Shortcut For Derivative of x^x

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
  • Here we will take the derivative of x^x FAST
    Regular video: • derivative of x^x
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    👉 Subscribe here: bit.ly/3wvjVL3
    🛍 Shop math t-shirt & hoodies: bit.ly/3uZ51vz
    💪 Become an undefound member for only $0.99/ month & watch all my unlisted videos first: bit.ly/3uYHrz1
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    bprp #fast

Комментарии • 239

  • @ארזאנגלברג
    @ארזאנגלברג 3 года назад +903

    the multivariable side of calculus is a pathway to many abilities, some consider to be unnatural

    • @gudu12321
      @gudu12321 Год назад +7

      אח יקר

    • @sirface7951
      @sirface7951 Год назад +6

      אח בדם

    • @ozderei6607
      @ozderei6607 Год назад +5

      שלום לכולם

    • @cheddlescheeseburger533
      @cheddlescheeseburger533 Год назад +16

      Is this even multi variable calculus?

    • @arbs-5164
      @arbs-5164 Год назад +29

      ​​@@cheddlescheeseburger533 he basically turned the problem into a multivariate problem and used a calc 3 derivative technique then set the 2nd variable to be x. And by that u basically get the same result as doing it by normal methods.
      F = x^y
      Taking the derivative wrt x
      F'= Fsubx.dx/dx +Fsuby.dy/dx
      (Fsubx and Fsub y are partial derivatives of F with respect to x and y respectively)
      F'= y.x^(y-1) + (x^y).ln(x)dy/dx
      If y=x
      F' = x.x^(x-1) + (x^x).ln(x).dx/dx
      F' = x^x + (x^x).ln(x)
      Which is the form given in the video

  • @lasslos1490
    @lasslos1490 Год назад +379

    Just do x^x=e^(ln(x)*x) and differenciate as usual. That's, in my opinion, way easier and mathematically complete.

    • @ayushraj233
      @ayushraj233 11 месяцев назад +8

      What will you do in f(x)^g(x)
      Power mein 😢

    • @noobcuber3921
      @noobcuber3921 11 месяцев назад +6

      @@ayushraj233 that isn't f(x)^g(x). it's f(g(x))

    • @dhdusidjdjso
      @dhdusidjdjso 10 месяцев назад +2

      I don’t think this was meant to be a way to solve equations like these, but rather just interesting to see

    • @BasitCeviriler
      @BasitCeviriler 10 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah, that is what I did.

    • @danny89620
      @danny89620 9 месяцев назад

      ​@@PaulZen30 same goes for the solution in the video then.

  • @AyushSingh-pq3cj
    @AyushSingh-pq3cj Год назад +140

    When Eminem becomes a maths teacher:)

  • @gaycat599
    @gaycat599 Год назад +99

    I just assumed it was y, took ln on both side, and differentiated both side with respect to x
    y=x^x
    ln(y)=x ln(x)
    dy/dx * 1/y = x/x + ln x
    dy/dx = x^x (1+ln x)

    • @piyusharora5327
      @piyusharora5327 Год назад +6

      Thank you for providing this solution

    • @StevenMinecraft25
      @StevenMinecraft25 Год назад +17

      This is the right way. Logarithmic implicit will get you the most right answers with the least random memorization

    • @kemosabe551
      @kemosabe551 11 месяцев назад +7

      Yeah, in the video he treats the derivative of x^x using something like the product rule, without proper background or justification.

    • @noobgaming-eu3or
      @noobgaming-eu3or 10 месяцев назад +2

      Absolutely correct way,here in the equation x^x both the x are variable so one can’t assume them as constant and differentiate

    • @Practicalinvestments
      @Practicalinvestments 6 месяцев назад +1

      Oh my lord thank you I did exactly what you did a while ago and wrote the formula in my notes but not the solution so I was mad confused trying to figure out how the hell I got that

  • @Seahorse31
    @Seahorse31 3 месяца назад +59

    Logarithmic differentiation also works.
    Y = X^x
    Ln Y = ln X^x = x(ln x) *exponent rule with logs
    Y'/Y = ln x + x(1/x) *product rule
    Y' = Y(lnx + 1)
    Y' = X^x(ln x +1)

    • @mabuaun7499
      @mabuaun7499 13 дней назад

      This way is definitely a simpler way of doing the problem for me

    • @tagaug
      @tagaug 8 дней назад +1

      Took me a moment to realize (ln Y)' = Y'/Y due to the chain rule. Well done!

  • @JamespaulChigozie
    @JamespaulChigozie 5 месяцев назад +9

    He talks faster than our teacher and yet he makes us understands easily

    • @samueldeandrade8535
      @samueldeandrade8535 2 месяца назад

      You do realise he edits the video to go faster. Right?

  • @htikeaungwai5513
    @htikeaungwai5513 3 года назад +103

    Would you accept this challenge? 🤭
    Find d/dx (x!) 😈
    (Pls make a video of it 😁, wanna know about digamma function)

    • @chessematics
      @chessematics 3 года назад +9

      There is already a video on that topic

    • @dipsacedemy
      @dipsacedemy 3 года назад +4

      Give him some time , he charming the expansion of x factorial 😂😂

    • @random22453
      @random22453 Год назад +6

      X! Isn't a continuous function

    • @PXO005
      @PXO005 Год назад +3

      ​@@random22453 although the gamma function is, and it is a continuous extension of thr Factorial

    • @gonzalesorgaz735
      @gonzalesorgaz735 Год назад +1

      Use the product rule 🤣🤣🤣

  • @JGHFunRun
    @JGHFunRun Год назад +7

    I was like “Wait that’s legal?!” and then I realized it’s equivalent to differentiating x^y against x and y and then setting x=y

  • @PunitKumar-kf3vj
    @PunitKumar-kf3vj 8 месяцев назад +5

    SIR WHAT IS THE DERIVATIVES OF
    1) 5 ^ x+1
    2) x^ x+1
    3) ( x+1) ^ x❤❤❤plzz batana sir

  • @gaetanbouthors
    @gaetanbouthors Год назад +13

    easiest is just x^x=e^(xlnx) so the derivative is (xlnx)'*e^(xlnx)=(lnx+1)x^x

  • @aswinr9676
    @aswinr9676 3 года назад +81

    How could you cut it off at " and.. we are.. done!!"

    • @DouglasZwick
      @DouglasZwick 3 года назад +1

      It really drives home how fast it is when he does that. Do we really _need_ to hear him say the N sound?

    • @nanamacapagal8342
      @nanamacapagal8342 9 месяцев назад

      Worse: no marker smack on the whiteboard.

  • @deepapattnaik3454
    @deepapattnaik3454 4 месяца назад +1

    Thanks it helped a lot ❤

  • @Hola-rx1jy
    @Hola-rx1jy 3 месяца назад

    In school we learned logarithmic differentiation which make the second and third easy

  • @sedmirnel7764
    @sedmirnel7764 15 дней назад +1

    I prefer to use this more general shortcut, you could even call it a rule:
    let f and g be functions:
    dx(f^g) = f^g*(g'*ln(f)+g*f'/f)
    In this video's case:
    dx(x^x) = x^x*(1*ln(x)+x*1/x) = x^x*(ln(x)+1)
    The proof is done by applying logarithmic derivative to f^g

  • @thatonesponge4849
    @thatonesponge4849 9 месяцев назад +3

    Man i used to love differentiation in Calculus. Integration is what messes everyone up 😂

  • @stephencerezo218
    @stephencerezo218 Месяц назад

    How about the integral of that

  • @fredericchalard6611
    @fredericchalard6611 3 года назад +12

    In fact, that's exacly how I solved it the first time.

    • @athenovae
      @athenovae Год назад

      Why is the exponent in x^x treated as a number at first?

    • @fredericchalard6611
      @fredericchalard6611 Год назад +2

      ​@@athenovaeI fact, here we are evaluating the multivariable derivative of u^v and then we take u=v=x.
      Multivariable derivative works like this (D is the multivar derivative)
      D(u^v)=d(u^v)/du+d(u^v)/dv
      First term we consider v as a number, second term we consider u as a number.
      In the short, bprp does that but with the single variable x. It's technically legal.

  • @noteventrying27
    @noteventrying27 Месяц назад

    Respect to bprp for numbing it down for me

  • @leandroteles7857
    @leandroteles7857 7 месяцев назад

    Unlike many "tricks" that this channel shows that really are coincidences, this one is not a coincidence, it's actually a valid way to differentiate x^x through the use of multivariable calculus (pretend it's x^y and take the total derivative)

  • @SoulFrmTitanic
    @SoulFrmTitanic 3 года назад +12

    Why am I here ??
    Hey bro you should join schools here in India you’ll feel like a genius in integrals

    • @mriduljoy8108
      @mriduljoy8108 Год назад

      Lool, nope, this is basic CBSE lvl stuff

  • @f.aurelous
    @f.aurelous 10 дней назад

    how bout if it is raised to 2x

  • @Luffy_wastaken
    @Luffy_wastaken Год назад

    d/dx ²x = x^x(1+lnx)

  • @suparnajitghosh7865
    @suparnajitghosh7865 2 месяца назад

    God bless you 😇🙏🏻

  • @tunistick8044
    @tunistick8044 4 месяца назад +2

    How do I convince yall that it's real

  • @flynner4805
    @flynner4805 5 месяцев назад

    why do you multiply by ln?

  • @theimmux3034
    @theimmux3034 3 года назад +151

    Is it a coincidence that this works?

    • @altarius44
      @altarius44 3 года назад +58

      Nope. That's just how it works lol

    • @amethyst2448
      @amethyst2448 3 года назад +58

      Nothing in mathematics is ever a coincidence

    • @theimmux3034
      @theimmux3034 3 года назад +46

      I've never heard of such a differentiation rule. I usually just convert the base to e and do the usual business.

    • @jigobiyoyo4006
      @jigobiyoyo4006 3 года назад +95

      @@amethyst2448 wrong. X^2=25 cancel the 2 twos and you get 5 😁

    • @martind2520
      @martind2520 3 года назад +20

      This is the chain rule for partial derivatives.

  • @M.Priyam
    @M.Priyam 4 месяца назад +1

    Am I watching the short in 2x speed??

  • @op-gamer3668
    @op-gamer3668 9 месяцев назад

    He is only person who speaks like doctor handwriting 😅

  • @markoj3512
    @markoj3512 9 месяцев назад +1

    Fun fact this: this video doesn’t show the steps only the solution. The didactic value tends to zero

  • @1badjesus
    @1badjesus Год назад

    HANG ON!... I'm still drawin CIRCLE around #3..

  • @ChaineYTXF
    @ChaineYTXF Год назад +3

    I write it down as e^(xln(x))

  • @AVIGOOO
    @AVIGOOO 2 года назад

    For the third one couldn't you just write it as =>x ln x?

  • @jtris01
    @jtris01 Год назад +2

    I alwats did the last one using implicit differentiation

  • @MINEXKILLER
    @MINEXKILLER 3 года назад +4

    Done.

    • @tzonic8655
      @tzonic8655 3 года назад +4

      Hahah someone had to finish this

    • @MINEXKILLER
      @MINEXKILLER 3 года назад +4

      @@tzonic8655
      It's an essential part od the video

  • @This_app_is...
    @This_app_is... Месяц назад

    Bro, a very quick friendly talk. Shave that beard , just do it and dont think about it. do it. you will not regret . Trust me

  • @kazuXZ69
    @kazuXZ69 5 месяцев назад +1

    Bro start rapping

  • @Wutheheooooo
    @Wutheheooooo 4 месяца назад +1

    Eminem has been very quite since this dropped

  • @-aqua-marine-
    @-aqua-marine- 15 дней назад

    We can take x^(x)=e^(xlnx) and just get it easily by chain rule

  • @Yo78423
    @Yo78423 2 года назад +1

    After watching this i forgot 1+1=2 for some moments

  • @mingza8132
    @mingza8132 9 месяцев назад

    😱🙏 thanks idea

  • @Optimusprime-ve7xi
    @Optimusprime-ve7xi 3 года назад +4

    One simple question. What is this?

    • @AVIGOOO
      @AVIGOOO 2 года назад

      Differentiation, calculus

    • @Optimusprime-ve7xi
      @Optimusprime-ve7xi 2 года назад

      @@AVIGOOO ok

    • @AVIGOOO
      @AVIGOOO 2 года назад

      @@Optimusprime-ve7xi yea prepared to go through hell if you decide to take maths in 11th and 12th
      Atleast in India

    • @ace5161
      @ace5161 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@AVIGOOOI am in 10th and good at maths so.....

  • @Jack_Likesmath
    @Jack_Likesmath 8 месяцев назад

    Other people : you can also use this … or this … or easiest like this …
    Me : …………………… What the fu-

  • @mattewdb2321
    @mattewdb2321 Год назад

    And thats how ez math is

  • @mrpain11
    @mrpain11 19 дней назад

    yh i think i will jst become a politician.... this math is crazy

  • @ahmedoppo4107
    @ahmedoppo4107 Месяц назад

    I wish I knew that shortcut for differentiating X^X

  • @ajayvarshney2117
    @ajayvarshney2117 3 года назад +5

    Is this the superposition of finding derivatives ?

    • @not_vinkami
      @not_vinkami 3 года назад

      No, it's just product rule

    • @not_vinkami
      @not_vinkami 3 года назад

      @@dp-zn8bd yes it is, kind of

    • @not_vinkami
      @not_vinkami 3 года назад

      @@dp-zn8bd x^x=e^(x lnx)

    • @yoavshati
      @yoavshati 3 года назад +5

      @@not_vinkami But he didn't use this...
      What he did was find the derivative of f(x,y)=x^y, with x=y

    • @thewitchking2556
      @thewitchking2556 2 года назад +1

      @@yoavshati just curious not in that math yet but would a viable way of getting f(x, y)=x^y be (e^lnx)^y =e^ylnx so e^ylnx (y/x + y’lnx)

  • @vnmgaming5172
    @vnmgaming5172 7 месяцев назад +1

    Where are our shortcuts

  • @Demonysticx83
    @Demonysticx83 8 месяцев назад

    SPEAK SLOWER FFS WE ARE NOT ALL SPEAKING FLUENT ENGLISH MY GOSH

  • @awhenpeter3669
    @awhenpeter3669 Год назад

    Please take it easy...i can't watch your videos

  • @all_bright
    @all_bright 3 года назад +1

    Taking log on both sides is much easier. 😂

  • @magidgaming5775
    @magidgaming5775 9 месяцев назад

    Sir slow down I don’t get what you’re saying

  • @secretnobody6460
    @secretnobody6460 10 месяцев назад

    What is ln?

  • @physicsdemonstrations2426
    @physicsdemonstrations2426 3 года назад +1

    Wait,!! Is there some other way?!! I would do it the exact same way!

  • @rarebucko
    @rarebucko 2 года назад

    Isnt that how you're supposed to do it

  • @replicaacliper
    @replicaacliper 3 года назад +6

    this is just like multivariable chain rule in disguise i guess?

    • @pavelmadarcik3240
      @pavelmadarcik3240 3 года назад +2

      @@volxxe I think you can, don't you?
      "BPRP method":
      ([f(x)]^[g(x)])' = g(x)*[f(x)]^[g(x)-1]*f'(x) + [f(x)]^[g(x)]*ln[f(x)]*g'(x)
      y'= [f(x)]^[g(x)] * [g(x)*[1/f(x)]*f'(x)+ g'(x)*ln[f(x)]]
      That's the same as "implicit derivation method":
      y=[f(x)]^[g(x)] / ln
      ln(y) =g(x)*ln[f(x)] / '
      (1/y)*y' = g'(x)*ln[f(x)]+g(x)*[1/f(x)]*f'(x)
      y' = [f(x)]^[g(x)] * [g'(x)*ln[f(x)]+g(x)*[1/f(x)]*f'(x)]
      And that's the same as the previous.
      Am I correct?

    • @volxxe
      @volxxe 3 года назад +2

      @@pavelmadarcik3240 looks like you can, I said you couldn’t because I remembered me trying this on a different function than x^x maybe I just derived it incorrectly anyway thanks!

  • @undefeatableyt7
    @undefeatableyt7 3 года назад +3

    This easy method is taught in class 11 in India

  • @have_and_have_not
    @have_and_have_not 25 дней назад

    I didn't get ..
    But it sounds good😂😂

  • @teampigs1188
    @teampigs1188 10 месяцев назад

    how is this legal

  • @Axurb187
    @Axurb187 Год назад

    This may sound complicated but it works
    [ f(x) ^ g(x) ] ` =
    f(x)^g(x) [ g(x)•ln(f(x) ] `
    =
    f(x)^g(x) [ g(x)•f `(x)/f(x)+ln(f(x))•g`(x)]

  • @InfinityPie-bw7tc
    @InfinityPie-bw7tc Год назад

    3rd one is epic way 😊

  • @notboboi9977
    @notboboi9977 8 месяцев назад

    bro had to talk so fast💀💀

  • @oscarmartinpico5369
    @oscarmartinpico5369 11 месяцев назад

    Do you not think it might be better if you do y = X^x => ln(y) = X·ln(X) => y'/y=ln(X)+1 => y' = y·(ln(X)+1) => d/dx (X^x) = X^x·(ln(X)+1)?

  • @sanjurawat3430
    @sanjurawat3430 День назад +1

    Easy question 😅😅😅😅

  • @AmitDash
    @AmitDash Месяц назад

    This is cheating

  • @RubyPiec
    @RubyPiec 7 месяцев назад

    i don't get d/dx(2^x), isn't that also just 2x? or would that be d/d2?

  • @rahilkeshav313
    @rahilkeshav313 3 года назад

    Does this work for x^^3 ?

  • @DanDart
    @DanDart Месяц назад

    I thought that this was a troll

  • @mayureshious
    @mayureshious 3 месяца назад

    But how it works. Any logical reason. Plz explain. Does it work for all f^g type

  • @MerakiDraw
    @MerakiDraw Месяц назад

    Bro rapping in calculus

  • @channelbuattv
    @channelbuattv 10 месяцев назад

    or x^x(ln(ex)).

  • @stevematson4808
    @stevematson4808 Месяц назад

    Would that be calc 2 ?

  • @JJ_TheGreat
    @JJ_TheGreat Месяц назад

    Brilliant! Thank you for breaking it down like this - making it more digestible!

  • @johnnolen8338
    @johnnolen8338 5 месяцев назад

    bprp, if times ever get tough, you definitely have a second career ahead of you as an auctioneer, my friend. 😂

  • @zakiabg845
    @zakiabg845 10 месяцев назад

    The last one is faulse.

  • @cosmolbfu67
    @cosmolbfu67 24 дня назад

    x^x = e^(xlnx)
    d(x^x)/dx = e^(xlnx) • (lnx + 1)
    = x^x • (lnx + 1)

  • @justanotherepicrider3974
    @justanotherepicrider3974 3 месяца назад

    X to the X pOwEr 🐓

  • @banglaextremefunny2593
    @banglaextremefunny2593 10 месяцев назад

    2x speed in this video

  • @ToTheWolves
    @ToTheWolves Месяц назад

    I get it now

  • @YogeshPandey-s8q
    @YogeshPandey-s8q 7 месяцев назад

    Watching in 2x

  • @AstroVp
    @AstroVp Год назад

    yo the third one is different method i solve theses type of qns by taking log in both sides

  • @S_1_L_3_N_C_3
    @S_1_L_3_N_C_3 Год назад

    Too fast!

  • @NaazKhan-c3c
    @NaazKhan-c3c 7 месяцев назад

    Madar aur confused hi gyi sala kl exam h 😢

  • @randhyLeksu7288
    @randhyLeksu7288 2 года назад +1

    the last one got me so 💀💀💀💀💀💀

  • @nYEOSUh
    @nYEOSUh 10 месяцев назад

    f(x)=x^x, lnf(x)=xlnx, f'(x)/f(x)=lnx+1, f'(x)=f(x)(lnx+1)=(x^x)(1+lnx)
    전 로그함수로 바꿔서 푸는 방법만 생각했는데, 저런 방법이 있을줄은 몰랐네요 감사합니다

  • @Why_Broken
    @Why_Broken 8 месяцев назад

    Who else is focusing on his beard 😂😂

  • @pp81191
    @pp81191 2 года назад

    I did the exact same thing in school around ~14 years back and showed it to my Maths teacher. He said this is wrong.

  • @abdosalah3832
    @abdosalah3832 3 года назад +1

    pretty cool

  • @tanushjain7679
    @tanushjain7679 9 месяцев назад

    Wow thanks I was it took me a lot of time to do the third one before

  • @AlfinFikri-yj8eq
    @AlfinFikri-yj8eq 18 дней назад

    Di Matematika Matematika

  • @TheChaos3DS
    @TheChaos3DS 3 года назад +1

    Oh he has a beard now

  • @ammarbasrah1362
    @ammarbasrah1362 Год назад

    Prove the third rule, please

  • @JSFG80
    @JSFG80 3 года назад +1

    Love your vids

  • @manas.mk47
    @manas.mk47 9 месяцев назад

    Hindi ke liye 2 dabay!😢

  • @jay_stack1270
    @jay_stack1270 3 года назад +1

    You’re toooooooo much Bro..... 😳

  • @mithunghosh3546
    @mithunghosh3546 Год назад

    Cant we just cancel the x

    • @carultch
      @carultch Год назад

      No, because the dx in the "denominator" doesn't have anything to do with dividing by x.
      "d/dx" is a notation for a derivative, with respect to x. There's some relationship to fractions through the first principles that define the derivative, but d/dx isn't a fraction of d/(d*x), where d is a variable.
      d/dx is an operator, not a fraction. and the d's are also operators, and not pronumerals. The d means "infinitesimal change in the following".

  • @colinjava8447
    @colinjava8447 11 месяцев назад

    I actually remembered all of those derivatives, even the last one.

  • @littleretroship6403
    @littleretroship6403 2 года назад

    That last one was right but it hurt my brain

  • @1st2nd2
    @1st2nd2 8 месяцев назад

    Minimum of x^x?

  • @helatard4272
    @helatard4272 7 месяцев назад

    0:00

  • @arshadalijanwariarshadalij5319
    @arshadalijanwariarshadalij5319 2 года назад

    How are you sir.
    Prove that , Why derivative of constant is equal to zero ...

    • @carultch
      @carultch Год назад

      limit as h -> 0 of (f(x + h) - f(x))/h = f'(x)
      Given: f(x) = C
      f(x + h) = C
      f(x) = C
      f(x + h) - f(x) = C - C = 0
      Thus, the ratio is 0/h
      Because the numerator went to zero before we even started sending the denominator to zero, the derivative of a constant equals zero.