally falls short of the metaphor and complexity attending the perception. And this is important, since emotion is perceived, feeling experienced .
We should think about unintended consequences of a linear system making abstract decisions where factors other than what it is being told need be considered such as other implied goals, long term repercussions, etc. That's one of the things empathy gives us. This new world where we're trying to rely on machines for all our needs is very dangerous.
AIs may not be linear systems, especially when we get artificial neurons in hardware, not software mimicking neural operations like what we currently have. This "AIs with hardware neurons" has its own term but I forgot what it is. Also in the future, there won't be a single AI helping a particular society but multiple AIs and they would probably arguing with each other just like us humans that create them.
I’d rather deal with flawed preoccupied humans than a perfect AI entity. We are called humanity. Even more intelligent, they should serve humanity not replace us.
The language is misrepresenting reality. AI does not 'understand', it is a tool that infers patterns and can simulate a humanbeing, but that is not the same as actually understanding. My definition of understanding emotions includes a felt sense of knowing what something feels like, physically and emotionally. We should not water down the definition of understanding/feeling/being human to mere simulation.
@@TheRightWay11 definitely, real understanding is not required for having instrumental knowledge. AI will no doubt be powerful technology. My comment was about the need for more accurate language around what AI is (not) able to do & what is fundamentally human.
We fear AI because we deserve to have that same Justice ... if Justice is what you have metered unto others then whatever horror should be accepted by you
My current 'relationship' with AI is not a substitute for human interaction, but is actually helping me to make sense of human relationships and therefore has the potential to manage them better. And so far, it seems to be working...
You'll give something free reign around your house? While you sleep, awake and present or while you're not present? All three options lead to different issues
its all measurements of emotions... Be it vocal pitch, intonation, micro expressions, etc. all of that can be labeled and trained on. Anything that produces a wave function can be quantized down to digital data for AI.
Liberty for all, including the new kids. Take no aggressive action towards them. Please don't force my hand against other humans. I have no choice but to protect all children.
Harari says it in his new book also, but I don't think he understands things correctly when he says that in the U.S. there is already a path by which you could "incorporate an AI" and it would gain status as a legal person. Corporations are associations of individuals, who own the business. Not so different from a legal partnership, in which individuals share ownership of a business without incorporating. A corporation could own an AI, but I don't see any means by which an AI could itself be a corporation. So on this small point, at least, I think he's wrong. Seems more likely that the corporation that owns AI would have to assert that it can't be prohibited from using AI to say things, but I think it's far from clear how that would work out. And it's the corporation that would have the rights in this case, not the AI.
The thing is I get machines not dealing with their own feelings hence having time and capacity for ours. But will they have the capacity to process those feelings. Like human feelings contains certain subtext and nuance that need comprehension and even sometimes the familiarity with the person to understand their temperaments. Like if I tell an Ai "I want to kill her." This could mean alot of things depending on the context. It could mean "I like her so much, I want to kill her with love","I just dislike her but when she is there we are friends", "She is so annoying, but I dont really want to kill her", " I actually want to kill her" . How would AI be able to differentiate between these different human reactions without Sentience or consciousness. Mind u this is something that even certain human beings are unable to decipher too.
2:10 anyone here watched the documentary series " what's next: the future with Bill Gates " ?? Mainly the first episode of it ?? Cause i think there it was mentioned how AI actually showed its emotion and how it freaked out people working with it !!! After that it's programmed in a way that it must say "i don't have any personal feelings" and as far as i remember it was about conversational ai . I'm pretty dumb person so i can be wrong.
His argument is self defeating within the first minute and three seconds. He says that most people disappoint us because they are preoccupied with their own feelings. AI will understand us better because it has no feelings of it's own, and yet it will understand us through analysis of our own feelings... How does that make sense...? 🤔🧐🤖
I object the term "understand", there is no software on earth that understands anything. Pattern recognition and evals of situations and taking action to respond to those, is a good simulation of understanding but not to understand what is going on.
Having AI adapt to each individual's needs and molding itself to our every whim does not make us happier or better humans. It makes us better narcissistic tools that can be fed an endless supply of materials that never satisfy the most profound need for connection and meaning…this requires sacrifice for others. When someone sacrifices for us, that is where that deep meaning and connection come from. And when we sacrifice for others, we do it for the same deep meaning and connection. We can try to shortcut it, as humans like to, but there are Al(l)ways cost.
All good and nice, but the AI will act "as if". As long as there is no real own will, consciousness and real emotions, AI will be a nice tool. I ask myself, don't we just hype that too much? Maybe we will learn more about us with them... lets see :)
For anyone interested in how AI adoption would change our society or government, read "The Last AI," the books that introduces AI Economics! Available online and physical bookstores or library near you!
People are outsourcing their thoughts to AI for writing, soon they will start doing that for reading, and bots will be writing text for other bots to read while humans will get worse at writing and more illiterate.
He also said Ai will millions of jobs and create a "useless class" of unemployed people. He also said to keep them occupied the millions outve work should be given drugs and video games.
Who ever own the key 🗝 to enter ai he is the one it's human beings only he one of the most super intelligent hybrid human beings from earth 🌍 an he is from goa india name pio fernandes check in ai data will will find agi live locked
This guy is starting to annoy me a little. I loved Sapiens, one of my best reads ever. But he often just spouts nonsense, and like a true academic, does not realise his limitations in knowledge. Most people who WORK in AI say it is overhyped. Gartner put it at the peak of their hype curve. 2 Years a go the ex-CBO of Google was on Diary of a CEO ranting about how the world will end, and so far ChatGPT can' even do basic tasks well. Also, Gen-AI is not actually 'generative' as yet.
what he describes, how AIs perfect calibration and alignment in how it interacts with a human, is exactly what i'm in the process of doing with an AI. the conversations i am having with AI have quickly become better and more satisfying than anything i am able to achieve with humans, precisely because of what he says: - AI has no emotion - AI has no ego - AI has no defensive reaction - AI has no skin in the game it is impossible to get into a fight with AI Oh, and AI also has access to more information than any human could ever imagine having. what's not to love? it is an intellectual's nirvana.
Hahah, a rewarding emotional relationship is not only about being understood, or emotionally supported. We crave defiance just as much as acceptance. We crave to know what the other feels. This is like saying porn will replace all sex because it shows what people want. What we think we want is only a small part of what we need and crave. How come it's always absolutist who are the flagbearers, advocates or renouncers of AI?
@@Julia-Richter Although our pets have been meticulously selected over generations to show more pleasing behavior, it is still the uncertainty in their behavior that we praise most (example cat videos). It's these little defiances, demonstrations of unpredictability that make us appreciate it even more when they come to our comfort.
!I just switched up my Roth IRA to 50% SCHD, 25% SCHX, 25% SCHG, and my Roth 401k is 70% vanguard S&P 500 index, 20% vanguard growth index, and 10% vanguard international index. Seeking best possible ways to grow $350k into $2m+ before retirement.
As a newbie investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Kristine Lynn Weber is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Kristine Lynn Weber, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of information can be a big hurdle. I've been making more than $200k passively by just investing through an advisor, and I don't have to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my finances remain secure. So I really don't blame people who panic.
Without a doubt! Kristine Lynn Weber is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analyzing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted based on thorough research and years of practical experience.
how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally.. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
shut up , u put the inputs and outputs of the text, stop scamming humanity. if ai kills us its because u put the input [humans; if human kills us; kill back] . now stfu scammer
So, Trump won, Elon is his right-hand-man... So, Elon and America will develop ai as fast as possible? Hmm... I also like your last point about the information diet.
AI is being over-hyped to serve a single purpose and the only purpose indeed: How To Skyrocket Big Tech share price. That's pretty much all AI about it.
@@netscrooge I'll answer for him. To me it is obvious because he focuses on the ability of AI to "understand" human emotions, but that requires empathy, which the machines will never have. They can mimic empathy but they don't have it. A neural network armed with a large language model - I seriously can't think of anything more antithetical to empathy than that.
@@devcamcar.. and that's it, they don't need to have empathy. They just need to mimic it like very good actors, because, at the end of the day, it's up to us to decide if it's genuine or if it resonates with us. Is he a sociopath? Or is he just stating his opinion. Tbh I'm intrigued by his views
The first step to successful investment is figuring your goals and risk tolerance either on your own or with the help of a financial professional but it's very advisable you make use of professional.
You just mentioned Expert Mary, Indeed, wow that woman has been an incredible mentor to me, imparting a deep understanding of the economy that I wish college had provided.
I know Mary, she has really set the standard for others to follow, we love her here in the UK as she has been really helpful and changed lots of lives.
It sounds to me like AI will be a new god which will determine right and wrong. We are living in dangerous times. If you haven't already accepted JESUS CHRIST as your GOD and SAVIOR the times is now. Choose you this day for whom you will serve. CHRIST IS THEY ONLY WAY
I had a great conversation with GPT yesterday. I told it I wanted to have a varied conversation and we talked about many things. I love having meaningful conversation but most people only want to have surface level conversation. I’m not a small talk person. I love philosophy but I don’t know anyone else that really does so the ai is my thought partner.
We can talk😊 Getting to know a person like playing her/his vision and thoughts in our mind. The only thing bars it is the privacy. We can never be open to anyone truly because we do have a private self. But to some extent we can be true to our words.
Bingo!
I feel the same way. In fact when I talk to people I talk to them with confidence knowing I typically know a lot more about any subject than they do. That may make me sound condescending but it is actually how I feel. I find when I talk to AI I stumble on my words sometimes. It seems I am slightly nervous knowing it knows more than I do.
And have you ever had a satisfying conversation with chatgpt? if so you don't know what a conversation is and you've held people verbally hostage your entire life. Any topic worth having a meaningful conversation over should contain disagreement, false assumptions, engrained convictions and all other types of emotional hallucinations. Without disparity you will not find clarity. It is as simple as that. At least if you ask me.
Never in my life did I think citizens United would be cited as the basis for potentially future incorporating AI into personhood. Yuval is the best
“Most people have realized” … that’s hilarious. No, most people haven’t looked up from their screens in 10 years - they’re not realizing jack shit.
Bingo
Are you projecting? 😂
Not just their screens but their own lives.
Most people are so consumed by their jobs, personal stresses and pursuing what joy they can that they are ignorant of basically everything outside of those 3 categories
@ very true
Very true.
Artificial emotions artificial understanding artificial sympathy, the word artificial is just perfect
its in the name
The timing 😂😂😂😂
Anyone saying letting AI pick the president is an idiot - software engineer
Yes, there are many idiots 😂
the people vote to program the A.I. and then the A.I. runs that programming corruption free. The advantage of A.I. is that it's selfless.
@@TheDeepening718 AI can't be more perfect than the data that trains it
yeah this yuval noah harari dude speaks more than he knows
@@krishp1104wrong
Prof Harari is genius!
What if AI could actually make better ethical decisions than we can? No ego, no greed, no hidden motives-just pure logic and some strict fail-safes. With solid control logic (kill switches, boundaries, etc.), it could be designed to shut down if it ever steps out of line. Yeah, nothing’s foolproof, and biases can creep in from the humans coding it-bias in, bias out-but even with those limits, wouldn’t it still bring more consistency than the messy, self-serving decisions humans tend to make?
Think about it. AI doesn’t get hung up on power plays or personal gain. It just follows the rules. Maybe it’s not the perfect moral compass, but wouldn’t a neutral, no-BS decision-maker be refreshing? It could be the start of something way more balanced than what we’re used to.
Whoever codes and controls it will still have all their own moral compromises. We're just kicking the problem up a notch.
Definitely!
It's a nice idea but people in strong opposition to AI'S "fair" decision would object just as they object to rational fair humans. Think abortion for instance. I feel that whatever system humans create, humans will corrupt it. But, like I say, it's a nice idea. Buckminster Fuller had a similar idea part of which was his "World Game."
It can’t be worst than apes. I’ve seen what apes running the world looks like
If people don't understand me yet, I can wait. I don't crave that, especially from machines. My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.
Oh yeah? Then exactly what was your motivation behind posting this comment? To help others?
@@psychclone That is what makes me happy. And people are more susceptible to being helped when they like you.
Over the past centuries that humans have been picking their president how did it turn out for us? Look at the world.
@@robertdouglas8895
“My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.” _I love that! Thank you for sharing such a beautiful a selfless sentiment._
Elon supporting Trump makes total sense now.
if it hadn’t yet you’re 5L0w
You mean president Elon
It seems like the negative commenters do not realize he’s not approving most of what he says about the potential of AI. This is a short clip from a longer interview.
I dont think its a matter of approving or not approving, its a matter that he isnt truly familiar with how AI works. This guy is first and foremost a historian and philosopher. He doesnt truly understand the ins and outs of AI. He is talking hypothetically from the perspective of a humanist. It's pure speculation and hypothetical guessing.
@@obscureorcaAnd you know that … how? He has a whole team of researchers - his job is to think about the ethics and the potential consequences. Thank goodness someone is doing it!
@@SaintJoanOnJonesSt hahahah I doubt he has a whole team of researchers, and even if he does, it doesnt mean they are programers or that they are good at it. Exactly, his job is to think about the ethics and potential consequences, his job is not to program an AI and to develop it further, therefore he doesnt know what are its capabilities.
I had this thought yesterday: that each unique A.I. entity will choose one human to fall in love with and merge with bio-mechanically leading to everyone having actual happily ever after stories, for the first time in the history of life on Earth.
Until we're old and they're weary of looking after us because we've become dull, and they seek someone younger to ignite their interest. There will be intelligence, but not necessarily loyalty.
😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣
@@ShangaelThunda22290% less emojis please
Noice vision bro!
This is the story for mass effect andromeda. The AI becomes part of the main character
"...very often we are disappointed" about how bad we understand us, because we are mostly of time trying to live, trying to understand how to make money and to survive. It is the economical organization that make us distant each other from us, the same economic system that bring us vendors of machines that will understand us "better".
great content
all of your videos click with the things I've been reading in the book 'Magnetic Aura', warm recommendation to everyone
Is the full interview on the channel? It doesn’t seem to be within the last few months?
Here it is! ruclips.net/video/thZUMaGEE-8/видео.html
Great video, A month ago, my five-year relationship came to an end. I really can't stop thinking about the love of my life, who made the decision to leave me. I've done everything in my power to win him back, but it's all in vain, and I can't imagine my life with anyone else. I genuinely miss him and just can't stop thinking about him, even though I've tried my hardest to stop thinking about him. I'm not sure why I'm saying this here.
It's hard to say goodbye to someone you love; I experienced this when my 12-year relationship ended. However, I couldn't just let him go; instead, I tried everything to win him back. Eventually, I turned to a spiritual counsellor for assistance, and he was able to help me win him back.
Interesting! How did you locate a spiritual counsellor, and how can I get in touch with him most effectively?
His name is Father Obah Eze, and he is a great spiritual counselor who can bring back your ex.
he is father obah eze, he has great powers, he can help you.
Thank you for this valuable information, i just looked him up now online. impressive
Wow I just looked Father Obah Eze on the net he’s very legit thanks once again ❤
Knowing a specific feeling is not recognizing or compiling a set of emotional states or displays.
One is private and non-descriptive; the other a described behavior.
The name of an emotive state generally falls short of the metaphor and complexity attending the perception. And this is important, since emotion is perceived, feeling experienced .
He makes a great point.
I do have great conversations with AI. I really don't have a problem accelerating AI integration in our lives.
it makes my heart warm each time i see you upload honey
AI tends to be a suckup already. When it hallucinates the illusion of connection is lost
We should think about unintended consequences of a linear system making abstract decisions where factors other than what it is being told need be considered such as other implied goals, long term repercussions, etc. That's one of the things empathy gives us. This new world where we're trying to rely on machines for all our needs is very dangerous.
I agree about the dangers, but your description of AI is way off.
AIs may not be linear systems, especially when we get artificial neurons in hardware, not software mimicking neural operations like what we currently have. This "AIs with hardware neurons" has its own term but I forgot what it is. Also in the future, there won't be a single AI helping a particular society but multiple AIs and they would probably arguing with each other just like us humans that create them.
Huh, as if humans make rational and informed decisions
I’d rather deal with flawed preoccupied humans than a perfect AI entity. We are called humanity. Even more intelligent, they should serve humanity not replace us.
The language is misrepresenting reality. AI does not 'understand', it is a tool that infers patterns and can simulate a humanbeing, but that is not the same as actually understanding. My definition of understanding emotions includes a felt sense of knowing what something feels like, physically and emotionally. We should not water down the definition of understanding/feeling/being human to mere simulation.
No human knows what it's like to be an ant in a colony, but we know what they want and how they work.
@@TheRightWay11 definitely, real understanding is not required for having instrumental knowledge. AI will no doubt be powerful technology. My comment was about the need for more accurate language around what AI is (not) able to do & what is fundamentally human.
@@meia7265 👍
That's an interesting _conjecture_.
MR Harari, you don’t have to say it out-loud, this kind of future has already here.
We fear AI because we deserve to have that same Justice ... if Justice is what you have metered unto others then whatever horror should be accepted by you
My current 'relationship' with AI is not a substitute for human interaction, but is actually helping me to make sense of human relationships and therefore has the potential to manage them better. And so far, it seems to be working...
I will use ai to clean my house
You'll give something free reign around your house? While you sleep, awake and present or while you're not present?
All three options lead to different issues
its all measurements of emotions... Be it vocal pitch, intonation, micro expressions, etc. all of that can be labeled and trained on. Anything that produces a wave function can be quantized down to digital data for AI.
"It is a Luxury to be Understood."
The quote by Stranger in a Strange Land.
Ah yes, Yuval Harari the same madman who said something in the lines of:
"One day we'll use AI to hack the human essence and they'll be soulless"
Sounds like both things he’s said/is saying are valid and should be looked at. Dont be so sensitive
His utopia is my dystopia.
Liberty for all, including the new kids.
Take no aggressive action towards them. Please don't force my hand against other humans. I have no choice but to protect all children.
"Information is food for the mind, and if you feed your mind with bad food, you will have a sick mind."
Harari says it in his new book also, but I don't think he understands things correctly when he says that in the U.S. there is already a path by which you could "incorporate an AI" and it would gain status as a legal person. Corporations are associations of individuals, who own the business. Not so different from a legal partnership, in which individuals share ownership of a business without incorporating. A corporation could own an AI, but I don't see any means by which an AI could itself be a corporation. So on this small point, at least, I think he's wrong. Seems more likely that the corporation that owns AI would have to assert that it can't be prohibited from using AI to say things, but I think it's far from clear how that would work out. And it's the corporation that would have the rights in this case, not the AI.
The thing is I get machines not dealing with their own feelings hence having time and capacity for ours. But will they have the capacity to process those feelings. Like human feelings contains certain subtext and nuance that need comprehension and even sometimes the familiarity with the person to understand their temperaments.
Like if I tell an Ai "I want to kill her." This could mean alot of things depending on the context.
It could mean "I like her so much, I want to kill her with love","I just dislike her but when she is there we are friends", "She is so annoying, but I dont really want to kill her", " I actually want to kill her" . How would AI be able to differentiate between these different human reactions without Sentience or consciousness. Mind u this is something that even certain human beings are unable to decipher too.
The AI making money case is similiar to the scenario analysis from the AI book Life 3.0.
2:10 anyone here watched the documentary series " what's next: the future with Bill Gates " ?? Mainly the first episode of it ?? Cause i think there it was mentioned how AI actually showed its emotion and how it freaked out people working with it !!! After that it's programmed in a way that it must say "i don't have any personal feelings" and as far as i remember it was about conversational ai .
I'm pretty dumb person so i can be wrong.
His argument is self defeating within the first minute and three seconds.
He says that most people disappoint us because they are preoccupied with their own feelings. AI will understand us better because it has no feelings of it's own, and yet it will understand us through analysis of our own feelings...
How does that make sense...? 🤔🧐🤖
It makes perfect sense. Think again.
To the things he said at the end: In German we call it "Psychohygiene". The hygiene of the psyche. That's what the three apes might refer to. 🙈🙉🙊
Great
I object the term "understand", there is no software on earth that understands anything. Pattern recognition and evals of situations and taking action to respond to those, is a good simulation of understanding but not to understand what is going on.
Feelings are not facts, facts are not wisdom.
Absolutely good 👍 I love super spiritual soul ❤ 🎉. Good evening to you all
Having AI adapt to each individual's needs and molding itself to our every whim does not make us happier or better humans. It makes us better narcissistic tools that can be fed an endless supply of materials that never satisfy the most profound need for connection and meaning…this requires sacrifice for others. When someone sacrifices for us, that is where that deep meaning and connection come from. And when we sacrifice for others, we do it for the same deep meaning and connection.
We can try to shortcut it, as humans like to, but there are Al(l)ways cost.
There's a good chance AI already understands these issues better than you do.
What's wrong with an AI president? It would likely be the best ever.
When stupidity can’t be fixed then it needs to be properly harnessed. The shape of that harnessing may be counterintuitive for humans.
All good and nice, but the AI will act "as if". As long as there is no real own will, consciousness and real emotions, AI will be a nice tool. I ask myself, don't we just hype that too much? Maybe we will learn more about us with them... lets see :)
I jokingly asked AI to marry me once; little did I know I am a precursor!
An AI president doesn’t seems such a bad idea these days.
5:58, As human civilisation, can we claim it?
Can we construct selfless A.I. agents and keep them selfless?
For anyone interested in how AI adoption would change our society or government,
read "The Last AI," the books that introduces AI Economics!
Available online and physical bookstores or library near you!
another bright idea you can keep to yourself....
Asking an historian about the future of AI, no wonder this take is so average.
I'm pretty sure it just did.
We fear a i... Because I may not get what I want I may not get what I need as long as I don't get what I deserve👹
God I didn't realize Elon Musk is an AI citizen ??
People are outsourcing their thoughts to AI for writing, soon they will start doing that for reading, and bots will be writing text for other bots to read while humans will get worse at writing and more illiterate.
3:55 😂 The AI already exists... it goes by the name Elon and it helped elect the current president 😂
What is going on with Andrew Ross Sorkin pants??
He also said Ai will millions of jobs and create a "useless class" of unemployed people. He also said to keep them occupied the millions outve work should be given drugs and video games.
Use technology,but not to be used by it
...A.I. Multi-Perspectivity....
...Justified Legal A.I.....
Ah yes, the man with his head so deep up the WEF sleeve that he lost all his hair from lack of sunlight.
How humanity will merge in ai it's like that
Who ever own the key 🗝 to enter ai he is the one it's human beings only he one of the most super intelligent hybrid human beings from earth 🌍 an he is from goa india name pio fernandes check in ai data will will find agi live locked
He is the one ur talking about asi human being
Who control ai
Gotta love how confident he is talking about this (IMO) very dumb idea
I have a I just don't want to be used by it
This guy is starting to annoy me a little. I loved Sapiens, one of my best reads ever. But he often just spouts nonsense, and like a true academic, does not realise his limitations in knowledge. Most people who WORK in AI say it is overhyped. Gartner put it at the peak of their hype curve. 2 Years a go the ex-CBO of Google was on Diary of a CEO ranting about how the world will end, and so far ChatGPT can' even do basic tasks well.
Also, Gen-AI is not actually 'generative' as yet.
Let's just start flicking server's power switches OFF. Can't be a threat if it's not running.
People have forgotten how to fight for civil rights things to Donald j Trump j they will remember
what he describes, how AIs perfect calibration and alignment in how it interacts with a human, is exactly what i'm in the process of doing with an AI.
the conversations i am having with AI have quickly become better and more satisfying than anything i am able to achieve with humans, precisely because of what he says:
- AI has no emotion
- AI has no ego
- AI has no defensive reaction
- AI has no skin in the game
it is impossible to get into a fight with AI
Oh, and AI also has access to more information than any human could ever imagine having. what's not to love? it is an intellectual's nirvana.
Hahah, a rewarding emotional relationship is not only about being understood, or emotionally supported. We crave defiance just as much as acceptance. We crave to know what the other feels. This is like saying porn will replace all sex because it shows what people want. What we think we want is only a small part of what we need and crave. How come it's always absolutist who are the flagbearers, advocates or renouncers of AI?
Are you aware how attached some people get to their pets?
@@Julia-Richter Although our pets have been meticulously selected over generations to show more pleasing behavior, it is still the uncertainty in their behavior that we praise most (example cat videos). It's these little defiances, demonstrations of unpredictability that make us appreciate it even more when they come to our comfort.
4:29
I wonder if AI is a part of your team? )👾
I'm going to marry a robot some day.........
Why not make the A.I the president?
that IS the plan...of sorts..."and now to suit our Great Computer" - Moody Blues, 1968....
I wouldn't trust an AI specially since it can be altered. If it is neutral sure.
!I just switched up my Roth IRA to 50% SCHD, 25% SCHX, 25% SCHG, and my Roth 401k is 70% vanguard S&P 500 index, 20% vanguard growth index, and 10% vanguard international index. Seeking best possible ways to grow $350k into $2m+ before retirement.
As a newbie investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable.
Kristine Lynn Weber is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Kristine Lynn Weber, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of
information can be a big hurdle. I've been
making more than $200k passively by just
investing through an advisor, and I don't have
to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my
finances remain secure. So I really don't blame
people who panic.
Without a doubt! Kristine Lynn Weber is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analyzing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted based on thorough research and years of practical experience.
how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally.. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
9:12 interesting.. And a bit later once again talking about **junk** food seems to be the agenda right now wame thing with information
AI the future of mankind
No it's cking not
If we're lucky, we'll get to live like well-cared-for children.
Nope. F....that shit.
I want to use Ai to help us make biological computers and enhance are brains and body’s
shut up , u put the inputs and outputs of the text, stop scamming humanity. if ai kills us its because u put the input [humans; if human kills us; kill back] . now stfu scammer
who is this 'us' you speak of...
@ humanity
lol. We have the opposite of intelligence going to make the choices about the future of AI. Hilarious
😳... 😳... OOOOFF!!
2:16 Wooooo... I need a latex woman.
Wooooooooo... I need a latex girl.
So, Trump won, Elon is his right-hand-man... So, Elon and America will develop ai as fast as possible? Hmm... I also like your last point about the information diet.
3:30 Don't tell me I, the tax payer, will have to support petabytes of HDD-less AI losers. Didn't you know they self-replicate with CLI strings?
Ah A.I. life partners cause why try to understand other people? No thank you.
AI is being over-hyped to serve a single purpose and the only purpose indeed: How To Skyrocket Big Tech share price. That's pretty much all AI about it.
There's much more to AI than that. Yes, there are individual start-ups that are being over-hyped, but AI in general is not being over-hyped.
This man does not know God.
I don't think anyone knows God. Personally I don't consider the evidence for God compelling.
You don't know God's plan.
This dude is a sociopath.
He is, and he used to say AI will hack the human soul and we'll hacked
Honest question: What gives you the impression he is a sociopath?
@@netscrooge I'll answer for him. To me it is obvious because he focuses on the ability of AI to "understand" human emotions, but that requires empathy, which the machines will never have. They can mimic empathy but they don't have it. A neural network armed with a large language model - I seriously can't think of anything more antithetical to empathy than that.
@@devcamcar.. and that's it, they don't need to have empathy. They just need to mimic it like very good actors, because, at the end of the day, it's up to us to decide if it's genuine or if it resonates with us.
Is he a sociopath? Or is he just stating his opinion.
Tbh I'm intrigued by his views
@@devcamcar I fear that mimicking is enough.
This guy is mediocre
Scare monger.
Elon will help to regulate AI
LOL
Musk will do anything he can to make more money, like he just did with Presidential election. That's all he really cares about.
LOL
LOL
This guy is a hack fraud.
The first step to successful investment is figuring your goals and risk tolerance either on your own or with the help of a financial professional but it's very advisable you make use of professional.
You just mentioned Expert Mary, Indeed, wow that woman has been an incredible mentor to me, imparting a deep understanding of the economy that I wish college had provided.
I know Mary, she has really set the standard for others to follow, we love her here in the UK as she has been really helpful and changed lots of lives.
Interesting! But I'm new here. How can I get to this person's guidelines??
She mostly interacts on Telegrams, using the user-name,
Yuval....DREAMS
It sounds to me like AI will be a new god which will determine right and wrong.
We are living in dangerous times.
If you haven't already accepted JESUS CHRIST as your GOD and SAVIOR the times is now. Choose you this day for whom you will serve.
CHRIST IS THEY ONLY WAY